Cidadania negada: a falta de direitos políticos das mulheres e a metamorfose constitucional do princípio da igualdade
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
ABERDAM, Serge. Deux occasions de participation féminine en 1793: le vote sur la Constitution et le partage des biens communaux. Annales historiques de la Révolution française, [s. l.], 339, p. 17-34, janv.-mars 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ahrf.2098.
ACHIN, Catherine; LÉVÊQUE, Sandrine. Femmes en politique. Paris: La Découverte, 2006.
ACKERMAN, Bruce. We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2014.
ACKERMAN, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1988.
ALBERT, Richard. Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment. The Yale Journal of International Law, [s. l.], v. 43, n. 1, p. 1-84, 2018.
ALEXY, Robert. The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
ALLEN, Peter; CUTTS, David; CAMPBELL, Rosie. Measuring the Quality of Politicians Elected by Gender Quotas – Are They Any Different? Political Studies, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. 143-163, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12.
APOSTOLI, Adriana. La dignità sociale come orizzonte della uguaglianza nell’ordinamento costituzionale. Costituzionalismo.it, Roma, n. 3, p. 1-32, 2019.
BALTRUNAITE, Audinga et al. Gender Quotas and the Quality of Politicians. Journal of Public Economics, [s. l.], v. 118, p. 62-74, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.008.
BLAKE, Michael. Okin, Susan Moller. In: MANDLE, Jon; REIDY, David A. (ed.). The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 577-578.
CALORE, Antonello. “Cittadinanza” tra storia e comparazione. In: BRUTTI, Massimo; SOMMA, Alessandro (ed.). Diritto: storia e comparazione. Nuovi propositi per un binomio antico. Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, 2018. p. 81-94.
CHAMPEAUX, Jacqueline. La religione dei romani. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2002.
CITIZEN (Original Title: Citoyen. Author: Denis Diderot. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, v. 3, p. 488-789, 1753. Translator: Sujaya Dhanvantari [University of Alberta]). In: BRINGMAN, Gregory; EDEN, Malcolm; STEWART, Philip (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert: Collaborative Translation Project. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2005. Available from: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/did/. Accessed: 19 April 2024.
CLAYTON, Amanda. Women’s Political Engagement under Quota-Mandated Female Representation: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment. Comparative Political Studies, [s. l.], v. 48, n. 3, p. 333-369, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014548104.
CONDORCET O’CONNOR, Arthur. Sur l’admission des femmes au droit de cité. In: CONDORCET O’CONNOR, Arthur; ARAGO, M. François (ed.). Œuvres de Condorcet. Tome Dixième. Paris: Firmin Didot, 1847. p. 120-130.
DE GOUGES, Olympe. Les Droits de la femme. A la Reine. Paris: [s. n.], 1791.
FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Il principio di uguaglianza e la differenza di genere. giudicedonna.it, [s. l.], n. 3, p. 1-14, 2015.
FRIEDRICH, Carl J. Trends of Federalism in Theory and Practice. New York: Praeger, 1968.
GERTNER, Nancy; HERIOT, Gail. The Nineteenth Amendment. Common Interpretation. National Constitution Center, Philadelphia, PA, 2018. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/mtjkd9p5. Accessed: 19 April 2024.
GERTZOG, Irwin N. Female Suffrage in New Jersey, 1790-1807. In: LYNN, Naomi B. (ed). Women, Politics and the Constitution. New York: The Haworth Press, 1990. p. 47-58.
GIANFORMAGGIO, Letizia. Eguaglianza, donne e diritto. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2005.
GOLDONI, Marco; WILKINSON, Michael A. The Material Constitution. The Modern Law Review, Oxford, UK, v. 81, n. 4, p. 567-597, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12352.
GUSTAFSSON, Martin. On Rawls’s Distinction between Perfect and Imperfect Procedural Justice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 2, p. 300-305, June 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104264925.
HAMILTON, Neil A. Rebel and Renegades: A Chronology of Social and Political Dissent in the United States. New York: Routledge, 2014.
HART, Herbert L. A. The Concept of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.
HARTOG, Hendrik. Man and Wife in America: A History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
HEILMAN, Madeline E.; WELLE, Brian. Disadvantaged by Diversity? The Effects of Diversity Goals on Competence Perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 5, p. 1.291-1.319, May 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00043.x.
IVERSEN, Torben; ROSENBLUTH, Frances. Women, Work, & Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.
JACOBSOHN, Gary J. Making Sense of the Constitutional Revolution. Constellations, Oxford, UK, v. 19, n. 2, p. 164-181, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2012.00686.x.
JELLINEK, Georg. Constitutional Amendment and Constitutional Transformation (1906). In: JACOBSON, Arthur J.; SCHLINK, Bernhard (ed.). Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. p. 54-57.
JOHNSON, Joan M. The Woman Suffrage Movement in the United States. Abingdon: Routledge, 2022.
KAMEN, Deborah. Status in Classical Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
KELSEN, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre. Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1934.
KENWORTHY, Lane; MALAMI, Melissa. Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis. Social Forces, [s. l.], v. 78, n. 1, p. 235-269, Sept. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3005796.
KROOK, Mona L. Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance. Politics, Groups, and Identities, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 268-283, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1151797.
LANDES, Joan B. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.
LASSÉBIE, Julie. Gender Quotas and the Selection of Local Politicians: Evidence from French Municipal Elections. European Journal of Political Economy, [s. l.], v. 62, Mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.101842.
LIMA, Jairo; PRADELLA BUENO, Marcella; STAMILE, Natalina. Supremas Ministras: a Inclusão de Mulheres na Composição do STF à Luz da Legitimidade das Cortes Constitucionais. Revista Direito Público, Brasília, v. 18, n. 98, p. 225-263, abr./jun. 2021. DOI: 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11117/rdp.v18i98.58.
MACKINNON, Catharine A. Gender in Constitutions. In: ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0021. p. 397-416.
MATLAND, Richard E.; TAYLOR, Michelle M. Electoral System Effects on Women’s Representation: Theoretical Arguments and Evidence from Costa Rica. Comparative Political Studies, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 186-210, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030002003.
MILLETT, Kate. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday, 1970.
MITCHELL, Juliet. Woman’s Estate. New York: Vintage Books, 1973.
MONOPOLI, Paula A. Constitutional Orphan: Gender Equality and the Nineteenth Amendment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
MORTATI, Costantino. La costituzione in senso materiale. Milano: Giuffré, 1940.
MÜLLER, Friedrich. Quem é o povo? A questão fundamental da democracia. São Paulo: Max Limonad, 2003.
ONIDA, Valerio. Eguaglianza, legalità, costituzione. In: ONIDA, Valerio. Idee in cammino. Bari: Cacucci, 2019. p. 177-194.
PATEMAN, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.
PERELMAN, Chaim. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London: Routledge, 1963.
POPELIER, Patricia. A Constitutional Perspective on Electoral Gender Quotas. In: GARDNER, James A. (ed). Comparative Election Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022. p. 322-343.
RADOJEVIC, Marco. The Subjective Effects of Gender Quotas: Party Elites Do Not Consider “Quota Women” to Be Less Competent. Politics & Gender, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 349-372, June 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000137.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
REYNOLDS, Andrew. Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling. World Politics, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 4, p. 547-572, July 1999.
RIX, Rebecca A. Gender and Reconstruction: The Individual and Family Basis of Republican Government Contested, 1868-1925. Ann Arbor: ProQuest UMI Dissertations Publishing, 2008.
RODRÍGUEZ RUIZ, Blanca; SACKSOFSKY, Ute. Gender in the German Constitution. In: BAINES, Beverley; RUBIO-MARIN, Ruth (ed.). The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005. p. 149-173.
RUGGIU, Ilenia. Mutamenti della forma di governo e integrazione europea. AIC Annual Conference, Brescia, 27-28 October 2023.
SIEGEL, Reva B. She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family. Harvard Law Review, [s. l.], v. 115, n. 4, p. 947-1.046, Feb. 2002.
SIEGEL, Reva B. The Nineteenth Amendment and the Democratization of the Family. The Yale Law Journal Forum, [s. l.], v. 129, p. 450-495, 2020.
SMART, Carol. The woman of legal discourse. Social and legal Studies, London, v. 1, p. 29-44, 1992.
SQUIRES, Judith. The New Politics of Gender Equality. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
STAMILE, Natalina. Igualdad, diferencia y teoría feminista. Eunomía, [s. l.], n. 18, p. 9-28, abr./sept. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2020.5261.
TOMEI, Samuël. Citoyenneté et suffrage universel en France depuis la Révolution. Humanisme, [s. l.], n. 284, p. 42-50, 2009.
UNITED NATIONS. Human Development Report 2020. The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. December 15, 2020a. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/unevv36j. Accessed: 19 April 2024.
UNITED NATIONS. Regional Information Centre for Western Europe. Sustainable Development Goals [SDG]. SDG 5: Gender Equality. June 12, 2020b. Available from: https://unric.org/en/sdg-5/. Accessed: 19 April 2024.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (U.S.). Library of Congress. U.S. Reports: Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875). 2 Apr. 2018. Available from: https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep088162/. Accessed: 19 April 2024.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (U.S.). Library of Congress. U.S. Reports: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1856). 21 July 2019. Available from: https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep060393a/. Accessed: 19 April 2024.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v69i1.95225