India as an Interested Third Player in the Sino-US Power Dispute

Authors

  • João Miguel Villas-Bôas Barcellos Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/cg.v9i1.70693

Abstract

In 2007, India and the United States signed an important document of nuclear cooperation, which meant the recognition of the Indian nuclear status by the world's largest power. India has become a regional power with global ambitions and has fundamental importance for the balance of power in the region which, after the advancement of the power of the “Middle Empire”, has been affected and tilts towards this. To what extent is India willing to cooperate with the United States to curb the expansion of Chinese power and influence on the Asian continent? Another substantive question is: is the United States willing to strengthen and support India to its ultimate consequences in this policy of Chinese containment? Can India and China cooperate and substantially alter the Asian power order? Our work aims to analyze these complex and still unclear issues, as their developments are in full force. To this end, it will be divided into four parts plus an introduction and conclusion. In the first, we will present the geopolitical picture of the regions in which India and China – South and East Asia – are inserted; In the second, we will analyze US-India relations focusing on nuclear partnership and cooperation for Chinese containment; In the third part, we will examine the challenges and possible scenarios of the issue. Finally, we will have a fourth part in which we will consider the possibility of cooperation between India and China through the Belt and Road Initiative.


Keywords: India; United States of America; Containment; Nuclear Cooperation.

Author Biography

João Miguel Villas-Bôas Barcellos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Doutorando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia Política Internacional (PEPI) - Instituto de Economia- UFRJ e pesquisador do núcleo de Análise da Conjuntura da Escola de Guerra Naval

References

AKHTAR, Shayerah Ilias; KRONSTADT, K. Alan. US-India Trade Relations. Congressional Research Service (CRC), 14, Fev. 2020. Disponível em: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF10384.pdf. Acesso em: 11/04/2020.

BARUAH, D. M. Asia's Nightmare: Could India and China Clash over the South China Sea?’. The National Interest, v. 14, 2015.

BURGESS, Stephen. The US Pivot to Asia and Renewal of the US–India Strategic Partnership. Comparative Strategy, v. 34, n. 4, p. 367-379, 2015.

BURNS, John F. India’s New Defense Chief Sees Chinese Military Threat. New York Times, v. 5, 1998.

CLARKE, Michael et al. China's Belt and Road Initiative: Views from along the Silk Road. Asia policy, n. 24, p. 65-122, 2017.

ELIAS, Norbert. O Processo Civilizador 2: formação do Estado e civilização. Zahar, 1993.

GADY, Franz-Stefan . India Approves Procurement of 10 More P-8I Maritime Patrol Aircraft. The Diplomat, 26, Jun. 2019. Disponível em: < https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/india-approves-procurement-of-10-more-p-8i-maritime-patrol-aircraft/>. Acesso em: 10/04/2020.

GE, Huang. India’s BRI rejection means lost opportunities: experts. Global Times, 04/Ago. 2019. Disponível em : < http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1145086.shtml#targetText=China%2DIndia%20trade%20rose%2013.2,the%20Chinese%20Ministry%20of%20Commerce. >. Acesso em: 08/10/2019.

GLOBAL FIRE POWER. India Military Strength. GFP, 2019. Disponível em: < https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strengthdetail.asp?country_id=india >. Acesso em: 25/06/2019.

________. China Military Strength. GFP, 2019. Disponível em: < https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=china >. Acesso em: 25/06/2019.

GOLDSTEIN, Avery. Rising to the challenge: China's grand strategy and international security. Stanford University Press, 2005.

GORDON, G. Chang. Clash of titans: India’s ‘Act east’Policy meets China’s Maritime Silk road in the South China Sea’. Journal of Political Risk, v. 3, n. 6, 2015.

JAISHANKAR, Subrahmanyam. India won’t join BRI, it’s concept won’t apply to us. The Economic Times, 04, Out. 2019. Disponível em: < https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/india-wont-join-bri-its-concept-wont-apply-to-us-jaishankar/articleshow/71441347.cms>. Acesso em: 05/10/2019.

________. IISS Fullerton Lecture by Dr. S. Jaishankar, Foreign Secretary in Singapore. Ministry of External Affairs, 2015. Disponível em: < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et2ihw8jHaY >.

JHA, Prem Shankar. Why India must embrace China’s One Belt One Road plan. The Wire, 2016.

KARAT, P. Belt and Road initiative: Blinkered view of government. People’s Democracy, 21, Mai. 2017. Disponível em: <https://peoplesdemocracy.in/2017/0521_pd/belt-and-road-initiative-blinkered-view-government>. Acesso em: 08/10/2019.

KAURA, Vinay. US-India Relations at the Crossroads – Can the growing US-India partnership survive ‘America First’?. The Diplomat, 24/06/2019. Disponível em: < https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/us-india-relations-at-the-crossroads/ >. Acesso em 01/07/2019.

KHURANA, Gurpreet S. China's ‘String of Pearls’ in the Indian Ocean and Its Security Implications. Strategic Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1-39, 2008.

KNODELL, K. China’s worst nightmare: Is a US-India military alliance brewing. The National Interest, Maio, 2016. Disponível em: < https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-worst-nightmare-us-india-military-alliance-brewing-16301 >. Acesso em: 22/05/2019.

MADAN, Tanvi. The US-India Relationship and China. Brookings, 23, Set. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-u-s-india-relationship-and-china/. Acesso em: 19/04/2020

MOHAN, Raja. India’s new role in the Indian Ocean. Paper presented at Seminar (617): India 2009, Janeiro de 2010. Disponível em: < https://www.india-seminar.com/2011/617/617_c_raja_mohan.htm >. Acesso em: 26/06/2019.

_______. Rising India: partner in shaping the global commons? The Washington Quarterly, v. 33, n. 3, p. 122-148, 2010.

_______. India and the changing geopolitics of the Indian Ocean. Maritime Affairs, v. 6, n. 2, p. 1-12, 2010.

MUNI, S. D. India's" Look East" Policy: The Strategic Dimension. In: Perspectives on South Asian Security. 2013. p. 67-99.

NALAPAT, M. China's Great Game. Also M. Malik,‘China's Strategy of Containing India’, Power and Interest News Report, v. 6, 2006.

NAYYAR, Deepak. A corrida pelo crescimento–Países em desenvolvimento na economia mundial. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2014.

_____. One Belt, One Road has no basis in China’s history. Livemint, 09, Jun. 2017. Disponível em: < https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/lrHNZQcdLcDN2eTtmbC9cK/One-Belt-One-Road-has-no-basis-in-Chinas-history.html>. Acesso em: 11/11/2019.

NYE, Joseph S. A Time for Positive-Sum Power. The Wilson Quarterly, v. 42, n. 4, 2018.

PANDA, Ankit. US-India Ties in Modi's Second Term: Charting a New Course? The Diplomat, 26/06/2019. Disponível em: < https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/us-india-ties-in-modis-second-term-charting-a-new-course/>. Acesso em: 26/06/2019.

_______. What the Recently Concluded US-India COMCASA Means. The Diplomat, 09/09/2018. Disponível em: < https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/what-the-recently-concluded-us-india-comcasa-means/ >. Acesso em: 08/02/2019.

PANT, Harsh V.; PASSI, Ritika. India's Response to China's Belt and Road Initiative: A Policy in Motion. Asia Policy, v. 24, n. 1, p. 88-95, 2017.

PANT, Harsh V.; SUPER, Julie M. India's ‘non-alignment’conundrum: a twentieth-century policy in a changing world. International Affairs, v. 91, n. 4, p. 747-764, 2015.

RAJAGOPALAN, Rajesh. India's Strategic Choices: China and the Balance of Power in Asia. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2017.

RICE, Condoleezza. Promoting the national interest. Foreign Affairs, v. 79, p. 45, 2000.

______. Rethinking the national interest: American realism for a new world. Foreign Affairs, p. 2-26, 2008.

SATALINE, Suzanne. Trump Has Started a Brain Drain Back to India. Foreign Policy, last modified September, v. 22, 2017.

SCOTT, David. The great power ‘great game’ between India and China: ‘The logic of geography’. Geopolitics, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2008.

SINDWANI, Prerna. Trump government agrees to sell naval guns worth $1 billion to India. Business Insider, 21, Nov. 2019. Disponível em : < https://www.businessinsider.in/policy/news/trump-government-agrees-to-sell-naval-guns-worth-1-billion-to-india/articleshow/72166598.cms>. Acesso em: 21/21/2019.

SINGH, Udai Bhanu. Significance of India’s Act East Policy and Engagement with ASEAN. IDSA, 04/12/2018. Disponível em: < https://idsa.in/backgrounder/significance-india-act-east-policy-and-engagement-with-asean-ubsingh_041218>. Acesso em: 25/04/2019.

SIPRI. Global arms industry: US companies dominate the Top 100; Russian arms industry moves to second place. Stockholm International Peace Institute, 18, Dez. 2018. Disponível em: < https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2018/global-arms-industry-us-companies-dominate-top-100-russian-arms-industry-moves-second-place>. Acesso em: 11/04/2020.

THE ECONOMIC TIMES. Indian Navy aiming at 200-ship fleet by 2027. Disponível em:/economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/48072917.cms?from=mdr&utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst>. Acesso em: 01/07/2019.

______. Us surpasses China to become India’s top trading partner. The Economic Times, 23, Fev. 2020. Disponível em: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/us-surpasses-china-to-become-indias-top-trading-partner/articleshow/74264765.cms?from=mdr. Acesso em: 09/04/2020.

TEWARI, Manish. OBOR is the Grandest Failure of Indian Foreign Policy. The Indian Express (Online). 17. Mai. 2017.

VAJPAYEE, Atal Bihari. Nuclear Anxiety; Indian’s Letter to Clinton on the Nuclear Testing. New York Times, v. 13, 1998.

WAGNER, Alex. Bush waives nuclear-related sanctions on India, Pakistan. Arms Control Today, v. 31, n. 8, p. 20, 2001.

WEISS, Leonard. US-India nuclear cooperation: Better later than sooner. Nonproliferation Review, v. 14, n. 3, p. 429-457, 2007.

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Barcellos, J. M. V.-B. (2020). India as an Interested Third Player in the Sino-US Power Dispute. Conjuntura Global, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/cg.v9i1.70693

Issue

Section

Articles