Transferência e conversão do conhecimento na gestão de processos
facilitadores e barreiras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v14.94935Palabras clave:
Gestão do conhecimento, Gestão de processos, Mapeamento de processos, Transferência de conhecimento, Conversão do conhecimentoResumen
Introdução: A Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) organiza o conhecimento relevante para a organização e se relaciona com a Gestão de Processos (GP), sobretudo por meio do Mapeamento de Processos (MP), que evidencia graficamente as atividades inerentes aos processos. O objetivo deste artigo foi caracterizar os facilitadores e barreiras da transferência e conversão do conhecimento no contexto da GP. Método: Foi iniciado com uma revisão exploratória dos principais conceitos relacionados à GC, à GP e ao MP e finalizado com uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura (RSL). Resultados: Na análise dos 41 artigos desta RSL, os facilitadores e barreiras obtidos foram agrupados por dimensões, sendo elas: ‘Organização’, ‘Intercâmbio’, ‘Emissor’, ‘Receptor’, ‘Emissor-Receptor’ e ‘Conhecimento’. As dimensões ‘Organização’ e ‘Intercâmbio’ foram mais frequentes. As menos frequentes foram as dimensões ‘Emissor’, ‘Receptor’ e ‘Emissor-receptor’. Evidenciou-se que as ações organizacionais e o espaço onde ocorrem as trocas de conhecimento foram os fatores mais relatados e os aspectos envolvidos com as características dos atores, fonte e destino do conhecimento compartilhado foram menos frequentes. Conclusão: Criou-se uma perspectiva sistêmica por meio de uma análise holística dos facilitadores e barreiras ranqueados e agrupados por dimensões. Os resultados podem também subsidiar as decisões organizacionais no sentido de potencializar a transferência e a conversão do conhecimento organizacional no desafio de retê-lo. Pesquisas futuras com dados empíricos podem investigar individualmente os facilitadores e barreiras e aprofundar a análise sobre as interações entre eles.
Citas
Abuezhayeh, S. W., Ruddock, L., & Shehabat, I. (2021). Integration between knowledge management and business process management and its impact on the decision making process in the construction sector: A case study of Jordan. Construction Innovation, 22(4), 987–1010. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-02-2020-0021
Adamides, E. D., & Karacapilidis, N. (2006). A knowledge centred framework for collaborative business process modelling. Business Process Management Journal, 12(5), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610690993
Aguiar, W. S., Damasceno, M., & Melo, F. (2016). Avaliação de softwares livres de BPMN para mapeamento de processos. In XII Congresso Nacional de Excelência em Gestão e III INOVARSE-Responsabilidade Social Aplicada. http://www.inovarse.org/sites/default/files/T16_318.pdf
Barber, K. D., Eduardo Munive‐Hernandez, J., & Keane, J. P. (2006). Process‐based knowledge management system for continuous improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(8), 1002–1018. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610688185
Bitkowska, A. (2019). Business process management vs modeling of the process of knowledge Management in contemporary enterprises. In: C. Di Ciccio et al. (Eds.), Business process management: blockchain and central and Eastern Europe Forum. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (pp. 319–323), 361. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30429-4_22
Bitkowska, A. (2020). The relationship between business process management and knowledge management - Selected aspects from a study of companies in Poland. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(1), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.7341/20201616
Brito, L. M. P., Oliveira, P. W. S. de, & Castro, A. B. C. de. (2012). Gestão do conhecimento numa instituição pública de assistência técnica e extensão rural do Nordeste do Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 46(5), 1341–1366. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-76122012000500008
Carvalho, L. P., Cappelli, C., & Santoro, F. M. (2020, November 3). BPMN pra GERAL, business process models in a citizen language. In XVI Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411564.3411632
Ceribeli, H. B., de Pádua, S. I. D., & Merlo, E. M. (2014). BPM: A case study of critical success factors. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness, and Governability, 7(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.3232/gcg.2013.v7.n2.07
Chión, S. J., Charles, V., & Morales, J. (2019). The impact of organisational culture, organisational structure and technological infrastructure on process improvement through knowledge sharing. Business Process Management Journal, 26(6), 1443–1472. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2018-0279
Dalmaris, P., Tsui, E., Hall, B., & Smith, B. (2007). A framework for the improvement of knowledge‐intensive business processes. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150710740509
Deng, Q., & Yu, D. (2006). Mapping knowledge in product development through process modelling. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 05(03), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649206001475
Gronau, N., Müller, C., & Uslar, M. (2004). The KMDL knowledge management approach: Integrating knowledge conversions and business process modeling. In D. Karagiannis, & U. Reimer (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management. PAKM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3336. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30545-3_1
Ishrat, R., & Rahman, W. (2020). Knowledge of the situation, social network and knowledge sharing in Peshawar University: An empirical study. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1718521
Jackson, P. (2010). Capturing, structuring and maintaining knowledge: A social software approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(6), 908–929. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011055117
Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE.
Jesus, A. M. de, & Mourão, L. (2012). Conhecimento organizacional em escolas de governo: Um estudo comparado. Revista de Administração Pública, 46(4), 939–968. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-76122012000400003
Jochem, R., Geers, D., & Heinze, P. (2011). Maturity measurement of knowledge‐intensive business processes. The TQM Journal, 23(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731111139464
Keane, J. P., Barber, K. D., & Munive-Hernandez, J. E. (2007). Towards a learning organisation: The application of process-based knowledge maps to asset management (a case study). Knowledge and Process Management, 14(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.277
Kwan, M. M., & Cheung, P.-K. (2006). The knowledge transfer process. Journal of Database Management, 17(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2006010102
Lacerda, A. C. R., & Popadiuk, S. (2016). O mapeamento de processos e a disseminação do conhecimento no contexto organizacional. Revista Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales. https://www.eumed.net/rev/cccss/2016/04/mapeamento.html
Law, C., & Ngai, E. (2008). An empirical study of the effects of knowledge sharing and learning behaviors on firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2342–2349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.03.004
Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., & Sanders, J. (2010). A knowledge framework underlying process management. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00286.x
Liyanage, C., Elhag, T., Ballal, T., & Li, Q. (2009). Knowledge communication and translation – a knowledge transfer model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962914
Mahmoodzadeh, E., Jalalinia, Sh., & Nekui Yazdi, F. (2009). A business process outsourcing framework based on business process management and knowledge management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003748
Malik, P., & Malik, P. (2021). Investigating the impact of knowledge sharing system on workplace deviance: A moderated mediated process model in Indian IT sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 2088–2114. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0567
Massingham, P., & Al Holaibi, M. (2017). Embedding knowledge management into business processes. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1534
Merx‐Chermin, M., & Nijhof, W. J. (2005). Factors influencing knowledge creation and innovation in an organisation. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590510585091
Pee, L. G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). A model of organisational knowledge management maturity based on people, process, and technology. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 08(02), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649209002270
Ranjbarfard, M., Aghdasi, M., Albadvi, A., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2013). Identifying knowledge management problems using a process‐based method (a case study of process 137). Business Process Management Journal, 19(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151311308312
Seethamraju, R., & Marjanovic, O. (2009). Role of process knowledge in business process improvement methodology: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003784
Slavicek, V., (2011). Enhancing business process management with knowledge. E & M: Ekonomie a Management, 14(1), 123–134.
Supulniece, I., Businska, L., & Kirikova, M. (2010). Towards extending BPMN with the knowledge dimension. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (pp. 69–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13051-9_7
Trim, P. R. J., & Lee, Y.-I. (2021). How B2B marketers interact with customers and develop knowledge to produce a co-owned marketing strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(10), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-12-2019-0544
Vaghefi, I., Lapointe, L., & Shahbaznezhad, H. (2018). A multilevel process view of organizational knowledge transfer: Enablers versus barriers. Journal of Management Analytics, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2018.1424572
Van Burg, E., Berends, H., & van Raaij, E. M. (2013). Framing and interorganizational knowledge transfer: A process study of collaborative innovation in the aircraft industry. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12055
Wadhwa, S., Bibhushan, Bhoon, K. S., & Chan, F. T. S. (2006). Postponement strategies for re-engineering of automotive manufacturing: Knowledge-management implications. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(3–4), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0679-z
White, G. R. T., & Cicmil, S. (2016). Knowledge acquisition through process mapping. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-01-2014-0007
Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K., & Heo, D. (2007). Closing the gap: Towards a process model of post-merger knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 17(4), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00248.x
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
La revista AtoZ es una revista científica de acceso abierto y los derechos de autor de artículos y entrevistas pertenecen a sus respectivos autores/encuestados. Los autores otorgan a la AtoZ el direito de incluir el material publicado (revisado por pares/pos-print) en em sistemas/herramientas de indización, agregadores o curadores.
Los autores tienen permiso y se les anima a depositar sus artículos en sus páginas personales, depósitos y/o portales institucionales anteriormente (pre-print) y posteriormente (post-print) a la publicación en esa Revista. Se pide, si possible, que se apunte la referencia bibliográfica del artículo (incluyendose la URL) en base a la AtoZ.
La AtoZ es sello verde por Diadorim/IBICT.
Todo el contenido de la revista (incluyendo las instrucciones, modelos y política editorial) a menos que se indique otra cosa, están bajo una Licencia de Atribución de Bienes Comunes Creativos (CC) 4.0 Internacional.
Cuando los artículos son publicados por esta revista, se pueden compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier soporte o formato para cualquier propósito, incluso comercial) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso si es comercial). Debe dar el crédito correspondiente, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios.
La AtoZ no cobra cualquier tasas por la sumisión y/o procesamiento y/o la publicación de artículos.
























