El desfinanciamiento de los Juegos Evita en Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/ra.v18i1.100989Abstract
This article analyzes the budget and disciplinary cuts applied to the Evita National Games during the Javier Milei administration, a policy recognized as Argentina's leading public sports initiative. It is assumed that the Evita Games were not only a sporting initiative, but also a pedagogical, cultural, and federal tool with strong territorial roots. Their defunding implies not only economic adjustment, but also a profound dispute over the meaning of sport in schools, the role of the State, and the rights of children and young people.
The analysis is based on regulatory frameworks such as the National Education Law, the Priority Learning Centers (NAPs), and the specific regulations of the Evita Games, as well as on theoretical contributions that allow for reflection on the redefinition of the State in the field of social and educational policies. To this end, the critical approaches of Pierre Rosanvallon and Lindomar Boneti are used as a reference. From this perspective, it is argued that the elimination of the Evita Games constitutes not only a budget cut, but also an ideological shift that shifts the State from an integrative role to a purely administrative one, affecting the right to sport as a substantive part of the right to education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
(b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
(c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).






