Gadamer on Kant and the problem of prejudice
A critical reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v24i1.104389Keywords:
prejudice, provisional judgment, German Enlightenment, error, illusionAbstract
The hermeneutical rehabilitation of prejudice carried out by Hans-Georg Gadamer, often understood as a response to the modern reduction of prejudice to a mere source of error, contributes to recovering the role of tradition as a source of truth. However, his conception of prejudice seems to overlook the contribution of Immanuel Kant in relation to his distinction between prejudices and preliminary judgments. Kant’s sustained reflection on these topics shows a remarkable proximity with Gadamer with respect to the acknowledgment of a permanently autocorrective and anticipatory awareness that accompanies every ongoing process of judgment. Moreover, in contrast to Gadamer — who refers to true and false prejudices — Kant also draws a thin but sharp line between preliminary judgments and prejudices, thereby introducing a critical criterion.
References
BÁRCENAS, R. El prejuicio y la cuestión crítica: una tensión fundamental en Verdad y método. Valenciana, v. 10, n. 19, p. 125-143, 2017. DOI: 10.15174/rv.v0i19.199.
CAPOZZI, M. Kant e la logica. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 2002.
CAPOZZI, M. Kant on heuristics as a desirable addition to logic. In: CELLUCCI, C.; PECERE, P. (ed.). Demonstrative and non-demonstrative reasoning in mathematics and natural science. Cassino: Edizioni Università di Cassino, 2006.
GADAMER, H.-G. Truth and method. New York: Continuum, 2004.
HINSKE, N. Kant als Herausforderung an die Gegenwart. Freiburg; München: Verlag Karl Alber, 1980.
HINSKE, N. Georg Friedrich Meier und das Grundvorurteil der Erfahrungserkenntnis: noch eine unbemerkt gebliebene Quelle der Kantschen Antinomienlehre. In: CESA, C.; CARBONCINI, S. (ed.). Kant und sein Jahrhundert: Gedenkschrift für Giorgio Tonelli. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; New York: Peter Lang, 1993.
KANT, I. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900-.
LAOS, C. Error, apariencia ilusoria y juicio: la doctrina de la imposibilidad del error total como pauta de lectura de la lógica trascendental de Kant. 2020. 319 f. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 2020. Disponível em: https://minerva.usc.gal/entities/publication/f2ba56a9-3751-4781-b27c-2aaceacacbaa.
LAOS, C. Del cuerpo propio y el juicio de los otros en los Sueños de un visionario al Phänomenon del conflicto. Daimon, [preprint], 2024. Disponível em: https://revistas.um.es/daimon/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/16781.
LA ROCCA, C. Vorläufige Urteile und Urteilskraft: zur heuristischen Logik des Erkenntnisprozesses. In: GERHARDT, V. et al. (ed.). Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. v. 2. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2001.
MEIER, G. F. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Johann Justinus Gebauer, 1752. Reimpresso em: KANT, I. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900-. v. 16, p. 3-872.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Claudia Laos Igreda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their works and grant Studia Kantiana the right of first publication.
Authors grant the publishers the right to link their articles in future databases.
Studia Kantiana uses the Creative Commons 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
