IP and virtual assistants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rrddis.v3i5.93953Palavras-chave:
Virtual assistants, Generative artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, Trade marks, Patents, Copyright, Designs, Black box,Resumo
Este artigo considera as implicações dos assistentes virtuais para a lei de propriedade intelectual. A Quarta Revolução Industrial e as consequências da pandemia da COVID-19 foram caracterizada por um aumento no comércio eletrônico por meio do uso de assistentes virtuais (“VAs”). Chatbots como o ChatGPT ou o Bard do Google e alto-falantes inteligentes como a ALEXA, Siri ou Google Assistant podem ser muito úteis para os usuários, aumentando os ganhos de eficiência, economizando tempo e custos. No entanto, os chatbots baseados em IA generativa são alimentados com conjuntos de dados em massa que podem aumentar o risco de violação dos direitos de PI e desafiar os conceitos fundamentais dos direitos de PI relacionados a direitos autorais, marcas registradas, patentes e designs. Constata-se que a lei de PI deve continuar a desenvolver à medida que os VAs desafiam a dinâmica tradicional do mercado.
Referências
COM (2021) 206: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/2021_106.
Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj.
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj.
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AL%3A2001%3A167%3ATOC.
Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R1001.
/06/2010, T-153/08, Communications equipment, EU:T:2010:248, § 23-24 Boards of Appeal EPO, 21/12/2021, J 0008/20, Designation of inventor/DABUS, ECLI:EP:BA:2021 C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagbaldes Forening (16/07/2009, C 5/08, Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagbaldes Forening, EU:C:2009:465)
Case C-683/17, Cofemel (12/09/2019, C 683/17, Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV, EU:C:2019:721) Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc. 499 U.S. 340 (1991) L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (8/06/2009, C 487/07, L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV, EU:C:2009:378) L’Oréal V eBay (12/07/2011, C-324/09, L’Oréal-eBay, EU:C:2011:474 C-324/09 EU:C:2011:474)
EDPB, Guidelines 02/2021 on Virtual Voice Assistants (7 July 2021). https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/documents/public-consultations/2021/guidelines-022021-virtual-voice-assistants_en.
EUIPO, ‘Study on the impact of artificial intelligence on the infringement and enforcement of copyrights and designs’ (March 2022). https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/reports/2022_Impact_AI_on_the_Infringement_and_Enforcement_CR_Designs/2022_Impact_AI_on_the_Infringement_and_Enforcement_CR_Designs_FullR_en.pdf.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION IP HELPDESK, ‘Intellectual Property in ChatGPT’. https://intellectual-property-helpdesk.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/intellectual-property-chatgpt-2023-02-20_en. Final Report of the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (July 31, 1978), Chapter 3: Computers and Copyright, New Works, Library of Congress/Washington (1979). http://digital-law-online.info/CONTU/contu17.html#_ftn142.
OUELLETTE, Lisa Larrimore, ‘Response, Does Running Out of (Some) Trademarks Matter?’, (Harvard Law Review, 2018), https://harvardlawreview.org/2018/02/doesrunning-out-of-some-trademarks- matter/.
RAFAILIDIS, Dimitrios and MANOLOPOULOS, Yannis ‘Can Virtual Assistants Produce Recommendations?’ (Conference: the 9th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, 26 June 2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333224988_Can_Virtual_Assistants_Produce_Recommendations.
THE UNITED KINGDOM GOVERNMENT CONSULTATION OUTCOME, Artificial intelligence call for views: trade marks (23 March 2021). https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property-call-for-views/artificial-intelligence-call-for-views-trade-marks.
WHITE, Marie, MOGYOROS, Alexandara, GANGJEE, Prof. Dev. ‘IPO Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: call for views Trade Marks’ (SSRN, 1 December 2020). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3740271.
WIPO Conversation on intellectual property (IP) and artificial intelligence (AI),
WIPO, Geneva, 27/09/2019. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wipo.int%2Fedocs%2Fmdocs%2Fmdocs%2Fen%-2Fwipo_ip_ai_ge_19%2Fwipo_ip_ai_ge_19_inf_4.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
ABBOTT, Ryan, ‘The Artificial Inventor Project’ (WIPO Magazine, December 2019). https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2019/06/article_0002.html.
CURTIS, Lee and PLATTS, Rachel, ‘Trademark law playing catch-up with Artificial Intelligence?’ (WIPO Magazine, June 2020). https://www.wipo.int/wipo_ magazine_digital/en/2020/article_0001.html. Accessed on 26 March 2023.
DAY, Matt, TURNER, Giles and DROZDIAK, Natalia, ‘Thousands of Amazon Workers Listen to Alexa Users’ Conversations’ Time Magazine (New York, 11 April 2019). https://time.com/5568815/amazon- workers-listen-to-alexa/. GUADAMUZ, Andres, ‘Artificial intelligence and copyright’ (WIPO Magazine, October 2017), Issue 5/2017. https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html.
HAßDENTEUFEL, Stefan, ‘In brief: copyright infringement and remedies in European Union’ (Lexology, 25 May 2022). https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=45bc2f60-4cb7-4b3e-b1f8- 0876d593b366.
HU, Krystal, ‘ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base’ (Reuters – technology, 2 February 2023). https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/.
JEDRUSIK, Ania, ‘Patent protection for software-implemented inventions’ (WIPO Magazine, February 2017). https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/01/article_0002.html.
KENTON, Will, ‘What Is a Black Box Model? Definition, Uses, and Examples’ (Investopedia, 6 March 2022). https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blackbox.asp.
KINSELLA, Bret & MUTCHLER, Ava ‘Voice Shopping Consumer Adoption Report’ (Voicebot.ai, June 2018). https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwia-ca8-4_-AhUNVaQEHSFgC7UQFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fvoicebot.ai%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%-2F2018%2F06%2Fvoice-shopping-consumer-adoption-report-june-2018-voicebot-voysis.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2CD0sqPe-3KsajtVoNnfNM.
KINSTA, “What is webscraping” (Kinsta, 15 September 2022). https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/what-is-web-scraping/#what-is-web-scraping.
LEE, Dave, ‘Amazons Big Dreams for Alexa Fall Short’ The Financial Times (London, 4 March 2023)
LOHR, Steve, ‘Ending the Chatbots Spiral of Misery’. The New York Times (3 March 2022)
MCCALLUM, Shiona, ‘ChatGPT banned in Italy over privacy concerns’. BBC (London, 1 April 2023). https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65139406.
NUSEIBEH, Rajai ‘What is a chatbot?’ (Chatbots Magazine, 11 May 2018). https://chatbotsmagazine.com/what-is-a-chatbot-6dfff005bb34.
OCELOT, Liquid, ‘Don’t Chat With ChatGPT: Amazon’s Warning To Employees’ (Medium 27 January 2023). https://medium.com/inkwater-atlas/dont-chat-with-chatgpt-amazon-s-warning-to-employees-ce1dc2236a40.
OVERBY, Stephanie, ‘Artificial intelligence (AI) vs. natural language processing (NLP): What are the differences?’ (The enterprisers project, 6 February 2020), https://enterprisersproject.com/article/2020/2/artificial-intelligence-ai-vs-natural-language-processing-nlp-differences.
PETKAUSKAS, Vilius, ‘ChatGPT’s answers could be nothing but a hallucination’(Cybernews, 6 March 2023). https://cybernews.com/tech/chatgpts-bard-ai-answers-hallucination/.
POIREAULT, Kevin ‘ChatGPT’s Data-Scraping Model Under Scrutiny From Privacy Experts’ (Infosecurity Magazine, 27 January 2023). https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news-features/chatgpts-datascraping-scrutiny/.
ROUTLEY, Nick, ‘What is generative AI? An AI explains’ (World Economic Forum – artificial intelligence, 6 February 2023). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/02/generative-ai-explain- algorithms-work/.
SCANNELL, Barry, MOORE, Leo & CULLEN, David, ‘Generative AI Generates Infringement Litigation’ (Lexology, 19 January 2023). https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=076d0a94-503d-447f-b350-ecd4f37788e4. Accessed on 24 March 2023.
SEVASTIANOVA, Vera, ‘Trademark Functions in the Age of Voice Shopping: A Search Costs Perspective’ (Thesis, Hanken School of Economics 2020). https://ecta.org/ECTA/documents/Sevastianova3517.pdf.
X, ‘ChatGPT-driven smart home voice assistant coming soon’. The Economic Times (Mumbai, 25 February 2023). https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/chatgpt-driven-smart-home-voice-assistant-coming-soon/articleshow/98227786.cms.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores declaram que qualquer texto apresentado, se aceito, não será publicado em outro meio/lugar, em inglês ou em qualquer outra língua, e inclusive por via eletrônica, salvo mencione expressamente que o trabalho foi originalmente publicado na RRDDIS - Revista Rede de Direito Digital, Intelectual & Sociedade. A Revista RRDDIS desde a sua primeira publicação, licencia todos os textos sob a Licença Creative Commons — Atribuição 4.0 Brasil — CC BY 4.0 BR, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na Revista;
DECLARAÇÃO DE DIREITO AUTORAL Os autores que publicam na Revista RRDDIS concordam com os seguintes termos: – os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e transferem à Revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons — Atribuição 4.0 Brasil — CC BY 4.0 BR, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na Revista; – os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada na Revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na Revista; – qualquer pessoa é livre para compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o trabalho em qualquer suporte ou formato) e para adaptar (remixar, transformar e criar a partir do trabalho) para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial, devendo todavia, em qualquer caso, dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas no trabalho original, nos termos da Licença Creative Commons — Atribuição 4.0 Brasil — CC BY 4.0 BR e respeitados a Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998, e outros normativos vigentes.
