Negative Comparative Law: The Sanitization Enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v10i1.88557Palavras-chave:
comparative law, foreign law, critical theory, epistemology, interpretation.Resumo
This article challenges four basic and intertwining assumptions informing orthodox comparative law: that a comparatist can exactly represent foreign law; that he can write about foreign law objectively; that he can state the truth regarding foreign law; and that he enjoys the subjective agency to overcome the obstacles on the way to the achievement of these goals. Comparatists-at-law being oblivious to their structural cognitive weakness, which makes the pursuit of these realizations irredeemably preposterous, a strong contrarian programme is necessary so as to bring comparative law to its epistemological senses and, in the process, to heighten the scholarly integrity and reliability of comparative interventions. This article succinctly formulates such an oppositional stance.
Referências
ADORNO, T. W. Der Essay als Form. In Noten zur Literatur. R. Tiedemann (ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1974 [1958].
ADORNO, T. W. Die Aktualität der Philosophie. In Philosophische Frühschriften. R. Tiedemann (ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973 [1931].
ADORNO, T. W. Metaphysik. R. Tiedemann (ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998 [1965].
ADORNO, T. W. Negative Dialectics. (E. B. Ashton, transl.). London: Routledge, 1973.
ADORNO, T. W. Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1966.
ADORNO, T. W. Vorlesung über Negative Dialektik. R. Tiedemann (ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2007 [1965].
ADORNO, T. W. Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970 [1956].
ASPREMONT, J. D’. After Meaning. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2021.
BARASH, J. A. Martin Heidegger and the Problem of Historical Meaning. 2nd edn. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003.
BARING, E. Converts to the Real. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.
BASS, A. Interpretation and Difference. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2006.
BECKETT, S. Closed Place. In Fizzles. In Texts for Nothing and Other Short Prose, 1950–1976. M. Nixon (ed.). London: Faber & Faber, 2010 [1976].
BECKETT, S. Impromptu d’Ohio. S. Beckett (transl.). In: Catastrophe et autres dramaticules. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1986 [1982].
BECKETT, S. Letter to Marthe Arnaud. In FEHSENFELD, M. D.; OVERBECK, L. M. (eds.). The Letters of Samuel Beckett. vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [10 June 1940].
BECKETT, S. Molloy. S. Weller (ed.). London: Faber & Faber, 2009 [1955].
BECKETT, S. Proust. In The Grove Centenary Edition. vol. 4. P. Auster; J. M. Coetzee. (eds.). New York: Grove Press, 2006 [1931].
BECKETT, S. Stirrings Still. In Company/Ill Seen Ill Said/Worstward Ho/Stirrings Still. D. Van Hulle (ed.). London: Faber & Faber, 2009 [1989].
BECKETT, S. Worstward Ho. In Company/Ill Seen Ill Said/Worstward Ho/Stirrings Still. D. Van Hulle (ed.). London: Faber & Faber, 2009 [1983].
BOGDAN, M. On the Value and Method of Rule-Comparison in Comparative Law. In MANSEL, H.-P. et al (eds.). Festschrift für Erik Jayme. Munich: Sellier, 2004.
BONILLA MALDONADO, D. Legal Barbarians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
BONOLI, L. Lire les cultures. Paris: Kimé, 2008.
BOURDIEU, P. Le Sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1980.
BRAND, O. Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, New York, vol. 32, n. 2, p. 405-466, 2007.
BRUNKHORST, H. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
CAMUS, A. La Chute. Paris: Gallimard, 1956.
CAPUTO, J. D. Radical Hermeneutics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
CAVELL, S. The Avoidance of Love: A Reading of King Lear. In Must We Mean What We Say? 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015 [1969].
CODE, L. (ed.). Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.
CULLER, J. In Defence of Overinterpretation. In COLLINI, S. (ed.). Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
DERRIDA, J. Apprendre à vivre enfin. J. Birnbaum (ed.). Paris: Galilée, 2005.
DERRIDA, J. Béliers. Paris: Galilée, 2003.
DERRIDA, J. Contresignature. Unpublished, 2000.
DERRIDA, J. Countersignature. M. Hanrahan (transl.). Paragraph. Edinburgh, vol. 27, n. 2, p. 7-42, 2004.
DERRIDA, J. De la grammatologie. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1967.
DERRIDA, J. Du droit à la philosophie. Paris: Galilée, 1990.
DERRIDA, J. Glas. Paris: Galilée, 1974.
DERRIDA, J. La Bête et le souverain. vol. 2. M. Lisse; M.-L. Mallet; G. Michaud (eds.). Paris: Galilée, 2010.
DERRIDA, J. La Carte postale. Paris: Flammarion, 1980.
DERRIDA, J. La Dissémination. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1972.
DERRIDA, J. La Voix et le phénomène. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967.
DERRIDA, J. L’Écriture et la différence. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1967.
DERRIDA, J. Papier machine. Paris: Galilée, 2001.
DERRIDA, J. Psyché. vol. 1. 2nd edn. Paris: Galilée, 1998.
DERRIDA, J. Ulysse gramophone. Paris: Galilée, 1987.
DERRIDA, J. (with ATTRIDGE, D.). “Cette étrange institution qu’on appelle la littérature”. In DUTOIT, T.; ROMANSKI, P. (eds.) Derrida d’ici, Derrida de là. Paris: Galilée, 2009 [1989].
DERRIDA, J. (with LABARRIÈRE, P.-J.). Altérités. Paris: Osiris, 1986.
DESCARTES, R. Discours de la méthode. In Œuvres de Descartes. vol. 6. C. Adam; P. Tannery (eds.). Paris: Cerf, 1902 [1637].
DESCARTES, R. Epistola ad G. Voetium. In Œuvres de Descartes. vol. 8. C. Adam; P. Tannery (eds.). Paris: Cerf, 1905 [May 1643].
DESCARTES, R. Meditatio III. In Meditationes de prima philosophia. In Œuvres de Descartes. vol. 7. C. Adam; P. Tannery (eds.). Paris: Cerf,1904 [1641].
DESCARTES, R. Regulæ ad directionem ingenii. In Œuvres de Descartes. vol. 10. C. Adam; P. Tannery (eds.). Paris: Cerf,1908 [1701†].
DESCARTES, R. Responsi authoris ad quintas objectiones. In Œuvres de Descartes. vol. 7. C. Adam; P. Tannery (eds.). Paris: Cerf,1904 [May-June 1641].
DESCARTES, R. Rules for the Direction of the Mind. D. Murdoch (transl.). In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. vol. 1. J. Cottingham; R. Stoothoff; D. Murdoch. (transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
DEVEREUX, G. From Anxiety to Method. The Hague: Mouton, 1967.
DIREK, Z.; LAWLOR, L. (eds.). A Companion to Derrida. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.
DOSTAL, R. J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
FISH, S. Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham: Duke University Press, 1989.
FISH, S. Is There a Text in This Class? Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.
[FOUCHER, S.] Critique de la recherche de la verité. Paris: Coustelier, 1675.
FRANKENBERG, G. The Innocence of Method – Unveiled: Comparison as an Ethical and Political Act. Journal of Comparative Law. vol. 9, n. 2, p. 222-258, 2014.
FREUD, S. Eine Schwierigkeit der Psychoanalyse. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 12. A. Freud et al (eds.). Frankfurt: Fischer, 1947 [1917].
GADAMER, H.-G. Die griechische Philosophie und das moderne Denken. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 6. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1985 [1978].
GADAMER, H.-G. Die Kehre des Weges. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 10. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995 [1985].
GADAMER, H.-G. Greek Philosophy and Modern Thinking. In The Gadamer Reader. R. E. Palmer (ed. and transl.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007.
GADAMER, H.-G. Hermeneutik auf der Spur. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 10. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995.
GADAMER, H.-G. Historismus und Hermeneutik. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1993 [1965].
GADAMER, H.-G. Nachwort zur 3. Auflage. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 2. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck: 1993 [1972].
GADAMER, H.-G. Philosophie und Philologie. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 6. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1985 [1982].
GADAMER, H.-G. Truth and Method. J. Cumming; G. Barden (transl.). London: Sheed & Ward, 1975.
GADAMER, H.-G. Truth and Method. 2nd Engl. edn. J. Weinsheimer; D. Marshall (eds. and transl.). New York: Continuum, 2004 [1960].
GADAMER, H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. 5th edn. In: Gesammelte Werke. vol. 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010 [1986].
GADAMER, H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1960.
GADAMER, H.-G. Was ist Wahrheit? In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1993 [1957].
GEORGE, T.; VAN DER HEIDEN, G.-J. (eds.). The Gadamerian Mind. London: Routledge, 2022.
GLANERT, S. Method? In MONATERI, P. G. (ed.). Methods of Comparative Law. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2012.
GLANERT, S.; GIRARD, F. (eds.) Law’s Hermeneutics: Other Investigations. London: Routledge, 2017.
GLISSANT, E. Poétique de la relation. Paris: Gallimard, 1990.
GOODRICH, P. Languages of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
GOODRICH, P. Reading the Law. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
GORDLEY, J. Comparative Legal Research: Its Function in the Development of Harmonized Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, Berkeley, vol. 43, n. 4, p. 555-568, 1995.
GORDON, P. E. Heidegger, Metaphysics, and the Problem of Self-Knowledge. In BOWLER, M.; FARIN, I. (eds.). Hermeneutical Heidegger. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2016.
GREENAWALT, K. Legal Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. GRONDIN, J. Sources of Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
HABERMAS, J. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988.
HAGE, J. Can Legal Theory Be Objective? In HUSA, J.; VAN HOECKE, M. (eds.). Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Hart, 2013.
HAHN, L. E. (ed.). The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.
HARTMAN, G. H. Saving the Text. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.
HEIDEGGER, M. Being and Time. J. Macquarrie; E. Robinson (transl.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.
HEIDEGGER, M. Being and Time. 2nd Engl. edn. J. Stambaugh (transl.). Albany: State University Press of New York, 2010.
HEIDEGGER, M. Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. (H.-H. Gander ed.). In Gesamtausgabe. vol. 58. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1993.
HEIDEGGER, M. In: Davoser Disputation zwischen Ernst Cassirer und Martin Heidegger. O. F. Bollnow; J. Ritter (eds.). In: Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2010 [1929].
HEIDEGGER, M. Letter to Julius Stenzel. In: Briefe Martin Heideggers an Julius Stenzel (1928-1932). Heidegger Studies. vol. 16, p. 11-33. 2000 [31 December 1929].
HEIDEGGER, M. Ontologie (Hermeneutik der Faktizität). In: Gesamtausgabe. vol. 63. K. Bröcker-Oltmanns (ed.). Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1982 [1923].
HEIDEGGER, M. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles: Einführung in die Phänomenologische Forschung. (W. Bröcker and K. Bröcker-Oltmanns eds.). In: Gesamtausgabe. vol. 61. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1994.
HEIDEGGER, M. Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. P. Jaeger (ed.). In Gesamtausgabe. vol. 20. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1994 [1925].
HEIDEGGER, M. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2001 [1927].
HEIDEGGER, M. Seminare. (C. Ochwadt ed.). In Gesamtausgabe. vol. 15. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2005 [1973].
HORKHEIMER, M.; ADORNO, T. W. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1947.
HUSA, J. A New Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart, 2015.
HUTCHINSON, A. C. The Province of Jurisprudence Democratized. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
HYLAND, R. Gifts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
ISAKU, Y. Avec Giacometti. (V. Perrin, transl.). Paris: Allia, 2014 [1969].
JAMESON, F. The Prison-House of Language. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.
KAFKA, F. Betrachtungen über Sünde, Leid, Hoffnung und den wahren Weg. In Gesammelte Werke. vol. 9. M. Brod (ed.). Frankfurt: Fischer, 1953 [1917].
KAFKA, F. Die Zürauer Aphorismen. R. Calasso (ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2006 [1931†].
KAHN, P. W. The Cultural Study of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
KANT, I. Kritik der Urteilskraft. K. Vorländer (ed.). Hamburg: Meiner, 1993 [1790].
KHOSLA, M. Is a Science of Comparative Constitutionalism Possible? Harvard Law Review. vol. 135, n. 8, p. 2110-2149, 2022.
KIDDER, P. Gadamer for Architects. London: Routledge, 2013.
KIMBALL, B. A.; COQUILLETTE, D. R. The Intellectual Sword. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020.
KISCHEL, U. Comparative Law. A. Hammel (transl.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
KISCHEL, U. Rechtsvergleichung. Munich: Beck, 2015.
KISIEL, T. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
KRAWJESKI, B. (ed.). Gadamer’s Repercussions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.
LACAN, J. Écrits. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1966 [1953].
LAWN, C.; KEANE, N. The Gadamer Dictionary. New York: Continuum, 2011.
LEGRAND, P. Derrida’s Gadamer. In GLANERT, S.; GIRARD, F. (eds.). Legal Hermeneutics: Other Investigations. London: Routledge, 2017.
LEGRAND, P. Foreign Law: Understanding Understanding. Journal of Comparative Law, London, vol. 6, n. 2, p. 67-177, 2011.
LEGRAND, P. Negative Comparative Law: A Strong Programme for Weak Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
LEGRAND, P. On Comparative Law’s Repressed Colonial Governance. American Journal of Comparative Law. vol. 71, n. 1, 2023.
LEGRAND, P. Paradoxically, Derrida: For a Comparative Legal Studies. Cardozo Law Review. vol. 27. n. 2, p. 631-718, 2005.
LEGRAND, P. The Same and the Different. In LEGRAND, P.; MUNDAY, R. (eds.) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
LEGRAND, P. What Is That, to Read Foreign Law? Journal of Comparative Law, London, v. 14, n. 2, p. 294-310, 2019.
LEIBNIZ, G. W. Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement. In: Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. vol. 5. C.I. Gerhardt (ed.). Hildesheim: Olms, 1965 [1764†].
LEYH, G. (ed.). Legal Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
MACINTYRE, A. On Having Survived the Academic Moral Philosophy of the Twentieth Century. In O’ROURKE, F. (ed.). What Happened in and to Moral Philosophy in the Twentieth Century? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.
MAKKREEL, R. A. Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
MALLARMÉ, [S.] Tennyson vu d’ici. In Quelques médaillons et portraits en pied. In Divagations. In Œuvres complètes. vol. 2. B. Marchal (ed.). Paris: Gallimard, 2003 [1892].
MALPAS, J.; ARNSWALD, U.; KERTSCHER, J. (eds.). Gadamer’s Century. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
MALPAS, J.; ZABALA, S. (eds.). Consequences of Hermeneutics: Fifty Years After Gadamer’s Truth and Method Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2010.
MARKESINIS, B. S. Why a Code Is Not the Best Way to Advance the Cause of European Legal Unity. European Review of Private Law, Alphen aan den Rijn, vol. 5, n. 4, p. 519-524, 1997.
MCDOWELL, J. Having the World in View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
MERRYMAN, J. H.. The Civil Law Tradition. 2nd edn. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1985.
MICHAELS, R. The True Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Bloomington, vol. 14, n. 2, p. 447-468.
MICHAELS, R. Two Paradigms of Jurisdiction. Michigan Journal of International Law. Ann Arbor, vol. 27, n. 4, p. 1003-1070, 2006.
MISGELD, D.; NICHOLSON, G. (eds.). Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. L. Schmidt; M. Reuss (transl.). Albany: State University Press of New York, 1992.
MONTAIGNE, M. DE. Les Essais. J. Balsamo; M. Magnien; C. Magnien-Simonin (eds.). Paris: Gallimard, 2007 [1595†].
MOOTZ, F. J. (ed.). Gadamer and Law. London: Routledge, 2007.
NANCY, J.-L. Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Galilée, 1996.
ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. La reviviscencia de los cuadros. In Obras completas. vol. 8. 2nd edn. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1983 [1946].
PECK, S. H. Post-Heller Second Amendment Jurisprudence. Congressional Research Service Report (R44618). <https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44618/14>, 2019.
PETERS, A.; SCHWENKE, H. Comparative Law Beyond Post-Modernism. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, London, vol. 49, n. 4, p. 800-834, 2000.
POLT, R. Heidegger: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1999.
Proclamation. In In transition: A Paris Anthology. New York: Doubleday, 1990 [1929].
RICHARDSON, J. Existential Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
RORTY, R. From Logic to Language to Play. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. Newark, vol. 59, n. 5, p. 747-753, 1986.
ROUSSE, B. S. Fore-structure. In WRATHALL, M. A. (ed.). The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
SACCO, R. Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (J. R. Gordley ed.). American Journal of Comparative Law, Berkeley, vol. 39, n. 1, p. 1-34, 1991.
SANDEL, A. A. The Place of Prejudice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
SHAPIRO, J. The Year of Lear. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015.
SHEEHAN, T. Reading a Life: Heidegger and Hard Times. In GUIGNON, C. B. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SHILLINGSBURG, P. Textuality and Knowledge. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.
SILVERMAN, H. J. (ed.). Gadamer and Hermeneutics. London: Routledge, 1991.
SMITH, B. et al Letter to the Editor. The Times. 9 May 1992. <http://www.ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/derridaletter.htm>.
SPIVAK, G. C. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.
SPIVAK, G. C. In Other Worlds. London: Routledge, 2006 [1987].
SPIVAK, G. C. The Politics of the Production of Knowledge. In CULLER, J.; LAMB, K. (eds.). Just Being Difficult? Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2003.
STEINER, G. Martin Heidegger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
STENGERS, I. Comparison as a Matter of Concern. Common Knowledge. Durham, vol. 17, n. 1, p. 48-63, 2011.
SVENAUEUS, F. Hermeneutics of Medicine in the Wake of Gadamer: The Issue of Phronesis. Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics. Washington, D.C., vol. 24, n. 5, p. 407-431, 2003.
TAYLOR, C. Comparison, History, Truth. In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
[TIEDEMANN, R.] Nachbemerkung des Herausgebers. In ADORNO, T. W. Vorlesung über Negative Dialektik. R. Tiedemann (ed.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2007 [2003].
VAN BUREN, J. The Young Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.
VICKERS, B. The One King Lear. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016.
WARNKE, G. Gadamer. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1987.
WARNKE, G. (ed.). Inheriting Gadamer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
WATT, G. Comparison as Deep Appreciation. In MONATERI, P. G. (ed.). Methods of Comparative Law. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2012.
WILLIAMS, B. Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
WRIGHT, K. (ed.). Festivals of Interpretation: Essays on Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Work. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
ZIMMERMANN, R. Der europäische Charakter des englischen Rechts. Zeitschrift für Europä-isches Privatrecht, Munich, vol. 1, n. 1, p. 4-50, 1993.
ZIMMERMANN, R. Statuta sunt stricte interpretanda? Statutes and the Common Law: A Continental Perspective. Cambridge Law Journal, Cambridge, vol. 56, n. 2, p. 315-328, 1997.
ZWEIGERT, K.; KÖTZ, H. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996.
ZWEIGERT, K.; KÖTZ, H. Introduction to Comparative Law. 3rd edn. T. Weir (transl.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
