The current influence of social media on democratic debate, political parties and electioneering

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v9i1.83460

Palavras-chave:

internet, democracy, risk, political parties, election campaigns

Resumo

This article provides an overview on how digital social media influences the debate and some of the major democratic organizations — namely political parties and electioneering campaigns. Its specific objectives are: i) to expose the debate about the democratic essence (or not) of the internet; ii) to analyze risk factors for democracy brought about by the digitization of social communications; iii) to study the transformations brought by the Internet to political parties and electoral campaigns. Results: i) what will define if there will still be the possibility of some democratic degree in the use of the internet will be the predominance of the forces (consumerist or communitarian) that build it; ii) immediacy, lack of moderation, lack of search for conformity and balance, anti-democratic technological strategies and technological colonialism expose the democratic debate to great risks of degradation; iii) participatoryism and disintermediation are ideological features of the new digitized parties that, at heart, hide a centralization around charismatic figures without a stable and fully definable electoral platform. It has a hypothetical-deductive method of procedure, qualitative approach, and bibliographic-documentary research technique.

Biografia do Autor

Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Unijuí, Brasil)

Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu (Mestrado e Doutorado) em Direitos Humanos da Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Unijuí, Brasil). Doutor em Direito pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos, Brasil), com Pós-Doutorado pela University of Westminster (Reino Unido).

Gustavo Silveira Borges, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brasil)

Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu (Mestrado) da Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense – UNESC (Criciúma-SC, Brasil). Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), com Pós-Doutorado em Direito pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - (UNISINOS). E-mail: gustavoborges@hotmail.com.

Referências

ANDERSON, Janna; RAINIE, Lee. Many experts say digital disruption will hurt democracy. Pew Research Center, 2020. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/21/many-tech-experts-say-digital-disruption-will-hurt-democracy/. Access in April 6th, 2020.

ANDERSON, Monica; PERRIN, Andrew; VOGELS, Emily. Most Americans Think Social Media Sites Censor Political Viewpoints. Pew Research Center, 2020. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/08/19/most-americans-think-social-media-sites-censor-political-viewpoints/. Access in April 6th, 2021.

BASAN, Arthur Pinheiro; JÚNIOR, José Luis de Moura Faleiros. A proteção de dados pessoais e a concreção do direito ao sossego no mercado de consumo. civilistica.com, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 9, n. 3, p. 1-27, set./dez. 2020.

BECHMANN, Anja; O’LOUGHLIN, Ben. Democracy & Disinformation: A Turn in the Debate. Brussels: Flemish Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020.

BORN, Rogério Carlos. A dominação política digital. Revista Jurídica Luso-Brasileira, Lisboa, ano 7, n. 1, p. 1197-1231, 2021.

CASTELLS, Manuel. Communication Power: mass communication, mass self-communication and power relationships in the network society. In: CURRAN, James; HESMONDALGH, David (Eds.). Media and Society. New York: Bloomsbury, 2019.

CHADWICK, Andrew; STROMER-GALLEY, Jennifer. Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns: Party Decline or Party Renewal? The International Journal of Press/Politics, [s.l.], vol. 21, n. 3, pp. 283-293, jul. 2016.

DEIBERT, Ronald J. The Road to Digital Unfreedom: Three Painful Truths About Social Media. Journal of Democracy, Baltimore, vol. 30, n. 1, p. 25-39, jan. 2019.

ESS, Charles. Democracy and the internet: a retrospective. Javnost: The Public, London, v. 25, n. 1-2, p. 93-101, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1418820.

FARHALL, Kate et al. Political Elites' Use of Fake News Discourse Across Communications Platforms. International Journal of Communication, v. 13, p. 4253-4375, 2019. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10677. Access in April 6th, 2021.

FEENBERG, Andrew. Technosystem: the social life of reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.

FLORIDI, Luciano. Trump, Parler and Regulating the Infosphere as Our Commons. Philosophy and Technology, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1-5, mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-021-00446-7.

FREEDOM HOUSE. Freedom on the net 2019: the crisis of social media. 2019. Available at: https://www.freedomonthenet.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/11042019_Report_FH_FOTN_2019_final_Public_Download.pdf. Access in April 6th, 2021.

GERBAUDO, Paolo. The digital party: political organisation and digital democracy. London: Pluto Press, 2019.

GROSHECK, Jacob; KOC-MICHALSKA, Karolina Koc-Michalska: Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, London, vol. 20, n. 9, jun. 2017.

GURUMURTHY, Anita; BHARTHUR, Deepti. Democracy and the algorithmic turn: issues, challenges, and the way forward. Sur, São Paulo, vol. 15, n. 27, p. 39-50, 2018.

HARTMANN, Ivar Alberto; IUNES, Julia. Fake news no contexto de pandemia e emergência social: os deveres e responsabilidades das plataformas de redes sociais na moderação de conteúdo online entre a teoria e as proposições legislativas. Direito Público, Brasília, vol. 17, n. 94, p. 388-414, jul./ago. 2020.

JHA, Chandan Kumar; KODILA-TEDIKA, Oasis. Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence, AGDI Working Paper, n. WP/19/031. Yaoundé: African Governance and Development Institute (AGDI), 2019. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/205001/1/1666944491.pdf. Accessed in April 6th, 2021.

KORNBLUH, Karen; GOODMAN, Ellen; WEINER, Eli. Safeguarding Democracy against Disinformation. Washington, D.C.: The German Marshall Fund of the United States:, 2020. Available at: http://www.gmfus.org/publications/safeguardingdemocracy-against-disinformation. Access in April 6th, 2021.

MCKAY, Spencer; TENOVE, Chris. Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy. Political Research Quarterly, Salt Lake City, vol. 74, n. 3, pp. 703-717, jul. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920938143.

MILLER, Michael L.; VACCARI, Cristian. Digital threats to democracy: comparative lessons and possible remedies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, [s.l.], vol. 25, n. 3, pp. 333-356, may. 2020.

MOROZOV, Evgeny. La internet non salverà il mondo: perché no dobbiamo credere a chi pense che la rete possa risolvere ogni problema. Milano: Mondadori, 2014.

MOROZOV, Evgeny. The net delusion: the dark side of internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs, 2011, p. 247.

PAPACHARISSI, Zizi. The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere. In: STEMPFHUBER, Martin; WAGNER, Elke (eds.). Praktiken der Überwachten: Öffentlichkeit und Privatheit im Web 2.0. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019.

PERSILY, Nathaniel. The 2016 U.S. Election: Can Democracy Survive the Internet? Journal of Democracy, Baltimore, vol. 28, n. 2, pp. 63-76, apr. 2017.

PICCONE, Ted. Democracia e Tecnologia Digital. Sur, São Paulo, vol. 15, n. 27, pp. 29-39, 2018.

PINTO, Renata Ávila. Soberania Digital ou Colonialismo Digital? Novas tensões relativas à privacidade, segurança e políticas nacionais. Sur, São Paulo, vol. 15, n. 27, pp. 15-28, 2018.

RANIOLO, Francesco; TARDITI, Valeria. Digital revolution and party innovations: An analysis of the Spanish case. Italian Political Science Review, [s.l.], vol. 50, n. 2, p. 1-19, 2019.

RUBIÃO, André; MIOTTO, Giovanna Zago. Liberdade de expressão e risco à saúde nas plataformas digitais durante a pandemia da covid-19: uma análise do controle dos discursos científicos a partir do caso mikovits. Direito Público, Brasília, vol. 17, n. 94, pp. 218-249, jul./ago. 2020.

STOLLER, M.; MILLER, S. Donald Trump being banned from social media is a dangerous distraction. The Guardian, 2021. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jan/11/trump-twitter-ban-capitol-attack-facebook-youtube-google. Accessed in April 6th, 2021.

STOYCHEFF, Elizabeth. Relatively democratic: How perceived Internet interference shapes attitudes about democracy. The International Journal of Press/Politics, [s.l.], vol. 25, n. 3, pp. 390-406, mar. 2020.

STROMER-GALLEY Jennifer. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

SUNSTEIN, Cass Robert. As mídias sociais são boas ou ruins para a democracia? Sur, São Paulo, vol. 15, n. 27, pp. 85-92, 2018.

TUCKER, Joshua A.; THEOCHARIS, Yannis; ROBERTS, Margaret E.; BARBERÁ, Pablo. From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media And Democracy. Journal of Democracy, Baltimore, vol. 28, n. 4, pp. 46-59, oct. 2017.

VACCARI, Cristian; VALERIANI, Augusto. Party Campaigners or Citizen Campaigners? How Social Media Deepen and Broaden Party-Related Engagement. The International Journal of Press/Politics, [s.l.], vol. 21, n. 3, pp. 294-312, apr. 2016.

WIGELL, Mikael. Hybrid interference as a wedge strategy: a theory of external interference in liberal democracy. International Affairs, Oxford, vol. 95, n. 2, pp. 255-275, mar. 2019.

WISCHMEYER, Thomas. Making social media an instrument of democracy. European Law Journal, [s.l.], vol. 25, n. 2, pp. 169-181, apr. 2019.

YORK, Jillian C.; ZUCKERMAN, Ethan. Moderating the Public Sphere. In: JORGENSEN, Rikke Frank (Eds.). Human Rights in the Age of Platforms. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2019.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-08-22

Como Citar

FORNASIER, Mateus de Oliveira; BORGES, Gustavo Silveira. The current influence of social media on democratic debate, political parties and electioneering. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 73–102, 2022. DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v9i1.83460. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/83460. Acesso em: 25 dez. 2025.

Edição

Seção

Artigos originais