The tension between global public procurement law and nationalist/populist tendencies: proposals for reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i2.74570Keywords:
public procurement, Global Administrative Law, protectionism, free trade, nationalism.Abstract
GPA had a main objective from its very beginning: confronting discrimination between bidders on national or geographical grounds and opening the system up to greater competence between private actors. The World has experienced a gradual liberalization of public national markets that was almost perceived as a natural process. But this other time thought never-ending process is experiencing serious difficulties. The global political panorama seems to be moving again towards the once forgotten nationalist ideologies; a fact that has brought back again the old host of economic protectionism to the front line of international public markets regulation. The present paper analyses the existing situation from a critical approach. Firstly, it carries out a study of the mechanisms and motives that lie behind populisms and its relationship with international law legitimacy and traditional procurement bias. Secondly, it signals the central role of GPA as the main international instrument to face neo-protectionism, and focuses on the subtle nature of most procurement barriers and how current review mechanism fail to both efficiently tackle potential infringements and to guarantee states’ autonomy. Finally, a proposal for reform is made as to the functioning of the GPA review mechanisms through the creation of a mixed review system.
References
ANDERSON, Robert D. and ARROWSMITH, Sue, The WTO regime on government procurement: past, present and future. In: ARROWSMITH, Sue and ANDERSON, Robert D. The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 3.
ANDERSON, Robert D.; MULLER, Ana C. The revised WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA): Key Design Features and Significance for Global Trade and Development. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 48, p. 949-1008, 2017. Available at: < https://www.law.georgetown.edu/international-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2018/05/48-4-The-Revised-WTO-Agreement-on-Government-Procurement-GPA.pdf>.
ARROWSMITH, Sue. The Revised Agreement on Government Procurement: Changesto the Procedural Rules and Other Transparency Provisions. In: ARROWSMITH, Sue and ANDERSON, Robert D. The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
AUBY, Jean-Bernard. Globalisation, Law and the State. 1st ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017
AYMERICH CANO, Carlos. La contratación pública en el TTIP. RVAP, 117, 2017, 19-41.
AZOULAI, Loïc and RITLENG, Dominique. Intégration européene et passions nsationales. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, n. 4, 2018, pp.721.
BALDWIN, Richard E.; EVENETT, Simon J. (ed.). COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2020
BALDWIN, Richard; EVENETT, Simon. The collapse of global trade, murky protectionism and the crisis: Recommendations for the G20. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2009.
BERGÉ, Jean-Sylvestre and HELLERINGER, Genevieve, Operating Law in a Global Context - Comparing, Combining and Prioritising. Oxford: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2017
BROBERG, Morten. The Preliminary Reference Procedure and Questions of International and National Law. Yearbook of European Law, vol. 28, n. 1, p. 362-389, 2009. Available at: < https://academic.oup.com/yel/article/28/1/362/1634246>..
BUTLER, Nicolette. Possible Improvements to The Framework of International Investment Arbitration. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol. 14, 2013, p. 632.
CARBONI, Chiara; IOSSA, Elisabetta and MATTERA, Gianpiero. Barriers to Public Procurement: A Review and Recent Patterns in the EU. Working Paper IEFE ‐ The Center for Research on Energy and Environmental, 92, 2017.
CAREY, Sean. Undivided Loyalties: is national identity an Obstacle to European integration?. European Union Politics, vol. 3, issue 4, p. 387-413, 2002. Available at: < https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116502003004001>
CASSESSE, Sabino. Il diritto globale. Torino: Einaudi, 2009.
CASTELLS, Manuel. The Power of Identity. 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 1997.
KUTLINA-DIMITROVA, Zornitsa. Why public procurement openness is more important now than ever. CEPR Policy Portal, 16 april 2020. Available at: < https://voxeu.org/article/why-public-procurement-openness-more-important-now-ever>.
CERNY, Philip G. Globalization and the End of Democracy. European Journal of Political Research, vol. 36, n. 1, 1999.
CHARRIS-BENEDETTI, Juan Pablo. The proposed Investment Court System: does it really solve the problems?. Revista Derecho del Estado, 42, 2.
CHENEVAL, Francis and NICOLAIDIS, Kalypso. The social construction of demoicracy in the European Union. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 16, issue 2, p. 235-260, 2017. Available at: < https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1474885116654696>.
CLERC, Evelyne. La mondialisation des marchés publics. BATSELÉ, Didier et al. (eds.), Les marchés publics à l'aube du XXIe siècle, Bruxelles: Bruylant, p. 141-194, 2000.
COLLINS, David A. Globalized Localism: Canada's Government Procurement Commitments under CETA. Journal of Transnational Dispute Management, n. 2, 2016.
CONSTANTINESCU, Cristina; MATTOO, Aaditya; RUTA, Michele. The Global Trade Slowdown: Cyclical or Structural?. International Monetary Found, vol. 15, n. 6, Jan. 2015. Available at: < https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp1506.pdf >.
CORVAGLIA, Maria Anna. TTIP Negotiations and Public Procurement: A Federalist Approach. Journal World Investment and Trade, vol. 19, n. 3, p. 392-414, 2017. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2958136>.
COTTIER, Thomas. Trade Policy in the Age of Populism: Why the New Bilateralism Will Not Work. Brexit: The International Legal Implications, Paper n 12, 2018.
COX, Michael. The Rise of Populism and the Crisis of Globalisation. Irish Studies in International Affairs, vol. 28, p. 9-17, 2017. Available at: < http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86880/7/Cox_Rise%20of%20populism%20published_2018.pdf>..
CRAIG, Paul. Shared Administration and Networks: Global and EU Perspectives. In: GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 81-116, 2011.
CRAIG, P. UK, EU and Global Administrative Law: Foundations and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
CRAIG, Paul. Brexit, A Drama: The Interregnum. Yearbook of European Law, vol. 36, n. 1, p. 3-45, 2017. Available at: <https://academic.oup.com/yel/article/doi/10.1093/yel/yex005/4562542>.
DALY, Paul. Reprendre le contrôle: ennuis et ironies (The Ironies of 'Taking Back Control'). Legal Studies Research Paper Series, n. 38, 2018. Available at: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3162560>.
DAMASIO, Antonio, R. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. London: Pantheon, 2010.
DAVIES, Arwel. The Evolving GPA. Lessons of Experience and Prospects for the Future. In: GEORGOPULOS, Aris C; HOEKMAN, Bernard; MAVROIDIS, Petros C. (eds.). The Internationalization of Government Procurement Regulation. Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2017, p. 23-55.
DAWAR, Kamala. The Government Procurement Agreement, the Most-Favored Nation Principle, and Regional Trade Agreements. In: GEORGOPULOS, Aris C; HOEKMAN, Bernard and MAVROIDIS, Petros C. The Internationalization of Government Procurement Regulation. Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2017, p. 113.
DELMAS MARTY, Mireille. Trois défis pour un droit mondial. Paris: Le Seuil, 1997.
DEZSŐ ZIEGLER, Tamás. TTIP and Its Public Criticism: Anti-Globalist Populism versus Valid Dangers. Studies in International Economics, 2016, vol. 2, n. 2, p. 19–51. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2930039>.
DÍAZ BRAVO, Enrique and RODRÍGUEZ LETELIER, Aníbal. Contratos administrativos en Chile. Santiago de Chile, RIL Editores, 2016.
DISDIER, Anne-Célia; FONTAGNÉ, Lionel; ENXHI, Tresa. Public Procurement- Related Protection: Insights from the Global Trade Alert Database. European Commission Technical Report 2017.
DUFFY-MEUNIER, Aurélie. Réflexions de nature constitutionnelle sur la loi sur le retrait du Royaume-Uni de l’Union européenne, l’European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, vol. 64, n. 4, 2018, p. 759-781.
EPSTEIN, Lee J. and KNIGHT, Jack. The Choices Justices Make. Washington DC: CQ Press, 1998.
ERIXON, Fredrik; SALLY, Razeen. Trade, Globalisation And Emerging Protectionism Since The Crisis. ECIPE Working Paper, n. 2, p. 2-20, 2010. Available at: < https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/174841/1/ecipe-wp-2010-02.pdf>.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Report from the Commission de réflexion pour la prévention des conflits d'intérêts dans La Vie Publish. Pour une nouvelle déontologie De la vie Publique. Presented to President Of the French Republic on 26 January 2011, p. 15. Available at: <https://www.hatvp.fr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Rapport-Commission-Sauve.pdf>
FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Poderes Salvajes: la crisis de la democracia constitucional. Madrid: Trotta, 2013.
FRIEDEN, Jeffry A. The Backlash Against Globalization and the Future of the International Economic Order. PATRICK, Diamond (ed.) The crisis of globalization: democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London and New York: IB Tauris, 2019, p. 133.
FUKUYAMA, Francis. The end of History and the Last Man. 1st ed. London: Penguin, 2012.
GAMBLE, Andrew. Globalization and the New Populism. PATRICK, Diamond (ed.) The crisis of globalization: democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London and New York: IB Tauris, 2019, pp. 90.
GERAPETRITIS, George. Affirmative Action: A New Challenge for Equality. In: GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 263-296, 2011.
GIDRON, Noam; HALL, Peter A. Populism as a Problem of Social Integration. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 53, n. 7, p. 1027-1059. Available at: < https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414019879947>.
GLEASON, Erin E. International Arbitral Appeals: What Are We So Afraid Of? Dispute Resolution Law Journal, vol. 7, 2007, p. 273-275.
GOLDMAN, David. Historial Aspects of Globalisation and Law. In: DAUVERGNE, Catherine (ed). Jurisprudence for an Interconnected Globe. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.
GORDON, Daniel I. GPA Institutional Provisions: Domestic Review Procedures & WTO Dispute Settlement. Symposium on the revised WTO agreement on government procurement. Geneva, September 2015.
GÓRSKI, Jędrzej. Public Procurement in 21st Century: Balancing Liberalisation, Social Values and Protectionism. Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Laws, The Chinese University of Hong Kong July 2016, p. 36
GRUSZCZYNSKI, Lukasz. The COVID-19 Pandemic and International Trade: Temporary Turbulence or Paradigm Shift?. European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 11, n. 2, p. 337-342, 2020. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3669017>.
HAMADA, Koichi. A Better Approach to Globalization. Yale Global Online, 2018. Available at: < https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/better-approach-globalization>.
HAMADA, Koichi. Why we need globalization. The Japan Times, 2018. Available at: <https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2018/05/03/commentary/japan-commentary/why-we-need-globalization/#.XJOTxi3FTOS>.
HARLOW, Carol; RAWLINGS, Hunter R. Promoting Accountability in Multilevel Governance: A Network Approach. European Law Journal, n. C-06-02, p. 542-652, 2007. Available at: <http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/typo3/site/fileadmin/wp/pdf/egp-connex-C-06-02.pdf>.
HAYES, Eric. TTIP: transatlantic free trade at last?. Global Affairs, vol. 1, n. 2, p. 113-120, 2015. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23340460.2015.1012914>.
HERNÁNDEZ GONZÁLEZ, José Ignacio. Las prerrogativas de la administración en los contratos de las administraciones públicas en Iberoamérica. In: RODRÍGUEZ-ARANA, Jaime; MORANDINI, Federico and FERNÁNDEZ CARBALLAL, Almudena. Contrataciones públicas en el marco de los derechos sociales fundamentales. Madrid : Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, 2017, pp. 67-100.
HERNÁNDEZ GONZÁLEZ, José Ignacio. El control de la Administración Pública a través del arbitraje internacional de inversiones. Barnés, Javier. (coord.) Entre tribunales: libro homenaje a Pablo García Manzano. Madrid: Cuatrecasas – Marcial Pons, 2018, pp. 239-269.
HERNÁNDEZ GONZÁLEZ, José Ignacio. El contrato administrativo en el derecho administrativo global: Una perspectiva Iberoamericana. In: ALCARAZ, Hubert and VERGARA BLANCO, Alejandro. Itinerario latinoamericano del derecho público francés. Tirant Lo Blanch, 2019, pp. 367-382.
HOEKMAN, Bernard; FIORINI, Matteo and YILDIRIM, 5 COVID-19: Export controls and international cooperation. In: BALDWIN, Richard E. and EVENETT, Simon J. COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, pp. 63-76.
HORVATH, Gunter J. and BERZERO, Roberta. Arbitrator and Counsel: The Double-Hat Dilemma. Transnational Dispute Management (TDM). 2017.
HUDSON, Josh, DAWSEY, J.; MEKHENNET, Souad. Trump expands battle with WHO far beyond aid suspension. The Washington Post, 26th April 2020.
HÜBNER, Denise C. The decentralized enforcement of European law: national court decisions on EU directives with and without preliminary reference submissions. Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 25, issue 12, 2018, p. 1817-1834. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501763.2017.1376701>.
INNERARITY, Daniel. El nuevo espacio público. Madrid: Espasa Libros, 2006.
KALDOR, Mary. Nationalism and Globalisation. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 10, n. 1-2, 2004, p. 161-177, Available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1354-5078.2004.00161.x>
KOETH, Wolfgang. Can the Investment Court System (ICS) save TTIP and CETA?. European Institute of Public Administration working paper, 2016/W/01
KEATING, Michael Europe’s Changing Political Landscape: Territorial Restructuring and New Forms of Government. In: BEAUMONT, Paul; LYONS, Carol and WALKER, Neil (eds), Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002.
KINGSBURY, Benedict, KRISCH, Nico; STEWART, Richard, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 68, n. 15, 2005.
KOETH, Wolfgang. Can the Investment Court System (ICS) save TTIP and CETA?. European Institute of Public Administration working paper, 2016/W/01.
KOOPMANS, Tim. Globalisation of Administrative Law—the European Experience. In: GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 393-406, 2011.
KUTLINA-DIMITROVA, Zornitsa. Government Procurement: Data, Trends And Protectionist Tendencies. DG Trade, issue 3, Sep. 2018. Available at: < https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/september/tradoc_157319.pdf>.
KUTLINA-DIMITROVA, Zornitsa; LAKATOS, Csilla. The Global Costs of Protectionism. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, n. 8277, Dec. 2017. Available at: < http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/962781513281198572/pdf/WPS8277.pdf>.
KYMLICKA, Will. Citizenship in an era of globalisation. In SHAPIRO, Ian and HACKER-GORDON, Casiano (eds), Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 88-111.
LAIRD, Ian; ASKEW, Rebecca. Finality versus Consistency: Does Investor State Arbitration Need an Appellate System?. The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, vol. 7, issue 2, 2005, p. 299. Available at: < https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1328&context=appellatepracticeprocess>.
LINARELLI, John. Global procurement law in times of crisis: new buy American policies and options in the WTO system. In: ARROWSMITH, S. and ANDERSON, R.D. The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 773-802.
MAIR, Peter. The europeanization dimensión. Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 11, issue 2, p. 337-348, 2004.
MALMSTRÖM, Cecilia. Concept Paper: Investment in TTIP And Beyond - The Path for Reform. European Commission, 2015.
MARCO, Dani; MENDES, Joana, MENENDEZ, Agustín José, WILKINSON, Michael, SCHEPEL, Harm. At the End of the Law: A Moment of Truth for the Eurozone and the EU. VerfBlog. Retrieved in 15th,2020. Available at: <https://verfassungsblog.de/at-the-end-of-the-law/>.
MEKHENNET, Souad. Trump expands battle with WHO far beyond aid suspension. The Washington Post, 26th April 2020
MILLER, Russell A. In Praise of Uncertainty: The Constitutional Court’s PSPP Decision. VerfBlog. Retrieved in June 4th, 2020. Available at: <https://verfassungsblog.de/in-praise-of-uncertainty/>.
MIRANZO DÍAZ, Javier. Causas y efectos de la corrupción en las sociedades democráticas. Revista de la Escuela Jacobea de Posgrado, n. 14, p. 1-26, jun. 2018. Available at: < https://www.jacobea.edu.mx/revista/numero14.php>
MIRANZO DÍAZ, Javier. Hacia la configuración de una estrategia eficiente de integridad en la contratación pública. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2020.
MORENO MOLINA, José Antonio. Derecho Global de la Contratación Pública. Ciudad de México: Ubijus, 2011.
MORENO MOLINA, José Antonio. El nuevo Derecho de la Contratación Pública de la Unión Europea: directivas 4.0. Oxford: Chartridge Books Oxford, 2015.
MORISON, John; GORDON, Anthony. The Place of Public Interest. In: GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 215-238, 2011.
MPEERA NTAYI, Joseph; NGOBOKA, Pascal; SABIITI KAKOOZA, Cornelia. Moral Schemas and Corruption in Ugandan Public Procurement. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 112, issue 3, p. 417-436, 2013. Available at: < https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-012-1269-7>.
ORTEGA, Luis. Global Citizenship and Global Legitimacy. GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 251-262, 2011.
PATRICK, Diamond. The Great Globalization Disruption: Democracy, Capitalism and Inequality in the Industrial World. PATRICK, Diamond (ed.) The crisis of globalization: democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London: IB Tauris, 2019, p. 31.
PICARD, Gabriel B. Legality and legitimacy in global administrative law. e-Pública, vol. II, n. 3, p. 215-229, dez. 2015. Available at: <https://www.e-publica.pt/volumes/v2n3/pdf/Vol.2-N%C2%BA3-Art.14.pdf>.
PÎRVU, Daniela; BÂLDAN, Cristina. Access to the EU Public Procurement Market: Are There Disparities Based on the Origin of Economic Operators?. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. XLVII, n. 3, p. 765-780, 2013. Available at: < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.2753/JEI0021-3624470309?scroll=top>.
RODI, Patricia. Populist Political Communication Going Mainstream? The Influence of Populist Parties on Centre-Left Parties in Western Europe. PATRICK, Diamond (ed.) The crisis of globalization: democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London and New York: IB Tauris, 2019, p. 167.
RODRÍGUEZ-ARANA MUÑOZ, Jaime. La Directiva Europea de Contratación Pública y la lucha contra la corrupción. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, Curitiba, v. 8, n. 1, p. 24-56, jan/abr. 2017.
RODRÍGUEZ-ARANA MUÑOZ, Jaime. The principles of the global law of public procurement. A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, ano 16, n. 65, p. 13-37, jul./set. 2016.
SARMIENTO, Daniel. Requiem for judicial dialogue – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Judgement in the Weiss case and its European implications. EU Law Live, n16, 2020.
SCHMIDT-AßMANN, Eberhard. Principles of an International Order of Information. In: GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 117-124, 2011.
SCHOENI, Daniel E. On the Non-tariff Barriers Obstructing Free Trade in the Transatlantic Defense Procurement Market. In: RACCA, Gabriela, and YUKINS, Christopher. Joint Public Procurement and Innovation: Lessons Across Borders. Brussels: Brulyant, p. 419-470, 2019.
SCHOLTE, Jan Aart. Global Civil Society. In: WOODS, Ngaire (ed), The Political Economy of Globalization. London: Macmillan, p. 173-201, 2000.
SCHOTT, Jeffrey J. and JUNG, Euijin. The WTO’s Existential Crisis: How to Salvage Its Ability to Settle Trade Disputes. S.L. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2019.
SCHOONER, Steven L. and YUKINS, Christopher R. Public Procurement: Focus on people, Value for Money and Systemic Integrity, Not Protectionism. In: BALDWIN, Richard and EVENETT, Simon (eds.). The Collapse of Global Trade, Murky Protectionism, and the Crisis: Recommendations for the G20. S.l.: VoxEU.org Publication, 2017. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1356170>.
SCHWARTZ, Joshua I. Procurement in times of crisis: lessons from US government procurement in three episodes of crisis in the twenty-first century. In: ARROWSMITH, S. and ANDERSON, Robert D. The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 773-802.
SMITH, Mitchell. State of Liberalization: Redefining the Public Sector in Integrated Europe. New York: State University of New York Press, 2005.
SOLOVEICIK, Deividas and SIMANSKIS, Karolis. The Evolving Concept of «Conflict of Interest» in the EU Public Procurement Law. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review (EPPPL), vol. 12, issue 2, p. 112-131, 2017. Available at: <https://epppl.lexxion.eu/article/EPPPL/2017/2/6
STEINBEIS, Maximilian. We Super-Europeans, VerfBlog. Retrieved May 8th, 2020. Available in: https://verfassungsblog.de/we-super-europeans/
TAGIURI, Giacomo. EU law and national belonging: Appeasing insiders while Resisting Nationalisms. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, n. 4, Dalloz, 2018, p. 743. Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342833586_The_tension_between_global_public_procurement_law_and_nationalistpopulist_tendencies_proposals_for_reform>.
TAMS, Christian J. Is There a Need for an ICSID Appellate Structure? In: Hofmann, Roald and Tams, Christian (eds.) The International Convention For The Settlement Of Investment Disputes: Taking Stock After 40 Years, Nomos: Baden Baden, 2007.
TRIONFETTI, Federico. Public Procurement, Market Integration, and Income Inequalities. Review of International Economics, vol. 9, issue 1, p. 29-41, 2001. Available at: < https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9396.00261>.
TRIPATHI, Rajeshwar. Concept of Global Administrative Law: An Overview. India Quarterly, vol. 67, issue 4, p. 355-372, 2011. Available at: < https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/097492841106700405>.
TSOUKALIS, Loukas. Brexit and Globalization: Collateral Damage or an Accident Waiting to Happen?. D. PATRICK, Diamond (ed.) The crisis of globalization: democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London and New York: IB Tauris, 2019.
UTTLEY, Mathew R.H.; HARTLEY, Keith. Public Procurement in the Single European Market: Policy and Prospects. European Business Review, vol. 94, n. 2, p. 3-7, 1944. Available at: < https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09555349410054132/full/html>.
WALKER, Neil. The shaping of global law, Transnational Legal Theory, vol. 8, n. 3, p. 360-370, 2017. Available at: < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20414005.2017.1398510>
WALKER, Neil. Populism and Constitutional Tension. University of Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper, vol. 18, n. 18, 2018. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3182359>.
WALKER, Neil. Sovereignty and Beyond: The Double Edge of External Constitutionalism. Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 57, issue 3, p. 799-820, 2018. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3057407>.
WOLFE, Robert. Exposing governments swimming naked in the COVID-19 crisis with trade policy transparency (and why WTO reform matters more than ever). In: BALDWIN, Richard E.; EVENETT, Simon J. COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, p. 165-178, 2020.
WOOLCOCK, Steve and HEILMAN GRIER, Jean. Public Procurement in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations. Paper No. 2 in the CEPS-CTR project “TTIP in the Balance’’ and CEPS Special Report No. 100, 2015. Available at: <https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/SR100PublicProcurementandTTIP.pdf>.
YUKINS, Christopher. Breaking The Impasse In The Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP) Negotiations: Rethinking Priorities In Procurement. The Government Contractor, vol. 56, n. 27, 2014. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2471653>.
YUKINS, Christopher R. The European Procurement Directives and The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP): Advancing U.S. - European Trade and Cooperation in Procurement. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper, n. 2014-15, 2014. Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2433219>.
YUKINS, Christopher. US Government Contracting in the Context of Global Public Procurement. In: GEORGOPULOS, Aris C; HOEKMAN, Bernard; MAVROIDIS, Petros C. The Internationalization of Government Procurement Regulation. Oxford Scholarship Online: p. 265-287, 2017.
YUKINS, Christopher. Withdrawing the United States from the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): Assessing Potential Damage to the U.S. and Its Contracting Community. The Government Contractor, vol. 62, n. 6, 2020. Available at: < https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2735&context=faculty_publications>
ZWART, Tom. Would International Courts be Able to Fill the Accountability Gap at the Global Level?. In: GORDON, Anthony; AUBY, Jean-Bernard; MORISON, John; ZWART, Tom (eds.). Values in Global Administrative Law. London: Hart Publishing, p. 193-214, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
