Open Journal Systems

Desintegração jurídica e uma teoria do Estado

William H. Clune

Resumo

Este artigo descreve uma topologia do pensamento jurídico e as condições sociais de que essa topologia, esse pensamento, é um componente. Propõe-se que o pensamento jurídico seja composto por um núcleo e uma periferia e que toda a estrutura corresponda aproximadamente à dicotômica e fragmentada economia política do moderno Estado de bem-estar social democrático. A parte I é uma descrição da estrutura do pensamento jurídico. Nesse sentido, considera-se que o pensamento jurídico possui um núcleo e uma periferia, ambos os quais interagem de maneiras que denomino transição e reintegração. O núcleo compreende um modelo de Tribunais, litigância e processos judiciais; um modelo de Direito Provado da ordem social; justificação ética; racionalidade interpretativa; e uma visão hegemônica da influência jurídica. A periferia, por sua vez, é composta pela legislação e diplomas; um modelo de Direito Público da ordem social; análise de política pública como racionalidade; interpretação jurídica positivista; e uma visão marginalista da influência jurídica. A parte II descreve a estrutura do Direito e a sua relação com a Economia política, incluindo as tendências em direção à reintegração nos aspectos periféricos da Economia política, enfatizando a cooperação social. A conclusão considera o lugar da prática jurídica tradicional em um novo panorama.

Palavras-chave

Filosofia do Direito; pensamento jurídico; teoria jurídica crítica; Economia Política; Teoria do Estado.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências

BARDACH, Eugene; KAGAN, Robert A. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982.

BOYLE, James. The Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Theory and Local Social Thought. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Pennsylvania, v. 133, n. 4, p. 685-780, 1985.

CALABRESI, Guido. A Common Law for the Age of Statutes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.

CLUNE, William H. A Political Model of Implementation and Implications of the Model for Public Policy, Research, and the Changing Roles of Law and Lawyers. Iowa Law Review, Iowa City, v. 69, p. 47-125, 1983.

CLUNE, William H. Institutional Choice as a Theoretical Framework for Research on Educational Policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 117–132, jun. 1987.

CLUNE, William H. Unreasonableness and Alienation in the Continuing Relationships of Welfare State Bureaucracy: From Regulatory Complexity to Economic Democracy. Wisconsin Law Review, Madison. v. 1985, p. 707-740, 1985.

CLUNE, William H.; PELT, Mark H. Van. A Political Method of Evaluating the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and the Several Gaps of Gap Analysis. Law and Contemporary Problems, Durham, v. 48, n. 1, p. 7-62, dec./feb. 1985.

CRIBBET, John Edward. Concepts in Transition: The Search for a New Definition of Property. University of Illinois Law Review, Champaign, [s.n.], n. 1, p. 1-42, 1986.

GOLDSTEIN, Joseph. Baby Doe: Problems and Legislative Proposals - Legislative Workshop. Arizona State Law Journal, Phoenix, p. 601-692, 1984.

GORDON, Robert. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 36, p. 57-125, 1984.

HANDLER, Alfred D. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. London: Harvard University Press, 1977.

HANDLER, Joel F. The Conditions of Discretion. [s.l.]: Russell Sage Foundation, 1986.

HECLO, Hugh. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.

HELLER, Thomas C. Structuralism and Critique. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 36, n. 1/2, p. 127-198, 1984.

JACOBS, Jane. Cities and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, 1984.

JAMES O’CONNOR, James. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1973.

KANTER, Rosabeth M. The Change Masters - Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation. New York: Simon Schuster, 1984.

KENNEDY, Duncan. Distributive and Paternalist Motives in Contract and Tort Law, with Special Reference to Compulsory Terms and Unequal Bargaining Power. Maryland Law Review, v. 41, n. 4, p. 563-658, 1982.

KENNEDY, Duncan. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication. Harvard Law Review, Cambridge, v. 89, n. 8, p. 1685-1778, 1976.

KENNEDY, Duncan. The political significance of the structure of the law school curriculum. Seton Hall Law Review, Newark, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-16, 1983.

KENNEDY, Duncan. The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries. Buffalo Law Review, Buffalo, v. 28, n. 2, p. 205-382, 1979.

KOMESAR, Neil K. Taking Institutions Seriously: Introduction to a Strategy for Constitutional Analysis. The University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, v. 51, n. 2, p. 366-446, 1984.

LUHMANN, Niklas. The Differentiation Of Society. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.

MACAULAY, Stewart. Images of law in everyday life: The lessons of school, entertainment and spectator sports. Madison: Institute for Legal Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School, 1986.

MASHAW, Jerry L. Positive Theory and Public Law. In: Rosenthal Lectures. [s.l.]: palestra proferida na Northwestern University Law School, arquivo do autor, fev. 1986.

MICHELMAN, Frank I. In Pursuit of Constitutional Welfare Rights: One View of Rawls’ Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Pennsylvania, v. 121, n. 5, p. 962-1019, 1973.

MICHELMAN, Frank I. On Protecting the Poor Through the Fourteenth Amendment. Harvard Law Review, Cambridge, v. 1, n. 1, p. 6-59, 1969.

OFFE, Claus. Contradictions of the Welfare State. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.

OFFE, Claus. Disorganized Capitalism: Contemporary Transformations of Work and Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.

OLSEN, Frances. Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis. Texas Law Review, Austin, v. 63, n. 3, p. 387-432, 1984.

PALAY, Thomas M. Comparative Institutional Economics: The Governance of Rail Freight Contracting. The Journal of Legal Studies, Chicago, v. 13, n. 2, p. 265-287, 1984.

PELLER, Gary; ACKERMAN, Bruce. The Politics of Reconstruction. Harvard Law Review, Cambridge, v. 98, n. 4, p. 863-881, 1985.

PETERS, Thomas J.; JR., Robert H. Waterman. In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best‐run companies. New York: Harper & Row, 1982.

PIORE, Michael; SABEL, Charles. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

POSNER, Richard. Statutory Interpretation in the Classroom and in the Courtroom. University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, v. 50, p. 800-822, 1983.

ROGERS, Joel. Divide and Conquer: The Legal Foundations of Postwar U.S. Labor Policy. In: JOERGES, Christian; TRUBEK, David M. (Orgs.). Critical Legal Thought: An American German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.

ROJAS, Fernando. Is Information Technology a Capitalist Tool for Further Subordinating Workers? Madison: Institute for Legal Studies - University of Wisconsin, 1987.

SCHLEGEL, John H. American Legal Theory and American Legal Education: A Snake Swallowing its Tail? In: TRUBEK, D.; JOERGES, C. (Orgs.). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.

SCHNEYER, Ted. Moral Philosophy’s Standard Misconception of Legal Ethics. Wisconsin Law Review, Madison, v. 1, p. 1529-1572, 1984.

SIMON, William H. Rights and Redistribution in the Welfare System. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 38, n. 6, p. 1431-1516, 1986.

SPARER, Edward V. Fundamental Human Rights, Legal Entitlements, and the Social Struggle: A Friendly Critique of the Critical Legal Studies Movement. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 36, n. 1/2, p. 509-574, 1984.

STEINER, Henry J. Moral Argument and Social Vision in the Courts: A Study of Tort Accident Law. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.

STONE, Katherine Van Wezel. Re-Envisioning Labor Law: A Response to Professor Finkin. Maryland Law Review, Baltimore, v. 45, n. 4, p. 978-1013, 1986.

SUGARMAN, Stephen D. Doing Away with Tort Law. California Law Review, Berkeley, v. 73, n. 3, p. 555-664, 1985.

TAYLOR, Serge. Making Bureaucracies Think: The Environmental Impact Statement Strategy of Administrative Reform. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1984.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg. Law & Society Review, New Jersey, v. 18, n. 2, p. 291-301, 1984.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law & Society Review, New Jersey, v. 17, n. 2, p. 239-286, 1983.

WHITE, G. Edward. From Realism to Critical Legal Studies: A Truncated Intellectual History. Southwestern Law Journal, Los Angeles, v. 40, n. 2, p. 819-843, 1986.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v8i1.82326