Open Journal Systems

The expressive function of constitutional amendment rules

Richard Albert

Resumo

The current scholarly focus on informal constitutional amendment has obscured the continuing relevance of formal amendment rules. In this article, I return our attention to formal amendment in order to show that formal amendment rules—not formal amendments but formal amendment rules themselves—perform an underappreciated function: to express constitutional values. Drawing from national constitutions, in particular the Canadian, South African, German, and United States constitutions, I illustrate how constitutional designers may deploy formal amendment rules to create a formal constitutional hierarchy that reflects special political commitments. That formal amendment rules may express constitutional values is both a clarifying and a complicating contribution to their study. This thesis clarifies the study of formal amendment rules by showing that such rules may serve a function that scholars have yet to attribute to them; yet it complicates this study by indicating that the constitutional text alone cannot prove whether the constitutional values expressed in formal amendment rules represent authentic or inauthentic political commitments.

Palavras-chave

constitutional amendment rules; formal amendment rules; constitutional values; constitutional hier-archy; formal entrenchment

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências

ACKERMAN, Bruce. We the People 1: Foundations. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1998.

ACKERMAN. Bruce, We the People 2: Transformations. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1998.

ACKERMAN, Bruce A. Transformative Appointments. Havard Law Review, Cambridge, vol. 101, n. 6, 1988.

ALBERT, Richard. Constitutional Handcuffs. Arizona State Law Journal, Tempe, vol42, n. 3, 2010.

ALEXANDER, Larry. Constitutions, Judicial Review, Moral Rights, and Democracy: Disentan-gling the Issues. In: HUSCROFT, Gran. (Org.). Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitu-tional Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008

AMAR, Akhil Reed. Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V. Univer-sity of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, vol. 55, n. 4, 1988.

ANDREWS, William G. Constitutions and Constitutionalism. 2 ed.New York: D Van Norstand Company, 1963.

BARBER, Benjamin R. Constitutional Rights—Democratic Instrument or Democratic Obstacle? In: LICHT, Robert A (Org.). The Framers and Fundamental Rights.Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1992.

BARK, Dennis L; GRESS, David R. A History of West Germany: From Shadow to Substance 1945–1963. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1989.

BEATTY, David M. The Ultimate Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

BENDA, Ernst. The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law). SMU Law Review, Dallas, vol.53, n.2, 2000.

BOUDREAUX, Donald J; PRITCHARD A C. Rewriting the Constitution: An Economic Analysis of the Constitutional Amendment Process. Fordham Law Review, New York, vol62, n. 1, 1993.

BOGNETTI, Giovanni. The Concept of Human Dignity in European and US Constitutionalism. In: NOLTE, Georg (Org.). European and US Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi-ty Press, 2005.

BRESLIN, Beau. From Words to Worlds: Exploring Constitutional Functionality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.

BURGESS, John W. Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law I: Sovereignty and Liberty. Boston: Ginn & Co, 1893.

CASSEL, Doug. Honduras: Coup d’Etat in Constitutional Clothing?—Revision, American Society of International Law, Washington, DC, vol.13, n.9, 2009.

Civil Administration Division, Office of Military Government for Germany (US), Draft Basic Law: Passed in First Reading in Nov/Dec 1948.15 January 1949.

COAN, Andrew B. The Irrelevance of Writtenness in Constitutional Interpretation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Philadelphia, vol.158, n.4, 2010.

COLLETT, Teresa Stanton. Judicial Independence and Accountability in an Age of Unconstitu-tional Constitutional Amendments.Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Chicago, vol.41, n.2, 2010

COLÓN-RÍOS, Joel I. Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Con-stituent Power. London: Routledge, 2012.

CONGLETON, Roger D. Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

CONTIADES, Xenophon; FOTIADOU, Alkmene. Models of Constitutional Change. In:

CONTIADES, Xenophon (Org.). Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA.New York: Routledge, 2013.

Counterinsurgency and Constitutional Design (Note) Havard Law Review, Cambridge, vol. 121, n.6, 2008.

CURRIE, David P. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

DELLINGER, Walter. The Legitimacy of Constitutional Change: Rethinking the Amendment Pro-cess. Havard Law Review, Cambridge, vol. 97, n.2, 1983.

DELLINGER, Walter. The Amending Process in Canada and the United States: A Comparative Perspective. Law and contemporary problems, Durham, vol. 45, n.4, 1982.

DENNING, Brannon P. Means to Amend: Theories of Constitutional Change. Tennessee Law Re-view, Tennessee, vol.65, n.155, p.180–209, 1997.

DENNING, Brannon P; VILE, John R. The Relevance of Constitutional Amendments: A Re-sponse to David Strauss. Tulane Law Review, New Orleans, vol 77, n.1, 2002.

DIXON, Rosalind;HOLDEN, Richard. Constitutional Amendment Rules: The Denominator Prob-lem. In GINSBURG, Tom (Org.). Comparative Constitutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

DIXON, Rosalind. Constitutional Amendment Rules: A Comparative Perspective. In: GINSBURG, Tom.DIXON, Rosalind (Org.). Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Ed-ward Elgar, 2011.

Document 7: The Signing and Proclamation of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz), 23 May 1949. In: SCHWEITZER, Carl-Christoph [et al] (Org.). Politics and Government in Germany, 1944–1994: Basic Documents. Providence: Berghahn Books, 1995.

DR Congo Backs New Constitution. 12 January 2006. BBC News Service. Available at: .

EBERLE, Edward J. Equality in Germany and the United States. San Diego International Law Journal, San Diego, vol.10, n.1, 2008.

EBERLE, Edward J. The German Idea of Freedom. American University International Law Re-view, Whasington, D.C, vol. 10, n. 1, 2008.

EBERLE, Edward J. Public Discourse in Contemporary Germany. Case Western Reserve Law Re-view, Cleveland, vol 47, n. 3, 1997.

ELSTER, Jon. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Con-straints.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

ELSTER, Jon. Constitutionalism in Eastern Europe: An Introduction. University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, vol. 52, n.2, 1991

ELSTER, Jon. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

FALLON, Richard H. Strict Judicial Scrutiny. UCLA Law Review, Los Angeles, vol.54, n.5, 2007

FARRAND, Max (Org.). The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, revised ed. vol.1. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966

FINER, SE; BOGDANOR, Vernon; RUDDEN Bernard. Comparing Constitutions. Oxford: Clar-endon Press, 1995.

FISCH, William B. Constitutional Referendum in the United States of America, American Journal Comparative Law (supplement), Ann Arbor, vol. 54, n.4 p.485, 490-491, 2006.

FLEMING, James E. We the Unconventional American People. University of Chicago Law Re-view, Chicago, vol. 65, n.4 1998.

FLETCHER, George P. Our Secret Constitution: How Lincoln Redefined American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

FOX, Gregory H; NOLTE, Georg. Intolerant Democracies. Havard International Law Journal, Cambridge, vol.36, n.1, 1995.

FRIEDMAN, Barry; SMITH, Scott B. The Sedimentary Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Philadephia, vol.147, p.1-45, 1998

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, ed and translated by Garrett Barden & John Cum-ming. New York: Crossroad, 1988.

GALSTON, Miriam. Theocracy in America: Should Core First Amendment Values be Permanent? Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, San Francisco, vol. 37, n. 1, 2009.

GARDBAUM, Stephen. The Myth and the Reality of American Constitutional Exceptionalism. Michigan Law Review,Ann Arbor, vol. 107, n.3, 2008.

GARNER, Bryan A. Modern American Usage, 3 ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

GATHII, James Thuo. Popular Authorship and Constitution Making: Comparing and Contrasting the DRC and Kenya.William & Mary Law Review, Williamsburg, vol. 49, n.4, 2008.

GERKEN, Heather K. The Hydraulics of Constitutional Reform: A Skeptical Response to Our Undemocratic Constitution. Drake Law Review, Des Moines, vol. 55, n. 925, p.929-33, 2007.

GINSBURG, Tom; POSNER, Eric A. Subsconstitutionalism. Stanford Law Review, California, vol. 62, p.1583-1600, 2010.

GINSBURG, Tom. Written Constitutions and the Administrative State: On the Constitutional Character of Administrative Law. In: ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan; LINDSETH Peter L (Org.). Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010.

GLENDON, Mary Ann. Abortion and Divorce in Western Law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Uni-versity Press, 1987.

GOERLICH, Helmut. Fundamental Constitutional Rights: Content, Meaning and General Doc-trines. In: KARPEN, Ulrich (Org.). The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany: Essays on the Basic Rights and Principles of the Basic Law with a Translation of the Basic Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988.

GREY, Thomas C. The Constitution as Scripture. Stanford Law Review, California, vol. 37, n.1, 1984.

GRIFFIN, Stephen M. Constituent Power and Constitutional Change in American Constitutional-ism. In: LOUGHLIN, Martin; WALKER, Neil (Org.). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constit-uent Power and Constitutional Form. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

GRIFFIN, Stephen M. The Nominee is ... Article V. Constitutional Commentary, Minneapolis, vol. 12, n.2, p.171-172,1995.

GUINS, George C. Towards an Understanding of Soviet Law. Soviet Studies, Glasgow, vol 7, n.1, 1955

HART, Vivien. Democratic Constitution Making. United States Institute of Peace Special Report 1 at 4. 2003. Special report 107. Available at: < http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/sr107.pdf>.

HENNETTE-VAUCHEZ, Stéphanie. A Human Dignitas? Remnants of the Ancient Legal Con-cept in Contemporary Dignity Jurisprudence. International Journal of Constitutional Law, New York, vol.9, n.1, 2011.

HEUN, Werner. The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011.

HOGG, Peter W. Formal Amendment of the Constitution of Canada. Law and contemporary prob-lems, Durham, vol. 55, n.1, 1992.

HOGG, Peter W. Constitutional Law of Canada. 5. ed. Toronto: Carswell, 2012

HOLMES, Stephen; SUNSTEIN Cass R. The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Eu-rope. In: LEVINSON, Sanford (Org.). Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

HOWARD, AE Dick. The Essence of Constitutionalism. In: THOMPSON, Kenneth W; LUDWIKOWSKI, Rett R (Org.). Constitutionalism and Human Rights: America, Poland, and France. London: University Press of America, 1991

HURLEY, James Ross. Amending Canada’s Constitution: History, Processes, Problems and Pro-spects.Ottawa: Canada Communication Group, 1996.

JACOBSOHN, Gary Jeffrey. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2010.

JEFFERY, Charlie. Dimensions of Constitutional Change: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared. In: in GUNLICKS, Arthur B (Org.). German Public Policy and Federalism: Current Debates on Political, Legal, and Social Issues. New York: Berghahn Books, 2003

KAHANA, Tsvi. Canada.In: OLIVER, Dawn; FUSARO, Carlo (Org.). How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011.

KEITH, Linda Camp. Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977–1996): Are They More Than Mere ‘Window Dressing?’” Political Research Quarterly, New York, vol. 55, n.1, 2002.

KLARMAN, Michael J. Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Acker-man’s Theory of Constitutional Moments.Stanford Law Review, Stanford, vol. 44, n. 3, 1992.

KLEIN, Claude; SAJÓ, András. Constitution-Making: Process and Substance. In: ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András. (Org.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

KLEIN, Eckart. Human Dignity in German Law. In: KRETZMER, David; KLEIN, Eckart (Org.). The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law Internation-al, 2002.

KOMMERS, Donald P. German Constitutionalism: A Prolegomenon. Emory Law Journal, Atlan-ta, vol.40, n.3, 1991.

KOMMERS, Donald P. The Constitutional Law of Abortion in Germany: Should Americans Pay Attention? Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy. Washington, D.C, vol.10, 1994.

KOMMERS, Donald P; MILLER, Russell A. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 3 ed. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.

KRAMER, Larry. What’s a Constitution for Anyway? Of History and Theory, Bruce Ackerman and the New Deal. Case Western Reserve Law Review, Cleveland, vol. 46, n.3,1996.

KU, Raymond. Consensus of the Governed: The Legitimacy of Constitutional Change. Fordham Law Review, New York, vo. 64, n.2, 1995.

KYVIG, David E. Arranging for Amendment: Unintended Outcomes of Constitutional Design. In: KYVIG, David E. (Org.). Unintended Consequences of Constitutional Amendment. Athens: Univeristy of Georgia Press, 2000

LAJOIE, Andrée; QUILLINAN, Henry. Emerging Constitutional Norms: Continuous Judicial Amendment of the Constitution—The Proportionality Test as a Moving Target. Law and contem-porary problems, Durham, vol. 55, n.1, 1992.

LANDAU, David. Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review, Davis, vol.47, [forthcom-ing], 2013.

LANE, Jan-Erik. Constitutions and Political Theory, 2 ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011.

LAW, David S. Constitutions.In: CANE, Peter; KRITZER, Herbert M (Org.). The Oxford Hand-book of Empirical Legal Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

LAW, David S; VERSTEEG, Mila. The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism. Cali-fornia Law Review, Berkeley, vol.99, n.5, 2011.

LAW, David S; VERSTEEG, Mila. Sham Constitutions. California Law Review, Berkeley, vol. 101, n.4, 2013.

LERNER, Max. Constitution and Court as Symbols.The Yale Law Journal, Danvers, vol.46, n.8, 1937.

LEVINSON, Sanford. Designing an Amendment Process. In: FEREJOHN, John; RAKOVE, Jack N.;RILEY, Jonathan. (Orgs.) Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

LEVINSON, Sanford. Do Constitutions Have a Point?: Reflections on ‘Parchment Barriers’ and Preambles. Social Philosophy & Policy, Cambridge, vol.28, n.1, 2011.

LEVINSON, Sanford (Org.). Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitu-tional Amendment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

LEVINSON, Sanford. Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It), 2 ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

LEVINSON, Sanford. The Political Implications of Amending Clauses. Constitutional Commen-tary, Minneapolis, vol. 13, n. 1, 1996.

LEVINSON, Sanford. The Constitution’ in American Civil Religion. Supreme Court Review, Chi-cago, vol. 123,1979.

LIJPHART, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries.New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.

LOEWENSTEIN, Karl. Reflections on the Value of Constitutions in Our Revolutionary Age. In: ZURCHER, Arnold J (Org.). Constitutions and Constitutional Trends Since World War II. New York: New York University Press, 1951.

LUTZ, Donald S. Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment. American Political Science Re-view, Denton, vol. 88, n.2, p. 355- 364, 1994.

LUTZ, Donald S. Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment. In: LEVINSON, Sanford (Org.). Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

MADISON, James. The Federalist No. 43. In: COOKE, Jacob E (Org.). The Federalist. Mid-dletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1961.

MAHLMANN, Matthias. The Basic Law at 60—Human Dignity and the Culture of Republican-ism. German Law Journal, Lexington, vol. 11, n.1, 2010.

MALKIN, Elisabeth, Honduran President Is Ousted In Coup. New York Times, 29 June 2009.Available at: .

MASSEY, Calvin. The New Formalism: Requiem for Tiered Scrutiny? Pennsylvania Constitution-al Law Review, Philadephia, vol. 6, n.5, 2004.

MCALLISTER, Marc Chase. Human Dignity and Individual Liberty in Germany and the United States as Examined Through Each Country’s Leading Abortion Cases Tulsa Journal of Compara-tive and International Law, Tulsa, vol.11, n.2, 2004.

MICHELMAN, Frank I. The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction. In: GINSBURG, Tom. DIXON, Rosalind (Org.). Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Ed-ward Elgar, 2011.

MÖLLERS, Christoph. Democracy and Human Dignity: Limits of Moralized Conception of Rights in German Constitutional Law. The Israel Law Review, Cambridge, vol.42, n.2, 2009.

MORIN, Jacques-Yvan; WOEHRLING, José. Les constitutions du Canada et du Québec: du régime français à nos jours, t 1–2, 2. ed. Montreal: Éditions Thémis, 1994.

MURPHY, Walter F. An Ordering of Constitutional Values.Southern California Law Review, Los Angeles, vol. 53, n.2, 1980.

MURPHY, Walter. Constitutions, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. In: GREENBERG, Douglas [et al] (Org.). Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

MURPHY, Walter F. Slaughter-House, Civil Rights, and Limits on Constitutional Change. The American Journal of Jurisprudence,South Bend, vol. 32, 1987.

MURPHY, Walter F. The Art of Constitutional Interpretation: A Preliminary Showing. In: HARMON, M Judd (Org.). Essays on the Constitution of the United States. Port Washington: Kennikat Press, 1978

NEGRETTO, Gabriel L. Toward a Theory of Formal Constitutional Change: Mechanisms of Con-stitutional Adaptation in Latin America. In:NOLTE, Detlef; SCHILLING-VACAFLOR Almut (Org.). New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.

O’KANE, Rosemary HT. Paths to Democracy: Revolution and Totalitarianism. London: Routledge, 2004.

OGENDO, HWO Okoth. Constitutions Without Constitutionalism: Reflections on an African Polit-ical Paradox. GREENBERG, Douglas [et al] (Org.). Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transi-tions in the Contemporary World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

OLIVER, Peter. Canada, Quebec, and Constitutional Amendment.University of Toronto Law Journal,Toronto, vol. 49, n.4, 1999.

ORGAD, Liav. The Preamble in Constitutional Interpretation. International Journal of Constitu-tional Law, New York, vol.8, n.4, 2010.

PELLETIER, Benoît. La modification constitutionnelle au Canada. Scarborough: Carswell, 1996.

PELLETIER, Benoît. Les modalités de la modification de la Constitution du Canada.Revue Juridique Thémis,Montréal, vol.33, 1999.

PREUSS, Ulrich K. The Implications of ‘Eternity Clauses: The German Experience. Israel Law Review, Cambridge, vol. 44, n. 3, 2011.

PRIMUS, Richard A. When Should Original Meanings Matter? Michigan Law Review,Ann Arbor vol. 107, n.2, 2008.

RASCH, Bjørn Erik; CONGLETON, Roger D. Amendment Procedures and Constitutional Stabil-ity. In CONGLETON, Roger D; SWEDENBORG, Birgitta (Org.) Democratic Constitutional De-sign and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2006.

RATLIFF, William. “Understanding the Mess in Honduras” Forbes, 28 September 2009, Available at:

RAY, S.N. Modern Comparative Politics: Approaches, Methods and Issues, 3d. Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India, 2004.

RESS, Georg. The Constitution and the Requirements of Democracy in Germany. In: STARCK, Christian (Org.). New Challenges to the German Basic Law: The German Contributions to the Third World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law. Baden-Baden: No-mos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1991.

RÖSLER, Hannes. Harmonizing the German Civil Code of the Nineteenth Century with a Modern Constitution—The Lüth Revolution 50 Years Ago in Comparative Perspective. Tulane European & Civil Law Forum, New Orleans, vol. 23, n.1, 2008

ROSENBERG, Gerald N. The Unconventional Conventionalist. Green Bag, Washington, DC, vol 2, n.2, 1999.

ROTH, Kenneth. Depots Masquerading as Democrats. In: Human Rights Watch. World Report (2008). Available at:

web.pdf>.

RUBENFELD, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Ha-ven: Yale University Press, 2001.

SAGER, Lawrence G. The Birth Logic of a Democratic Constitution. In: RAKOVE, Jack N.;RILEY, Jonathan. (Orgs.) Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

SAJÓ, András. Limiting Government: An Introduction to Constitutionalism.New York: Central Eu-ropean University Press, 1999.

SAMAHA, Adam M. Dead Hand Arguments and Constitutional Interpretation. Columbia Law Re-view, New York, vol. 108, n. 1, p.606-618, 2008.

SARTORI, Giovanni. Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion.American Political Science Re-view, Denton, vol.56, n.4, 1962.

SARTORI, Giovanni. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incen-tives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press, 1994

SCHAUER, Frederick. Deliberating About Deliberation.Michigan LawReview,Ann Arbor, vol. 90, n.6, 1992.

SCHEFFLER, Samuel. Equality and Tradition: Questions of Value in Moral and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

SCHEUERMAN, William E. Constitutionalism in an Age of Speed. Constitutional Commentary, Minneapolis, vol. 19, n. 2, 2002.

SCHMITT, Carl Schmitt, Constitutional Theory. ed and translated by Jeffrey Seitzer.Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.

SCHMITT, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy. ed and translated by Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.

SCHNEIER, Edward. Crafting Constitutional Democracies: The Politics of Institutional Design. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.

SCHWARTZBERG, Melissa. Democracy and Legal Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

SCOTT, Stephen A. Pussycat, Pussycat or Patriation and New Constitutional Amendment Process-es.Western Journal of Legal Studies, London, CA, vol.20, 1982.

SHERRY, Suzanna. The Ghost of Liberalism Past. Havard Law Review, Cambridge, vol. 105, n.4, 1992.

SMITH, Douglas G. An Analysis of Two Federal Structures: The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.San Diego Law Review, San Diego, vol.34, n.1, 1997.

SMITH, Craig T; FETZER, Thomas. The Uncertain Limits of the European Court of Justice’s Au-thority: Economic Freedom Versus Human Dignity. Columbia Journal of European Law, New York, vol.10, n.3, 2004.

SONTHEIMER, Kurt, Principles of Human Dignity in the Federal Republic. In: KIRCHHOF; Paul; KOMMERS, Donald P (Org.). Germany and its Basic Law: Past, Present, and Future—A German–American Symposium. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993.

STARCK, Christian. Constitutional Definition and Protection of Rights and Freedoms. In:STARK, Christian (Org.). Rights, Institutions and Impact of International Law According to the German Basic Law: The Contributions of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Second World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1987.

STARCK, Christian. Human Rights and Private Law in German Constitutional Development and in the Jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court.In: FRIEDMANN, Daniel; BARAK-EREZ, Daphne (Org.). Human Rights in Private Law. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2001.

STRAUSS, David A. The Living Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

STRAUSS, David A. The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments. vol. 114, n.5 Harvard Law Review, Cambridge, p.1457-1460, 2001.

SUBER, Peter. The Paradox of Self-Amendment: A Study of Logic, Law, Omnipotence, and Change. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.

SULLIVAN, Kathleen. Constitutional Amendmentitis. The American Prospect. Fall, 1995. Availa-ble at: < http://prospect.org>

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. New York: Oxford Universi-ty Press, 2001.

SUNSTEIN. Cass R. On the Expressive Function of Law. European Constitutional Law Review, Cambridge, vol.5, n.1, 1996.

TAYLOR, Greg. The Horizontal Effect of Human Rights Provisions, the German Model and Its Applicability to Common-Law Jurisdictions. King’s College Law Journal, London, vol.13, n.2, 2002.

The Economist Intelligence Unit. Democracy Index 2012: Democracy at a Standstill (2013) at 8 The Economist Available at: .

TRIBE, Laurence H. Taking Text and Structure Seriously: Reflections on Free-Form Method in Constitutional Interpretation. Havard Law Review, Cambridge, vol 198, n.6, 1995.

TROPER, Michel. Sovereignty. In: ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András. (Org.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012

TUSHNET, Mark. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.

VAROL, Ozan O. Temporary Constitutions.California Law Review, Berkeley, vol. 102, [forthcom-ing in 2014]

VILE, John R. Contemporary Questions Surrounding the Constitutional Amending Process. Westport: Praeger, 1993.

ZHANG, Qianfan. A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? The Paths of Constitutional Devel-opment in China. International Journal of Constitutional Law, New York, vol. 8, n.4, 2010.

WALKER, Geoffrey de Q. The Rule of Law: Foundation of Constitutional Democracy. Carlton: Melbourne University Press, 1988.

WALSH, Frank M. The Honduran Constitution is Not a Suicide Pact: The Legality of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya’s Removal. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Athens, vol. 38, n.2, 2010.

WALTER, Christian. Human Dignity in German Constitutional Law.In: European Commission for Democracy Through Law, The Principle of Respect for Human Dignity (1998), available at:

WEBBER, Jeremy. Reimagining Canada: Language, Culture, Community, and the Canadian Constitution. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1994.

WOERHLING, José. Les aspects juridiques de la redéfinition du statut politique et constitutionnel du Québec.Revue Québécoise de Droit International,Quebec, vol.7, n. 1, 1991–1992.

WOLF-PHILLIPS, Leslie. Introduction. In WOLF-PHILLIPS, Leslie (Org.). Constitutions of Modern States: Selected Texts and Commentary. New York: Praeger, 1968.

YOSHINO, Kenji. The New Equal Protection. Havard Law Review, Cambridge, vol. 124, n.3, 2011.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i1.43100