AÇÃO DE ESTUDANTES ENVOLVIDOS EM PRÁTICAS DE ORÇAMENTO PARTICIPATIVO DAS ESCOLAS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/jpe.v18i1.96046

Palavras-chave:

Políticas educacionais, Orçamento Participativo das Escolas, Ação de estudantes

Resumo

O artigo examina o Orçamento Participativo das Escolas (OPE) como uma prática importante que oferece aos alunos a oportunidade de mostrar seu papel de agente, ou seja, a capacidade de influenciar estruturas e instituições sociais. O objetivo do estudo é examinar as manifestações da ação dos alunos que participam do OPE. A base empírica do estudo inclui os resultados de uma pesquisa de 670 alunos das classes 7-11, realizada de maio a outubro de 2023 em 32 regiões da Rússia. O questionário continha perguntas sobre práticas específicas nas quais os alunos participaram. O nível de ação foi determinado usando uma metodologia especialmente desenvolvida para avaliar a ação dos alunos em diferentes áreas. Os resultados mostraram que o nível de ação dos alunos está intimamente relacionado ao seu envolvimento no OPE. Quanto maior o nível de ação, maior o grau de envolvimento no orçamento. No entanto, o alto nível de atuação e o grau máximo de envolvimento são característicos de apenas uma pequena porcentagem dos entrevistados. Os principais motivos para a participação dos alunos no OPE são o desenvolvimento pessoal, a aquisição de novas competências, conhecimentos e mobilidade social. Os participantes do OPE com o maior nível de ação muitas vezes procuram mudanças nas práticas e regulamentos existentes, bem como a implementação de projetos socialmente significativos destinados a melhorar a vida da comunidade escolar.

Biografia do Autor

Mikhail Goshin, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Russian Federation

Doutor em Química. Professor Associado, pesquisador do centro Pinsky de Educação Geral e Extracurricular, Instituto de Educação, Escola Superior de Economia da Universidade Nacional de pesquisa (HSE). Federação Russa. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7251-3938. E-mail: m.goshin@mail.ru

Boris Kupriyanov, Universidade de Moscou

Doutor em Pedagogia. Professor. Investigador Principal do centro de Orçamento de iniciativa, investigação Instituto financeiro do Ministério das Finanças da Federação Russa. Professor da cadeira de Pedagogia da Universidade da cidade de Moscou. Federação Russa. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-6056. E-mail: bvkupriyanov@yandex.ru

Pavel Sorokin, Universidade Nacional de pesquisa

Doutoramento em Sociologia. Professor Associado, pesquisador líder, chefe do Laboratório de pesquisa em Capital humano e Educação, Instituto de Educação, Escola Superior de Economia da Universidade Nacional de pesquisa (HSE). Federação Russa. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-2090. E-mail: psorokin@hse.ru

Referências

ABEBE, Tatek. Reconceptualising children’s agency as continuum and interdependence. Social Sciences, v. 8(3), 2019, p. 81.

ARCHER, Margaret S. Social Morphogenesis and the Prospects of Morphogenic Society. In: ARCHER, M. (eds) Social Morphogenesis. Springer, Dordrecht, 2013.

BANDURA, Albert. Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on psychological science, v. 13(2), 2018, p. 130-136.

BARTLETT, Tara; SCHUGURENSKY, Daniel. Reinventing Freire in the 21st Century: Citizenship Education, Student Voice and School Participatory Budgeting. Current Issu in Comparative Education, v. 23(2), 2021, pp. 55–79.

BARTLETT, Tara; SCHUGURENSKY, Daniel. Inclusive civic education and school democracy through participatory budgeting. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, April 2023.

BØRHAUG, Frédérique Brossard, WEYRINGER Sieglinde. Developing critical and empathic capabilities in intercultural education through the VaKE approach. Intercultural Education, 2019, n. 30, p. 1–14.

CAVAZZONI, Federica, FIORINI, Alec, & VERONESE, Guido. How do we assess how agentic we are? A literature review of existing Instruments to evaluate and measure individuals’ Agency. Social Indicators Research, n. 59, 2021, p. 1125–1153.

COOK-SATHER, Alison. Student Voice across Contexts: Fostering Student Agency in Today’s Schools. Theory Into Practice, 2019.

COOK-SATHER, Alison. Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 2006, v. 36(4), p. 359–390.

CRUM, Thea, FAYDASH, Katherine. Youth Citizenship in Action - Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Schools Pilot (Rep.). Great Cities Institute, 2018.

DOBRYAKOVA Maria S., YURCHENKO Olesya V. Independence and Agency of Schoolchildren: Distinguishing Concepts. Sociologicheskie issledovanija [Sociological studies], n. 11, 2023, p. 80-92.

ESTEBAN Marta Beatriz, NOVELLA Ana María, MARTÍNEZ Miquel. Principle of progressive autonomy, participation, and recognition of agency. Substantive citizenship in the transition from childhood to adolescence. Foro de Educación, v. 20(1), 2022, p. 134–157.

GIBBS Norman P., BARTLETT Tara, SCHUGURENSKY Daniel. Does School Participatory Budgeting Increase Students’ Political Efficacy? Bandura’s ‘Sources’, Civic Pedagogy, and Education for Democracy. Curriculum and Teaching, v. 36(1), 2021, p. 5–27.

GURDAL, Sevtap, SORBRING, Emma. Children’s Agency in Parent–Child, Teacher–Pupil and Peer Relationship Contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, n. 13, 2018, p. 1565239

FLIGSTEIN, Neil, MCADAM, Doug. Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, v. 29(1), 2011, p. 1–26.

GOLDFRANK, Benjamin, SCHUGURENSKY, Daniel. Participatory Budgeting, Civic Education, and Political Capital. Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, 2019, p. 1–6.

HOGGETT, Paul. Agency, Rationality and Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy, v. 30(1), 2001, p. 37-56.

HOPWOOD, Nick & SANNINO, Annalisa (Eds.), Agency and transformation: Motives, mediation, and motion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.

KUPRIYANOV, Boris V. Diagnostics of School Involvement of Learners Included in the Practice of Participatory Budgeting. Integration of Education, v. 27(1), 2023, p. 119–130. doi:

LEHTONEN, Pauliina, RADZIK-MARUSZAK, Katarzyna. Inclusion as ownership in participatory budgeting: facilitators’ interpretations of public engagement of children and youth. Critical Policy Studies, 2023.

MANYUKHINA, Yana. Children’s agency in the National Curriculum for England: a critical discourse analysis. Education 3-13, n. 50, 2022, p. 506–520.

MICHALOS, Alex C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, v. 171, 2014.

DA MOTA, Marcus Vinícius Guedes, DOS SANTOS SILVA, Ricardo. Humanistic education and Participatory Budget - Possible Application in Mirandela and Bragança Teaching Units. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, 2021, p. e8310413811.

NOVELLA CAMARA, Ana María, CRESPO TORRES, Ferran, POSE PORTO, Héctor. Meetings Between Professionals for the Inclusion of Children in Citizen Participation: A Formative Experience. Social Inclusion, v. 10(2), 2022, p. 19-31.

OSWELL, David. The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

PARDO-BENEYTO, Gonzalo, ABELLÁN-LÓPEZ, María Ángeles. Participatory budgeting for young people as democratic socialisation: An approach to the case of Spain. Children & Society, v. 37(5), 2023, p. 1555–1575.

Partnership for 21st Century Learning [P21], 2016.

PEARSE, Harry. Refurbishing Democracy: More Direct, More Deliberative, and Younger. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, v. 5(1), 2022, p. 11-15.

PEARSE, Harry. Children, Voting, and the Meaning of Universal Suffrage. Political Studies Review, 2023, p. 1–18.

RODRÍGUEZ, Louie F., BROWN, Tara. What is the Skill of Teaching? A New Framework of Teachers’ Social Emotional Cognition. In: LOPEZ, A.E., OLAN, E.L. (Eds.). Transformative pedagogies for teacher education: Moving toward critical praxis in an era of change. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2018, p. 87-102.

SOROKIN, Pavel S. The Problem of "Agency" Through the Prism of a New Reality: the State and Directions of Development. Sociologicheskie-issledovanija [Sociological studies], n. 3, 2023, p. 103-114.

SOROKIN, Pavel S., FROUMIN, Isak D. ‘Utility’ of education and the role of transformative agency: Policy challenges and agendas. Policy Futures in Education, v. 20(2), 2022, p. 201-214.

UDEHN, Lars. The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 28(1), 2002, p. 479–507.

VERONESE, Guido, PEPE, Alessandro, CAVAZZONI, Federica, OBAID, Hania, PEREZ, Jesus Manuel. Agency via life satisfaction as a protective factor from cumulative trauma and emotional distress among bedouin children in Palestine. Frontiers in Psychology, n. 10, 2019, p. 1674.

WOODHEAD, Martin. Childhood studies. An introduction to childhood studies, 2008, p. 17-31.

Publicado

2024-12-23

Como Citar

Goshin, M., Kupriyanov, B., & Sorokin, P. (2024). AÇÃO DE ESTUDANTES ENVOLVIDOS EM PRÁTICAS DE ORÇAMENTO PARTICIPATIVO DAS ESCOLAS . Jornal De Políticas Educacionais, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/jpe.v18i1.96046

Edição

Seção

Dossiê: Educação e Formas de Participação no Contexto dos BRICS