Inquiry and Meno’s Paradox in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics B 8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v7i3.18017Keywords:
epistemologia, investigação científica, definição, explicação, aprendizado, heurística, scientific research, epistemology, definition, explanation, learning, heuristicsAbstract
This paper discusses some issues about Aristotle’s theory of scientificinvestigation in Posterior Analytics II 8. Aristotle says that scientific investigationcomes in three stages. My point is that Aristotle’s theory of scientific investigation cannot avoid Meno’s paradox – the paradox about the impossibility ofwhatsoever sort of investigation – unless its second stage, the stage in which oneestablishes that an object exists, is understood in terms of establishing that theobject is a legitimate explanandum in the domain of a given science.Downloads
Published
2010-07-13
How to Cite
Bronstein, D. (2010). Inquiry and Meno’s Paradox in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics B 8. DoisPontos, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v7i3.18017
Issue
Section
Aristotle