Inquiry and Meno’s Paradox in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics B 8

Authors

  • David Bronstein University of Boston/ University of Oxford (Balliol College)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v7i3.18017

Keywords:

epistemologia, investigação científica, definição, explicação, aprendizado, heurística, scientific research, epistemology, definition, explanation, learning, heuristics

Abstract

This paper discusses some issues about Aristotle’s theory of scientificinvestigation in Posterior Analytics II 8. Aristotle says that scientific investigationcomes in three stages. My point is that Aristotle’s theory of scientific investigation cannot avoid Meno’s paradox – the paradox about the impossibility ofwhatsoever sort of investigation – unless its second stage, the stage in which oneestablishes that an object exists, is understood in terms of establishing that theobject is a legitimate explanandum in the domain of a given science.

Published

2010-07-13

How to Cite

Bronstein, D. (2010). Inquiry and Meno’s Paradox in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics B 8. DoisPontos, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v7i3.18017