The struggle for new social imaginaries: Drucilla Cornell, Frantz Fanon and the shape of legal subjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v67i3.72630Keywords:
Drucilla Cornell. Frantz Fanon. Feminism. Colonialism.Abstract
The aim of this article is to propose an articulation between the political reflections of Frantz Fanon and Drucilla Cornell regarding social transformation and legal subjectivity. The research adopts Cornell’s reading of Fanon as a starting point, highlighting the way in which his position promotes the struggle for new social imaginaries in the midst of the radical transformation provided by revolutionary practice. Based on these theoretical frameworks, the research seeks to verify whether important transformations for legal subjectivity can be linked to the process of formulating new political demands. The second section of the article brings the two authors together through a parallel between the critique of colonialism and the feminist critique, paying attention to the way in which colonial and female subjectivities bear similarities in terms of how they are conceived in the midst of determined power structures. Finally, the article points out the utopian potential, with regard to the struggle for new social imaginaries, underlying both positions. The article’s conclusion is that the process of subjectivation resulting from colonial struggles described by Fanon complements and strengthens the concept of imaginary domain proposed by Cornell. The article adopts as a methodology a specific literature review of the work of these authors.
References
ARANTES, Marco Antônio. Sartre e o Humanismo Racista Europeu: uma leitura sartriana de Frantz Fanon. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, n. 27, p. 382-409, maio/ago. 2011.
BERNARDINO-COSTA, Joaze. A prece de Frantz Fanon: Oh, meu corpo, faça sempre de mim um homem que questiona! Civitas, Porto Alegre, v. 16, n. 3, p. 504-521, jul./set. 2016.
CASSIRER, Ernst. A Filosofia das Formas Simbólicas, Volume 3: Fenomenologia do Conhecimento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011.
CASSIRER, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume 1: Language. London: Routledge, 2021.
CONNOLLY, William E. The Ethos of Democratization. In: CRITCHLEY, Simon; MARCHART, Oliver (org.). Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge, 2004. p. 167-181.
CONNOLLY, William E. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
CORNELL, Drucilla. At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, & Equality. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998.
CORNELL, Drucilla. Defending Ideals: War, Democracy, and Political Struggles. London: Routledge, 2004.
CORNELL, Drucilla. Fanon today. In: DOUZINAS, Costas; GEARTY, Conor. The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 121-136.
CORNELL, Drucilla. Rethinking Legal Ideals after Deconstruction. In: SARAT, Austin; DOUGLAS, Lawrence; UMPHREY, Martha Merrill. Law’s Madness. Minneapolis: The University of Michigan Press, 2006. p. 147-168.
CORNELL, Drucilla. The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography and Sexual Harassment. London: Routledge, 1995.
CORNELL, Drucilla. The Philosophy of the Limit. London: Routledge, 1992.
CORNELL, Drucilla. uBuntu, Pluralism and the Responsibility of Legal Academics to the New South Africa. Law and Critique, [s. l.], v. 20, p. 43-58, 2009.
CORNELL, Drucilla; PANFILIO, Kenneth Michael. Symbolic Forms for a New Humanity: Cultural and Racial Reconfigurations of Critical Theory. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.
CORNELL, Drucilla; THURSCHWELL, Adam. Feminism, Negativity, Intersubjectivity. In: BENHABIB, Seyla; CORNELL, Drucilla (org.). Feminism as Critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987. p. 143-162.
CUNHA, Olívia Maria Gomes da. Reflexões sobre Biopoder e Pós-Colonialismo: Relendo Fanon e Foucault. Mana, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 149-163, 2002.
DERRIDA, Jacques. Signature Event Context. In: DERRIDA, Jacques. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988. p. 1-24.
FANON, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks. London: Pluto Press, 1986.
FANON, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press, 2004.
GORDON, Peter E. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010.
JACKSON, Emily. Imagining the Future: Drucilla Cornell’s Transformations and Catharine MacKinnon’s Only Words. Law and Critique, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 165-174, 1994.
LÓPEZ, Laura Cecilia. O Corpo Colonial e as Políticas e Poéticas da Diáspora para Compreender as Mobilizações Afro-Latino-Americanas. Horizontes Antropológicos, Porto Alegre, n. 43, p. 301-330, jan./jun. 2015.
NAGEL, Thomas. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
RUSSELL, Yvette. Thinking Sexual Difference Through the Law of Rape. Law and Critique, [s. l.], v. 24, p. 255-275, 2013.
SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty. Can the Subaltern Speak? In: NELSON, Cary; GROSSBERG, Lawrence (org.). Marxism and The Interpretation of Culture. London: MacMillan Education, 1988. p. 271-313.
VARGAS, Valentina Bulo; GUZMÁN, Rodolfo Meriño. Diferentes Diferencias. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, v. 40, n. 1, p. 151-164, jan./mar. 2017.
VILELA, Ana Laura Silva. Violência Colonial e Criminologia: Um confronto a partir do documentário Concerning Violence. Revista Direito e Práxis, Rio de Janeiro, v. 9, n. 4, p. 2.011-2.040, 2018.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
