Como o direito pensa: em busca de uma epistemologia construtivista do direito
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v66i2.81411Palavras-chave:
Filosofia do Direito, Epistemologia jurídica, ConstrutivismoResumo
Tradução para o português a partir de original em inglês (original: TEUBNER, G. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law. Law & Society Review, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 5, p. 727-757, 1989. doi:10.2307/3053760) [N. do E.].
Referências
ADAMS, Michael. Ökonomische Analyse der Gefährdungs und Verschuldenshaftung. Heidelberg: Decker and Schenck, 1985.
ALBERT, Hans. Law as an Instrument of Rational Practice. In: DAINTITH, T. C.; TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.
ALCHIAN, Armen A.; DEMSETZ, H. Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization. In: 62 American Economic Review 777, 1972.
ALEXY, Robert. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation: Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1978.
APEL, Karl-Otto. Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik. In: APEL, K.-O. Transformation der Philosophic. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973.
APEL, Karl-Otto. Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988.
ARBIB, Michael A.; HESSE, Mary B. The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
AUBERT, Vilhelm. In Search of Law: Sociological Approaches to Law. Oxford: Robertson, 1983.
AUBERT, Vilhelm. On the Relationship between Legal and Sociological Concepts. In: BLANKENBURG, E.; ROTTLEUTHNER, H. (ed.). Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1980.
BADURA, Peter; RITTNER, Fritzit; RUTHERS, Bernd. Mitbestimmungsgesetz 1976 und Grundgesetz: Gemeinschaftsgutachten. München: Beck, 1977.
BARNES, Barry. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan, 1974.
BARWISE, Jon; ETCHEMENDY, John. The Liar: An Essay in Truth and Circularity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
BAUDRILLARD, Jean. L’échange symbolique et la mort. Paris: Gallimard, 1976.
BERGER, Peter L; LUCKMANN, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
BLOOR, David. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan, 1976.
BOHLER, Dietrich. Rekonstruktive Pragmatik: Von der Bewußtsein philosophie zur Kommunikationsreflexion: Neubegründung der praktischen Wissenschaften und Philosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1985.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. La force du droit: Éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique. In: Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 3, 1986.
CARROLL, Lewis. Stanza of Anglo-Saxon Poetry. Misch-Masch, 1855.
CARROLL, Lewis. Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. [Cited after the edition of 1960, Bramhall House, New York]. London: Macmillan, 1871.
CLARK, Robert C. Agency Costs Versus Fiduciary Duties. In: PRATT, J. W.; ZECKHAUSER, R. J. (ed.). Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1985.
COHEN, Felix S. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. In: 35 Columbia Law Review 809, 1935.
COLLINS, Harry. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985.
COTTERRELL, Roger. Law and Sociology: Notes on the Constitution and Confrontation of Disciplines. In: 13 Journal of Law and Society 9, 1986.
COTTERRELL, Roger. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. London: Butter-Worths, 1984.
CROZIER, Michel; FRIEDBERG, Erhard. L’acteur et le système: Les contraintes de l’action collective. Paris: Seuil, 1977.
DAN-COHEN, Meir. Rights, Persons, and Organizations: A Legal Theory for Bureaucratic Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
DEGGAU, Hans-Georg. The Communicative Autonomy of the Legal System. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.
DOUGLAS, Mary. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1986.
DREYFUS, Hubert L; RABINOW, Paul. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
EASTERBROOK, Frank. Corporations as Contracts. Conference paper, presented at Stanford Law School, 1988.
ELSTER, Jon (ed.). The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
ELSTER, Jon. Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
ELSTER, Jon. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
ETZIONI, Amitai. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press, 1988.
FAMA, Eugen F.; JENSEN, Michael. Agency, Problems and Residual Claims. In: 26 Journal of Law and Economics 327, 1983.
FEBBRAJO, Alberto. The Rules of the Game in the Welfare State. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1985.
FODOR, J. A. Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology. In: 3 Behavioral Brain Science 63, 1980.
FÖRSTER, Heinz von. Entdecken oder Erfinden? Wie Lußt sich Verstehen Verstehen? In: MOHLAR, A. (ed.). Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. München: Oldenbourg, 1985.
FÖRSTER, Heinz von. Observing Systems. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications, 1981.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage/Random House, 1979.
FOUCAULT, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon, 1972.
FOUCAULT, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock, 1974.
FRANKENBERG, Gunter. Der Ernst im Recht. In: 20 Kritische Justiz, p. 281-307, 1987.
FREY, Reiner. Vom Subjekt zur Selbstreferenz: Rechtstheoretische Überlegungen zur Rekonstruktion der Rechtskategorie. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1989.
FULLER, Steve. Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.
GIDDENS, Anthony. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
GILBERT, Nigel; MULKAY, Michael. Opening Pandora’s Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
GLASERSFELD, Ernst von. An Epistemology for Cognitive Systems. In: ROTH, G.; SCHWEGLER, H. (ed.). Self-Organizing Systems: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Frankfurt: Campus, 1981.
GLASERSFELD, Ernst von. Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit und des Begriffs der Objektivität. In: GUMIN, H.; MOHLAR, A. (ed.). Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. München: Oldenbourg, 1985.
GLASERSFELD, Ernst von. Radical Constructivism and Piaget’s Concept of Knowledge. In: MURRAY, F. B. (ed.). Input of Piagetian Theory. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.
GORDON, Robert W. Critical Legal Histories. In: 36 Stanford Law Review 57, 1984.
GRÜNBERGER, Hans. Dehumanisierung der Gesellschaft und Verabschiedung staatlicher Souveränität: Das Politische System in der Gesellschaftstheorie Niklas Luhmanns. In: FETSCHER, I.; MÜNKLER, H. (ed.). Pipers Handbuch der politischen Ideen. München: Piper, 1987.
GRZEGORCZYK, Christophe. Système juridique et réalité: Discussion de la théorie autopoiétique du droit. In: 33 Archives de philosophie du droit, 1989.
GÜNTHER, Klaus. Der Sinn fur Angemessenheit: Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1974.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971a.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Law as Medium and Law as Institution. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1985.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press, 1975.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1983.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Nachmetaphysisches Denken: Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. V. 2. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987a.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. V. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz. In: HABERMAS, J.; LUHMANN, N. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie—Was leistet die Systemforschung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971b.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Wahrheitstheorien. In: FAHRENBACH, H. (ed.). Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Pfullingen: Neske, 1973.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Wie ist Legitimation durch Legalität möglich? In: 20 Kritische Justiz 1, 1987b.
HAYEK, Friedrich A. Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 1948.
HAYEK, Friedrich A. Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order. London: Routledge and Paul, 1973.
HELLER, Thomas. Accounting for Law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.
HELLER, Thomas. Structuralism and Critique. In: 36 Stanford Law Review 127, 1984.
HOMANS, George C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. London: Routledge and Kegan, 1961.
HONNETH, Axel. Kritik der Macht: Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1985.
HORWITZ, Morton. Santa Clara Revisited. In: 88 West Virginia Law Review 173, 1985.
HUTTER, Michael. Die Produktion von Recht. Tübingen: Mohr und Siebeck, 1989.
JHERING, Rudolf von. Scherz und Ernst in der Jurisprudenz. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Haertel, 1884.
JOERGES, Christian. Politische Rechtstheorie and Critical Legal Studies. In: JOERGES, C.; TRUBEK, D. (ed.). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.
KENNEDY, David. Critical Theory, Structuralism, and Contemporary Scholarship. In: 21 New England Law Review 209, 1985.
KENNEDY, Duncan. Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology. In: 36 Journal of Legal Education 518, 1986.
KERCHOVE, Michel van de; OST, François. Le système juridique entre ordre et desordre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.
KITSCHELT, Herbert. Der ökologische Diskurs: Eine Analyse von Gesellschaftskonzeptionen in der Energiedebatte. Frankfurt: Campus, 1984.
KNORR-CETINA, Karin. Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis: Zur Anthropologic der Naturwissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.
KNYPHAUSEN, Dodo zu. Unternehmungen als evolutionsfähige Systeme: Überlegungen zu einem evolutionären Konzept für die Organisationstheorie. Herrsching: Kirsch, 1988.
KRIPPENDORFF, Klaus. Paradox and Information. In: DERVIN, B.; VOIGHT, M. (ed.). Progress in Communication. Norwood: Ablex, 1984.
KÜBLER, Friedrich; SCHMIDT, Walter; SIMITIS, Spiros. Mitbestimmung als gesetzgebungspolitische Aufgabe. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1978.
LADEUR, Karl-Heinz. Zu einer Grundrechtstheorie der Selbstorganisation des Unternehmens. In: Festschrift fur Helmut Ridder. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1989b.
LADEUR, Karl-Heinz. Abwägung—Ein neues Paradigma des Verwaltungsrechts: Von der Einheit der Rechtsordnung zum Rechtspluralismus. Frankfurt: Campus, 1984.
LADEUR, Karl-Heinz. Perspectives on a Post-Modern Theory of Law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.
LADEUR, Karl-Heinz. The Law of Uncertainty. In: JOERGES, C.; TRUBEK, D. (ed.). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989a.
LATOUR, Bruno; WOOLGAR, Steve. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
LÜBBE-WOLFF, Gertrude. Rechtsfolgen und Realfolgen. Freiburg: Alber, 1981.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Closure and Openness: On Reality in the World of law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988a.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Autopoiese des Bewußtseins. In: 36 Sociale Welt 402, 1985.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Individuum und Gesellschaft. In: 39 Universitas 1, 1983.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Intersubjektivitat oder Kommunikation: Unterschiedliche Ausgangspunkte soziologischer Theoriebildung. In: 54 Archivio di Filosofia 41, 1986c.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Rechtssystem und Rechtsdogmatik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1974.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Soziale Systemme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.
LUHMANN, Niklas. The Autopoiesis of Social Systems. In: GEYER, F.; ZOUWEN, J. van der (ed.). Sociocybernetic Paradoxes. London: Sage, 1986a.
LUHMANN, Niklas. The Coding of the Legal System. In: FEBBRAJO, A.; TEUBNER, G. (ed.). State, Law, Economy as Autopoietic Systems. Milano: Giuffrè, 1990.
LUHMANN, Niklas. The Individuality of the Individual: Historical Meaning and Contemporary Problems. In: HELLER, T. C.; SOSNA, M.; WELLBERY, D. E. (ed.). Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986b.
LUHMANN, Niklas. The Theory of Social Systems and Its Epistemology: Reply to Danilo Zolo’s Critical Comments. In: 16 Philosophy of the Social Sciences, p. 129-134, 1985.
LUHMANN, Niklas. The Third Question: The Creative Use of Paradoxes in Law and Legal History. In: 15 Journal of Law and Society 153, 1988b.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Wissenschaft. Bielefeld: Typoscript, 1988c.
MAJONE, Giandomenico. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
MAJONE, Giandomenico. Process and Outcome in Regulatory Decision-Making. In: WEISS, C. H.; BARTON, A. (ed.). Making Bureaucracies Work. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.
MATURANA, Huberto R.; VARELA, Francisco J. Autopoiesis and Cognition. Boston: Reidel, 1980.
MAYNTZ, Renate. Steuerung, Steuerungsakteure und Steuerungsinstrumente: Zur Präzisierung des Problems. In: 70 HiMon-DB. Siegen: Universität, 1986.
MENGONI, Luigi. La questione del ‘diritto giusto’ nella società postliberale. In: 11 Fenomenologia e Società Diritto ed Etica Pubblica 14, 1988.
NELSON, Alan. Some Issues Surrounding the Reduction of Macroeconomics to Microeconomics. In: 51 Philosophy of Science 573, 1984.
NERHOT, Patrick. The Fact of Law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.
OPP, Karl-Dieter. Soziologie im Recht. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1973.
OST, François. Between Order and Disorder: The Game of Law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.
PIAGET, Jean. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Ballantine, 1971.
PIZZORNO, Alessandro. Spiegazione come re-identificatione. In: SCIOLLA, L.; RICOLFI, L. (ed.). Il soggetto dell’azione: Paradigmi sociologichi e immagini dell’attore sociale. Milano: Angeli, 1989.
PODAK, Klaus. Ohne Subjekt, ohne Vernunft: Bei der Lektüre von Niklas Luhmanns Hauptwerk ‘Soziale Systeme’. In: 7 Merkur 733, 1984.
POPPER, Karl. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1953.
PREUSS, Ulrich K. Rationality Potentials of Law: Allocative, Distributive and Communicative Rationality. In: JOERGES, C.; TRUBEK, D. (ed.). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.
PRINS, H. Offenders, Deviants or Patients? An Introduction to the Study of Socio-Forensic Problems. London: Tavistok, 1980.
QUINE, Willard V. The Ways of Paradox. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.
ROOS, Carl Martin. Corporate Personality and Contractual Structure: Legal Aspects on the Firm as a Nexus of Treaties. Uppsala: Manuscript, 1988.
ROTH, Gerhard. Die Entwicklung kognitiver Selbstreferentialität im menschlichen Gehirn. In: BAECKER, D. et al. (ed.). Theorie als Passion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1987.
ROTH, Gerhard. Erkenntnis und Realität: Das Gehirn und seine Wirklichkeit. In: PASTERNACK, G. (ed.). Erklären, Verstehen, Begründen. Bremen: Universitat, 1984.
ROTTLEUTHNER, Hubert. Biological Metaphors in Legal Thought. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.
ROTTLEUTHNER, Hubert. Diskussionsvotum zum vorstehenden Beitrag. In: BLANKENBURG, E.; KLAUSA, E; ROTTLEUTHNER, H. (ed.). Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1980.
ROTTLEUTHNER, Hubert. Zur Methode einer folgenorientierten Rechtsanwendung. In: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 13. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1979.
SCHANE, Sanford A. The Corporation is a Person: The Language of a Legal Fiction. In: 61 Tulane Law Review 563, 1987.
SCHANZE, Erich. Contract, Agency, and the Delegation of Decision Making. In: BAMBERG, G.; SPREMAN, K. (ed.). Agency Theory, Information, and Incentives. Berlin: Springer, 1987.
SCHANZE, Erich. Potential and Limits of Economic Analysis: The Constitution of the Firm. In: DAINTITH, T.; TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.
SCHIMANK, Uwe. Der mangelnde Akteurbezug systemtheoretischer Erklärungen gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung—Ein Diskussionsvorschlag. In: 14 Zeitschrift für Soziologie 421, 1985.
SCHMIDT, Siegfried (ed.). Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1987.
SCOTT, Robert. The Jabberwock Traced to Its True Source. Macmillan’s Magazine, February 1872.
SELZNICK, Philip. Law: The Sociology of Law. In: 9 International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 50, 1968.
SKINNER, Quentin. The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
TEUBNER, Gunther. And God Laughed…: Indeterminacy, Self-Reference, and Paradox in Law. In: JOERGES, C.; TRUBEK, D. (ed.). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the ‘Essence’ of the Legal Person. In: 36 American Journal of Comparative Law 130, 1988a.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Evolution of Autopoietic Law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988b.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Generalklauseln als sozio-normative Modelle. In: STACHOWIAK, H. (ed.). Bedürfnisse, Werte und Normen im Wandel. Bd1. München: Fink and Schöningh, 1982.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Hypercycle in Law and Organization: The Relationship between Self-Observation, Self-Constitution and Autopoiesis. In: European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 43, 1988c.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Social Order from Legislative Noise? Autopoietic Closure as a Problem for Legal Regulation. In: TEUBNER, G.; FEBBRAJO, A. (ed.). State, Law, Economy as Autopoietic Systems. Milano: Giuffrè, 1990.
VARDARO, Gaetano. Before and Beyond the Legal Personality: Group Enterprises and Industrial Relations. In: SUGARMAN, D.; TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1990.
VARELA, Francisco J. Living Ways of Sense-Making: A Middle Path for Neuro-Science. In: LIVINGSTONE, P. (ed.). Disorder and Order: Proceedings of the Stanford International Symposium. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri, 1984.
WEBER, Max. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
WEINBERG, Alvin M. Science and Trans-science. In: 10 Minerva 209, 1972.
WEINTRAUB, E. Roy. Microfoundations: The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
WIETHÖLTER, Rudolf. Proceduralization of the Category of Law. In: JOERGES, C.; TRUBEK, D. (ed.). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.
WIETHÖLTER, Rudolf. Social Science Models in Economic Law. In: DAINTITH, T.; TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.
WIETHÖLTER, Rudolf. Materialization and Proceduralization in Modern Law. In: TEUBNER, G. (ed.). Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1985.
WILLIAMSON, Oliver E. The Contractual Logic of Internal Organization. Firenze: EUI conference paper, 1987.
WINDSCHEID, Bernhard. Die Aufgaben der Rechtswissenshaft. In: WINDSCHEID, B. Gesammelte Reden und Abhandlungen. Leipzig: Duncker, 1904.
WINTER, Gert. Die Angst des Richters bei der Technikbewertung. In: 20 Zeitschrift fur Rechtspolitik 425, 1987.
WOLF, Rainer. Der Stand der Technik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1986.
WORMELL, C. P. On the Paradoxes of Self-Reference. In: 67 Mind 267, 1958.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores que publicam na Revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
– os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e transferem à Revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons — Atribuição 3.0 Brasil — CC BY 3.0 BR, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na Revista;
– os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada na Revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na Revista;
– qualquer pessoa é livre para compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o trabalho em qualquer suporte ou formato) e para adaptar (remixar, transformar e criar a partir do trabalho) para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial, devendo todavia, em qualquer caso, dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas no trabalho original, nos termos da Licença Creative Commons — Atribuição 3.0 Brasil — CC BY 3.0 BR e respeitados a Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998, e outros normativos vigentes.
