Necrocapitalism, data colonialism, and Facebook in Myanmar
The repression of the Rohingya (2012-2018)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/cg.v14i3.98770Keywords:
Mianmar, necrocapitalism, Data colonialism, Rohingya, Facebook.Abstract
This article investigates how the systematic repression of the Rohingya people—particularly between 2012 and 2018—can be understood through the intersection of necrocapitalism and data colonialism. The research is guided by the following question: in what ways did the actions of the company Meta (Facebook) in Myanmar contribute to the escalation of hate speech and ethno-religious violence later classified as genocide? The central objective is to analyze the impact of digital platforms in contexts of structural violence, with a specific focus on Facebook’s role in amplifying persecutory narratives and socially legitimizing violence against the Rohingya population. Based on the concepts of necrocapitalism and data colonialism, the working hypothesis is that the data-extractive logic employed by major platforms, coupled with the lack of local regulation and institutional negligence by the company, facilitated the widespread dissemination of hate speech, thereby reinforcing colonial hierarchies and entrenching historical inequalities within the country. Methodologically, the study draws on bibliographic review and document analysis, with particular attention to the 2018 report by the United Nations Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, which attributes part of the crisis to the influence of social media. The findings indicate that Meta’s operations, when embedded within a sociopolitical landscape marked by colonial legacies and ethnic tensions, intensified necropolitical mechanisms mediated by digital infrastructures. This analysis thus highlights how the global digital economy can function as a vector of violence in postcolonial contexts marked by institutional fragility.
References
ALAM, J. The current Rohingya crisis in Myanmar in historical perspective. Journal of Muslim minority affairs, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1–25, 2019.
ANG, C. Visual Capitalist: How do big tech Giants make their billions?, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/how-big-tech-makes-their-billions-2022/; Acesso em: 05 jun. 2024.
ANSAR, A et al. Digital Diaspora Activism at the Margins: Unfolding Rohingya diáspora interac-tions on facebook (2017-2022). Social Media + Society, 10(1), pp. 1-16, 2024.
BAIROCH, P. Geographical Structure and Trade Balance of European Foreign Trade. Joumal of European Economic History, v. 3, pp. 557-608, 1974.
BANAJI, S et al. Social media and hate. Londres, England: Routledge, 2022.
BANCO MUNDIAL. População de Mianmar - 2023. Disponível em: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=MM; Acesso em: 08 jun. 2024.
BANERJEE, S. Necrocapitalism. Organization Studies, v. 29, n. 12, 2008. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0170840607096386; Acesso em: 15 dez. 2024.
BARBROOK, R.; CAMERON, A. A ideologia californiana: uma crítica ao livre mercado nasci-do no vale do Silício. União da Vitória: Monstro dos Mares, Porto Alegre: BaixaCultura, 2018.
CASSINO, J. O sul global e os desafios pós-coloniais na era digital. In: CASSINO, J. et al. (org.). Colonialismo de dados: como opera a trincheira algorítmica na guerra neoliberal. São Paulo: Autonomia Literária, 2021.
COULDRY, N.; MEJIAS, A. Data colonialismo: Rethinking bid data’s relations to the contempo-rary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), pp. 1-14, 2018.
DAVIS, A. Hate Speech in Myanmar: The Perfect Storm In: JAYAKUMAR, S., ANG, B., ANWAR, N. Disinformation and Fake News. Singapura: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
DEEJAY, AL. Et al. Bad adopters or bad proponentes of technology? Facebook and the violence Against Muslims in Myanmar. Third World Quarterly, 45(8), p. 1309–1324, 2023.
EMBASSY OF MYANMAR. General Information of Myanmar, 28 mar. 2018. Dis-ponível em: https://myanmarbsb.org/_site/general-information/; Acesso em: 8 ago. 2023.
FANON, F. Os condenados da terra. Juiz de Fora: Editora UFJF, 2005.
FANON, F. Pele negra, máscaras brancas. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2008
FAUSTINO, D.; LIPPOLD, W. Colonialismo digital: por uma crítica hacker-fanoniana. São Paulo: Boi Tempo, 2023.
FERREIRA, S. R. DA S. O que é (ou o que estamos chamando de) ‘Colonialismo de Dados’? PAU-LUS Revista de Comunicação da FAPCOM, v. 5, n. 10, 2021. Disponível em: https://revista.fapcom.edu.br/index.php/revista-paulus/article/view/458; Acesso em: 02 nov. 2024.
FOLHA DE S. PAULO. Facebook reconhece que falhou em impedir violência contra Rohingya, Folha de S. Paulo, 8 nov. 2018. Disponível em: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mundo/2018/11/facebook-reconhece-que-falhou-em-impedir-violencia-contra-Rohingya.shtml; Acesso em: 20 fev. 2025.
FRANCISCO, Y. M.; FLORIO, B. P. Religião, Raça e Nacionalismo em Mianmar: o Caso das Mu-lheres Rohingya. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD, 12(24), p. 196–223, 2024.
GONSALVES, T, PATHAK, A. The Rohingya Crisis: A Long Road Ahead. In: Mukhopadhyay, U. Internal Migration Within South Asia: Contemporary Issues and Challenges. India: Sprin-ger, 2022.
GROSFOGUEL, Ramón. Les implications des altérités épistémiques dans la redéfinition du capi-talisme global. Transmodernité, pensée frontalière et colonialité globale. Multitudes, v. 26, p. 51-74, 2006.
HRC [HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL]. Report of the independent international fact-finding mission on Myanmar, 2018. Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1643079/files/A_HRC_39_CRP-2-EN.pdf?ln=en; Acesso em: 08 ago. 2023.
JORNAL DA USP. Genocídio Rohingya gerou maior êxodo do mundo contemporâneo. Jornal da USP, 14 set. 2018. Disponível em: https://jornal.usp.br/atualidades/genocidio-Rohingya-gerou-maior-exodo-do-mundo-contemporaneo/; Acesso em: 05 jan. 2025.
KILOMBA, Grada. Memórias da plantação: episódios de racismo cotidiano. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Cobogó, 2019.
KOLLI, P. Altona Mirror: Tech companies are Worth trillions: Are they too big?, 2024. Dispo-nível em: <https://www.altoonamirror.com/news/2024/05/tech-companies-are-worth-trillions-are-they-too-big/#:~:text=The%20top%20five%20American%20technology,%2412%20trillion%20in%20market%20capitalization; Acesso em: 05 jun. 2024.
LEE, R. Extreme peech in Myanmar: The role of state media in the Rohingya forced migration crisis. International Journal of Communication, v.13, pp. 3203-3224, 2019.
LEONG, L. Domesticating algorithms: Na exploratory study of Facebook users in Myanmar. The Information Society, 36(2), p. 97-108, 2020.
LOOMBA, A. Colonialism/Potcolonialism. Londres: Routledge, 1998.
LORA, L. Limitations and scope of the responsability of internet servisse provider companies. Meta and incitement to genocide of Rohingya case. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, v. 15, n.2, pp. 141-166, 2023.
MCKINLEY, D. Reclaiming Public Water: The struggle Against water privatisation in South Africa, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.tni.org/files/watersafrica.pdf; Acesso em: 05 jun. 2024.
MEIXLER, Eli. Rohingya refugees ‘stand on the precipice of more tragedy’ one year after brutal crackdown’, Time, 2018. Disponível em: https://time.com/5374143/myanmar-Rohingya- au-gust-25-crackdown/; Acesso em: 11 ago. 2023.
MORADA, N. Continuing violence and atrocities in Rakhine since 2017: Beyond the outrage, fail-ures of the international community. Global Responsibility to Protect, v. 12, n. 1, p. 64–85, 2020
ONU [Organização das Nações Unidas]. Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, 2019a. Disponível em: https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/myanmar-ffm/index; Acesso em: 08 ago. 2023.
ONU [Organização das Nações Unidas]. Rohingyas ameaçados de perseguição e genocídio em Mianmar. ONU News, 16 Setembro 2019b. Disponível em: https://news.un.org/pt/story/2019/09/1687022; Acesso em: 02 jan. 2025.
RIO, V. Myanmar: the role of social media inn fomenting violence In: SCHIRCH, L. Social me-dia impacts on conflict and democracy: The techtonic shift. New York: Routledge, 2021.
SAMET, O. Facebook Usage and Outgroup Intolerance in Myanmar. Political Communica-tion, 41(6), p. 944-964, 2024.
SABLOSKY, J. Dangerous organizations: Facebook’s contente moderation decisions and ethnic visibility in Myanmar. Media, Culture & Society, 43(6), 1017-1042, 2021.
STATISTA. The 100 largest companies in the world by market capitalization in 2023. Disponível em: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263264/top-companies-in-the-world-by-market-capitalization/; Acesso em: 10 jan. 2025.
STECKLOW, S. Why Facebook Is Losing the War on Hate Speech in Myanmar. Reuters, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/myanmar-facebook-hate/; Acesso em: 06 jan. 2024.
TÄHTINEN.T. When Facebook Is the Internet: The Role of Social Media in Ethnic Conflict. World Development, v. 180, 2024.
VEJA. Muçulmanos de Mianmar exigem R$ 850 bi do Facebook por genocídio. Veja, 7 dez. 2021. Disponível em: https://veja.abril.com.br/mundo/muculmanos-de-mianmar-exigem-r-850-bi-do-facebook-por-genocidio; Acesso em: 15 fev. 2025.
YOUNG, H. et al. More a red than a harbinger of democracy: Myanmar’s experimente with media freedom and domestic media coverage of the Rohingya. International Journal of Commu-nication, v. 17, pp. 1038-1060, 2023. Disponível em: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19005; Acesso em: 25 set. 2024.
WHITTEN-WOODRING, J. et al. Poison if you don’t know how to use it: Facebook, democracy, and human rights in Myanmar. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), pp. 407-425, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Conjuntura Global (ISSN 2317 - 6563) editors reserve the right to adapt the submissions to the journal's editorial standard format. The articles and reviews are under the responsibility of their authors and do not express the opinion of Conjuntura Global's editors.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), that allows the work to be shared with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
- Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
- The approval of the submission automatically implies the authorization to Conjuntura Global to forward the relevant information to the scientific journals' indexing databases.
