Republicanism Without Republic. Kant's Political Philosophy in its Historico-Systematic Context
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v18i3.90192Mots-clés :
republic, republicanism, monarchy, state, government, representative system, Plato, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Montesquieu, KantRésumé
The essay assesses the character, extent and limits of Kant's republican commitments in political philosophy in a twofold perspective. Historically, Kant's recourse to republican political principles is placed in the context of the early modern discourse about forms of rule and types of government in general and about the relative merits of monarchical and republican constitutions in particular. Systematically, Kant's political republicanism is tied to his philosophy of law in general and to his account of public law in particular. Throughout the paper argues for a non-republican republicanism in Kant that imports basic features of modern republican theory and practice into a juridico-political context marked by enlightened monarchical absolutism and by an anti-revolutionary conception of political history. Section 1 opens with reflections on the timeliness and untimeliness of political philosophy and then sketches the career of republican thought in classical antiquity. Section 2 follows the trajectory of modern republican thought from Machiavelli to Montesquieu. Section 3 outlines the normative nature and the jural character of republicanism in Kant. Section 4 details the distinct political profile of republican rule in Kant.
Références
ARISTOTLE. Politics. Trans. C. D. C. Reeves, Indianapolis/Cambridge, Hackett, 1998.
BARON, H. The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance. Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyranny. 2 vols, rev. ed., Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1966.
BODIN, J. Les Six Livres de la République. Paris, Jacques du Puys, 1576.
BODIN, J. De Republica libri sex. Latine ab autore redditi, Paris, Jacques du Puys, 1586.
BODIN, J. On Sovereignty. Four Chapters from The Six Books of the Commonwealth. Ed. and trans. J. H. Franklin, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
CICERO. Der Staat. Latin and German, ed. and tr. K. Büchner, Munich, Artemis & Winkler, 1993.
CICERO. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Ed. J. E. G. Zetzel, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
FONTANA, B. “Tacitus on Empire and Republic,” History of Political Thought, 14, 1993, 27–40.
KEMPSHALL, M. S. “De re publica 1.39 in Medieval and Renaissance Political Thought”, Bulletin of the Institutes of Classical Studies 45, 2001, Supplement 76, “Cicero’s Republic,” 99–135.
HAMILTON, A., MADISON, J. and JAY, J. The Federalist. Ed. T. Ball, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
HEGEL, G. W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Ed. A. W. Wood and trans. H. R. Nisbet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
HOBBES, T. Leviathan. Ed. J. C. A. Gaskin, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 1996.
KANT, I. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Prussian Academy of Sciences and successors, Berlin, later Berlin/New York, Reimer, later De Gruyter, 1900–.
KANT, I. Political Writings. Ed. H. R. Reiss, trans. H. B. Nisbet, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
KANT, I. Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. M. J. Gregor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KANT, I. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood, Cambridge, Cambridge University, Press, 1998 (a).
KANT, I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Ed. J. Timmermann, Hamburg, Meiner, 1998 (b).
KANT, I. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. P. Guyer and trans P. Guyer and E. Matthews, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
KANT, I. Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. and trans. A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
KANT, I. Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Ed. F. Rauscher and trans. F. Rauscher and K. R. Westphal, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016 (a).
KANT, I. Lezioni sul Diritto naturale (Naturrecht Feyerabend). German original and Italian transl., ed. N. Hinske and G. Sadun Bordoni, Milano, Bompiani, 2016 (b).
LOCKE, J. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. P. Laslett, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
MACHIAVELLI, N. Discourses on Livy. Trans. H. C. Mansfield and N. Tarcov, Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press, 1996.
MACHIAVELLI, N. The Prince. Trans. and ed. P. Bondanella, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
MACHIAVELLI, N. Tutte Le Opere. Ed. P. D. Accendere, 2nd ed., Flirence/Milano, Bompiani, 2018.
MACPHERSON, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Hobbes to Locke. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1962.
MONTESQUIEU, C. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline. Trans. D. Lowenthal, New York, The Free Press, 1965.
MONTESQUIEU, C.-L. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. A. M. Coulter and B. C. Miller, trans. H. S. Stone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
NATORP, P. Platos Ideenlehre. Eine Einführung in den Idealismus. 2nd, enlarged edition of 1921, Hamburg, Meiner, 1994.
PETITT, P. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.
PLATO. The Republic. Ed. G. R. F. Ferrari and trans. T. Griffith, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
POCOCK, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1975.
POLYBIUS. The Histories. Trans. R. Waterfield, Oxford, Oxford, University Press, 2010.
ROUSSEAU, J.-J. Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract. Trans. C. Betts, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
STRUNK, T. E. History after Liberty. Tacitus on Tyrants, Sycophants, and Republicans. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2016.
TACITUS. The Histories. Trans. K. Wellesley, London, Penguin, 2009.
TOCQUEVILLE, A. Democracy in America. Trans. and ed. H. C. Mansfield and D. Winthrop, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002.
ZÖLLER, G. “Der negative und der positive Nutzen der Ideen. Kant über die Grenzbestimmung der reinen Vernunft,” in Über den Nutzen von Illusionen. Die regulativen Ideen in Kants theoretischer Philosophie. Ed. B. Dörflinger and G. Kruck, Hildesheim/New York, Olms, 2011, 13-27.
ZÖLLER, G. Res Publica. Plato's “Republic” in Classical German Philosophy. Hong Kong, Chinese University Press, 2015 and Albany, State University of New York Press, 2015.
ZÖLLER, G. “‘Allgemeine Freiheit.’ Kants Naturrecht Feyerabend über Wille, Recht und Gesetz,” in Zum Verhältnis von Recht und Ethik in Kants praktischer Philosophie. Ed. Bernd Dörflinger, Dieter Hüning and Günter Kruck, Hildesheim/New York, Olms, 2017, 71–88.
ZÖLLER, G., “Law and Liberty. Immanuel Kant and James Madison on the Modern Polity,” Revista de Estudios Kantianos 3, 2018, 1-13.
ZÖLLER, G., “‘’Right Rests Solely on Freedom.’ The Historical and Systematic Significance of Kant's Natural Law Feyerabend,” in Kants “Naturrecht Feyerabend.” Analysis and Perspectives on Kant’s “Natural Law Feyerabend,” ed. Gianluca Sadun Bordoni and Annika Schlitte, Berlin and Boston, De Gruyter, 2020 (a), 33–50.
ZÖLLER, G. “‘[W]ahre Republik.’ Kants legalistischer Republikanismus im historischen und systematischen Kontext,” in Kants Metaphysik der Sitten. Der Zusammenhang von Rechts- und Tugendlehre, ed. Jean-Christophe Merle and Carola Freiin von Villiez, Berlin/Boston, De
Gruyter, 2020 (b).
ZÖLLER, G., “Autocracy (Autokratie), autocratic (autokratisch),” in The Cambridge Kant Lexicon, ed. Julian Wuerth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021 (a), 52–54.
ZÖLLER, G., “State (Staat),” in The Cambridge Kant Lexicon, ed. Julian Wuerth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021 (b), 412–414.
ZÖLLER, G., “‘(D)ieser wechselseitig entgegengesetzte Selbstzwang.’ Kant über ethische Freiheit,” forthcoming in Kant und die Tugendethik, ed. D. Hüning and G. Kruck, Hildesheim/New York, Olms, 2021 (c).
ZÖLLER, G., “‘Participation of the People Through Its Deputies.’ Montesquieu, Kant and Hegel on German Freedom” forthcoming in Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 42, 2021 (d).
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Autores mantém os direitos de republicação, sob condição de indicação de primeira publicação na Studia Kantiana.
Autores cedem o direito aos editores de vincular seus artigos em futuras bases de dados.
A Studia Kantiana utiliza a licença Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
Não Comercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
Sem Derivações — Se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
