Open Journal Systems

Constitutional dismemberment via referenda: a comparative overview

Valentina Rita Scotti

Resumo

Constitutional dismemberment is one of the main consequences attached to constitutional amendments that Albert's book analyses. After having analyzed Albert’s definition, the present essay focuses on the practice of constitutional dismemberment via referendum and discusses whether, in times of populism and democratic decay, the constitutional design should provide for specific measures in order to protect the political opposition from the allegiance between the populist leadership and the majority of the population. Building on the existing literature and on a comparative analysis, the essay concludes by highlighting the pros and cons of introducing special protections for political minorities during constitutional referenda to protect democracy against populist deviations, suggesting the need to provide further studies in this field.

Palavras-chave

constitutional amendments; referendum; Rule of Law; constitutional dismemberment; populism.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências

ACKERMAN, Bruce. The future of liberal revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.

ALBERT, Richard. Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment. Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 43, n. 1, 6, 2018.

ALBERT, Richard. Constitutional amendments: making, breaking, and changing constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

BÁNKUTİ, Miklós; HALMAI, Gàbor; SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Hungary’s Illiberal Turn: Disabling the Constitution. Journal of Democracy, vol. 23, n. 3, p. 138–46, 2012.

BULL, Martin J. Renzi Removed. The 2016 Italian Constitutional Referendum and Its Outcome. Italian Politics, n. 1, pp. 131-153, 2017.

CHAMBERS, Simone. Democracy and constitutional reform: Deliberative versus populist constitutionalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 45, n. 9-10, p. 1116-1131, 2019.

CHAMBERS, Simone. Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy. Constellations – An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, vol. 11, issue 2, p. 153-173, 2004.

DE BENOIST, Alain. Démocratie: le problème. Paris : Le Labyrinthe, 1985.

DICEY, Albert Venn. Ought the referendum to be introduced into England. Contemporary Review, 1890.

EISENSTADT, Todd A.; LEVAN, Carl A.; MABOUDI, Tofigh. When Talk Trumps Text: The Democratizing Effects of Deliberation during Constitution-making, 1974-2011. American Political Science Review, vol. 109, n. 4, p. 592-612, 2015.

ERDOĞAN, Recep Tayyip. Yenikapı’da tarihi bulus¸mada tarihi mesajlar. Sabah, April 8, 2017.

HART, Vivien. Democratic Constitution-Making. US Institute of Peace-Special Report n. 107, 2003.

HOLMES, Stephen T.; SUNSTEIN, Cass R. The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe. In: SANFORD, Levinson (Coord.). Responding to imperfection: the theory and practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. p. 275-290.

JAGERS, Jan; WALGRAVE, Stefaan. Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, vol. 46, n. 3, p. 319–345, 2007.

LANDAU, David. Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review, n. 47, p. 189-260, 2013.

LANDAU, David. Populist Constitutions. The University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, vol. 85, n. 2, p. 521-544, 2018.

LANDAU, David; DIXON, Rosalind. Constraining Constitutional Change. Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 50, n. 4, p. 859-890, 2015.

LIJPHART, Arend. Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.

MADISON, James. Federalist Paper No 10.

MAYORGA, Rene Antonio. Outsider and Neopopulism: the road to plebiscitary democracy. In: MAINWARING, Scott (Coord.). The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes. Redwood: Stanford University Press, 2006.

MILL, John Stuart. Considerations on Representative Government [1862]. New York: Prometheus Books, 1991.

MUDDE, Cas. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, n. 39, p. 541-543, 2004.

MUELLER, Dennis C. Constitutional Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

O’DONNELL, Guillermo. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, p. 55-69, 1994.

OAKESHOTT, Michael. Rationalism in Politics and other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991.

ÖRÜCÜ, Esin. Whither the Presidency of the Republic of Turkey? European Public Law, n. 14, p. 35-53, 2008.

ÖZBUDUN, Ergun. The Constitutional System of Turkey: 1876 to the Present. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2011.

QVORTRUP, Mads. Are Referendums Controlled and Pro-hegemonic? Political Studies, vol. 48, pp. 821-826, 2000.

ROZNAI Yaniv; YOLCU, Serkan. An unconstitutional constitutional amendment-The Turkish perspective: A comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court′s headscarf decision. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 10, n. 1, p. 175-202, 2012.

ROZNAI, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

SARTORI, Giovanni. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. New York: Chatham House, 1987.

SCOTTI, Valentina Rita. On the pro-hegemonic nature of referenda for constitutional reforms in Turkey. A focus on 16 April 2017 referendum introducing presidentialism. Osservatorio Costituzionale, n. 2, 2017.

SEMETKO, Holli A.; DE VREESE, Claes E. (Coord.). Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue. London: Routledge, 2004.

SETALA, Maija. On the problems of responsibility and accountability in referendums. European Journal of Political Research, n. 45, 2006.

SİEYÈS, Emmanuel-Joseph. What is the Third Estate? (Qu’est-ce que le Tiers Etat ?). London: Praeger, 1963.

SUKSI, Marku. Bringing in the people: a comparison of constitutional forms and practices of the referendum. Leida: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.

TIERNEY, Stephen. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

WEYLAND, Kurt. Clarifying a Contested Concept – Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Journal of Comparative Politics, vol. 34, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2001.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i3.74334