Amendments of Russian constitution concerning international law and the BRICS

Autores/as

  • Ekaterina Kudryashova Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law
  • Michel Verlaine Institute of Child Nutrition Business School
  • Anna Shashkova Moscow State Institute of International Relations

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i2.73355

Palabras clave:

BRICS, constitutional reform in Russia, Russian constitution, political pragmatism, sources of international law.

Resumen

The paper presents the current constitutional reform in Russia focusing on the constitutional amendment concerning the international case law. The amended article 79 of the Constitution of Russian Federation restricts the international case law applicability in Russia. There was no polemic around the draft of the constitutional amendment and this restriction was accepted by experts, politicians and public without any discussion. To certain extent this unanimous acceptance could be explained by general positivistic trend in Russia. The amendment is in line with the positivistic approach to the international law formed in Russia recently. The strategic documents on the cooperation within BRICS are scrutinized showing that the positivistic approach is in line with the strategies of Russia announced previously. Based on the general scientific methods and on the method of academic foresight the authors made the following conclusions. The constitutional reform regarding international law does not affect the BRICS documents directly and it does not go against the principles of BRICS cooperation announced by Russia. However, there are certain indirect implications. It is clear that the reform deepens divergences between the BRICS countries. The differences in the approaches to the human rights, certain ideological differences will become more acute within BRICS and there is a space for political use of these differences.

Biografía del autor/a

Ekaterina Kudryashova, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law

Doctor of Science (Law), Head researcher of the Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia). Attorney at law. E-mail: ev_kudryashova@inbox.ru.

Michel Verlaine, Institute of Child Nutrition Business School

PhD in Economics and Management, Institute of Child Nutrition Business School – ICN Business School (Paris, France). E-mail: michel.verlaine@icn-artem.com.

Anna Shashkova, Moscow State Institute of International Relations

Doctor of Science (Politics), Candidate of Science (Law), Professor of Constitutional Law Chair, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (Moscow, Russia). E-mail: a.shashkova@inno.mgimo.ru.

Citas

ASUELIME, Lucky E. The cons of South Africa’s membership in a China-led BRICS: an appraisal. Journal of African Union Studies, Johannesburg, v. 7, n. 1, p. 115-128, apr. 2018.

BRICS INFORMATION PORTAL. Available at: <http://infobrics.org>. Last accessed: 10 apr. 2020.

BROSIG, Malte. The Role of BRICS in Large-Scale Armed Conflict. New security challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 1-41.

BUTLER, William. Five Generations of Russian Constitutions: Russia as part of the Western Legal Heritage. BRICS Law Journal, Tiumen, v. 6, n. 3, 2019, p. 13-21.

COOPER, Andrew F. The BRICS: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

CRAWFORD, James. Chance, Order, Change: the course of international law. General Course on Public International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2014, p. 174.

DEHSHIRI, Mohammad Reza; NESHASTESAZAN, Mohammad Hossein. Human Rights Diplomacy: Case Study of Brazil. Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies, Tehran, v. 2, n. 1, 2018.

ELSTER, Jon. Constitution-making and violence. Journal of Legal Analysis, Oxford, v. 4, n. 1, p. 7-39, mar./may. 2012.

GARCÍA, Arturo Oropeza. The role of China and the BRICS project. Mexican Law Review, México, v. 7, n. 1, p. 109-136, jul./dec. 2014.

HANQUIN, Xue. Chinese Contemporary Perspective on International Law: History, Culture and International Law. The Hague Academy of international law Collected Courses. Vol. 355. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011, p. 41-234.

INDIA. Website of India’s 2016 BRICS, ‘About BRICS’. Available at: <http://brics2016.gov.in/content/innerpage/about-usphp.php>. Last accessed: 10 apr. 2020.

INSHAKOVA, Agnessa O.; MARCHUKOV, Igor P. General Energy Policy and Ways of Development of Legal Regulation of Foreign Trade Turnover of Energy Resources of the BRICS Countries. In: INSHAKOV, Oleg V.; INSHAKOVA, Agnessa O.; POPKOVA, Elena G. (Eds.). Energy Sector: A Systematic Analysis of Economy, Foreign Trade and Legal Regulations Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Switzerland: Springer, 2019, p. 227-245.

KALINICHENKO, Paul. The constitutional order of the Russian Federation and its adaptability to European and Eurasian integration Project. In: PETROV, Roman; ELSUWEGE, Peter (Eds.). Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration. Adapting to European and Eurasian Integration Projects. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018, p.168-177.

KUDRYASHOVA, Ekaterina. Pravovoe regulirovanie strategicheskogo planirovaniia v sfere gosudarstvennykh finansov. Moscow: Institute zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniia, 2019.

MALKSOO, Lauri. Russian Approaches to International law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

NEUWIRTH, Rostam J.; SVETLICINII, Alexandr. The BRICS-Lawyers’ Guide to BRICS Texts and Materials. Macau: BRICS-Lawyers, 2019.

RICCERI, Marco. A report on the ambassador’s conference in Rome following the 10th BRICS summit conference. Kutafin University Law Review. Moscow, vol. 6, n. 1, p. 225-234, apr. 2019.

ROLLAND, Sonia E. The BRICS’ Contributions to the Architecture and Norms of International Economic Law Proceedings of the Annual Meeting. American Society of International Law, Massachusetts, v. 107, 2013, p. 164-170.

RYAZANOVA, M. O. Energy cooperation within the BRICS: Significance of the issue. Bulletin of MGIMO, Moscow, v. 39, n. 6, p. 7-11, 2015.

SANDREY, Ron; JANSEN, Hans Grinsted. A fresh look at a Preferential Trade Agreement among the BRICS. Stellenbosch: Tralac, 2013.

SHASHKOVA, Anna; VERLAINE, Michel; KUDRYASHOVA, Ekaterina, On modifications to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020. Russian Law Journal, Moscow, v. 8, n. 1, p. 60-83, 2020.

SHOKHIN, Sergey; KUDRYASHOVA, Ekaterina. Macroeconomic Coordination in the Eurasian Economic Union: Strategic Aspects. Russian Law Journal. Moscow, v. 7, n. 3, 2019, p. 38-52.

SIMÕES, Fernando Dias. A Dispute Resolution Center for the BRICS? In: NEUWIRTH, Rostam J.; SVETLICINII, Alexandr; HALIS, Denis de Castro (Eds.). The BRICS-Lawyers’ Guide to Global Cooperation.Campridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, p. 270-286.

SMITH, K. South Africa, the BRICS and human rights: In bad company? In: KHADIAGALA, Gilbert M.; PILLAY, Devan; SOUTHALL, Roger (Eds.). New South African Review 5: Beyond Marikana. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand Press, 2015.

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. BRICS-plus: Alternative globalization in the making? Available at: <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/brics-plus-an-alternative-to-globalization-in-the-making/>. Last accessed: 10 apr. 2020.

ZAKHAROVA, Larissa. The interpretive approach to international law: a positivist view. Kutafin University Law Review, Moscow, v. 2, n.1, p. 136-155, may. 2015.

ПРЕЗИДЕНТ РОССИИ. Послание Президента Федеральному Собранию. Moscow. Available at: <http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62582>. Last accessed: 20 feb. 2020.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-10-31

Cómo citar

KUDRYASHOVA, Ekaterina; VERLAINE, Michel; SHASHKOVA, Anna. Amendments of Russian constitution concerning international law and the BRICS. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 337–353, 2020. DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v7i2.73355. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/73355. Acesso em: 25 dic. 2025.

Número

Sección

Artículos originales