Open Journal Systems

Constitutionalism and rights protection in Mexico and Brazil: comparative remarks

Francisca Pou Giménez

Resumo

Comparative exercises between constitutional law in Brazil and in Mexico may seem destined to be exercises of identifying a reduced set of commonalities in an ocean of difference. The article, however, aims to suggest to what extent the opposite might be closer to the truth, and provide some sense of the amount of parallels between the two countries when viewed through constitutional lenses. Despite divergent paths of historical evolution in the XIX and the XX centuries, there are elements that confer to contemporary constitutional systems in Brazil and Mexico an air of commonality. The article underlines at least three of them: (i) commonalities in patterns of constitutional genesis and change; (ii) the existence of generous constitutional declarations of rights coupled with a varied assortment of rights-protecting channels in both places; and (iii) the existence in the two countries of old Supreme Courts with extensive jurisdictional menus and ample space for transformative action at their disposal. On the other hand, the main differences identified and analyzed in the article occur in the domain of rights protection and include the system of judicial enforcement of rights and the public profile of the two Supreme Courts.

Palavras-chave

constitutionalism; Comparative Law; Brazil; Mexico; Supreme Court.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências

ABRAMOVICH, Víctor; PAUTASSI, Laura. La revisión judicial de las políticas sociales. Buenos Aires: Editores del Puerto, 2008.

ALTERIO, Micaela. NIEMBRO, Roberto. Constitutional Culture and Democracy in Mexico: A Critical View of the 100-Year-Old Mexican Constitution. In: GRABER, Mark; LEVINSON, Sanford; TUSHNET, Mark. (eds.). Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

ALVIAR, Helena; KLARE, Karl; WILLIAMS, Lucy A. (eds.). Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2015.

ARGUELHES, Diego Werneck; RIBEIRO, Leandro Molhano. ‘The Court, it is I’? Individual judicial powers in the Brazilian Supreme Court and their implications for constitutional theory. Global Constitutionalism, v. 7, n. 2, p. 236–262, 2018.

BARBOSA, Leonardo Augusto de Andrade. Legislative Process and Constitutional Change in Brazil: On the Pathologies of the Procedure for Amending the 1988 Constitution. In: ALBERT, Richard; BERNAL, Carlos; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden (eds.). Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019 (forthcoming).

BARCELLOS, Ana Paula de. Sanitation Rights, Public Law Litigation, and Inequality: A Case Study from Brazil. Health and Human Rights, v. 16, n. 2, p. 35-46, 2014.

BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden. The Brazilian Constitutional Amendment Rate: A Culture of Change? International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog. Available at: . Accessed on: 11 Oct. 2017.

BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden; GONÇALVES, Fernando José Acunha. O papel da política na atuação das Corte Supremas: Uma comparaçao entre Brasil e México. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, v. 37, n. 1, p. 57-79, 2018.

BEGALLO, Paola. Justicia y experimentalismo: la función remedial del poder judicial en el litigio de derecho público en Argentina. In: Derecho y pobreza SELA, 2005. Available at: . Accessed on: 11 Oct. 2017.

BIEHL, João; SOCAL, Mariana P.; AMON, Joseph J. The judicialization of health and the quest for state accountability: Evidence from 1262 lawsuits of access to medicines in Southern Brazil. Health and Human Rights Journal, v. 18, n. 1, p. 209-220, 2016.

BOGDANDY, Armin von. MAC-GREGOR, Eduardo Ferrer; ANTONIAZZI, Mariela Morales; PIOVESAN, Flávia (eds.); SOLEY, Ximena (managing ed.). Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Emergence of a New Ius Commune. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

CASAR, María Amparo; MARVÁN, Ignacio. (eds.). Reformar sin mayorías. La dinámica del cambio constitucional en México 1997-2012. Mexico City: Taurus, 2014.

COBO, Fernanda; CHARVEL, Sofía. The Mexican Supreme Court and the right to health: its problematic interpretations. Unpublished paper, on file with author, 2018.

COSSÍO DÍAZ, José Ramón. Sistemas y modelos de control constitucional en México. Mexico City: IIJ UNAM, 2013.

COSSÍO DÍAZ, José Ramón (coord.). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Comentada. Mexico City: Tirant lo Blanch, 2017.

COSTA, Alexandre Araújo; ASSUNÇÃO, Guilherme Sena de. On the Limits of the Supermajority Rule: The Brazilian Experience on Using Constitutional Amendments to Circumvent the System of Checks and Balances. In: ALBERT, Richard; BERNAL, Carlos; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden (eds.). Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019 (forthcoming).

DAVIS, Richard; TARAS, David. (eds.). Justices and Journalists. The Global Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

FERNANDES, Edesio; MC ALLISTER, Lesley K. Making Law Matter: Environmental protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, v. 41, n. 3, p. 629–630, 2009.

FERRAZ, Ottavio L. Mota. The right to health in the courts of Brazil: Worsening health inequalities? Health and Human Rights, v. 11, p. 33-45, 2009.

GIDI, Antonio. Class Actions in Brazil - A Model for Civil Law Countries. American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 51, p. 311-408, 2013.

HIRSCHL, Ran. On the blurred methodological matrix of comparative constitutional law. In: CHOUDHRY, Sujit. (ed.). The migration of constitutional ideas. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

KAPISZEWSKI, Diana. How Courts Work: Institutions, Culture and the Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal. In: SIEDER, Rachel; HUNNEUS, Alexandra; COUSO, Javier (eds.). Cultures of Legality. Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

KAPISZEWSKI, Diana. Economic Governance on Trial: High Courts and Elected Leaders in Argentina and Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, v. 55, n. 4, p. 47-73, 2013.

MARVÁN LABORDE, Ignacio. Cómo hicieron la Constitución de 1917. Mexico City, CIDE, 2017.

MCALLISTER, Lesley. Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection & Legal Institutions in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.

MCALLISTER, Lesley K. Environmental Advocacy Litigation in Brazil and the United States. Journal of Comparative Law, v. 6, n. 2, p. 203-219, 2011.

MENDES, Conrado Hübner. The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil. In: JAKAB, András; DVEVRE, Arthur; ITZCOVICH, Giulio (eds). Comparative Constitutional Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

PAZ, Octavio. El laberinto de la soledad. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1994.

POU GIMÉNEZ, Francisca. Constitutional Change and the Supreme Court Institutional Architecture: Decisional Indeterminacy as a Problem for Legitimacy. In: CASTAGNOLA, Andrea; NORIEGA, Saúl López (eds.). Judicial Politics in Mexico: The Supreme Court and the Transition to Democracy. New York: Routledge, 2017.

POU GIMÉNEZ, Francisca; POZAS-LOYO, Andrea. Are Constitutional Amendment and Judicial Review Substitutes? Unexpected Lessons from Mexico and Brazil. Paper presented at Law and Society Annual Meeting 2017, Mexico City, 2017.

POU GIMÉNEZ, Francisca; POZAS-LOYO, Andrea. The Paradox of Mexican Constitutional Hyper-reformism: Enabling Peaceful Transition while Blocking Democratic Consolidation. In: ALBERT, Richard; BERNAL, Carlos; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden (eds.). Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019 (forthcoming).

POU GIMÉNEZ, Francisca; RODILES, Alejandro. Mexico. In: PALOMBINO, Fulvio (ed.). Duelling for Supremacy: International Law vs. National Fundamental Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 (forthcoming).

POZAS-LOYO, Andrea; RIOS FIGUEROA, Julio. Anatomy of an Informal Institution: Patronage Networks and the ‘Gentlemen’s Pact’ in the Mexican Federal Judiciary, 1917-1994. International Political Science Review. Forthcoming, 2018.

PRADO, Mariana Mota; MACHADO, Marta. The Promises and Perils of Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Lava Jato Case. Paper presented at Seminario en Latinoamérica de Teoría Constitucional y Política (SELA) 2018, San Juan de Puerto Rico, 2018.

ROSENN, Keith S. Recent Important Decisions by the Brazilian Supreme Court. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, v. 45 n. 2, p. 297-334, 2013.

ROSENN, Keith S. Procedural Protection of Constitutional Rights in Brazil. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 59 n.4, p. 1009-1050, 2011

SALGADO, Eneida Desiree; CHAGAS, Carolina Alves das. The Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Brazil and the Super-Countermajoritarian Role of the Brazilian Supreme Court. In: ALBERT, Richard; BERNAL, Carlos; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden (eds.). Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019 (forthcoming).

SILVA, Virgílio Afonso da. The Constitution of Brazil. A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019 (forthcoming).

SILVA, Virgílio Afonso da. Deciding without Deliberating. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 11, n. 3, p. 557-584, 2013.

SILVA, Virgilio Alfonso da; TERRAZAS, Fernanda Vargas. Claiming the Right to Health in Brazilian Courts: The exclusion of the already excluded? Law and Social Inquiry, v. 36 n. 4, p. 825-853, 2011.

SILVA GARCÍA, Fernando. Derechos humanos y restricciones constitucionales: ¿reforma constitucional del futuro vs. interpretación constitucional del pasado? (comentario a la CT 293/2011 del Pleno de la SCJN). Cuestiones constitucionales, n. 30, p. 251-272, 2014.

TSCHORNE, Samuel I. The “legitimacy crisis” and the “constitutional problem” in Chile: what is left? Paper presented at Seminario en Latinoamérica de Teoría Constitucional y Política (SELA) 2018, San Juan de Puerto Rico, 2018.

UNGER, Roberto Mangabeira. Democracy realized. The progressive alternative. London: Verso, 1998.

UPRIMNY, Rodrigo. The recent transformation of constitutional law in Latin America. Trends and challenges. In: RODRÍGUEZ-GARAVITO, César. (ed.). Law and Society in Latin America. A New Map. New York: Routledge, 2015.

YRIGOYEN FAJARDO, Raquel Z. The panorama of pluralist constitutionalism: from multiculturalism to decolonization. In: RODRÍGUEZ-GARAVITO, César. (ed.). Law and Society in Latin America. A New Map. New York: Routledge, 2015.

VELASCO, Mariana. Mexico’s Constitutional Entrenchment Mirage: The Political Sources of Hyper-Reformism. In: ALBERT, Richard; BERNAL, Carlos; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden (eds.). Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019 (forthcoming).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i3.60972