Psychology, the United Health System (SUS) and the Ambulatory Care Information System (SIA): innovations, propositions and misdirections

Authors

  • Isabel Fernandes de Oliveira
  • Candida M. Bezerra Dantas
  • Ana Ludmila F. Costa
  • Tatiane Medeiros Silva Gadelha
  • Elisa Maria Parahyba Campos Ribeiro
  • Oswaldo H. Yamamoto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v9i2.4790

Keywords:

Psychology, Public Health, Ambulatory Care Information System

Abstract

 

The adequability of Psychology patterns of intervention have been discussed since the first incursions of psychologists on the Public Health System, that have a redundant health care, individual and inefficient. However, the interference on deliberations, orientations and exigencies of the Brazilian United Health System’s Ambulatory Care Information System (SIA/SUS), that provides psychologists with a set of procedures has been overlooked. This study analised the reports of psychological procedures in Natal/RN, available at SIA/SUS, aiming to verify how its structure influences the maintenance of models of professional practice. Data suggest a permanence of compartmentalized actions, specially in morbid occurrences. Constraints to the development of innovative actions has led psychology professionals either to record them in a disguised format or to persist in using traditional procedures. It is our conclusion that, in what concerns Psychology, the information system constrains the development of a model of professional practice more in agreement with the sanitation reform ideals.

 

Keywords: Psychology; Public Health; Ambulatory Care Information System.

How to Cite

de Oliveira, I. F., Dantas, C. M. B., Costa, A. L. F., Gadelha, T. M. S., Ribeiro, E. M. P. C., & Yamamoto, O. H. (2005). Psychology, the United Health System (SUS) and the Ambulatory Care Information System (SIA): innovations, propositions and misdirections. Interação Em Psicologia, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v9i2.4790

Issue

Section

Articles