Disruptive Innovation and the Idea of Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i1.91159Palavras-chave:
Disruptive Innovation, Technology, Conceptual History, Fear, ReificationResumo
From its obscure origins in management theory, disruptive innovation has become one of the concepts used to describe how networked digital technologies and platforms transform industries and institutions. In this paper, I will examine how contested, and at times incommensurable, iterations of disruptive innovation share a similar idea of technology. Drawing upon discourses of disruptive innovation from management theory, institutional policies, and popular culture reveals a shared idea of technology whose characteristics include a reified idea of technology and a horizon of expectations in which fear of falling behind influences ideas about technological change.
Referências
After Capitalism, n+1, 24 (Winter 2016), p. 10. https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-24/the-intellectual-situation/after-capitalism/
Berman, M. (1982). All that is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin.
Boccioni, U., Carra, C., Russolo, G., Balla, G., & Severini, G. (1910 [1973]). Manifesto of Futurist Painters. In U. Apollonio (Ed.), Futurist Manifestos: The Documents of 20th-century art (p. 24-27). Viking Adult.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bower, J., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive Technology: Catching the Wave. Harvard Business Review, January-February. https://hbr.org/1995/01/disruptive-technologies-catching-the-wave
Chatterjee, K. (2014). It’s Time to Disrupt Europe: Digital First. In S. Schurink (Ed.) Digital Minds for a New Europe. Leading thinkers look at the challenges ahead – and the solutions digital technology will provide (p. 29-34) https://docplayer.net/24232355-European-digital-forum-foreword-by-neelie-kroes.html
Christensen, C. M. (1997 [2011]). The Innovator’s Dilemma. New York: Harper Business.
Christensen, C. M. (2006). The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00180.x
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is Disruptive Innovation? Harvard Business Review, December, 44-53. https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation
Christensen, C., & Rosenblom, R. (1995). Explaining the Attacker’s Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network. Research Policy, 24, 233-257.
Christensen, C., Craig, T., & Hart, S. (2001). The Great Disruption. Foreign Affairs, 80(2), 80-95.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
Eyring, H., & Chrstensen, C. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out. San Jose: Josey Bass.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. New York: Routledge
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology. New York: Oxford University Press
Feenberg, A. (2014). The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukacs and the Frankfurt School. London: Verso.
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gans, J. (2016). The Disruption Dilemma. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977[1953]). The Question Concerning Technology. In Selected Writings (p. 307-343). New York: Harper.
Herf, J. (1984). Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge University Press.
Hwang, J., & Christensen, C. (2008). Disruptive Innovation in Health Care Delivery: A Framework for Business Model Innovation. Health Affairs, 27(5), 1329-1335.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jonas, H. (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technlogical Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kline, R. (1995). Construing “Technology” as “Applied Science”: Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis, 86,194-221.
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing Things Together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice (p. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lepore, J. (2014). The Disruption Machine: What the Gospel of Innovation gets Wrong. The New Yorker, June 23.
Long, P. (1991). Invention, Authorship, “Intellectual Property,” and the Origins of Patents: Notes toward a Conceptual History. Technology & Culture, 32(4), 846-884.
Lukacs, G. (1973 [1925]). Technology and Social Relations. In Marxism and Human Liberation (p. 49-61). New York: Dell Publishing Co.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marineti, F. T. (1909 [1973]. The Founding and Manifesto of Futurism. In U. Apollonio (Ed.), Futurist Manifestos (p. 19-24). Viking Adult.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1994 [1848]). The Communist Manifesto. In L. Simon (Ed.), Selected Writings (p.157-187). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Marx, L. (1994). The Idea of ‘Technology’ and Postmodern Pessimism. In Smith & Marx (Eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (p. 237-259). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Marx, L. (1997). Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept. Social Research, 64(3), 965-988.
Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A Guide to our Future. London: Penguin.
Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam University Press.
Pistone, M. R., & Horn, M. B. (2016). Disrupting Law School: How Disruptive Innovation will Revolutionize the Legal World. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, March 15. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/disrupting-law-school/
Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik Comes to America: Changing Meanings of Technology before 1930. Technology & Culture, 47(3), 486-512.
Schatzberg, E. (2012). From Art to Applied Science. Isis, 103, 555-563.
Schmidt, E. (2014). Embracing a New Digital Era in Europe. In S. Schurink (Ed.) Digital Minds for a New Europe. Leading thinkers look at the challenges ahead – and the solutions digital technology will provide (p. 105-107) https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/209596/Digital_Minds_for_a_New_Europe.pdf?t=1453216482993
Schumpeter, J. A. (2010 [1942]). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Serres, M. (2015). Thumbelina: The Culture and Technology of Millennials. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sharon, T. (2016). The Googlization of Health Research: From Disruptive Innovation to Disruptive Ethics. Personalized Medicine, 13(6), 563-574.
Sims, C. (2017). Disruptive Fixation: School Reform and the Pitfalls of Techno-Idealism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
The New York Times (2014). Report on Innovation, March 24, 97 p. https://sriramk.com/memos/nytimes-innovation-report.pdf
Tyfield, D (2018). Innovating innovation: Disruptive Innovation in China and the Low-Carbon Transition of Capitalism. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.024
van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users Femininity and Masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (p. 193-209). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics out of Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
NOvation é uma revista de acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0, que permite que outros compartilhem o trabalho com um reconhecimento (e preservação) da autoria e do direito de propriedade intelectual do autor.
Nesta medida, os autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1. Autores mantém os direitos e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho publicado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 que permite [...]
2. Autores têm autorização para distribuição, da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, em repositório institucional, temático, bases de dados e em outras obras como capítulo de livro, com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na revista;
3. Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista serão indexados em bases de dados, repositórios, portais, diretórios e outras fontes em que a revista está e vier a estar indexada.
Responsabilidade ética dos autores
Esta revista está empenhada em manter a integridade do registo científico.
O consentimento para submissão foi recebido explicitamente de todos os coautores, bem como das autoridades responsáveis – tácita ou explicitamente – incluindo o instituto/organização onde o trabalho foi realizado, antes do trabalho ser submetido
