Is Responsible Innovation Possible? The Problem of Depoliticization for a Normative Framework of RI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91155Keywords:
responsibility, politics, depoliticization, (R)RI, Hannah ArendtAbstract
Global frameworks of RI face several challenges. These include (1) the extent to which economic interests can be reconciled with the concept of responsibility in innovation processes and (2) the lack of a strong political dimension in these frameworks’ conception of responsibility. Responding to these challenges is crucial if RI is to ensure that societal and natural needs are sufficiently considered in the innovation process. The influence of economic incentives on innovation processes coupled with the widespread depoliticization of persons makes it more urgent that RI adopt a political conception of responsibility in order to safeguard the legitimacy of the values and outcomes it deems societally desirable. This paper argues that the operative conception of responsibility in RI should be broadened to include a stronger political dimension. To this end, I turn to the work of Hannah Arendt to continue rethinking the concept of “the political” and, by extension, how responsibility and politics can be understood as two sides of the same coin.
References
Arendt, H. (2006 [1963]). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Intro. by Amos Elon. NY: Penguin Books.
Arendt, H. (2004). Philosophy and Politics. Social Research, 71(3), 427-454.
Arendt, H. (1998 [1958]). The Human Condition. Ed. by Margaret Canovan. 2nd Ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. San Diego: Harcourt, Inc.
Arendt, H. (2005). The Promise of Politics. Ed. by Jerome Kohn. NY: Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (1977 [1954]). What is Freedom? In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (pp. 143-171). Dallas, PA: Penguin Books.
Arendt, H. (1994). ‘What Remains? The Language Remains’: A Conversation with Günter Gaus. In Essays in Understanding 1930-1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism (pp.1-23). Ed. by Jerome Kohn. NY: Schocken Books.
Berkowitz, R. (2018). The Singularity and the Human Condition. Philosophy Today, 62(2), 337-355.
Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation. In B. Koops, J. van den Hoven, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & I. Oosterlaken (Eds.) Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches and Applications (pp. 19-36). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dinan, M. (2017). The Robot Condition: Karel Čapek's R.U.R. and Hannah Arendt on Labor, Technology, and Innovation. Perspectives on Political Science, 46(2), 108-117.
European Commission (2014). Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Social Challenges. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2be36f74-b490-409e-bb60-12fd438100fe
Fleming, R. C., & Mauger, R. (2021). Green and Just? An Update on the 'European Green Deal'. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 18(1-2), 164-80. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-18010010
Frodeman, R. (2019) Review of International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(2), 255-257.
Gianni, R. (2019). Choosing freedom: ethical governance for responsible research and innovation. In R. von Schomberg & J. Hankins (Eds.), International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource (pp. 49-69). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Godin, B. (2015). Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation over the Centuries. Routledge.
Grunwald, A. (2018). Diverging Pathways to Overcoming the Environmental Crisis: A Critique of Eco- Modernism from a Technology Assessment Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1854-1862.
Heidegger, M. (2010 [1927]). Being and Time. Trans. by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Loidolt, S. (2018). Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity. NY: Routledge.
Owen, R., & Pansera, M. (2019). Responsible innovation: process and politics. In R. von Schomberg & J. Hankins (Eds.), International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource (pp.35-48). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Owen, R, Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.
Pianta, M., & Lucchese, M. (2020). Rethinking the European Green Deal: An Industrial Policy for a Just Transition in Europe. Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(4), 633-641.
Stangneth, B. (2016). Eichmann before Jerusalem: The Unexamined Life of a Mass Murderer. Repr. London: Vintage.
Stilgoe, J,. Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.
Straume, I. S., & Humphrey, J. F. (2010). Introduction. In I. S. Straume & J. F. Humphrey Depoliticization: The Political Imaginary of Global Capitalism (pp. 9-19). NSU Press.
van Oudheusden, M. (2014). Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
Villa, D. (1996) Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
von Schomberg, L., & Blok, V. (2019). Technology in the Age of Innovation: Responsible Innovation as a New Subdomain Within the Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00386-3
von Schomberg, R. (2019). Why responsible innovation? In R. von Schomberg & J. Hankins (Eds.), International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource (pp.12-32). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Reijers, W. (2020). Responsible innovation between virtue and governance: revisiting Arendt’s notion of work as action. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 471-489.
Williams, G. (2015). Disclosure and Responsibility in Arendt’s The Human Condition. European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (1), 37-54.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
