Potential for carbon storage in school infrastructure as a sustainability strategy: a case study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v56i1.103322

Keywords:

Wood products, Biogenic CO₂, Climate change

Abstract

Wood plays a fundamental role in mitigating climate change due to its ability to fix and store carbon dioxide (CO₂). This study estimated the carbon stored in wood products at Eduardo Mondlane Secondary School in Maputo, Mozambique. Simple random sampling was adopted in five classrooms, measuring the dimensions and humidity of furniture (desks, doors, windows, blackboards, tables, and chairs) to calculate volumes, apparent densities, and CO₂ stocks, according to the EN 16449:2014 standard. The results revealed that mixed desks (wood and metal, type 1) store an average of 308.56 kg of CO₂ each, while solid wood desks (type 2) accumulate 511.08 kg. Doors stand out with 1,834.68 kg of CO₂ per unit, compared to 23.54 kg in blackboards. In the real-world school setting, the total carbon stock reaches 244,091 kg of CO2, equivalent to 290.58 kg/m² (considering 56 m² per classroom). It is concluded that wood products in public schools represent a significant carbon reservoir, contributing to climate mitigation.

Author Biographies

Narciso Fernando Bila, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane

Faculdade de Agronomia e Engenharia Florestal, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Maputo, Maputo, Moçambique

Géssica da Maurida Talube, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane

Engenheira Florestal e Mestre em Biologia e Ecologia da Conservação pela Universidade Eduardo Mondlane. Possui habilidades teórico-prático em, Análise de dados, Estatística, Conservação da Biodiversidade, Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Mudanças climáticas e ESG .

References

ANDERSON, T. R.; HAWKINS, E.; JONES, P. D. CO₂, the greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering work of Arrhenius and Callendar to today's Earth System Models. Endeavour, v. 40, n. 3, p. 178-187, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2016.07.002.

BRAGA, C. I.; PETREA, S.; ZAHARIA, A.; CUCU, A. B.; SERBAN, T.; IENASOIU, G.; RADU, G. R. Assessing the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of harvested wood products in Romania and their contribution to achieving climate neutrality. Sustainability, v. 17, n. 2, art. 640, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020640.

BUCHHOLZ, T.; MASON, T.; SPRINGSTEEN, B.; GUNN, J.; SAAH, D. Carbon life cycle assessment on California-specific wood products industries: do data backup general default values for wood harvest and processing? Forests, v. 12, n. 2, art. 177, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020177.

DZHURKO, D.; KYLILI, A.; FOKAIDES, P. A.; IOANNOU, I. Future buildings as carbon sinks: comparative analysis of timber-based building typologies regarding their carbon emissions and storage. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1330105.

EMAMI, N.; MARTEINSSON, B.; HEINONEN, J. Environmental impact assessment of a school building in Iceland using LCA—including the effect of long distance transport of materials. Buildings, v. 6, n. 4, art. 46, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings6040046.

EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL CITIZENS' ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ECOS). An emerging framework for timber buildings. Brussels: ECOS, 2023.

FREITAS JUNIOR, J. A.; SANQUETTA, C. R.; SANQUETTA, M. N. I.; DALLA CORTE, A. P.; SANQUETTA, F. T. I. Carbon storage in internal wood doors of residential buildings. Enciclopédia Biosfera, Goiânia, v. 11, n. 22, p. 1183-1189, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18677/Enciclopedia_Biosfera_2015_152.

GROSSI, F.; GE, H.; ZMEUREANU, R. Life cycle assessment of the environmental benefits of using wood products and planting trees at an all-electric university laboratory. Buildings, v. 13, n. 7, art. 1584, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071584.

HOWE, J. Building with wood: proactive climate protection. Minneapolis: Dovetail Partners, Inc., 2015.

IORDAN, C.-M.; HU, X.; ARVESEN, A.; KAUPPI, P.; CHERUBINI, F. Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Carbon Balance and Management, v. 13, art. 12, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0101-9.

IPCC. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

LAO, W.; HAN, Y.; YOU, J. Carbon footprint as an environmental indicator for wood flooring industry in China. Case Studies in Construction Materials, v. 21, e03594, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03594.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (MINEDH). Report on school furniture in public educational institutions. Maputo: MINEDH, 2021.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS OF MOZAMBIQUE (INE). Annual report on demographic and socioeconomic indicators. Maputo: INE, 2020.

NAKANO, K.; KOIDE, M.; YAMADA, Y.; OGAWA, T.; HATTORI, N. Environmental impacts of structural lumber production in Japan. Journal of Wood Science, v. 70, art. 4, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-023-02118-w.

QIAN, Y.; GUNAWARDENA, T.; MENDIS, P.; AYE, L. Carbon footprint variability in engineered wood products for timber buildings: a systematic review of carbon accounting methodologies. Sustainability, v. 17, n. 11, art. 4804, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114804.

RÖCK, M.; SAADE, M. R. M.; BALOUKTSI, M.; RASMUSSEN, F. N.; FRISCHKNECHT, R.; HABERT, G.; LUTZKENDORF, T.; PASSER, A. Embodied GHG emissions of buildings: the hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Applied Energy, v. 278, 114107, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107.

SEBESTYÉN, T. T. Evaluation of the carbon footprint of wooden glamping structures by life cycle assessment. Sustainability, v. 16, n. 7, art. 2906, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072906.

ZHANG, L.; ZHANG, S.; CHEN, D.; LI, T.; WANG, S.; XU, Z.; WANG, Y.; LIU, Z.; ZHANG, S. Spatiotemporal trends of carbon stock in wood and bamboo products in China during 1987–2020. Scientific Reports, v. 13, art. 15194, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41007-6.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

Bila, N. F., & Talube, G. da M. (2026). Potential for carbon storage in school infrastructure as a sustainability strategy: a case study. Floresta, 56(1), e103322. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v56i1.103322

Issue

Section

Artigos