Do Engajamento ao Desprendimento
Resumo
Com a crescente tomada de consciência de seus direitos, os povos indígenas no Brasil, a exemplo de tantos outros no mundo, passaram a reagir contra os abusos de certos pesquisadores que persistem em tratar o espaço indígena como terra de ninguém. Essas reações atingem muitos etnógrafos, principalmente a partir dos anos 1990, o que nos leva a ponderar sobre o futuro dos estudos etnográficos tradicionais. Ao mesmo tempo, com a crescente escolaridade dos indígenas, abre-se o horizonte para as auto-etnografias, ou seja, pesquisas realizadas por aqueles que sempre foram "objetos" de investigação etnográfica. Se essa tendência se confirmar, o que acontecerá com a etnografia acadêmica? Sob o nome de ator coadjuvante, propõe-se a possibilidade de uma gama de prováveis papéis que os etnógrafos tradicionais podem assumir sem abrir mão de seu compromisso tanto com os povos indígenas quanto com a profissão antropológica.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ALBERT, Bruce. 1993. L’Or Cannibale et la Chute du Ciel: Une critique chamanique de l’économie politique de la nature (Yanomami, Brasil). Número temático: La Remontée de l’Amazonie. L´Homme 126-128:349-378. https://doi.org/10.3406/hom.1993.369644
ALBERT, Bruce. 1997. “‘Ethnographic Situation’ and Ethnic Movements: Notes on post-Malinowskian fieldwork”. Critique of Anthropology 17(1):53-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9701700104
ARVELO-JIMÉNEZ, Nelly e Simeón Jiménez (orgs.). 2001. Atlas Dekuana. Caracas: Point Grafique, C.A.
ASAD, Talal. 1973. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. Londres: Ithaca Press.
BASHKOW, Ira. 2004. A Neo-Boasian Conception of Cultural Boundaries. American Anthropologist 106(3): 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.443
BATESON, Gregory. 1958 [1936]. Naven: A survey of the problems suggested by a composite picture of the culture of a New Guinea tribe drawn from three points of view. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
BRIGGS, Charles. 1996. “The Politics of Discursive Authority in Research on the ‘Invention of Tradition’”. Cultural Anthropology 11(4): 435-469. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1996.11.4.02a00020
BRIONES, Claudia. 2003. “Re-membering the Dis-membered: A drama about Mapuche and anthropological cultural production in three scenes” (4ª edição). Número temático: Indigenous Struggles and Contested Identities in Argentina, Gastón Gordillo e Silvia Hirsch (orgs.) Journal of Latin American Anthropology 8(3): 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlca.2003.8.3.31
BURLING, Robbins. 1964. Cognition and Componential Analysis: God’s truth or hocus-pocus? American Anthopologist 66: 20-27.
https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.1.02a00020
BUNZL, Matti. 2004. “Boas, Foucault, and the ‘Native Anthropologist’”: Notes toward a neo-Boasian anthropology. American Anthropologist 106(3): 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.435
CAPLAN, Pat (org.). 2003 The Ethics of Anthropology: Debates and dilemmas. Londres: Routledge.
CHAGNON, Napoleon. 1968. Yanomamö: The fierce people. Nova York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
CLIFFORD, James e George Marcus (orgs.). 1986. Writing Culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
DELORIA Jr., Vine. 1988. Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
FABIAN, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object. Nova York: Columbia University Press.
FARDON, Richard, org.1990. Localizing Strategies: Regional traditions of ethnographic writing. Edimburgo: Scottish Academic Press e Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
FLUEHR-LOBBAN, Carolyn (org.). 2003. Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for ethically conscious practice. 2ª ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
FOSTER, Stephen W. 1982. The Exotic as a Symbolic System. Dialectical Anthropology 7(1): 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247064
FOX, Richard G. (org.). 1991. Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the present. Santa Fé, N.M.: School of American Research Press.
FOX, Richard G. e Barbara J. King (orgs.). 2002. Anthropology Beyond Culture. Oxford: Berg.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. NovaYork: Crossroads.
GEWERTZ, Deborah B. e Frederick K. Errington. 1991. Twisted Histories, Altered Contexts: Representing the Chambri in a world system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GORDILLO, Gastón e Silvia Hirsch (orgs.). 2003. “Introduction. Indigenous Struggles and Contested Identities in Argentina: Histories of invisibilization and reemergence”. Número temático: Indigenous Struggles and Contested Identities in Argentina, Gastón Gordillo y Silvia Hirsch (orgs.) Journal of Latin American Anthropology 8(3): 4-30. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlca.2003.8.3.4
GRIMSON, Alejandro, Gustavo Lins Ribeiro e Pablo Semán (orgs.). 2004. La Antropologia Brasileña Contemporânea: Contribuciones para un diálogo latinoamericano. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros/ABA.
HANDLER, Richard. 2004. “Afterword: Mysteries of culture”. American Anthropologist 106(3): 488-494. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.488
HASTRUP, Kirsten e Peter Elsass. 1990. “Anthropological Advocacy: A Contradiction in terms?” Current Anthropology 31(3): 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1086/203842
HERZFELD, Michael. 1987. Anthropology Through the Looking Glass: Critical ethnography in the margins of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HERZFELD, Michael. 1997. Cultural Intimacy: Social poetics in the nation-state. Londres: Routledge.
HIRSCH, Silvia María. 2003. “Bilingualism, Pan-Indianism, and Politics in Northern Argentina: The Guaraní’s struggle for identity and recognition”. Número temático: Indigenous Struggles and Contested Identities in Argentina, Gastón Gordillo y Silvia Hirsch, orgs. Journal of Latin American Anthropology 8(3): 84-103.
https://doi.org/10.1525/jlca.2003.8.3.84
HYMES, Dell, org. 1974. Reinventing Anthropology. NovaYork: Vintage Books.
JACKSON, Jean. 1989. Is There a Way to Talk About Making Culture Without Making Enemies? Dialectical Anthropology 14: 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01959981
JACKSON, Jean. 1991. Hostile Encounters Between Nukak and Tukanoans: Changing ethnic identity in the Vaupés, Colombia. The Journal of Ethnic Studies 19(2): 17-39.
JACKSON, Jean. 1995. Culture, Genuine and Spurious: The politics of Indianness in the Vaupés, Colombia. American Ethnologist 22(1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.1.02a00010
JACKSON, Jean. 1999. The Politics of Ethnographic Practice in the Colombian Vaupés. Identities 6(2-3): 281-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1999.9962646
KIRSCH, Stuart. 2004. “Activist Ethnographies: Politics of the body, state and nature in New Guinea”. Conferência intitulada Political Interactions: Research, Advocacy and Representation. Goldsmith’s College, Londres, novembro.
LAZZARI, Axel. 2003. “Aboriginal Recognition, Freedom, and Phantoms: The vanishing of the Ranquel and the return of the Rankülche in La Pampa”. Número temático: Indigenous Struggles and Contested Identities in Argentina, Gastón Gordillo y Silvia Hirsch, orgs. Journal of Latin American Anthropology 8(3): 59-83.
https://doi.org/10.1525/jlca.2003.8.3.59
MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. 1961. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Nova York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc. MARCUS, George. 1999. “The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mise-en-Scène of Anthropological Fieldwork”. In Sherry Ortner (org.) The Fate of “Culture”: Geertz and Beyond. Berkeley: University of California Press.
MIHESUAH, Devon A. 1998. Natives and Academic: Researching and writing about American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press (Bison Books).
MILLS, David. 2003. “‘Like a horse in blinkers’? A political history of anthropology’s research ethics. In Pat Caplan (org.) The Ethics of Anthropology: Debates and dilemmas. Londres: Routledge.
OLIVEIRA, João Pacheco (org.). 1999. A Viagem da Volta: Etnicidade, política e reelaboração cultural no Nordeste indígena. Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa.
ORTA, Andrew. 2004. “The Promise of Particularism and the Theology of Culture: Limits and lessons of ‘neo-Boasianism’”. American Anthropologist 106(3): 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.473
ORTNER, Sherry B. (ed.). 1999. The Fate of Culture: Geertz and beyond. Berkeley: University of California Press.
PEIRANO, Mariza. 1995. A Favor da Etnografia. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.
POVINELLI, Elizabeth. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous alterities and the making of Australian multiculturalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
PRATT, Mary Louise. 1994. “Transculturation and Autoethnography: Peru, 1615/1980”. In Francis Barker, Peter Hulme e Margaret Iversen (orgs.) Colonial Discourse/Postcolonial Theory. Manchester e Nova York: Manchester University Press.
RAMOS, Alcida R.1987. “Reflecting on the Yanomami: Ethnographic images and the pursuit of the exotic”. Cultural Anthropology 2(3):284-304. Republicado em George Marcus (org.) 1992, Rereading Cultural Anthropology. Durham: Duke University Press.
RAMOS, Alcida R. 1990. “Ethnology Brazilian Style”. Cultural Anthropology 5(4): 452-472. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00080
RAMOS, Alcida R. 1994. “The Hyperreal Indian”. Critique of Anthropology 14(2):153-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9401400203
RAMOS, Alcida R. 1990. Memórias Sanumá: Espaço e tempo em uma sociedade Yanomami. São Paulo: Marco Zero/Brasília: Edunb.
RAMOS, Alcida R. 1995. Sanumá Memories: Yanomami ethnography in times of crisis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
RAMOS, Alcida R. 1999-2000. “The Anthropologist as Political Actor”. Número temático: Reading Brazilian Anthropologists, Gustavo Lins Ribeiro (org.) Journal of Latin American Anthropology 4(2)/5(1): 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlat.1999.4.2.172
RAMOS, Alcida R. 2003a. “Advocacy Rhymes with Anthropology”. Social Analysis, Série Forum (Austrália) 47(1): 110-116.
RAMOS, Alcida R. 2003b. “Pulp Fictions of Indigenism”. In Donald Moore, Jake Kosek e Anand Pandian (orgs.) Race, Nature, and the Politics of Difference. Durham: Duke University Press.
RAPPAPORT, Joanne. 2005. Intercultural Utopias: Public intellectuals, cultural experimentation, and ethnic pluralism in Colombia (Latin America Otherwise). Durham: Duke University Press.
RIBEIRO, Gustavo Lins (org.). 1999-2000. Número temático: Reading Brazilian Anthropologists. Journal of Latin American Anthropology 4(2)/5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/jlat.1999.4.2.4
RIBEIRO, Gustavo Lins. 2005. “Antropologias Mundiais: Cosmopolíticas, poder e teoria em antropologia”. Série Antropologia 379. Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de Brasília.
ROSENBLATT, Daniel. 2004. “An Anthropology Made Safe for Culture: Patterns of practice and the politics of difference in Ruth Benedict”. American Anthropologist 106(3): 459-472.
https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.459
SAHLINS, Marshall. 1988. “Cosmologies of Capitalism: The trans-Pacific sector of the ‘world system’”. Proceedings of the British Academy for 1988: 1-51.
SAHLINS, Marshall. 1992. The Economics of Develop-Man in the Pacific. Res 21: 12-25.
SAHLINS, Marshall. 1993. “Goodbye to Tristes Tropes: Ethnography in the context of modern world history”. The Journal of Modern History 65(1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1086/244606
SIOUI, Georges E. 1992. For an American Autohistory (tradução do francês por Sheila Fischman). Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
SOTOMAYOR, María Lúcia (org.). 1998. Modernidad, Identidad y Desarrollo: Construcción de sociedad y re-creación cultural en contextos de modernización. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología/Ministerio de Cultura/Conciencias.
STOCKING Jr., George. 1983. “The Ethnographer’s Magic: Fieldwork in British anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski”. In Observers Observed: Essays on ethnographic fieldwork. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
THOMAS, Nicholas. 1991. “Against Ethnography”. Cultural Anthropology 6(3): 306-322. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1991.6.3.02a00030
TRAJANO Filho, Wilson e Gustavo Lins Ribeiro (orgs.). 2004. O Campo da Antropologia no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa/ABA.
TROUILLOT, Michel-Rolph. 1991. Anthropology and the Savage Slot: The poetics and politics of otherness. In Richard G. Fox (org.) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the present. Santa Fe, N.M: School of American Research Press.
TURNER, Terence. 1991. Representing, Resisting, Rethinking: Historical transformations of Kayapo culture and anthropological consciousness. In George W. Strocking, Jr. (org.) Colonial Situations: Essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
VELHO, Otávio Guilherme. 1982. “Through Altusserian Spectacles: Recent social anthropology in Brazil”. Ethnos 47(1): 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1982.9981235
VÍCTORA, Ceres, Ruben G. Oliven, Maria Eunice Maciel e Ari P. Oro (orgs.). 2004. Antropologia e Ética: O debate atual no Brasil. Niterói (RJ): Editora da Universidade Federal Fluminense.
VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo (org.). 1995. Antropologia do Parentesco: Estudos ameríndios. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.
WARREN, Kay B. 1998. Indigenous Movements and Their Critics: Pan-Maya activism in Guatemala. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
WEAVER, Thomas (ed.). 1973. To See Ourselves: Anthropology and modern social issues. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/cam.v8i1.9559
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Enviar artigo via e-mail 
