Open Journal Systems

“Situação Etnográfica” e Movimentos Étnicos. Notas sobre o trabalho de campo pós-malinowskiano

Bruce Albert

Resumo

Este artigo analisa as mudanças nos parâmetros políticos, éticos e epistemológicos do trabalho de campo antropológico clássico induzidas pela emergência em escala mundial de movimentos políticos indígenas e de ONGs que os apoiam. Primeiramente são examinadas as conexões entre as políticas de desenvolvimento do pós-guerra e a emergência dessas organizações indígenas e indigenistas. Segue-se uma discussão geral sobre as relações entre lutas etnopolíticas, ativismo antropológico, pesquisa etnográfica e “observação participante”. Consideram-se finalmente as condições de independência intelectual de uma antropologia engajada e as possíveis potencialidades heurísticas de sua nova perspectiva de “participação observante”.

Palavras-chave

Ativismo antropológico; Trabalho de campo antropológico; Movimentos etnopolíticos; Povos indígenas; Observação participante; Antropologia Social.

Texto completo:

AHEAD OF PRINT PDF FINAL

Referências

ABU-LUGHOD, Lila. 1991. “Writing against Culture”. In R.G. Fox (ed.) Recapturing Anthropology. Working in the Present. Santa Fé: School of American Research Press.

AIAS (Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies). 1986. Special Feature: 25 Years of Anthropology. Australian Aboriginal Studies 1.

ALBERT, Bruce. 1988. “La fumée du métal. Histoire et représentations du contact chez les Yanomami du Brésil”. L’Homme 106-7: 87-119. https://doi.org/10.3406/hom.1988.368972

ALBERT, Bruce. 1992. “Indian lands, environmental policy, and military geopolitics in the development of the Brazilian Amazon: the case of the Yanomami”. Development and Change 23(1): 35-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00438.x

ALBERT, Bruce. 1993. “L’or cannibale et la chute du ciel. Une critique chamanique de l’économie politique de la nature". L’Homme 126-8: 353-82.

ALBERT, Bruce. 1994. “Gold miners and Yanomami indians in the Brazilian Amazon: the Hashimu massacre”. In: B. Johnston (ed.) Who pays the price? The sociocultural context of environmental crisis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

ALBERT, Bruce. 1995. “‘Anthropologie apliquée’ ou ‘anthropologie impliquée’? Ethnographie, minorités et développement”. In: J.F. Baré (ed.) Les applications de l’anthropologie. Un essai de réflexion à partir de la France. Paris: Karthala.

ALBERT, Bruce; GOODWIN GOMEZ, Gale. 1997. Saúde Yanomami. Um manual etnolinguístico. Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.

ALBERT, Bruce. 1997. “Territorialité, ethnogenèse et développement. Note sur les ‘terres indigènes’ et le mouvement indien en Amazonie brésilienne”. Cahiers des Amériques Latines.

ALTHABE, Gérard. 1993. “Choix et responsabilité en anthropologie”. Journal des Anthropologues 50-1: 35-7. https://doi.org/10.3406/jda.1992.1739

AUGÉ, Marc. 1989. “La force du présent”. Communications 49: 43-55. https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1989.1736

BALANDIER, Georges. 1951. “La situation coloniale: approche théorique”. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 11: 44-79.

BENSA, Alban. 1995. Chroniques Kanak. L’ethnologie en marche (Ethnies Documents 18-19). Paris: Peuples Autochtones et Développement/Survival International France.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. 1982. “La force de la représentation"; “Décrire et prescrire: les conditions de possibilité et les limites de l’efficacité politique”. In: Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. 1987. “Espace social et pouvoir symbolique”; “La délégation et le fétichisme politique”. In: Choses dites. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

BRACKELAIRE, Vincent. 1992. “La problématique des terres indiennes d’Amazonie”. Problèmes d’Amérique Latine 7.

BURGER, Julian. 1987. Report from the frontier: the state of the world’s indigenous people. London: Zed Books; Cambridge: Cultural Survival.

BURGER, Julian. 1994. “The United Nations and indigenous peoples”. In: L. Van de Fliert (ed.) Indigenous peoples and international organizations. Nottingham: Spokesman.

CAILLÉ, Alain. 1993. La démission des clercs. La crise des sciences sociales et l’oubli du politique. Paris: La Découverte.

CARDOSO DE OLIVEIRA, Roberto. 1978 [1966]. A sociologia do Brasil indígena. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.

CERNEA, Michael. 1988. Non-governmental organizations and local development. World Bank Discussion Papers 40. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

DAVIS, Shelton H. (ed.). 1993. Indigenous views of land and the environment. World Bank Discussion Papers 188. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

DAVIS, Shelton H. 1993. The social challenge of biodiversity conservation. Global Environment Facility Working Paper 1. Washington, DC: The World Bank/UNDP/UNEP.

DAVIS, Shelton H. 1994. “The World Bank and Operational Directive 4.20”. In: L. Van de Fliert (ed.) Indigenous peoples and international organizations. Nottingham: Spokesman.

DAVIS, Shelton H; EBBE, Katrinka. 1995. Traditional knowledge and sustainable development. EDS Proceedings Series 4. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

DESCOLA, Philippe; TAYLOR, Anne Christine (eds.). 1993. “Introduction”, Numéro spécial: La Remontée de l’Amazone. Anthropologie et histoire des sociétés amazoniennes. L’Homme 126-8: 13-24.

DRUCKER, Charles. 1988. “Dam the Chico: hydropower development and tribal resistance”. In: J. H. Bodley (ed.) Tribal peoples and development issues. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

DYCK, Noel; WALDRAN, James. 1993. Anthropology, public policy and native peoples in Canada. Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press.

ELLEN, Roy F. 1986. “What Black Elk left unsaid. On the illusory images of green primitivism”. Anthropology Today 2(6): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3032837

GEERTZ, Clifford. 1988. Works and lives. The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

GOODLAND, Robert. 1982. Tribal peoples and economic development. Human ecologic considerations. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

GUICHAOUA, André; GOUSSAULT, Yves. 1993. Sciences sociales et développement. Paris: Armand Colin.

IWGIA (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs). 1995. The indigenous world 1995-96. Copenhagen: IWGIA.

JOHNSTON, Barbara R. (ed.). 1994. Who pays the price? The sociocultural context of environmental crisis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

KILANI, Mondher. 1990. “Les anthropologues et leur savoir: du terrain au texte”. In: J.-M. Adam; M.-J. Borel; C. Calame; M. Kilani (eds.). Le discours anthropologique. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.

KUPER, Adam. 1988. The invention of primitive society. Transformations of an illusion. London: Routledge.

LEACH, Edmund. 1989. “Tribal ethnography: past, present, future”. In: E. Tonkin, M. McDonald & M. Chapman (eds.) History and ethnicity. London: Routledge.

LECLERC, Gérard. 1979. L’Observation de l’homme. Une histoire des enquêtes sociales. Paris: Seuil.

MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. 1978 [1922]. Argonauts of Western Pacific. An account of native enterprise and adventure in the Archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

MARCUS, George. 1991. “Identidades passadas, presentes e emergentes: requisitos para etnografias sobre a modernidade no final do século XX ao nível mundial”. Revista de Antropologia 34: 197-221.

MORIN, Françoise. 1992. “Revendications et stratégies politiques des organisations indigènes amazoniennes”. Cahiers des Amériques Latines 13: 75-85.

MORIN, Françoise. 1994. “De l’ethnie à l’autochtonie. Stratégies politiques amérindiennes”. Caravelle 63: 161-74. https://doi.org/10.3406/carav.1994.2612

MORIN, Françoise; SALADIN D’ANGLURES, Bernard. 1994. “Le ‘développement’ politique des ‘peuples’ autochtones dans les États-Nations”. In: G. Gosselin & A. Van Haecht (eds.) La réinvention de la démocratie. Paris: L’Harmattan.

PAINE, Robert. 1985. Advocacy and Anthropology, first encounters. St John’s, Newfoundland: ISER/Memorial University of Newfoundland.

RAMOS, Alcida R. 1990. “Ethnology Brazilian style”. Cultural Anthropology 5(4): 452-7. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00080

REDFORD, Kent H. 1991, “The ecologically noble savage”. Cultural Survival Quarterly 15(1): 46-8.

ROULAND, Norbert. 1996. “Le Droit des peuples autochtones”. In: N. Rouland (ed.) Droit des minorités et des peuples autochtones. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

SCHULTE-TENCKHOFF, Isabelle. 1995. “The irresistible ascension of the UN Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: stopped short in its tracks?”. Native American Studies 9(2): 5-8.

STERN, Steve J. 1987. Resistance, rebellion, and consciousness in the Andean peasant world. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

STOCKING, George. 1983. “The ethnographers’s magic. The development of fieldwork in British anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski”. In: G.W. Stocking (ed.) Observers observed (History of Anthropology, 1). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

TODOROV, Tzvetan. 1989. Nous et les autres. La réflexion française sur la diversité humaine. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

TURNER, Terence. 1991. “Representing, resisting, rethinking: historical transformations of Kayapo culture and anthropological consciousness”. In: G.W. Stocking (ed.) Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge (History of Anthropology, 7). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

TURNER, Terence. 1992. “Defiant images. The Kayapo appropriation of video”. Anthropology Today 8(6): 5-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2783265

VAN DE FLIERT, Lydia. (ed.) 1994. Indigenous peoples and international organizations. Nottingham: Spokesman.

VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo B. 1993. “Le marbre et la myrte. De l’inconstance de l’âme sauvage”. In: A. Monod Becquelin & A. Molinié (eds.) Mémoire de la tradition. Nanterre: Société d’Ethnologie.

WARREN, Dennis M. 1993. Using indigenous knowledge in agricultural development. 2nd ed. World Bank Discussion Papers 127. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

WRIGHT, Robin. 1988. “Anthropological presuppositions of indigenous advocacy”. Annual Review of Anthropology 17: 365-90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.002053

ZEMPLÉNI, Andras. 1984. “Secret et sujétion. Pourquoi ses ‘informateurs’ parlent-ils à l’ethnologue?”. Traverses 30-1.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/campos.v15i1.42993