Autores predatórios: uma proposta preliminar de indicadores qualitativos para gestão de boas práticas em periódicos científicos

Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi; José Augusto Chaves Guimarães; Laura Maria Rego-Piva; Amanda Maria dos Santos Silva

doi:10.5380/atoz.v15.99036

Authors

Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1250-3767
José Augusto Chaves Guimarães Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - Marilia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-2331
Laura Maria Rego-Piva Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - Marilia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1874-2064
Amanda Maria dos Santos Silva Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-0631

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v15.99036

Keywords:

Predatory authorship, ; Qualitative indicators, Scientific productivism, Management of scientific journals, Ethics, Integrity in Science

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, integrity in academic publishing has been questioned by unethical practices, such as plagiarism and data manipulation, often motivated by scientific productivism. This has led to the need to analyze the presence of ethical elements and rules of good scientific practice in the editorial policy of scientific journals, especially with regard to so-called predatory journals. However, another phenomenon emerges, equally worrying and related to predatory journals, although more difficult to detect predatory authors. Consequently, this work aims to outline the characteristic practices of predatory authors in scientific publication and to elaborate a preliminary proposal of qualitative indicators for their identification. Method: The study uses a critical review of the literature,, based on Web of Science and Google Scholar, and combining the following expressions: “predatory authorship”, “predatory journals”, “predatory publishing”, “ethics” and “research integrity”, between 2013 and 2024, resulting in a corpus of 36 articles, which were analyzed thematically. Results: As a result, a table of qualitative indicators of predatory authorship was prepared from elements related to Academic Productivism, Inappropriate Authorships for Strategic Purposes, Citation Manipulation, Manipulation of Academic Reputation, Misuse of AI, and Motivations for Authorship Practices predatory, as well as the specifying elements and examples of situations that characterize it. Conclusions: It is concluded that this model contributes to the quality management of scientific journals and the maintenance of trust in science and in the academic community.

Author Biographies

Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)

Universidade Federal de São Carlos.

José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - Marilia

Bacharel em Biblioteconomia pela Unesp. Bacharel em Direito pela Univem. Mestre em Ciência da Comunicação pela USP. Doutor em Ciência da Informação pela USP. Estágio Pós-Doutoral na Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Professor Titular Aposentado do Departamento de Ciência da Informação da Unesp. Professor Permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Infomração da Unesp. Professor Colaborador do Program de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação da UFF. Bolsista de Produtividade em Pesquisa do CNPq

Laura Maria Rego-Piva, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - Marilia

Doutora e Mestra em Ciência da Informação pelo PPGCI - UNESP/Marília - SP
Bacharela em Biblioteconomia e Arquivologia pela UNESP/Marília - SP Bolsista de Apoio Técnico - A1 (CNPq) Pesquisadora e vice Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa FAPOI (CNPq)

Amanda Maria dos Santos Silva, Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar

Doutoranda em Educação pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Mestra em Educação Brasileira pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (2014). Especialista em Docência do Ensino Superior pela Faculdade Única (2020). Graduada em Licenciatura Plena em História pela Universidade Estadual do Piauí (2012). Graduada em Bacharelado em Turismo pela Universidade Federal do Piauí (2012).

References

Alcadipani, R. Resistir ao produtivismo: uma ode à profissão acadêmica. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 9(4), 1174-1178. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512011000400015

Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415) 179. 10.1038/489179a

Bourdieu, P. (2007). Método científico e hierarquia social dos objetos. In: M. A. Nogueira; A. Catani (org.). Escritos de Educação. Vozes. 33-38.

Cobey, K. D., Grudniewicz, A., Lalu, M. M., Rice, D. B., Raffoul, H., & Moher, D. (2019). Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: A survey. BMJ Open, 9(3), e026516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516

Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association, World Association of Medical Editors. (2022). Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

https://publicationethics.org/guidance/guideline/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing

Creswell, J. W., & Clarck, V. L. P. (2017) Design and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Martín-Martín, A. (2024). La ruta de oro de la publicación científica: del negocio de las revistas a las revistas negocio. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 15 (2), e26763. 10.14198/MEDCOM.26763

Demir, S. B. (2018). Predatory journals: who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12 (4), 1291-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008

Dreybrod, W. (2020, February 4) Predatory authors. For better Science. https://forbetterscience.com/2020/02/04/predatory-authors-by-wolfgang-dreybrodt/

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. (2014). Código de boas práticas científicas da FAPESP. FAPESP. https://fapesp.br/boaspraticas

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. (2025). Boas práticas. Revista Pesquisa FAPESP, 355 https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/revista/sessao/?section=boas-praticas&e_id=515

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 reviews types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Grudniewicz, A. Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., & Ciro, J. B. (2019). Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature, 576, 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y

Guimarães, J. A. C., & Hayashi, M. C. P. I. (2023). Revistas predatórias: um inimigo a ser combatido na comunicação científica. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 21, e023003. 10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8671811

Guimarães, J. A. C., Hilário, C. M., & Grácio, M. C. C. (2024). As dimensões do produtivismo acadêmico e seu efeito danoso na atividade científica. Em Questão, 30, e-138768. 10.1590/1808-5245.30.138768

Hayashi, M. C. P. I & Guimarães, J. A. C. (2024). Dinâmicas sociais e princípios éticos: chaves de leitura sobre retratações em publicações científicas. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 22, e024022. 10.20396/rdbci.v22i00.8676800.

Hilário, C. M.; Grácio, M. C. C. & Guimarães, J. A. C. (2018). Aspectos éticos da coautoria em publicações científicas. Em Questão, 24(2) 2–36. 10.19132/1808-5245242.12-36

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Updated December 2019. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations

Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31, 141–147. 10.1002/leap.1150

Mertkan, S., Aliusta, G. O. & Suphi, N. (2021). Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 30(4) 470-483. 10.1093/reseval/rvab032

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Mathew effect in science: the reward and communication system of science are considered. Science, 159(3810) 55-63.10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In: R. K. Merton. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago University Press, 267-278.

Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V. & Agarwal, V. (2018). Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: Challenges and opportunities for improvement. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(46), e287. 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Picano, E. (2024). Who is the author: genuine, honorary, ghost, gold, and fake authors? Exploration of Cardiology, 2, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2024.00024

Porter, S. J. & McIntosh, L. D. (2024). Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(29569). 10.1038/s41598-024-71230-8

Resnik, D.; B.; Rasmussen, L. M. & Kissling, G. E. (2015). An international study of research misconduct policies. Accountability in Research, 22(5) 249-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218

Salehi, M., Shams, S., & Zohrevand, Y. (2019). Predatory journals: Authors’ perspectives. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(6), 1789-1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1261

Shrestha, J. (2021). Predatory journals as threats to the academic publishing: a review. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(2) 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v4i2.33640

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024). Caution with journal selection: spam, copycat journals, and predatory publishing. BioScientific Review, 6(2) 1-7. https://doi.org/10.32350/bsr.62.i

Tsigaris, P.; Kendall, G. & Teixeira da Silva; J.A. (2023). What does ChatGPT advise about predatory publishing? Journal of Professional Nursing, 49, 188-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.08.002

Vasconez-Gonzalez, J.; Izquierdo-Condoy, J. S.; Naranjo-Lara, P.; Garcia-Bereguiain, M. A. & Ortiz-Prado, E. (2024) Integrity at stake: confronting “publish or perish” in the developing world and emerging economies. Frontiers in Medicine, 11(1405424). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1405424

World Association of Medical Editors. (2022) Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. https://www.wame.org/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing

Xia, J.; Harmon, J. L., Connoly, K. G., Donelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2014). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information, 66(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265

Zuckerman, H. (1977). Deviant behavior and social control in science. In: E. Sagarin (Ed.) Deviance and social change. Sage Annual Reviews of Studies in Deviance. Sage, 87-138.