Bewußtseinslust. Das freie Spiel der Vermögen in Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft als transzendentales Verhältnis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v18i3.90194Palavras-chave:
Transcendental Philosophy, Methodology and Terminology, Free Play of Faculties, Aesthetic Judgement versus Aesthetics, Lust and Pleasure as ConsciousnessResumo
Kant´s critical philosophy as a whole operates on the condition of possibility that the faculties of pure reason can be isolated analytically in order to evaluate them, while at the same time they work together in various effective forms of inter-play. As one of these forms, Kant in the Critique of the Power of Judgment introduces the "free play of imagination and understanding", which plays an important role in setting together the four moments of the aesthetic judgement. Within the last two decades or so it has been discussed widely how this cooperation between these two faculties works, but it barely has been reflected on the question how to address the "free play" properly in terms of a methodological classification. This paper follows the various contexts in which the "free play" is referred to, focusses primarily on the dysfunctional cases in which the cooperation between the two faculties fails or comes to a halt and thus evaluates the basic structure of the "free play" under the perspective of theoretical technique on the horizon of transcendental philosophy. The aim is to eventually propose a more precise title of the free play or alternatively give a reason why such a labelling could not be possible after all.
Referências
ADAIR, Stephanie. The Aesthetic Use of the Logical Functions in Kant’s Third Critique. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2018.
ADELUNG, Johann Christoph. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der Hochdeutschen Mundart, mit beständiger Vergleichung der übrigen Mundarten, besonders aber der Oberdeutschen, zweyte vermehrte und verbesserte Ausgabe. Leipzig, 1793-1801.
ALLISON, Henry E. Kant´s Theory of Taste. A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
BAUMGARTEN, Alexander Gottlieb. Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus/Philosophische Betrachtungen über einige Bedingungen des Gedichtes. Übersetzt und hg. von Harald Paetzold, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.
BAUMGARTEN, Alexander Gottlieb. Ästhetik/Aesthetica. Übersetzt und hg. von Dagmar Mirbach, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007.
BERGER, David. Kant´s Aesthetic Theory. The Beautiful and Agreeable. London/Oxford: Continuum Studies in Philosophy, 2009.
BRADY, Emily. “Imagination and Freedom in the Kantian Sublime”, in: THOMPSON, M. (ed) Imagination in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin : De Gruyter, 2013, s. 163-182.
BRANDT, Reinhard. „Die Schönheit der Kristalle und das Spiel der Erkenntniskräfte. Zum Gegenstand und zur Logik des ästhetischen Urteils bei Kant“, in: STARK, W. (Hg.) Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte. Zu Edition, Amtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1994, s. 19-57.
FICHTE, Johann Gottlieb. Fichtes sämmtliche Werke. Hg. von I. H. Fichte, Berlin 1845/46, photomechanischer Nachdruck, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1971.
FICHTE, Johann Gottlieb. J. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Bad Cannstatt, 1962-2012.
GESS, Nicola. Gewalt der Musik. Literatur und Musikkritik um 1800. Freiburg/Berlin: Rombach Verlag, 2011.
GIORDANETTI, Piero. Kant und die Musik. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2005.
GISBORG, Hannah. “Interesseloses Wohlgefallen und Allgemeinheit ohne Begriffe (§§ 1-9)”, in: HÖFFE, O. (Hg). Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008, s. 59-77.
GUHRAUER, Gottschalk Eduard. Nachträge zu der Biographie Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibnitz. Breslau: F. Hirt, 1846.
GUYER, Paul. “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited”, in: KUKLA, R. (Hg.). Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, s. 162-193.
GUYER, Paul. Knowledge, Reason, and Taste. Kant’s Response to Hume. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008.
HEYDENREICH, Karl Heinrich. System der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Göschen, 1790.
HUGHES, Fiona Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. Edinbugh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
HUGHES, Fiona. Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum, 2010
KALAR, Brent. The Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics. London/New York: Continuum Studies in Philosophy, 2006.
KANT, Immanuel. Akademie Ausgabe Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1902ff.; photomechanischer Nachdruck, Berlin 1968.
KANT, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer/Eric Matthews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
KNELLER, Jane. Kant and the Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
KNELLER, Jane. “Imagining our World. Affinity and Hope in Kant’s Theory of Imagination”, in: THOMPSON, M. (ed) Imagination in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, s. 141-161.
KUKLA, Rebecca (Hg.). Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
LESSING, Gotthold Ephraim. Werke. Hg. von Herbert G. Göpfert et al. München: Hanser, 1970.
LONGUENESSE, Béatrice. “Kant’s Leading Thread in the Analytic of the Beautiful”, in: KUKLA, Rebecca (Hg.). Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, s. 194-219.
LUHMANN, Niklas; PFÜRTNER, Stephan H. (Hg). Theorietechnik und Moral. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1978.
ROGERSON, Kenneth F. The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant’s Aesthetics. New York: State University of New York Press, 2008.
SCHILLER, Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke. Hg. von Gerhard Fricke et al. München: Carl Hanser, 1959ff.
SCHMID, Carl Christian Erhard. Wörterbuch zum leichtern Gebrauch der Kantischen Schriften. Jena, 1798; reprographischer Nachdruck, neu hg. von Norbert Hinske, Darmstadt: WBG, 1996.
THOMPSON, M. (ed) Imagination in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
WARDA, Arthur. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin: M. Breslauer, 1922.
WEIß, Michael Bastian. Der Autor als Individuum. Die Wende zum Subjekt in Ästhetik und Kunst des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms, 2007.
WEIß, Michael Bastian. Leben als Leben. Johann Gottlieb Fichtes späte Wissenschaftslehre. Baden-Baden: Ergon, 2019.
WENZEL, Christian Helmut. “Art in Imagination in Mathematics”, in: THOMPSON, M. (ed) Imagination in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, s. 49-68.
ZINKIN, Melissa. “Intensive Magnitudes and the Normativity of Taste”, in: KUKLA, Rebecca (Hg.). Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, s. 138-161.
ZÖLLER, Günter. Theoretische Gegenstandsbeziehung bei Kant. Zur systematischen Bedeutung der Termini “objektive Realität” und “objektive Gültigkeit” in der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 1984.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores mantém os direitos de republicação, sob condição de indicação de primeira publicação na Studia Kantiana.
Autores cedem o direito aos editores de vincular seus artigos em futuras bases de dados.
A Studia Kantiana utiliza a licença Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
Não Comercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
Sem Derivações — Se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.