Disruptive Innovation and the Idea of Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i1.91159Keywords:
Disruptive Innovation, Technology, Conceptual History, Fear, ReificationAbstract
From its obscure origins in management theory, disruptive innovation has become one of the concepts used to describe how networked digital technologies and platforms transform industries and institutions. In this paper, I will examine how contested, and at times incommensurable, iterations of disruptive innovation share a similar idea of technology. Drawing upon discourses of disruptive innovation from management theory, institutional policies, and popular culture reveals a shared idea of technology whose characteristics include a reified idea of technology and a horizon of expectations in which fear of falling behind influences ideas about technological change.
References
After Capitalism, n+1, 24 (Winter 2016), p. 10. https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-24/the-intellectual-situation/after-capitalism/
Berman, M. (1982). All that is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin.
Boccioni, U., Carra, C., Russolo, G., Balla, G., & Severini, G. (1910 [1973]). Manifesto of Futurist Painters. In U. Apollonio (Ed.), Futurist Manifestos: The Documents of 20th-century art (p. 24-27). Viking Adult.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bower, J., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive Technology: Catching the Wave. Harvard Business Review, January-February. https://hbr.org/1995/01/disruptive-technologies-catching-the-wave
Chatterjee, K. (2014). It’s Time to Disrupt Europe: Digital First. In S. Schurink (Ed.) Digital Minds for a New Europe. Leading thinkers look at the challenges ahead – and the solutions digital technology will provide (p. 29-34) https://docplayer.net/24232355-European-digital-forum-foreword-by-neelie-kroes.html
Christensen, C. M. (1997 [2011]). The Innovator’s Dilemma. New York: Harper Business.
Christensen, C. M. (2006). The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00180.x
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is Disruptive Innovation? Harvard Business Review, December, 44-53. https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation
Christensen, C., & Rosenblom, R. (1995). Explaining the Attacker’s Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network. Research Policy, 24, 233-257.
Christensen, C., Craig, T., & Hart, S. (2001). The Great Disruption. Foreign Affairs, 80(2), 80-95.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
Eyring, H., & Chrstensen, C. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out. San Jose: Josey Bass.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. New York: Routledge
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology. New York: Oxford University Press
Feenberg, A. (2014). The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukacs and the Frankfurt School. London: Verso.
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gans, J. (2016). The Disruption Dilemma. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977[1953]). The Question Concerning Technology. In Selected Writings (p. 307-343). New York: Harper.
Herf, J. (1984). Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge University Press.
Hwang, J., & Christensen, C. (2008). Disruptive Innovation in Health Care Delivery: A Framework for Business Model Innovation. Health Affairs, 27(5), 1329-1335.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jonas, H. (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technlogical Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kline, R. (1995). Construing “Technology” as “Applied Science”: Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis, 86,194-221.
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing Things Together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice (p. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lepore, J. (2014). The Disruption Machine: What the Gospel of Innovation gets Wrong. The New Yorker, June 23.
Long, P. (1991). Invention, Authorship, “Intellectual Property,” and the Origins of Patents: Notes toward a Conceptual History. Technology & Culture, 32(4), 846-884.
Lukacs, G. (1973 [1925]). Technology and Social Relations. In Marxism and Human Liberation (p. 49-61). New York: Dell Publishing Co.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marineti, F. T. (1909 [1973]. The Founding and Manifesto of Futurism. In U. Apollonio (Ed.), Futurist Manifestos (p. 19-24). Viking Adult.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1994 [1848]). The Communist Manifesto. In L. Simon (Ed.), Selected Writings (p.157-187). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Marx, L. (1994). The Idea of ‘Technology’ and Postmodern Pessimism. In Smith & Marx (Eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (p. 237-259). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Marx, L. (1997). Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept. Social Research, 64(3), 965-988.
Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A Guide to our Future. London: Penguin.
Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam University Press.
Pistone, M. R., & Horn, M. B. (2016). Disrupting Law School: How Disruptive Innovation will Revolutionize the Legal World. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, March 15. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/disrupting-law-school/
Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik Comes to America: Changing Meanings of Technology before 1930. Technology & Culture, 47(3), 486-512.
Schatzberg, E. (2012). From Art to Applied Science. Isis, 103, 555-563.
Schmidt, E. (2014). Embracing a New Digital Era in Europe. In S. Schurink (Ed.) Digital Minds for a New Europe. Leading thinkers look at the challenges ahead – and the solutions digital technology will provide (p. 105-107) https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/209596/Digital_Minds_for_a_New_Europe.pdf?t=1453216482993
Schumpeter, J. A. (2010 [1942]). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Serres, M. (2015). Thumbelina: The Culture and Technology of Millennials. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sharon, T. (2016). The Googlization of Health Research: From Disruptive Innovation to Disruptive Ethics. Personalized Medicine, 13(6), 563-574.
Sims, C. (2017). Disruptive Fixation: School Reform and the Pitfalls of Techno-Idealism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
The New York Times (2014). Report on Innovation, March 24, 97 p. https://sriramk.com/memos/nytimes-innovation-report.pdf
Tyfield, D (2018). Innovating innovation: Disruptive Innovation in China and the Low-Carbon Transition of Capitalism. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.024
van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users Femininity and Masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (p. 193-209). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics out of Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
