Open Journal Systems

Open access, responsibility and the “platformization” of academic publishing

Raúl Tabarés

Abstract


Digitalization was supposed to be a transformation force for the academic publishing sector, but it has reinforced the oligopoly of for-profit academic publishers. Open access (OA) was also meant to counterbalance this situation, but after a decade of efforts it seems that it has not achieved their goals. This essay explores how the combination of digitalization and OA have contributed to reinforce the lock-in effects exerted in the sector by digital platforms operated by for-profit academic publishers. I also explore alternative paths for the development of OA with the theoretical lenses that provide responsible innovation, putting social emphasis at the politics and values that lie at the heart of academia. I argue that exploitation, appropriation of labor and quantification metrics widely present in this social domain must be counterbalanced with different actions that do not focus alone in making freely available scientific articles for citizens.

Keywords


digital platforms; responsible innovation; platform economy; platform capitalism; open access; open science

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R. (2021). Six Questions (with Answers!) about UC’s and Elsevier’s New Transformative Deal. The Scholarly Kitchen, March 25. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/03/25/six-questions-with-answers-about-ucs-and-elseviers-new-transformative-deal/

Aspesi, C., & Brand, A. (2020). In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough. Science, 368(6491), 574-577. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3763

Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455

Beverungen, A., Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012). The poverty of journal publishing. Organization, 19(6), 929-938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412448858

Boseley, S., & Davey, M. (2020). Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials. The Guardian, June 4. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/covid-19-lancet-retracts-paper-that-halted-hydroxychloroquine-trials

Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What´s mine is yours. How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Harper Collins.

Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian, June 27. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Burchardt, J. (2014). Researchers Outside APC-Financed Open Access. SAGE Open, 4(4), 215824401455171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014551714

Burgelman, J.-C., Pascu, C., Szkuta, K., Von Schomberg, R., Karalopoulos, A., Repanas, K., & Schouppe, M. (2019). Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century. Frontiers in Big Data, 2(December), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2020). The Costs of Connection: How Data Are Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Crow, R., Gallagher, R., & Naim, K. (2020). Subscribe to Open: A practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1262

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “Just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the “gig-economy.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602

Delaney, N., Tornasi, Z., Lagher, R., Monachello, R., & Warin, C. (2020). Science with and for society in Horizon 2020. Achievements and recommendations for Horizon Europe. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2777/32018

European Commission (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2777/11739

European Commission (2016). Open innovation, open science, open to the world. A vision for Europe. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-vision-europe

Ferretti, F., Pereira, Â. G., Vértesy, D., & Hardeman, S. (2018). Research excellence indicators: Time to reimagine the “making of”? Science and Public Policy, 45(5), 731-741. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCY007

Fox, J. (2020). Covid-19 Shows That Scientific Journals Need to Open Up. Bloomberg Opinion, June 30. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-30/covid-19-shows-scientific-journals-like-elsevier-need-to-open-up

Fuster-Morell, M. (2010). Governance of online creation communities: Provision of infrastructure for the building of digital commons. European University Institute.

Gillespie, T. (2010). The Politics of Platforms. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch28

Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Helmond, A. (2015). The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511560308. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080

Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The Rise of the Platform Economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61.

Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B. C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961

Langham-Putrow, A., & Carter, S. J. (2020). Subscribe to Open. College & Research Libraries News, 81(1), 18.

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Markie, M. (2021). Introducing Open Research Europe (ORE) – Q and A with Michael Markie. LSE Impact Blog, March 25. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/03/25/introducing-open-research-europe-ore-qa-with-michael-markie/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+feedburner%2FLSEImpactBlog+%28LSE+Impact+Blog%29

Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.

O’Neill, K. (2019). Q&A: Heather Paxson on a new model for open-access publishing in anthropology. MIT News, May 10. https://news.mit.edu/2019/mit-heather-paxson-open-access-model-workshop-0510

O´Neill, C. (2017). Weapons of Math Destruction. How Big Data increases inequality and threatens democracy. London: Penguin Books.

Owen, R., & Pansera, M. (2019). Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation. In D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm & W. Canzle (Eds.), Handbook on Science and Public Policy (pp. 26-48). Edward Elgar publishing.

Papaioannou, T. (2020). Innovation, value-neutrality and the question of politics: unmasking the rhetorical and ideological abuse of evolutionary theory. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(2), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1605484

Pirie, I. (2009). The political economy of academic publishing. Historical Materialism, 17(3), 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1163/146544609X12469428108466

Pitt, J. (2018). Publish or Impoverish. Academic Publishing and the Platform Economy. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 37(2), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2826058

Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012). How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management. Research Policy, 41(7), 1262-1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015

Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer.” Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673

Saltelli, A., & Funtowicz, S. (2017). What is science’s crisis really about? Futures, 91(May), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010

Scholz, T. (2012). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Sundararajan, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Tabarés, R. (2018). Understanding the role of digital commons in the web; The making of HTML5. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1438-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.013

Tabarés, R. (2021). HTML5 and the evolution of HTML; tracing the origins of digital platforms. Technology in Society, 65(May), 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101529

Tennant, J. (2018). Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe. The Guardian, June 29. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2018/jun/29/elsevier-are-corrupting-open-science-in-europe

Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33

van Dalen, H. P. (2021). How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists. Scientometrics, 126(2), 1675-1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03786-x

van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture, and Society, 31(1), 41.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & Waal, M. de. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.

Van Noorden, R. (2013). The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495.

van Oudheusden, M. (2014). Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882097

Vogelstein, F. (2013). Dogfight: How Apple and Google Went to War and Started a Revolution. Sarah Crichton Books.

von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 51–74). London: John Willey & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91157

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.