Open Journal Systems

Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative

Hannot Rodríguez, Sergio Urueña, Andoni Ibarra

Abstract


The call for the development of more responsible research and innovation has increasingly permeated European Union research and development policies. Specifically, under the auspices of approaches such as “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) and “Open Science”, these policies conceive of the need to make innovation dynamics radically open and debatable, even with regard to the underlying preferences and expectations shaping them. Responsibility has thus been conceived in eminently anticipatory terms, that is, in terms of collectively taking care in the present of the futures enabled through innovation practices. This normative conception, which emphasises the politicisation of the ways futures are constructed through innovation and goals they are oriented towards, is nonetheless realised within a context where the prevailing way of approaching the future with regard to innovation systems is highly committed to a capitalist imperative of technological progress and economic growth. This article argues that while anticipation – understood as an interventive practice – can deploy valuable responsibilisation heuristics, their degree of disruptiveness, or openness, may depend on how such interventive practice engaging with futures deals with this techno-economic commitment, or imperative.

Keywords


anticipation; responsible innovation; RRI; open science; anticipatory ambivalence; socio-technical futures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Brill.

Alvial-Palavicino, C., & Konrad, K. (2019). The rise of graphene expectations: Anticipatory practices in emergent nanotechnologies. Futures, 109, 192-202.

Arnaldi, S. (2018). Retooling Techno-Moral Scenarios. A Revisited Technique for Exploring Alternative Regimes of Responsibility for Human Enhancement. NanoEthics, 12(3), 283-300.

Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., & Guston, D. H. (2008). Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Third Edition (pp. 979-1000). The MIT Press.

Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Harvard University Press.

Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5-16.

Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & van Lente, H. (2006). The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 285-298.

Council of the EU (2013). Council Decision of 3 December 2013 establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decisions 2006/971/EC, 2006/972/EC, 2006/973/EC, 2006/974/EC and 2006/975/EC (2013/743/EU). Official Journal of the European Union (20.12.2013), L 347, 965-1041.

Cranor, C. F. (2017). Tragic Failures: How and Why We are Harmed by Toxic Chemicals. Oxford University Press.

Delogu, B. (2016). Risk Analysis and Governance in EU Policy Making and Regulation: An Introductory Guide. Springer.

Dickson, D. (1984). The New Politics of Science. Pantheon Books.

European Commission (2013). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2014–2015: 16. Science with and for Society, C(2013) 8631 of 10 December 2013. Brussels.

European Commission (2016). Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World – a vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission (2017). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2016-2017: 16. Science with and for Society, C (2017)2468 of 17 April 2017. Brussels.

European Commission (2018a). Annexes to the Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, COM(2018) 436 final (7.6.2018). Brussels.

European Commission (2018b). OSPP-REC: Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission (2018c). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, COM(2018) 435 final (7.6.2018). Brussels.

European Commission (2019a). Orientations towards the first Strategic Plan implementing the research and innovation framework programme Horizon Europe. Brussels.

European Commission (2019b). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2018-2020: 16. Science with and for Society, C (2019)1849 of 18 March 2019. Brussels.

Eizagirre, A., Rodríguez, H., & Ibarra, A. (2017). Politicizing Responsible Innovation: Responsibility as Inclusive Governance. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 20-36.

ERA [European Research Area] Expert Group (2008). Challenging Europe’s Research: Rationales for the European Research Area (ERA) (EUR 23326). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Parliament and Council of the EU (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2010) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC. Official Journal of the European Union (20.12.2013), L 347, 104-173.

Felt, U. (Rapporteur), Wynne, B. (Chairman), Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., Joly, P.-B., Konopasek, Z., May, S., Neubauer, C., Rip, A., Siune, K., Stirling, A., & Tallacchini, M. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission (EUR 22700). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Environmental Risk and Democratic Process: A Critical Review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14(2), 501-547.

Fisher, E. (2019). Governing with ambivalence: The tentative origins of socio-technical integration. Research Policy, 48(5), 1138-1149.

Foley, R. W., Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2018). Towards the anticipatory governance of geoengineering. In J. J. Blackstock & S. Low (Eds.), Geoengineering our Climate? Ethics, Politics, and Governance (pp. 223-243). Routledge.

Gerber, A., Forsberg, E.-M., Shelley-Egan, C., Arias, R., Daimer, S., Dalton, G., Cristóbal, A. B., Dreyer, M., Griessler, E., Lindner, R., Revuelta, G., Riccio, A., & Steinhaus, N. (2020). Joint declaration on mainstreaming RRI across Horizon Europe. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 708-711.

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press.

Godin, B. (2016). Making sense of innovation: from weapon to instrument to buzzword. Quaderni, 90, 21-40.

Grunwald, A. (2013). Modes of orientation provided by futures studies: making sense of diversity and divergence. European Journal of Futures Research, 2(1), 30.

Grunwald, A. (2019). The inherently democratic nature of technology assessment. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 702-709.

Guston, D. H. (2008). Preface. In E. Fisher, C. Selin & J. M. Wetmore (Eds.), The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society. Volume 1: Presenting Futures (pp. v-viii). Springer.

Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242.

Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109.

Hölscher, L. (1999). Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.

Jasanoff, S. (2016). The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. W. W. Norton & Company.

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.) (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. The University of Chicago Press.

Konrad, K., van Lente, H., Groves, C., & Selin, C. (2016). Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Fourth Edition (pp. 465-493). The MIT Press.

Kuhlmann, S., Stegmaier, P., & Konrad, K. (2019). The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction. Research Policy, 48(5), 1091-1097.

Kuntz, M. (2012). The postmodern assault on science. EMBO reports, 13(10), 885-889.

Kuntz, M. (2017). Science and Postmodernism: From Right-Thinking to Soft-Despotism. Trends in Biotechnology, 35(4), 283-285.

Lehoux, P., Miller, F. A., & Williams-Jones, B. (2020). Anticipatory governance and moral imagination: Methodological insights from a scenario-based public deliberation study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 151, 119800.

Lösch, A., Grunwald, A., Meister, M., & Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (Eds.) (2019). Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges. Springer VS.

Lösch, A., Heil, R., & Schneider, C. (2019). Visionary Practices Shaping Power Constellations. In A. Lösch, A. Grunwald, M. Meister & I. Schulz-Schaeffer (Eds.), Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges (pp. 67-88). Springer VS.

Lund Declaration (2009). Europe Must Focus on the Grand Challenges of our Time. In New Worlds – New Solutions. Research and Innovation as a Basis for Developing Europe in a Global Context (The Swedish EU Presidency Conference – Final report), Uno Svedin (Rapporteur), Lund (Sweden), 7-8 July 2009, pp. 40-41.

Macnaghten, P. (2020). The Making of Responsible Innovation. Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, K. (2015). From Science 2.0 to Open Science - Turning rhetoric into action? STCSN E-Letter, 3(1). http://stcsn.ieee.net/e-letter/stcsn-e-letter-vol-3-no-1/from-science-2-0-to-open-science

Mendez, E. (Chair), Lawrence, R. (Editor and Coordinator), MacCallum, C. J. (Writing Chair), Moar, E. (Rapporteur) et al. (2020). Progress on Open Science: Towards a Shared Research Knowledge System. Final Report of the Open Science Policy Platform. Publications Office of the European Union.

Moedas, C. (2015). Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World (SPEECH/15/5243). “A new start for Europe: Opening up to an ERA of Innovation” Conference. 22 June 2015. Brussels.

Moedas, C. (2017). Foreword. In A. Ricci, C. Sessa, & M. Weber (Authors), New Horizons: Future Scenarios for Research & Innovation Policies in Europe (European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation) (p. 7). Publications Office of the European Union.

Nordmann, A. (2010). A forensics of wishing: technology assessment in the age of technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis, 7(1-2), 5-15.

Nordmann, A. (2014). Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 87-98.

Novitzky, P., Bernstein. M. J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Chan, T. T., Lamers, W., Loeber, A., Meijer, I., Lindner, R., & Griessler, E. (2020). Improve alignment of research policy and societal values. Science, 369(6499), 39-41.

Owen, R., & Pansera, M. (2019). Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation. In D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, & W. Canzler (Eds.), Handbook on Science and Public Policy (pp. 26-48). Edward Elgar.

Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A Framework for Responsible Innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 27-50). Wiley.

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books.

Poli, R. (2017). Introduction to Anticipation Studies. Springer.

Poli, R., & Valerio, M. (2019). Anticipation, Agency and Complexity. Springer.

Ramírez, R., & Selin, C. (2014). Plausibility and probability in scenario planning. Foresight, 16(1), 54-74.

Ramos, J., Sweeney, J. A., Peach, K., & Smith, L. (2019). Our futures: by the people, for the people. Nesta.

Rip, A. (2018). Futures of Science and Technology in Society. Springer VS.

Rodríguez, H. (2018). Nanotechnology and Risk Governance in the European Union: the Constitution of Safety in Highly Promoted and Contested Innovation Areas. NanoEthics, 12(1), 5-26.

Rodríguez, H., Eizagirre, A., & Ibarra, A. (2019). Dynamics of responsible innovation constitution in European Union research policy: tensions, possibilities and constraints. In R. von Schomberg & J. Hankins (Eds.), International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource (pp. 167-180). Edward Elgar.

Ruggiu, D. (2019). Models of Anticipation Within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: the Two RRI Approaches and the Challenge of Human Rights. NanoEthics, 13(1), 53-78.

Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R. A., Jr., & Byerly, R. (2000). Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature. Island Press.

Schiølin, K. (2020). Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science, 50(4), 542-566.

Selin, C. (2011). Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 723-737.

Shelley-Egan, C., Gjefsen, M. D., & Nydal, R. (2020). Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 16, 7.

Siune, K. (Chair), Markus, E. (Rapporteur), Calloni, M., Felt, U., Gorski, A., Grunwald, A., Rip, A., de Semir, V., & Wyatt, S. (2009). Challenging Futures of Science in Society. Emerging trends and cutting-edge issues. Publications Office of the European Union.

Stemerding, D., Betten, W., Rerimassie, V., Robaey, Z., & Kupper, F. (2019). Future making and responsible governance of innovation in synthetic biology. Futures, 109, 213-226.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.

Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”. Power, Participation and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262-294.

Stirling, A. (2016). Addressing scarcities in responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(3), 274-281.

Urueña, S. (2019). Understanding “plausibility”: A relational approach to the anticipatory heuristics of future scenarios. Futures, 111, 15-25.

von Schomberg, L., & Blok, V. (2021). The turbulent age of innovation. Synthese, 198(Suppl. 19), 4667-4683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01950-8

von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 51-74). Wiley.

von Schomberg, R., & Hankins, J. (Eds.) (2019). International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Edward Elgar.

Wiek, A., Withycombe Keeler, L., Schweizer, V., & Lang, D. J. (2013). Plausibility indications in future scenarios. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 9(2-4), 133-147.

Withycombe Keeler, L., Bernstein, M. J., & Selin, C. (2019). Intervening Through Futures for Sustainable Presents: Scenarios, Sustainability, and Responsible Research and Innovation. In A. Lösch, A. Grunwald, M. Meister & I. Schulz-Schaeffer (Eds.), Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges (pp. 255-282). Springer VS.

Yoshizawa, G. (2019). Reflexive Hermeneutics Against Closing Down Technology Assessment Discourses: The Case of Synthetic Biology. In A. Lösch, A. Grunwald, M. Meister & I. Schulz-Schaeffer (Eds.), Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges (pp. 189-210). Springer VS.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91156

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.