Cultivating the Innovative Region: Participatory Innovation, Citizens and Statehood in Wallonia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i3.91145Keywords:
participatory innovation, innovation policies, public participation in science, technology and innovation, regional innovation, WalloniaAbstract
Innovation is becoming more and more participatory. Discourses insisting on the desirable involvement of users and lay citizens in innovation-making processes are burgeoning around the globe. This burgeoning is often fostered and supported by innovation scholars whose studies on, and calls for more open and participatory forms of innovation have recently gained traction among public authorities. However, as the appropriation of such scholarly work by public authorities is a recent phenomenon, much remains to be discovered about the interactions between participatory innovation models and the political contexts in which they emerge. In particular, this article offers an analysis of the relationships and allocation of power between the State and citizens that develop through participatory innovation policies. By developing a context-sensitive approach to study the case of Wallonia, one of the federal regions of Belgium, I analyze participatory innovation as a particular mode of government through which public authorities (re)invent themselves and the society they govern. I show that what matters for Walloon public authorities when they promote and set up participatory innovation practices is not only the results of such practices in terms of innovation products, but also and perhaps more importantly the shaping of entrepreneurial citizens as well as the Region that is expected to develop accordingly. Ultimately, this approach allows for critical scrutiny of the politics of innovation and the democratic order it contributes to produce in an economically peripheral region looking for quickly (re)developing itself in order to exist in the global economic competition.
References
Accaputo, A., Bayenet, B., & Pagano, G. (2006). Le plan Marshall pour la Wallonie. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, n° 1919-1920(14), 5‑73.
Alcaud, D., & Brillet, E. (2007). La gouvernance de l’innovation : Quels enjeux pour la dynamique territoriale ? Le cas de Paris et de l’Ile-de-France. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 263‑286.
Bacqué, M.-H., Rey, H., & Sintomer, Y. (eds.). (2005). Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative : Une perspective comparative. Découverte.
Barber, B. (1998). A Place for Us : How to Make Society Civil and Democracy Strong. Hill and Wang.
Brandão, T., & Bagattolli, C. (2017). «Best practices» as mimesis ? Innovation policies in peripheral countries. In B. Godin & D. Vinck (eds.), Critical Studies of Innovation : Alternative Approaches to the Pro-innovation Bias (p. 48‑67). Edward Elgar.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77‑101.
Buur, J., & Matthews, B. (2008). Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(03), 255‑273.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World. MIT Press.
Charlier, N. (2018). Gouverner la recherche entre excellence scientifique et pertinence sociétale [Thèse présentée en vue de l’obtention du titre de docteur en sciences politiques et sociales]. Université de Liège.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Cohendet, P., & Simon, L. (2008). Knowledge Intensive Firms, Communities and Creative Cities. In A. Amin & J. Roberts (eds.), Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization. Oxford University Press.
Delvenne, P., & Macq, H. (2020). Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments. Science as Culture, 29(2), 245‑268.
Eder, J. (2019). Innovation in the Periphery : A Critical Survey and Research Agenda. International Regional Science Review, 42(2), 119‑146.
Engels, F., Wentland, A., & Pfotenhauer, S. M. (2019). Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance. Research Policy, 48(9), 103826.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse : Textual analysis for social research. Routeledge
Fallon, C., & Delvenne, P. (2009). Les transformations actuelles du régime de l’innovation en Wallonie : Une analyse des pôles de compétitivité. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 22(4), 411‑425.
Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2010). Machineries for Making Publics : Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement. Minerva, 48(3), 219‑238.
Florida, R. L. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books.
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777‑795.
Gaglio, G., Godin, B., & Pfotenhauer, S. (2019). X-Innovation: Re-Inventing Innovation Again and Again. NOvation-Critical Studies of Innovation, I(2019), 1-17.
Haddad, C., & Benner, M. (2021). Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: A research agenda for context sensitivity. Research Policy, 50(7), 104273.
Irani, L. (2019). Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India. Princeton University Press.
Irwin, A., Vedel, J. B., & Vikkelsø, S. (2021). Isomorphic difference: Familiarity and distinctiveness in national research and innovation policies. Research Policy, 50(4), 104220.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge : The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge.
Jasanoff, S. (2011). Constitutional moments in governing science and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 621‑638.
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity : Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. The University of Chicago Press.
Joly, P.-B., Rip, A., & Callon, M. (2010). Re-inventing innovation. In Governance of Innovation: Firms, Clusters and Institutions in a Changing Setting (p. 1‑14). Edward Elgar.
Kuhlmann, S., & Matamoros, H. G. O. (2017). Introduction : Governance of innovation in emerging countries: understanding failures and exploring options. Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies: Towards Better Models (p. 1‑34). Edward Elgar.
Lakhani, K. R., & Panetta, J. A. (2007). The Principles of Distributed Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(3), 97‑112.
Laurent, B. (2016). Political experiments that matter : Ordering democracy from experimental sites. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 773‑794.
Lezaun, J., Marres, N., & Tironi, M. (2017). Experiments in Participation. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, & Smith-Doerr, Laurel (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies : Fourth Edition (p. 195‑221). MIT Press.
Macq, H., Parotte, C., & Delvenne, P. (2021). Exploring Frictions of Participatory Innovation between Sites and Scales. Science as Culture, 30(2), 161‑171.
Macq, H., Tancoigne, É., & Strasser, B. J. (2020). From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019). Minerva, 58(4), 489‑512.
Pallesen, T., & Jacobsen, P. H. (2021). Demonstrating a Flexible Electricity Consumer : Keeping Sight of Sites in a Real-world Experiment. Science as Culture, 30(2), 172‑191.
Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford University Press.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
Pfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017). Traveling imaginaries : The «practice turn» in innovation policy and the global circulation of innovation models. In D. Tyfield, S. Randalls, R. Lave & C. Thorpe (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science (p. 416‑428). Routledge.
Pfotenhauer, S., & Juhl, J. (2017). Innovation and the political state: Beyond the myth of technologies and market. In B. Godin & D. Vinck (eds.), Critical Studies of Innovation : Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias. Edward Elgar.
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5‑18.
Simon, L. (2009). Underground, upperground et middle-ground : Les collectifs créatifs et la capacité créative de la ville. Management international/Gestiòn Internacional/International Management, 13, 37‑51.
Spronck, V., Peters, P., & Werff, T. van de. (2021). Empty Minds: Innovating Audience Participation in Symphonic Practice. Science as Culture, 30(2), 216‑236.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991‑2006.
Tironi, M., & Valderrama, M. (2021). Experimenting with the Social Life of Homes: Sensor Governmentality and Its Frictions. Science as Culture, 30(2), 192‑215.
van Oudheusden, M. V., Charlier, N., & Delvenne, P. (2019). Flanders Ahead, Wallonia Behind (But Catching Up): Reconstructing Communities Through Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Making. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 37(4), 185-198.
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
