Obstetric violence and human development: knowledge, power and agency in Colombian women’s birth stories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/guaju.v4i2.57866Palavras-chave:
Obstetric violence, human development, birth, violence against womenResumo
Obstetric violence was first described in Latin America, consisting of violence perpetrated mainly by health workers against women during pregnancy, birth or postpartum. It affects women worldwide and represents a challenge for human development, as it negatively affects women’s health and rights. This study reflects on the experiences of obstetric violence of a group of Colombian women, bringing visibility to their experiences and analyzing the language they use as a way to understand the issues underpinning these narratives. We adopted qualitative research with in-depth interviews and analyzed the narratives using discourse analysis. This research highlighted: 1) the women’s point of view; despite not being aware of the term “obstetric violence,” their experiences fit into this category that is often naturalized; 2) a hierarchy of knowledge with the biomedical model as authoritative, in which health professionals do not give adequate weight to women’s experiences or knowledge; 3) the relations between obstetric violence and human development, considering women’s (dis)empowerment and the limitations that these abuses imply for women’s freedom and agency.
Referências
AGUIAR, J. M.; D´OLIVEIRA, A.F.P.L.; SCHRAIBER, L.B. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 29(11):2287-2296, nov, 2013.
AGUIAR, J. M.; D’OLIVEIRA, A.F.L. Institutional violence in public maternity hospitals: the women´s view. Interface Comun Saúde Educ. 2011; 15:79-92.
BAKER, S.R.; CHOI, P.Y.L.; HENSHAW, C.A.; TREE, J. ‘I Felt as though I’d been in Jail’: Women’s Experiences of Maternity Care during Labour, Delivery and the Immediate Postpartum. Feminism & Psychology 15(3):315-342, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-353505054718
BARROS, J.A.C. Pensando o processo saúde-doença: a que responde o modelo biomédico? Saúde e Sociedade. 11 (1) 67-84; 2002.
BEATON, J. Dimensions of Nurse and Patient Roles in Labour. Health Care of Women International 11: 393-408; 1990.
BEATON, M.I. Patterns of Nurse-Patient Interaction in Labour: An Analysis of Impact on Patient Perceptions of Satisfaction and Control in Childbirth. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 1986.
BOHREN, M. A. et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med.12(6):e1001847, 2015.
BOWSER, D, HILL, K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth: Report of a Landscape Analysis. Available from:
http://www.tractionproject.org/resources/access-skilled-care-respectful-maternal-care/exploring-evidence-disrespect-and-abuse, accessed on 22/01/2018.
BRUJIN, M.; GOULD, D. How to heal a bad birth: Making sense, making peace & moving on. Kenmore, Queensland: Birthtalk, 2016.
CAMARGO JÚNIOR, K. R. A biomedicina. Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro. v. 7, n. 1, p. 45-68, 1997.
CAMARGO JÚNIOR, K. R. Biomedicina, saber & ciência: uma abordagem crítica. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2003.
CAMERON, D. Working with spoken discourse. London: SAGE Publications, 2001.
DAVIS-FLOYD, R. Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
DIAZ-TELLO, F. Invisible wounds: obstetric violence in the United States. Reprod Health Matters. 24(47):56-64, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
FREEDMAN, L.P.; KRUK, M.E. Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: Challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. Lancet, 384(9948), e42-e44, 2014. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X
JENKINSON, B.; KRUSKE, S.; KILDEA, S. The experiences of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: A feminist thematic analysis. Midwifery. 52:1-10, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 11.
JORDAN, B. Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In: DAVIS-FLOYD, R.; SARGENT, C. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley; University of California Press, 1997. p. 55-79.
JORDAN, B.; IRWIN, S. The ultimate failure: court-ordered caesarean section. In: WHITEFORD, L.; POLAND, M. New Approaches to Human Reproduction. Boulder; Westview Press, 1989. p. 185-199.
LAZAR, M. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis. Critical Discourse Studies. 4(2):141-164, 2007.
LIAMPUTTONG, P.; EZZY, D. Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd. Ed. Melbourne: Oxford, 2005.
LUPTON, D. 'Precious cargo': Foetal subjects and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3), 329-340, 2012.
LUPTON, D., SCHMIED, V. Splitting bodies/selves: women’s concepts of embodiment at the moment of birth. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(6):828-41, 2013. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01532
MONROY-MUÑOZ, S.A. El continuo ginecobs-tétrico: experiencias de violencia vividas por mujeres gestantes en servicios de salud en Bogotá. Masters Thesis. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Escuela de Estudios de Género, 2012.
NHMRC. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Research Council. Australian Vice -Chancellors’ Committee National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, Canberra, 2007. Available from:
https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72_national_statement_may_2015_150514_a.pdf, accessed on 22/01/2018.
RAPP, R. Commentary on “Birth in twelve cultures: papers in honor of Brigitte Jordan,” a symposium at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association. San Francisco, December 1992.
REGIS, J.F.S. Violência e resistência: representação discursiva da assistência obstétrica no Brasil em relatos de parto e cartas à/ao obstetra [Violence and resistance: The discursive representation of obstetric care in Brasil in birth stories and letters to the obstetrician]. PhD thesis, Universidade de Brasília and Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 2016.
SADLER, M.; SANTOS, M.J.; RUIZ-BERDÚN, D.; ROJAS, G.L.; SKOKO, E.; GILLEN, P.; CLAUSEN, J.A. Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters. 24(47):47-55, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
SAFFIOTI, H. I. B. Violência doméstica: questão de polícia e da sociedade. In: CORRÊA, M. (Org.). Gênero e cidadania. Campinas: Núcleo de Estudos de Gênero – Pagu, 2001.
SAVAGE, V.; CASTRO, A. Measuring Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth: A Review of Terminology and Methodological Approaches. Reproductive Health. v.14: 138. Web. 4 Jan. 2018.
SEN, A. Desenvolvimento como liberdade. v. 11. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2000.
SONEGO, M. et al. Unperceived intimate partner violence and women’s health. Gac. Sanit. 2013; 27(5):440–446.
TOLTON, L. Legitimation of violence against women in Colombia: A feminist critical discourse analytic study. PhD Thesis, School of Languages and Comparative Cultural Studies, The University of Queensland, 2010.
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, 2015.
VENEZUELA. Ley orgánica sobre el derecho de las mujeres a una vida libre de violencia. 2007. Available from: <http://www.derechos.org.ve/pw/wp-content/uploads/11.-Ley-Orgánica-sobre-el-Derecho-de-las-Mujeres-a-una-Vida-Libre-de-Violencia.pdf>, accessed on 04/01/2018.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council., 2013.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women. Department of Gender and Women's Health Family and Community Health World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Human Reproduction Program. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
A publicação do artigo está condicionada à cessão dos direitos autorais, sem ônus, a Guaju, que terá exclusividade de publicá-lo em primeira mão.
Os manuscrtitos serão publicados sob a licença Creative Commons By - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho, mesmo comercialmente, contanto que eles atribuam o crédito pela criação original. Esta é a mais flexível das licenças oferecidas. Recomendado para máxima divulgação e uso de materiais licenciados.
Para a publicação dos manuscritos em outros meios de veiculação ou compartilhamento, solicita-se que seja mencionada a Guaju como sendo responsável pela primeira publicação do artigo.
As afirmações e os conceitos explicitados nos textos são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores, não recaindo sobre o Conselho Editorial da Guaju.
