POTENTIAL AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS FOR SEMIARID REGIONS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v51i2.68962

Palavras-chave:

Agrosilviculture, Consortium, Spacing, Area equivalence index.

Resumo

The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential of agroforestry systems in the semiarid, and to evaluate the productivity of eucalyptus in three planting spacing, in single cultivation in agroforestry systems. The comparison of the systems was in a randomized block design with four systems (monoculture; peanut systems; castor bean; cassava) and three eucalyptus spacing (10 m x 2 m, 10 m x 3 m and 10 m x 4 m). Monocultures and other characteristics were compared by randomized block design. Peanut productivity was evaluated at three and a half months, castor productivity at five and eight months and cassava productivity at 21 months. Eucalyptus productivity was measured at 13 and 21 months of age. The results showed that the wood production was greater in the 10 m x 2 m spacing and in the system with castor and single cultivation. The castor yield was higher in the system, in the 10 m x 3 m spacing, while the cassava productivity was higher in monoculture. The area equivalence index of the systems was higher than that of monocultures. Therefore, eucalyptus agroforestry systems intercropped with castor and cassava are suitable for the semiarid region. The 10 m x 2 m spacing provided a larger volume of wood (m³ ha-1). Castor yield was higher in the 10 m x 3 m spacing. For cassava, the highest yield was obtained in monoculture and in the system with 10 m x 3 m or 10 m x 4 m spacing.

Biografia do Autor

Erick Martins Nieri, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará

Eng. Florestal -  UTFPR
Mestre em Eng. Florestal -UFLA
Doutor em Eng. Florestal - UFLA

Professor Adjunto de Eng. Florestal - UNIFESSPA

Downloads

Publicado

16-03-2021

Como Citar

Nieri, E. M., Almeida, R. S. de, Macedo, R. L. G., Magalhães, W. M., Venturin, N., & Higashikawa, E. M. (2021). POTENTIAL AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS FOR SEMIARID REGIONS. FLORESTA, 51(2), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v51i2.68962

Edição

Seção

Artigos