Between Control and Trust.

Paradigms of Early Modern and Enlightenment Optimism in the Thought of Kant and Spener and their Continuity in Contemporary Thought

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v22i3.101183

Schlagworte:

Control, Enlightenment, Fate, Optimism, Pessimism, Trust

Abstract

N/A

Autor/innen-Biografie

Anna Szyrwinska-Hörig, Universität Vechta

Lecturer for special tasks in philosophy at the University of Vechta since October 2015. Previously, a lecturer in the Department of Philosophy at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg from July 2013 to October 2015. Served as a research assistant at the Department of Philosophy at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg from July 2013 to June 2014. Completed a Ph.D. at the Polish Academy of Sciences on the topic: "The Influence of Pietism on Immanuel Kant's Ethics" in 2012. An associate member of the Research Training Group of the Network of Excellence Enlightenment - Religion - Knowledge of the State of Saxony-Anhalt at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg from January 2011 to December 2012. Previously studied philosophy at the Universities of Warsaw and Constance, pursued doctoral studies in Warsaw and Halle, and was a scholarship holder of the Fritz Thyssen Foundation and the Polish Ministry of Education and Science. Main research interests include the history of philosophy, the early modern period, and the Enlightenment, focusing on freedom and determinism, ethics, philosophy of law, and philosophy of religion.

Literaturhinweise

AUWEELE, D. V. 2018. Pessimism in Kant’s ethics and rational religion. Lanham: Lexington Books.

CRISP, O. D. 2014. Deviant Calvinism: broadening reformed theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

HANKE, T.; SANS, G. 2024. Kants Theorie des Bösen im Kontext. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.

HARE. J. 2000. Kant on recognizing our duties as God's commands. Faith and Philosophy, [s.l] v. 17, n. 4, p. 459 –478.

KADLAC, A. 2017. Hopes and Hopefulness. American Philosophical Quarterly, Minnesota, v. 54, n. 3, p. 209–221, jul 2017.

KANT, I. 2006. An answer to the question: what is enlightenment?. In: COLCLASURE, D.L. (ed.). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.

KANT, I. 2014. An attempt at some reflections on optimism. In: WALFORD, D. (ed.). Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KANT, I. 2006. Conjectural beginning of human history. In: COLCLASURE, D.L. (ed.). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.

KANT, I. 2006. Idea for a universal history from a cosmopolitan perspective. In: COLCLASURE, D. L. (ed.). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.

KANT, I. 1992. The conflict of the faculties. London: Nebraska University Press.

KANT, I. 2006. Toward perpetual peace: a philosophical sketch. In: COLCLASURE, D. L. (ed.). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.

KANT, I. 2018. Religion within the boundaries of mere reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KROUGLOV, A. N. 2018. Kant and the crusians in the debate on optimism. Kantian Journal, Kaliningrad, v. 37, n. 2, p. 7–31.

KUPŚ, T. 2008. Filozofia religii Immanuela Kanta. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.

KÜHNLEIN, M. 2023. Religionsphilosophie nach Kant: im Angesicht des Bösen. Berlin: J.B. Metzler.

MARTIN, A. M. 2014. How we hope: a moral psychology. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

PALMQUIST, S. 1994. “The kingdom of God is at hand!” (did Kant really say that?). History of Philosophy Quarterly, Illinois, v. 11, n. 4, p. 421–437, oct 1994.

PASTERNACK, L.R. 2014. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Kant on religion within the boundaries of pure reason. London and New York: Routledge.

PETTIT, P. 2004. Hope and its place in mind. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, [s.l], v. 592, p. 152–165.

PFISTER, O. 1949. Die Rolle des Unbewussten im philosophischen Denken. Dialectica, Geneva, v. 3, n. 4, p. 254–271, dez 1949.

RÖMELT, J. 2022. Zwischen medizinischem Optimismus, sozialer Distanzierung und religiöser Lebenshilfe. In: BAHNE, T.; RÖMELT, J. (eds.). Lebenswert in Verantwortung: ethische Herausforderungen in der Corona-Pandemie. Würzburg: Echter Verlag.

SAVAGE, D. 1991. Kant’s rejection of divine revelation and his theory of radical evil. In: ROSSI, P. J.; WREEN, M. (eds.). Kant’s philosophy of religion reconsidered. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

SCHNEEWIND, J. B. 1997. The invention of autonomy: a history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SPENER, P. J. 2001. Hoffnung besserer Zeiten: Erwartungshorizonte der Christenheit. Drei Schriften Philipp Jakob Speners aus den Jahren 1693/94. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.

SPENER, P. J. 1664. Muhammedismus in angelis Euphrataeis S. Johanni Apocal. IX. v. XIII. & seq. praemonstratus, Straßburg: Literis Georgi Andreae Dolhopfii.

SPENER, P. J. 2005. Pia desideria. Gießen: Brunnen-Verlag.

SZYRWIŃSKA-HÖRIG, A. 2024. Philipp Jacob Speners Einfluss auf Kants Auffassung von der Erbsünde. In: HANKE, T.; SANS, G. (eds.). Kants Theorie des Bösen im Kontext. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

THEIS, R. 1994. Gott: Untersuchung zur Entwicklung des theologischen Diskurses in Kants Schriften zur theoretischen Philosophie bin hin zum Erscheinen der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-holzboog.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2026-02-23

Zitationsvorschlag

Szyrwinska-Hörig, A. (2026). Between Control and Trust.: Paradigms of Early Modern and Enlightenment Optimism in the Thought of Kant and Spener and their Continuity in Contemporary Thought. DoisPontos, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v22i3.101183

Ausgabe

Bd. 22 Nr. 3 (2025): Racionalidade e irracionalidade social

Rubrik

Racionalidade e irracionalidade social

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Szyrwinska-Hörig

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.

Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem a Doispontos o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou em sua página pessoal) antes da publicação ou repositório institucional/temático após a publicação, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).