Knowledge ecosystems on Industry 4.0 in Brazil: a bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v10i3.81513Keywords:
Industry 4.0, Bibliometric analysis, Knowledge Ecosystems.Abstract
Introduction: The production of knowledge in science is materialized in the collaborative interaction between researchers who investigate common themes, forming knowledge ecosystems through their productions, in this sense, the article aims to map the main actors (researchers, universities and funding agencies) that constitute the ecosystem and the knowledge that permeates it, especially those centered on industry 4.0 in the Brazilian context. Method: It is a quantitative, descriptive research, using bibliometric techniques through an analysis of published works on Industry 4.0 in the Web of Science database in the last five years, refining the search by country and selecting Brazil. In all, 369 documents produced in the country were analyzed using the metric software VOSviewer to build collaboration networks. Results: The authors Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures and Fernando Deschamps stand out as the main producers of knowledge in the ecosystem, as well as CAPES and CNPQ as guiding actors in the financing of research on Industry 4.0, which were developed in the University space. of São Paulo and the Federal University of Santa Catarina. Conclusion: The knowledge ecosystems in Industry 4.0 are formed by universities and public development agencies, which use resources to develop in the country artificial intelligence technologies, internet of things, cyberphysical systems, among other guiding knowledge.
References
Araújo, R. F. de. (2017). Estudos métricos da informação na web e o papel dos profissionais da informação. Biblioteca Universitária, 2, 42-64. Retirado de: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistarbu/article/view/3074.
Clarivate Analytics (2017). Web of Science. Retirado de http://wilearncap.asuscomm.com:81/wikipedia_en_all_novid_2017-08/A/Web_of_Science.html.
Curty, R. G., & Delbianco, N. R. (2020). As diferentes metrias dos estudos métricos da informação: evolução epistemológica, inter-relações e representações. Encontros Bibli, 25, 01-21. doi: 10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e74593.
Fapesp (2010). Análise da produção científica a partir de publicações em periódicos especializados. In Fapesp. Indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em São Paulo 2010. São Paulo: Fapesp. Retirado de https://fapesp.br/indicadores/2010/volume1/cap4.pdf.
Grácio, M. C. C., & Oliveira, E. F. T. de. (2017). A pesquisa brasileira em estudos métricos da informação: proximidade entre pesquisadores de destaque e áreas afins. Informação & Sociedade, 27(2), 105-116. Retirado de https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/ies/article/view/32483.
Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: a theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Järvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., & Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of knowledge ecosystems: prefigurative and partial forms. Research Policy, 10(8), 1523-1537. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.007
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239-242. doi: 10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4.
Macias-Chapula, C. A. (1998). O papel da Informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional. Ciência da Informação, 27(2), 132-140. doi: 10.1590/S0100-19651998000200005
Miller, F. Q. (2015). Experiencing information use for early career academics’ learning: a knowledge ecosystem model. Journal of Documentation, 71(6), 1228-1249. doi: 10.1108/JD-04-2014-0058
Morais, M. de O., Costa Neto, P. L. de O., Santos, O. S. dos, Cardoso Junior, A. P., & Sacomano, J. B. (2020). The evolution of quality in industry 4.0. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), 1-29. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8634
Morais, S. P., & Garcia, J. C. R. (2014, maio). O estado da arte da patentometria em periódicos internacionais da ciência da informação. IV Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria. Retirado de http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/45400.
Moreira, P. S. da C., Guimarães, A. J. R., & Tsunoda, D. F. (2020). Qual ferramenta bibliométrica escolher? um estudo comparativo entre softwares. P2P e Inovação, 6(2), 140-158. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
Nascimento, M. R. (2021). Ecossistemas de conhecimento e a Ciência da Informação: os estudos métricos da informação na mensuração do conhecimento científico. In C. R. S. Barbalho, D. O.
Inomata, & T. B. Fernandes (Orgs.). Sustentabilidade Informacional em Ecossistemas de Conhecimentos. Manaus, AM: Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas. Retirado de http://riu.ufam.edu.br/handle/prefix/5856.
Robertson, J. (2020). Competition in Knowledge Ecosystems: A Theory Elaboration Approach Using a Case Study. Sustainability, 12(18), 1-20. doi: 10.3390/su12187372.
Santos, B. P., Alberto, A., Lima, T. D. F. M., Charrua-Santos, F. B. B. (2018). Indústria 4.0: desafios e oportunidades. Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento, 4(1), 111-124. doi: 10.32358/rpd.2018.v4.316.
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fouth Industrial Revolution. Nova Iorque: Crow Business.
Silva, I. O. (2016). Webometria e análise de redes sociais. Revista ACB, 21(2), 294-308. Retirado de: https://revista.acbsc.org.br/racb/article/view/1137.
Thomson, A. J. (2007). How should we manage knowledge ecosystems? Using adaptive knowledge management. In K. M.
Reynolds, A. J. Thomson, M. Köhl, M. A. Shannon, D. Ray, & K. Rennolls. Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. Wallingford: CABI.
Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17-24. Retirado de https://timreview.ca/article/919.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer manual. Holanda: Universiteit Leiden.
Vanti, N. A. P. (2005). Os links e os estudos webométricos. Ciência da Informação, 34(1), 78-88. doi: 10.1590/S0100-19652005000100009.
Vermulm, R. (2018). Políticas para o desenvolvimento da indústria 4.0 no Brasil. São Paulo: IEDI. Retirado de: http://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/handle/1408/15486
Wilkesmann, M., Wilkesmann, U. (2018). Industry 4.0: organizing routines or innovations?. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(2), 238-254. doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2017-0019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Atoz is a open access journal and the authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their papers in personal web pages, institutional repositories or portals before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication at AtoZ. It is just asked, when and where possible, the mention, as a bibliographic reference (including the atributted URL), to the AtoZ Journal.
The authors license the AtoZ for the solely purpose of disseminate the published work (peer reviewed version/post-print) in aggregation, curation and indexing systems.
The AtoZ is a Diadorim/IBICT green academic journal.
All the journal content (including instructions, editorial policies and templates) - except where otherwise indicated - is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, since October 2020.
When published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any support or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose , even if commercial). You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made
AtoZ does not apply any charges regarding manuscripts submission/processing and papers publication.
