Open innovation in the development of medical technologies

Sergio Evangelista Silva; Camila Alves Damásio; Alana Deusilan Sester Pereira

doi:10.5380/atoz.v14.94881

Autores

Sergio Evangelista Silva Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-518X
Camila Alves Damásio Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-0639
Alana Deusilan Sester Pereira Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0571-9324

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v14.94881

Palavras-chave:

Inovação aberta, Universidade-empresa, Canais de conhecimento, Canais de mercado, Inovação social, Canais sociais

Resumo

Introdução: Este artigo analisa como uma unidade acadêmica da área médica de uma universidade pública brasileira implementou parcerias de inovação aberta com agentes externos. A análise envolveu a identificação dos tipos de arranjos, agentes externos e conhecimento acessado externamente. Método: Essas iniciativas foram analisadas por meio da identificação de dois construtos básicos: tipos de arranjos implementados e tipos de conhecimento acessado. Resultados: Foram identificados dois tipos de arranjos, horizontal e vertical, três tipos de parceiros externos, departamentos acadêmicos externos, empresas e fundações de serviços públicos, e dois tipos básicos de conhecimento: criação de conhecimento em equipes de projeto e conhecimento sobre canais de difusão (disseminação). Conclusões: Este estudo deve ser aprimorado por meio de replicações em outras universidades e institutos de pesquisa para identificar o uso da inovação aberta para o desenvolvimento e a difusão de tecnologias. Este artigo apresenta insights para que as universidades avaliem e planejem arranjos de inovação aberta. Os insights revelados neste artigo podem ser utilizados como instrumento para o planejamento estratégico de ações de inovação aberta de unidades acadêmicas em universidades para o desenvolvimento e a difusão de tecnologias úteis para a sociedade. Este artigo contribui para a literatura ao mostrar em detalhes como uma unidade acadêmica de universidades implementa arranjos para acessar conhecimento externo e quais tipos de conhecimento são acessados externamente para complementar suas competências internas.

Biografia do Autor

Sergio Evangelista Silva, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)

Professor Associado do Departamento de Engenharia de Produção da Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto; Doutor em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos

Camila Alves Damásio, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)

Graduada em Engenharia de Produção - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Mestre em Engenharia de Produção - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Doutoranda em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Alana Deusilan Sester Pereira, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil

Professora Adjunta da Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Doutora em Administração de Empresas pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Referências

Alexander, A. T., Miller, K., & Fielding, S. (2015). Open for business: universities, entrepreneurial academics and open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(06), 1540013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400137

Aliasghar, O., & Haar, J. (2023). Open innovation: are absorptive and desorptive capabilities complementary?.International Business Review, 32(2), 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101865

Angelidou, S., Mount, M., & Pandza, K. (2022). Exploring the asymmetric complementarity between external knowledge search and management innovation. Technovation, 115, 102472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102472

Ardito, L., Petruzzelli, A. M., Dezi, L., & Castellano, S. (2020). The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders?. Journal of Business Research, 119, 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043

Bäck, I., & Kohtamäki, M., (2015). Boundaries of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 45-46, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.07.002

Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T. M., Conradsen, M. L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A. P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., Effert, A., Fecher, B., Filiou, D. Frederiksen, L., Gillier T., Grimpe, C., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Heigl, F., Hoisl, K., ... Xu, S. M. (2022). The open innovation in science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 136-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274

Bertello, A., Ferraris, A., Bernardi, P. de, & Bertoldi, B. (2022). Challenges to open innovation in traditional SMEs: an analysis of pre-competitive projects in university-industry-government collaboration. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00727-1

Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2016). Open innovation: are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1034-1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2375

Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2014). A fad or a phenomenon?: The adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Research-Technology Management, 57(2), 16-25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.5437/08956308X5702196?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Coccia, M. (2020). Deep learning technology for improving cancer care in society: new directions in cancer imaging driven by artificial intelligence. Technology in Society, 60, 101198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101198

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2013). Business Research Methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593

Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., & Seitz, N. (2019). The impact of university focused technology transfer policies on regional innovation and enterpreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1451-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09733-0

Dahlborg, C., Lewensohn, D., Danell, R., & Sundberg, C. J. (2017). To invent and let others innovate: a framework of academic patent transfer modes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 538-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9490-7

Devaraj, S., Wolfe, M. T., & Patel, P. C. (2020). Creative destruction and regional health: evidence from the US. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31(2), 573-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00663-x

Díez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sánches, A. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: the case of a science park. Technovation, 50-51, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001

Dong, J.Q., & Netten, J. (2017). Information technology and external search in open innovation age: new findings in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.021

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Eppinger, E. (2021). How open innovation practices deliver societal benefits. Sustainability, 13(3), 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031431

Fernandes, S., Cesario, M., & Barata, J. M. (2017). Ways to open innovation: main agents and sources in the Portuguese case. Technology in Society, 51, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.002

Fong, P. S. W. (2003). Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: an empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships. International Journal of Project Management, 21(7), 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00047-4

Goebel, K., Losekann, S. D., Polla, P. T. B., Montenegro, K. B. M., & Ávila, A. R. (2024). Offering technologies for innovation: strategies and challenges. Innovation & Management Review, 21(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-10-2021-0186

Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2017). Hitting the nail on the head: exploring the relationship between public subsidies and open innovation efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.022

Grimaldi, M., Greco, M., & Cricelli, L. (2021). A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.043

Haeussler, C., & Assmus, A. (2021). Bridging the gap between invention and innovation: Increasing success rates in publicly and industry-funded clinical trials. Research Policy, 50(2), 104155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104155

He, V. F., Krogh, G. von, Sirén, C., & Gersdorf, T. (2021). Asymmetries between partners and the success of university-industry research collaborations. Research Policy, 50(10), 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104356

Huggins, R., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2020). Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 718-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09720-5

Inomata, D. O., Passos, K. G. F. dos, Pintro, S., Sena, P. M. B., & Bedin, J. (2020). Compartilhamento de conhecimentos e aprendizagem colaborativa em tempo de pandemia. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 9(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v9i2.76168

Janeiro, P., Proença, I., & Goncalves, V. da C. G. (2013). Open innovation: factor explaining universities as service firm innovation sources. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2017-2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.027

Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. de C., Armellini, F., & Ferrari, A. G. (2020). Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 119985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119985

Leckel, A., Veilleux, S., & Dana, L. P. (2020). Local open innovation: a means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119891

Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012

Lopes, A. P. V. B. V., & Carvalho, M. M. de. (2018). Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: towards a contingent conceptual model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.014

Mattos, C. A. de, Kissimoto, K. O., & Laurindo, F. J. B. (2018). The role of information technology for building virtual environments to integrate crowdsourcing mechanisms into the open innovation process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.020

Mehmood, T., Alzoubi, H. M., Alshuridecj, M., Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Ahmed, G. (2019). Schumpeterian entrepreneurship theory: evolution and relevance. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(4), 1-10. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Schumpeterian-entrepreneurship-theory-evolution-and-relevance-1528-2686-25-4-301.pdf

Milici, A., Ferreira, F. A. F., Pereira, L. F., Carayannis, E. G., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2023). Dynamics of open innovation in small-and medium-sized enterprises: a metacognitive approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(2), 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3042458

Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human resources for Health, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-19

Nascimento, M. R. (2021). Ecossistemas de conhecimento sobre indústria 4.0 no Brasil: uma análise bibliométrica. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 10(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v10i3.81513

Nguyen, T. P. T., Huang, F., & Tian, X. (2023). Intellectual property protection need as a driver for open innovation: empirical evidence from Vietnam. Technovation, 123, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102714

O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qualitative Health Research, 18(11), 1574-1585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308325535.

Ottonicar, S. L. C., & Valentim, M. L. P. (2021). A indústria 4.0 e a inovação aberta em aceleradoras de startups. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 10(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v10i3.81882

Pihlajamaa, M. (2023). What does it mean to be open? A typology of inbound open innovation strategies and their dynamic capability requirements. Innovation, 25(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1907192

Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: an empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014

Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbach, E., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004

Rayna, T., Striukova, L., & Darlington, J. (2015). Co-creation and user innovation: the role of online 3D printings platforoms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002

Ribeiro, B., & Shapira, P. (2020). Private and public values of innovation: a patent analysis of synthetic biology. Research Policy, 49(1), 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103875

Shaikh, I., & Randhawa, K. (2022). Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation: bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus. Technovation, 114, 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102437

Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2016). Theory building: a review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647102

Singh, S. K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2021). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 788-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040

Suh, Y., & Jeon, J. (2019). Monitoring patterns of open innovation using the patent-based brokerage analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.037

Suhada, T. A., Ford, J. A., Verreynne, M. L., & Indulska, M. (2021). Motivating individuals to contribute to firms’ non-pecuniary open innovation goals. Technovation, 102, 102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102233

Sun, Y., Liu, J., & Ding, Y. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between open innovation, knowledge management capability and dual innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1632431

Tukoff-Guimarães, Y. B., Kniess, C. T., Penha, R., & Ruiz, M. S. (2021). Patents valuation in core innovation: case study of a Brazilian public university. Innovation & Management Review, 18(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2019-0027

Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2020). The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis. R&D Management, 50(1), 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12313

Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: the importance of collective team identification. Academy of management Journal, 48(3), 532-547. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407918

Viana, L., Jabour, D., Ramirez, P., & Cruz, G. da. (2018). Patents go to the market? University-industry technology transfer from a brazilian perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 13(3), 24-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000300024

Vieira, F. C., Bonfim, L. R. C., & Cruz, A. C. da (2021). The process of opening innovation networks: open innovation at Embrapa Florestas. Innovation & Management Review, 19(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-05-2020-0057

Villasalero, M. (2014). University knowledge, open innovation and technological capital in Spanish science parks: research revealing or technology selling?.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(4), 479-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2014-0083

West, J., & Bogers, M. (2017). Open innovation: current status and research opportunities. Innovation, 19(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995

West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H., (2014). Open innovation: the next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001

Wirsich, A., Kock, A., Strumann, C., & Schultz, C. (2016). Effects of university–industry collaboration on technological newness of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 708-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12342

Yang, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2017). Creating and capturing value through sustainability: the sustainable value analysis tool. A new tool helps companies discover opportunities to create and capture value through sustainability. Research-Technology Management, 60(3), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1301001