The Place of the Sacred in Cassirer’s Philosophy of Mythology

Autores

  • Gregory S Moss Universidade Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v20i2.90649

Palavras-chave:

Mythology, Magic, Symbol, Philosophy of Culture, The Sacred

Resumo

In this essay I defend Cassirer’s account of mythical culture against a series of critiques raised against his philosophy of mythology. Cassirer has been charged with neglecting the profane dimension of mythical culture and with presenting an inconsistent account of sacred being. In order to make headway on these critiques, I first demonstrate that Cassirer does in fact acknowledge the profane and its place in mythical culture. Through close conceptual and textual analysis, I reconstruct Cassirer’s account of the sacred and the profane in “Myth as Form of Intuition” in the second volume of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. After demonstrating the presence of this distinction in Cassirer’s texts, I reconstruct Cassirer’s account of the emotive origin of the sacred in mythical culture. Finally, I show how Cassirer’s the law of mythical culture is not inconsistent with the sacred, but is a further articulation of the form of sacred being.

Biografia do Autor

Gregory S Moss, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Professor Adjunto.

Referências

BUBER, M. I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. NY: Simon and Schuster, 1970.

CASSIRER, E. Language and Myth. Translated by Susanne K. Langer. NY: Dover, 1946.

CASSIRER, E. Myth of the State. New Haven: Yale UP, 1974.

CASSIRER, E. Mythos, Sprache, und Kunst; Nachgelassene Manuskripte und Texte, Band 7. Edited by Jörn Bohr and Gerald Hartung. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2011.

CASSIRER, E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol. 1: Language. Translated by Ralph Mannheim. New Haven: Yale UP, 1955.

CASSIRER, E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol. 2: Mythical Thought. Translated by Ralf Mannheim. New Haven: Yale UP, 1955.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol. 3: The Phenomenology of Knowledge. Translated by Ralf Mannheim. New Haven: Yale UP, 1955.

CASSIRER, E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol 2: Mythical Thinking. Translated by Steve Lofts. NY: Routledge, 2021.

DURKHEIM, É. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Carol Cosman, Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.

ELIADE, M. The Sacred and the Profane. Translated by Willard R. Trask. NY: Harcourt, 1987.

HEIDEGGER, M. The Piety of Thinking: Essays by Martin Heidegger. Translated by G.Hart and John C. Maraldo. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1976

HESIOD. Theogony. Translated by Stanley Lombardo. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Pub., 1993.

HORKHEIMER, M. & ADORNO, T. W.. Dialectic and Enlightenment. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002.

JUENGHANI, M. A. “How Cassirer Explains Myth and Other Symbolic Functions Through Semiotic Functions.” Semiotica, 2020, 125-144.

MAUSS, M. A General Theory of Magic. Translated by Robert Brain. London/New York, Routledge, 2005.

MOSS, G. Ernst Cassirer and the Autonomy of Language, Lanham: Lexington, 2014.

OTTO, R. The Idea of the Holy. Translated by John W. Harvey. London: Oxford UP, 1923.

PEDERSEN, E.O. “The Holy as an Epistemic Category and a Political Tool: Ernst Cassirer and Rudolf Otto’s Philosophies of Myth and Religion.” New German Critique, Issue 104 (2008) 207-227.

SILVERMAN, D. P. Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.

VERENE, D. “Cassirer’s View of Myth and Symbol.” The Monist, Vol. 50, Issue 4 (1996) 53-564.

WEILANDT, T. Das Verhältnis von Sprache und Mythos als Symbolische Formen: die Frage nach dem Fundament der Kultur. München: Akademische Verlagsgemeinschaft, 2009.

ZORBAS, K. “Agents of Evil: Curse Accusations and Shamanic Retaliation in Post Soviet Tuva (Siberia).” Dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2007.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-06-08

Como Citar

Moss, G. S. (2023). The Place of the Sacred in Cassirer’s Philosophy of Mythology. Studia Kantiana, 20(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v20i2.90649

Edição

Seção

Artigos