Elementos kantianos na filosofia da matemática de Ernst Cassirer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v20i2.90399Palavras-chave:
Kant, neokantismo, Cassirer, filosofia da matemática, filosofia transcendentalResumo
A tarefa deste artigo é explicitar algumas influências kantianas na filosofia da matemática do neokantiano da escola de Marburgo, Ernst Cassirer. Conforme argumentamos, em sua primeira obra sistemática, Conceito de Substância Conceito de Função: uma investigação sobre as questões fundamentais da Crítica do Conhecimento (1910), certos pressupostos da filosofia transcendental de Kant (tais quais, e.g., seu compromisso anti-metafísico manifesto e sua ideia de “lógica transcendental”) desempenharam papéis importantes na filosofia da matemática de Cassirer, servindo enquanto conceitos complementares ao logicismo-estrutural defendido pelo neokantiano.
Referências
BARONE, F. Logica Formale e Logica Transcendentale. Vol. I-II. Edizioni di filosofia. Torino, 1957.
BAUM, M. „Methode, tranzendentale“. Ritter, J., Günder, K. (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Bd. 5, Basel/Stuttgart, Schwabe, 1980.
BEISER, F. The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism. 1796-1880. Oxford University Press, 2014.
BENACERRAF, P. and PUTNAM, H. Philosophy of Mathematics. Second Edition. Cambridge U. Press, 1983.
BIAGIOLI, F. “Articulating space in terms of transformations groups: Helmholtz and Cassirer”. Journal for the history of analytic philosophy, vol. 6 nº 3. (2018) pp. 115 131.
__________. “Cassirer’s view of the mathematical method as a paradigm of symbolic thinking”. GIEL, J. (Hrsg.) Ernst Cassirer: Zwischen Mythos und Wissenschaft. Lectiones & Acroases Philosophicae, VIII, 1. pp. 193-223, 2015.
__________. “Ernst Cassirer’s transcendental account of mathematical reasoning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 79, (2020) pp. 30-40.
BOWNE, G. D. Philosophy of Logic (1880-1908). London, 1966.
CANTÙ, P. “The epistemological question of the applicability of mathematics”. In.: Journal for the history of analytic philosophy, vol. 6, nº 3, (2018), pp. 94-114.
CARNAP, R. „Die logizistische Grundlegung der Mathematik“. Erkenntniss, vol. 2, 1931.
CASSIRER, E. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neuren Zeit. B. II. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1991.
______. „Erkenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der Logik“. Erkenntnis, Begriff, Kultur. Ed. Rainer A. Bast. Hamburg: Meiner. pp. 1-76, 1993.
______. Esencia y efecto del concepto de símbolo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1975.
______. Filosofia das formas simbólicas. Primeiro Tomo: A linguagem [1923] São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.
______. Filosofia das formas simbólicas. Segundo Tomo: O pensamento mítico [1925] São Paulo: Marins Fontes, 2001.
______. Filosofia das Formas simbólicas. Terceiro Tomo: Fenomenologia do conhecimento [1929] São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.
______. „Kant und die moderne Mathematik – Mit Bezug auf Bertrand Russells und Louis Couturats Werke über die Prinzipien der Mathematik“. KANT-STUDIEN, Zwölfter Band. Berlin, (1907), pp. 1-49.
______. “Substance and Function” [1910]. Substance and Function and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Chicago: Open Court, 1953.
COFFA, A. The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
COHEN, H. Kants Begründung der Ethik. Berlin. Ferd. Dümmlers Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1887.
______. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Berlin. Ferd. Dümmlers Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1871/1885.
DEDEKIND, R. Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1888.
EDGAR, S. “Intersubjectivity and physical laws in Post-Kantian theory of knowledge: Natorp and Cassirer”. FRIEDMAN, J. T. and LUFT, S. (eds.) The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: a Novel Assessment. Books by Marquette University Faculty. Book 225, pp. 141-162, 2015.
________. Journal for the history of analytical philosophy. Vol. 6, Nº 3. Special issue: Method, Science and Mathematics: Neo-Kantianism and analytical philosophy (2018).
FERRARI, M. “Ernst Cassirer and the history of science”. FRIEDMAN, J. T. and LUFT, S (eds.). The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: a Novel Assessment. Books by Marquette University Faculty. Book 225, pp. 11-29, 2015.
___________. Is Cassirer a Neo-Kantian Methodologically speaking? LUFT, S. And MAKRELL, R. (eds.) Neo-Kantianism in contemporary philosophy. Indiana University Press, pp. 293-314, 2010.
FREGE, G. Collected papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy – edited by Brian McGuinness. Basil Blackwell Publisher, 1984.
FRIEDMAN, J. T. and LUFT, S. (eds). The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: a Novel Assessment. Books by Marquette University Faculty. Book 225, 2015.
FRIEDMAN, M. A Parting of Ways: Carnap Cassirer and Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court, 2000.
GABRIEL, G. und SCHLOTTER, S. Frege und die kontinentalen Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie. Münster: Mentis Verlag, 2017.
HEIS, J. “Arithmetic and number in the ‘Philosophy of Symbolic Forms’”. FRIEDMAN, J. T. and LUFT, S. (Eds.). The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: a Novel Assessment. Books by Marquette University Faculty. Book 225, pp. 123-140, 2015.
_______. “Critical philosophy begins at the very point where logistic leaves off: Cassirer’s Response to Frege and Russell”. Perspectives on Science, vol. 18, no. 4, by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2010), pp. 383-408.
_______. (2011) “Ernst Cassirer’s Neo-Kantian philosophy of geometry”. British journal for the history of philosophy. Vol. 19, nº 4, (2011). pp. 759-794.
IHMIG, K-N. “Ernst Cassirer and the structural conception of objects in modern science: the importance of the ‘Erlanger Programm’”. Science in Context, 12, 4. (1999). pp. 513-529.
KANT, I. Crítica da Razão Pura [1ª Ed. 1781 – 2ª Ed. 1787] Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbekian, 1994.
KATZ, M. And MORMANN, T. “Infinitesimals as an issue of Neo-Kantian Philosophy of science”. The journal of the international society for the history of philosophy of science. Vol. 3, nº 2, 2013, pp. 236-280.
KÖHNKE, K. The Rise of neo-Kantianism: German academic philosophy between idealism and positivism. [1986] New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
LOVRENOV, M. “The role of invariance in Cassirer’s interpretation of the theory of relativity”. In: Syntesis Philosophica. 42, (2006), pp. 233-241.
MACO, R. “Philosophy of Mathematics in Early Ernst Cassirer”. FILOZOFIA 65, No 1, (2010), pp. 27-39.
MAKREEL, R. “Neo-Kantianism in contemporary philosophy”. Indiana University Press, 2010.
MATHERNE, S. “Cassirer’s Psychology of Relations: From the Psychology of Mathematics and Natural Science to the Psychology of Culture”. Journal for the history of analytical philosophy. Vol. 6, Nº 3. Special issue: Method, Science and Mathematics: Neo-Kantianism and analytical philosophy. Ed. Scott Edgar and Lydia Paton. University of Massachusetts, (2018), pp. 133-162.
MORMANN, T. “Idealization in Cassirer’s Philosophy of Mathematics”. Philosophia Mathematica. Vol. 3, nº 16, (2008), pp. 151-181.
_____________. “Mathematics to Quantum Mechanics – On the Conceptual Unity of Cassirer’s Philosophy of Science (1907–1937)”. FRIEDMAN, J. T. and LUFT, S. (eds) The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: a Novel Assessment. Books by Marquette University Faculty. Book 225, pp. 31-63, 2015.
NATORP, P. (1910). Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig und Berlin Druck und Verlag von B. G. Teubner, 1910.
______. „Über objektive und subjektive Begründung der Erkenntnis”. Philosophische Monatshefte, 23, 1982, pp. 257–286.
NEUBER, M. „Treffpunkt Struktur – Cassirer, Schlick und Carnap“. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 95 (2). (2013), pp. 206-233.
OLIVA, L.“Kant and the Neo-Kantians on Mathematics”. STAITI, A. and WARREN, N. (eds.) New approaches on Neo-Kantianism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 285 306, 2015.
PARSONS, C. “The structuralist view of mathematical objects”. Synthese, 84, (1990), pp. 303-346.
PORTA, M. A. G. “A teoria do número em Natorp e Cassirer (1898-1910). Uma contribuição histórica ao estruturalismo matemático e às origens do ‘semantic turn’”. pp. 103-144. ______. ESTUDOS NEOKANTIANOS. São Paulo: Loyola, 2011.
______. “Cassirer e Kant”. In: Crítica. V. 12, (2007), pp. 183-218.
______. “De Newton a Maxwell. Uma contribuição à compreensão do projeto cassireriano de uma ‘Filosofia das Formas Simbólicas’” P. 71-102. Kant e-prints. v. 5, (2010), pp. 44-65.
PRINGE, H. B. “The principle of causality and the coordination of concepts and space-temporal objects in Cassirer’s philosophy”. Idealistic studies. Vol. 44, nº 1, 2014, pp. 51-66.
PULKKINEN, J. “Russell and the Neo-Kantians”. Studies in history and philosophy of science, Vol. 32, No. 1, (2001), pp. 99-117.
RECK, E. “Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (originally published in 2008, revised in 2011), pp. 1-32.
______. “Dedekind, structural reasoning, and mathematical understanding”, In.: VAN KERKHOVE, B. (ed.), New Perspectives on Mathematical Practices, Singapore: World Scientific. pp. 150-173, 2009.
RECK, E. and KELLER, P. (No prelo) “From Dedekind to Cassirer: Logicism and the Kantian heritage”. POSY, C. and RECHTER, O. Kant’s philosophy of Mathematics, Vol. II: Reception and development after Kant. Cambridge University Press.
RICHARDSON, A. “‘The Fact of Science’ and ‘Critique of Knowledge’: Exact Science as Problem and Resource in Marburg Neo-Kantianism”. FRIEDMAN AND NORDMANN: The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-century Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 211-226, 2006.
RUSSELL, B. Principles of Mathematics [1903]. Routledge University Pres, 2010.
RYCKMAN, T. A. ‘CONDITION SINE QUA NON?’ Zuordnung in the earlies epistemologies of Cassirer and Schlick. Synthese Vol. 88, No. 1, (1991), pp. 57- 95.
SHAPIRO, S. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
SCHIEMER, G. “Cassirer and the Structural Turn in Modern Geometry”. Journal for the history of analytical philosophy. Vol. 6, Nº 3. Special issue: Method, Science and Mathematics: Neo-Kantianism and analytical philosophy. Ed. Scott Edgar and Lydia Paton. University of Massachusetts, (2018), pp. 182-212.
SCHLIPP, P. A. The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. The library of living philosophers, Inc, 1949.
SMART, H. R. “Cassirer versus Russell”. Philosophy of science. Vol. 10, nº 3, 1943, pp. 167-175.
______. “Review of “Substance and Function and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity” by Ernst Cassirer”. In.: The Philosophical Review. Vol. 33, nº 4, (1924), pp. 398-406.
YAP. A. “Dedekind and Cassirer on Mathematical Concept Formation”. Philosophia Mathematica, (2014), pp. 1-21.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Lucas Alessandro Duarte Amaral
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais (copyright) de suas obras e concedem à revista Studia Kantiana o direito de primeira publicação.
Autores cedem o direito aos editores de vincular seus artigos em futuras bases de dados.
Todo o conteúdo desta revista está licenciado sob a Licença Internacional Creative Commons 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
