Los esquemas de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos como procedimientos de síntesis gobernados por reglas conceptuales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v12i17.88901Palavras-chave:
Kant, esquematismo, empíricos, matemáticos, procedimientosResumo
El objetivo del presente artículo es ofrecer una interpretación de la doctrina del esquematismo de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos presentada por Kant en su Crítica de la razón pura. Mostramos que los esquemas de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos son procedimientos de síntesis gobernados por reglas conceptuales. Aunque no consideramos que esta doctrina kantiana carece de problemas, nuestro trabajo muestra que: 1) esos esquemas pueden distinguirse rigurosamente de sus correspondientes conceptos; 2) esos esquemas no son entidades superfluas. Estas conclusiones se alcanzan mostrando que el contenido de un concepto (esto es, un conjunto de notas discursivas) determina la unidad de elementos sensibles que tiene que ser efectuada por un esquema en tanto procedimiento de síntesis.
Referências
ALLISON, Henry E. “Kant’s critique of Berkeley”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11.1 (1973): 43-63.
_____. Kant’s transcendental idealism. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
AQUILA, Richard E. “Kant’s theory of concepts”, Kant-Studien 65.1 (1974): 1-19.
ARIAS, Martín (2008) “¿Hay un esquematismo de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos? (Kant: Critica de la Razón Pura, A 138/ B 177)”, Anuario Filosófico, 41.3 (2008): 621-635.
ARIAS ALBISU, Martín. “Una relación de homogeneidad entre términos heterogéneos. El concepto de homogeneidad en el capítulo del esquematismo de la Critica de la razón pura”, Diánoia, 54.63 (2009a): 71-88.
_____. “Heterogeneidad y diferencia. Acerca de los problemas del esquematismo trascendental y del esquematismo de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos”, Cuadernos Filosóficos. Segunda Época, 6 (2009b): 49-60.
_____. “On two different lines of argumentation in Kant’s theory of schematism of empirical and mathematical concepts”, Kant Studies Online, (2014): 1-42. http://www.kantstudiesonline.net/KSO_Author_AK_files/AriasAlb isuMartin01713.pdf
BAXTER, Donald L. M. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57.2 (1997): 307-330.
BAYNE, Steven M. Kant on causation. On the fivefold routes to the principle of causation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2004.
_____. “Abstract general ideas and Kant’s schematism”. En: Valerio Rodhen y otros (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Vol. 2, p. 97-105, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
_____. “Marks, images, and rules: concepts and transcendental idealism”. En: Dennis Schulting y Jacco Verburgt (eds.), Kant’s idealism. New interpretations of a controversial doctrine. p. 127- 142. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
BENNETT, Jonathan. Kant’s analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
BERKELEY, George. The works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne (A.A. Luce y T. E. Jessop, eds.). London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1948-1957.
CAIMI, Mario. Leçons sur Kant. La déduction transcendantale dans la deuxième édition de la Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2007.
_____. “Comments on the conception of imagination in the Critique of Pure Reason”. En: Valerio Rodhen y otros (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant- Kongresses. Vol. 1, p. 39-50. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
CHIPMAN, Lauchlan. “Kant’s categories and their schematism”, Kant-Studien, 63.1 (1972): 36-50.
DAHLSTROM, Daniel O. “Thinking, knowing, and schematism”. En: Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 5. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Mainz 4.-8. April 1981. Vol. I.1, p. 209-220. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1981.
DESCARTES, René. Meditationes de prima philosophia. En: Charles Adam y Paul Tannery (eds.), OEuvres de Descartes. Vol. 7, Paris: Léopold Cerf, 16411, 1642/ 1904.
DÜSING, Klaus. “Schema und Einbildungskraft in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. En: Lothar Kreimendahl (ed.), Aufklärung und Skepsis. Studien zur Philosophie und Geistesgeschichte des 17. Und 18. Jahrhunderts. p. 47-71. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann- Holzboog, 1995.
ECO, Umberto. Kant y el ornitorrinco. Trad. por Helena Lozano Miralles. Barcelona: Lumen, 1997/ 1999.
ERDMANN, Benno. “Kant und Hume um 1762”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 1.1 (1888): 62-77, 1.2 (1888): 216-230.
FELDMAN, Susan. “Kant’s schemata as reference rules”. En: Gerhard Funke y Thomas M. Seebohm (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress. Vol. II.1, p. 229-240. Washington, DC: The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America, 1989.
FERRARIN, Alfredo. “Construction and mathematical schematism. Kant on the exhibition of a concept in intuition”, Kant-Studien, 86.2 (1995a): 131-174.
_____. “Kant’s productive imagination and its alleged antecedents”, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 18.1 (1995b): 65-92.
GINSBORG, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understanding”, Philosophical Topics, 25.1 (1997): 37-81.
_____. “Thinking the particular as contained under the universal”. En: Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and cognition in Kant’s critical philosophy. p. 35-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
GUYER, Paul. Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1929/ 1991.
HUME, David. An enquiry concerning human understanding. And other writings (Stephen Buckle, ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17481, 1777/ 2007.
KANT, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie-Ausgabe). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900 ss.
_____. Crítica de la razón pura. Trad. por Mario Caimi. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1787/ 2009.
_____. Lógica. Un manual de lecciones (Edición original de G. B. Jäsche). Trad. por María J. Vázquez Lobeiras. Madrid: Akal, 2000.
KEMP SMITH, Norman. A commentary to Kant’s “Critique of pure reason”. London: Macmillan, 1918.
KIM, Joongol. “Concepts and intuitions in Kant’s philosophy of geometry”, Kant-Studien, 97.2 (2006): 138-162.
KLEMME, Heiner F. (ed.). Reception of the Scottish Enlightenment in Germany: Six significant translations, 1755–1782. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000.
KORIAKO, Darius. “Kants Schematismuslehre und ihre Relevanz für die Philosophie der Mathematik”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 83.3 (2001): 286-307.
KÖRNER, Stephan. Kant. London: Penguin Books, 1955.
LA ROCCA, Claudio. “Schematismus und Anwendung”, Kant-Studien, 80.2 (1989): 129-154.
_____. “How are synthetic apriori judgments possible? The conditions and process of empirical knowledge in Kant”, Quaestio, 4 (2004): 265-293.
LEAVITT, Frank J. “Kant’s schematism and his philosophy of geometry”, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 22.4 (1991): 647-659.
LOCKE, John. An essay concerning human understanding (Peter H. Nidditch, ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press, 16891, 1700/ 1975.
LONGUENESSE, Béatrice. Kant and the capacity to judge. Trad. Por Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993/ 1998.
MELLIN, G. S. A. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der kritischen Philosophie. Züllichau/Jena y Leipzig: Friedrich Frommann, 1797- 1804.
METZ, Wilhelm. Kategoriendeduktion und produktive Einbildungskraft in der theoretischen Philosophie Kants und Fichtes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991.
MOTTA, Giuseppe. “‘Das Phantom des berkleyischen Idealisms’. Su alcuni riferimenti a J. G.H. Feder nella Critica della ragion pura”, Studi Kantiani, 25 (2012): 59-69.
NOLAN, J. P. “Kant on meaning: two studies”, Kant-Studien, 70.2 (1979): 113-130.
PARSONS, Charles. “Arithmetic and the categories”, Topoi, 3.2 (1984): 109-121.
PATON, Herbert J. Kant’s metaphysic of experience. A commentary on the first half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1936/ 1970.
PHILONENKO, Alexis. “Lecture du schématisme transcendantal.” En: Joachim Kopper y Wolfgang Marx (eds.), 200 Jahre Kritik der reinen Vernunft. p. 291-312. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1981.
PIPER, William B. “Kant’s contact with British empiricism”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12.2 (1978-1979): 174-189.
PIPPIN, Robert B. “The schematism and empirical concepts”, Kant- Studien, 67.2 (1976): 156-171.
PIPPIN, Robert B. “Kant on empirical concepts”, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 10.1 (1979): 1-19.
PIPPIN, Robert B. Kant’s theory of form. An essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University, 1982.
PITCHER, Georg. Berkeley. Trad. por José A. Robles García. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1977/ 1983.
SCHRADER, George. “Kant’s theory of concepts”, Kant-Studien, 49.1-4 (1958): 264-278.
SEEL, Gerhard. “Die Einleitung in die Analytik der Grundsätze, der Schematismus und die obersten Grundsätze”. En: Georg Mohr y Marcus Willaschek (eds.), Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. p. 217-246. Berlin: Akademie, 1998.
SHABEL, Lisa. “Kant on the ‘symbolic construction’ of mathematical concepts”, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 29.4 (1998): 589-621.
_____. “Kant’s philosophy of mathematics.” En: Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy. p. 94-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SMIT, Houston. “Kant on marks and the immediacy of intuition”, The Philosophical Review, 109.2 (2000): 235-266.
STADELMANN, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.
STERN, Leah J. “Empirical concepts as rules in the Critique of Pure Reason”. En: Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Mainz 6.-10. April 1974. Vol. II.1, p. 158-165. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974.
SUTHERLAND, Daniel. “Kant on arithmetic, algebra, and the theory of proportions”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44.4 (2006): 533-558.
TURBAYNE, Colin M. (1955) “Kant’s refutation of dogmatic idealism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 5.20 (1955): 225-244.
WARDA, Arthur. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin: Martin Breslauer, 1922.
WARNOCK, Geoffrey J. “Concepts and schematism”, Analysis, 9.5 (1949): 77-82.
WOLFF, Christian. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. En: Jean École y otros (eds.), Gesammelte Werke. Vol. I.2. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 17201, 1751/ 1983.
WOLFF, Robert P. “Kant’s debt to Hume via Beattie”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 21.1 (1960): 117-123.
_____. Kant’s theory of mental activity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963.
YOUNG, Michael. “Kant on the construction of arithmetical concepts”, Kant-Studien, 73.1 (1982): 17-46.
_____. “Construction, schematism, and imagination”, Topoi, 3.2 (1984): 123-131.
_____. “Kant’s view of imagination”, Kant-Studien, 79.2 (1988): 140- 164.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores mantém os direitos de republicação, sob condição de indicação de primeira publicação na Studia Kantiana.
Autores cedem o direito aos editores de vincular seus artigos em futuras bases de dados.
A Studia Kantiana utiliza a licença Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
Não Comercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
Sem Derivações — Se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
