Los esquemas de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos como procedimientos de síntesis gobernados por reglas conceptuales
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ALLISON, Henry E. “Kant’s critique of Berkeley”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11.1 (1973): 43-63.
_____. Kant’s transcendental idealism. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
AQUILA, Richard E. “Kant’s theory of concepts”, Kant-Studien 65.1 (1974): 1-19.
ARIAS, Martín (2008) “¿Hay un esquematismo de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos? (Kant: Critica de la Razón Pura, A 138/ B 177)”, Anuario Filosófico, 41.3 (2008): 621-635.
ARIAS ALBISU, Martín. “Una relación de homogeneidad entre términos heterogéneos. El concepto de homogeneidad en el capítulo del esquematismo de la Critica de la razón pura”, Diánoia, 54.63 (2009a): 71-88.
_____. “Heterogeneidad y diferencia. Acerca de los problemas del esquematismo trascendental y del esquematismo de los conceptos empíricos y matemáticos”, Cuadernos Filosóficos. Segunda Época, 6 (2009b): 49-60.
_____. “On two different lines of argumentation in Kant’s theory of schematism of empirical and mathematical concepts”, Kant Studies Online, (2014): 1-42. http://www.kantstudiesonline.net/KSO_Author_AK_files/AriasAlb isuMartin01713.pdf
BAXTER, Donald L. M. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57.2 (1997): 307-330.
BAYNE, Steven M. Kant on causation. On the fivefold routes to the principle of causation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2004.
_____. “Abstract general ideas and Kant’s schematism”. En: Valerio Rodhen y otros (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Vol. 2, p. 97-105, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
_____. “Marks, images, and rules: concepts and transcendental idealism”. En: Dennis Schulting y Jacco Verburgt (eds.), Kant’s idealism. New interpretations of a controversial doctrine. p. 127- 142. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
BENNETT, Jonathan. Kant’s analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
BERKELEY, George. The works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne (A.A. Luce y T. E. Jessop, eds.). London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1948-1957.
CAIMI, Mario. Leçons sur Kant. La déduction transcendantale dans la deuxième édition de la Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2007.
_____. “Comments on the conception of imagination in the Critique of Pure Reason”. En: Valerio Rodhen y otros (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant- Kongresses. Vol. 1, p. 39-50. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
CHIPMAN, Lauchlan. “Kant’s categories and their schematism”, Kant-Studien, 63.1 (1972): 36-50.
DAHLSTROM, Daniel O. “Thinking, knowing, and schematism”. En: Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 5. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Mainz 4.-8. April 1981. Vol. I.1, p. 209-220. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1981.
DESCARTES, René. Meditationes de prima philosophia. En: Charles Adam y Paul Tannery (eds.), OEuvres de Descartes. Vol. 7, Paris: Léopold Cerf, 16411, 1642/ 1904.
DÜSING, Klaus. “Schema und Einbildungskraft in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. En: Lothar Kreimendahl (ed.), Aufklärung und Skepsis. Studien zur Philosophie und Geistesgeschichte des 17. Und 18. Jahrhunderts. p. 47-71. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann- Holzboog, 1995.
ECO, Umberto. Kant y el ornitorrinco. Trad. por Helena Lozano Miralles. Barcelona: Lumen, 1997/ 1999.
ERDMANN, Benno. “Kant und Hume um 1762”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 1.1 (1888): 62-77, 1.2 (1888): 216-230.
FELDMAN, Susan. “Kant’s schemata as reference rules”. En: Gerhard Funke y Thomas M. Seebohm (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress. Vol. II.1, p. 229-240. Washington, DC: The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America, 1989.
FERRARIN, Alfredo. “Construction and mathematical schematism. Kant on the exhibition of a concept in intuition”, Kant-Studien, 86.2 (1995a): 131-174.
_____. “Kant’s productive imagination and its alleged antecedents”, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 18.1 (1995b): 65-92.
GINSBORG, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understanding”, Philosophical Topics, 25.1 (1997): 37-81.
_____. “Thinking the particular as contained under the universal”. En: Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and cognition in Kant’s critical philosophy. p. 35-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
GUYER, Paul. Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1929/ 1991.
HUME, David. An enquiry concerning human understanding. And other writings (Stephen Buckle, ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17481, 1777/ 2007.
KANT, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie-Ausgabe). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900 ss.
_____. Crítica de la razón pura. Trad. por Mario Caimi. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1787/ 2009.
_____. Lógica. Un manual de lecciones (Edición original de G. B. Jäsche). Trad. por María J. Vázquez Lobeiras. Madrid: Akal, 2000.
KEMP SMITH, Norman. A commentary to Kant’s “Critique of pure reason”. London: Macmillan, 1918.
KIM, Joongol. “Concepts and intuitions in Kant’s philosophy of geometry”, Kant-Studien, 97.2 (2006): 138-162.
KLEMME, Heiner F. (ed.). Reception of the Scottish Enlightenment in Germany: Six significant translations, 1755–1782. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000.
KORIAKO, Darius. “Kants Schematismuslehre und ihre Relevanz für die Philosophie der Mathematik”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 83.3 (2001): 286-307.
KÖRNER, Stephan. Kant. London: Penguin Books, 1955.
LA ROCCA, Claudio. “Schematismus und Anwendung”, Kant-Studien, 80.2 (1989): 129-154.
_____. “How are synthetic apriori judgments possible? The conditions and process of empirical knowledge in Kant”, Quaestio, 4 (2004): 265-293.
LEAVITT, Frank J. “Kant’s schematism and his philosophy of geometry”, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 22.4 (1991): 647-659.
LOCKE, John. An essay concerning human understanding (Peter H. Nidditch, ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press, 16891, 1700/ 1975.
LONGUENESSE, Béatrice. Kant and the capacity to judge. Trad. Por Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993/ 1998.
MELLIN, G. S. A. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der kritischen Philosophie. Züllichau/Jena y Leipzig: Friedrich Frommann, 1797- 1804.
METZ, Wilhelm. Kategoriendeduktion und produktive Einbildungskraft in der theoretischen Philosophie Kants und Fichtes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991.
MOTTA, Giuseppe. “‘Das Phantom des berkleyischen Idealisms’. Su alcuni riferimenti a J. G.H. Feder nella Critica della ragion pura”, Studi Kantiani, 25 (2012): 59-69.
NOLAN, J. P. “Kant on meaning: two studies”, Kant-Studien, 70.2 (1979): 113-130.
PARSONS, Charles. “Arithmetic and the categories”, Topoi, 3.2 (1984): 109-121.
PATON, Herbert J. Kant’s metaphysic of experience. A commentary on the first half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1936/ 1970.
PHILONENKO, Alexis. “Lecture du schématisme transcendantal.” En: Joachim Kopper y Wolfgang Marx (eds.), 200 Jahre Kritik der reinen Vernunft. p. 291-312. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1981.
PIPER, William B. “Kant’s contact with British empiricism”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12.2 (1978-1979): 174-189.
PIPPIN, Robert B. “The schematism and empirical concepts”, Kant- Studien, 67.2 (1976): 156-171.
PIPPIN, Robert B. “Kant on empirical concepts”, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 10.1 (1979): 1-19.
PIPPIN, Robert B. Kant’s theory of form. An essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University, 1982.
PITCHER, Georg. Berkeley. Trad. por José A. Robles García. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1977/ 1983.
SCHRADER, George. “Kant’s theory of concepts”, Kant-Studien, 49.1-4 (1958): 264-278.
SEEL, Gerhard. “Die Einleitung in die Analytik der Grundsätze, der Schematismus und die obersten Grundsätze”. En: Georg Mohr y Marcus Willaschek (eds.), Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. p. 217-246. Berlin: Akademie, 1998.
SHABEL, Lisa. “Kant on the ‘symbolic construction’ of mathematical concepts”, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 29.4 (1998): 589-621.
_____. “Kant’s philosophy of mathematics.” En: Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy. p. 94-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SMIT, Houston. “Kant on marks and the immediacy of intuition”, The Philosophical Review, 109.2 (2000): 235-266.
STADELMANN, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.
STERN, Leah J. “Empirical concepts as rules in the Critique of Pure Reason”. En: Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Mainz 6.-10. April 1974. Vol. II.1, p. 158-165. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974.
SUTHERLAND, Daniel. “Kant on arithmetic, algebra, and the theory of proportions”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44.4 (2006): 533-558.
TURBAYNE, Colin M. (1955) “Kant’s refutation of dogmatic idealism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 5.20 (1955): 225-244.
WARDA, Arthur. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin: Martin Breslauer, 1922.
WARNOCK, Geoffrey J. “Concepts and schematism”, Analysis, 9.5 (1949): 77-82.
WOLFF, Christian. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. En: Jean École y otros (eds.), Gesammelte Werke. Vol. I.2. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 17201, 1751/ 1983.
WOLFF, Robert P. “Kant’s debt to Hume via Beattie”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 21.1 (1960): 117-123.
_____. Kant’s theory of mental activity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963.
YOUNG, Michael. “Kant on the construction of arithmetical concepts”, Kant-Studien, 73.1 (1982): 17-46.
_____. “Construction, schematism, and imagination”, Topoi, 3.2 (1984): 123-131.
_____. “Kant’s view of imagination”, Kant-Studien, 79.2 (1988): 140- 164.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v12i17.88901
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.