Inteligência Artificial, Big Data e Crédito Social em Boot et al.: Uma Discussão Ética à luz de Feenberg e Jonas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/petfilo.v21i1.81502Abstract
A construção de modelos artificiais capazes de tomar decisões geralmente é contrastada à fraca estrutura de comportamento ético capaz de compreender o uso de inteligência artificial para a escolha moral. Neste artigo, discutimos o papel da ética de Hans Jonas e da filosofia crítica de Andrew Feenberg na determinação de princípios para uma ética destes modelos, indo na direção oposta às pesquisas e publicações recentes na área. Analisando o caso específico trazido em Boot et al., à luz de ambos filósofos, podemos demonstrar como os avanços na técnica carecem da necessária crítica filosófica e estudo da nova ética na era da tecnologia.
Literaturhinweise
ALBERTS, Jeffrey & DELLINGER, Leighton.. Criminalizing Free Enterprise: The Bank Secrecy Act and The Cryptocurrency Revolution. Westlaw Journal: Computer & Internet, v 33, no 2, 2015, p. 1-5. Disponível em: https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I7dbed94f218311e598dc8b09b4f043e0/View/FullText.html (acesso: junho/2021)
BACKER, Larry Catá. Measurement, Assessment and Reward: The Challenges of Building Institutionalized Social Credit and Rating Systems in China and in the West. Coalition for Peace & Ethics, no 9/2, 2017, p. 1-18. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3040624 (acesso em: maio/2021)
BOOT, Arnoud & HOFFMANN, Peter & LAEVEN, Luc & RATNOVSKI, Lev. Financial Intermediation and Technology: What’s Old, What’s New? IMF Working Papers. 2020, v 20, p. 21, 1-32. Disponível em: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2020/08/07/Financial-Intermediation-and-Technology-Whats-Old-Whats-New-49624 (acesso: maio/2021).
_____. What is Really New in Fintech. IMFBlog,, 2013. Disponível em: https://blogs.imf.org/2020/12/17/what-is-really-new-in-fintech/ (acesso: maio/2021).
DOSILOVIC, Filip Karlo & BRCIC, Mario & HLUPIC, Nikica. Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey. 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics. 2018, p. 210-215. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8400040 (acesso: maio/2021)
FEENBERG, A. Subversive rationalization: Technology, power, and democracy. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, v 35, 1992, p. 301-322. Disponível em: http://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/books/Subversive_Rationalization_Technology_Power_Democracy.pdf (acesso: maio/2021).
_____. Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies, v. 1, no 1, 2005, p. 47-64. Disponível em: https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/books/critbio.pdf (acesso: junho/2021).
GÜNTER, Andrea. Hans Jonas’ “The Imperative of Responsibility”, future generations and the ironical situation of ethics. Freiburg, 2016, p. 1-16. Disponível em: http://www.andreaguenter.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Reconstructing-the-generationality-of-ethics.pdf (acesso em: maio/2021).
HACKER, Philipp. Teaching Fairness to Artificial Intelligence: Existing and Novel Strategies Against Algorithmic Discrimination Under EU Law. Common Market Law Review, 2018, p. 1143-1186. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3164973 (acesso em: maio/2021).
HOFFMAN, Samantha R. Programming China: the Communist Party’s autonomic approach to managing state security. Tese de Doutorado, University of Notthingham, 2017.
ILVES, Toomas Hendrik. Rebooting Trust? Freedom vs Security in Cyberspace. President. 2014. Disponível em: https://vp2006-2016.president.ee/en/official-duties/speeches/9796-qrebooting-trust-freedom-vs-security-in-cyberspaceq/ (acesso em: maio/2021).
JONAS, Hans. The Imperative of Responsability: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago, 1984.
_____. Técnica, medicina y ética. La prática del principio de responsabilidad. Trad. Carlos Fortea Gil. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997.
_____. Technology and Responsibility: Reflections on the New Tasks of Ethics. In: Sandler R.L. (ed.) Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 2014, p. 37-47. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137349088_3 (acesso: junho/2021)
LIU, Han-Wei & LIN, Ching-Fu & CHEN, Yu-Jie. Beyond State v Loomis: artificial intelligence, government algorithmization and accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, v 27, no 2, 2019, p. 122-141. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/ijlit/article-abstract/27/2/122/5316430 (acesso: junho/2021)
MEISSNER, Mirjam. China’s Social Credit System, a Big-Data enabled approach to market regulation with broad implications for doing business in China. Merics: Mercator Institute for China Studies, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.chinafile.com/library/reports/chinas-social-credit-system-big-data-enabled-approach-market-regulation-broad (acesso: maio/2021).
MURRELL, Audrey. Pushing The Ethical Boundaries of Big Data: A Look At China’s Social Credit Scoring System. Forbes, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.forbes.com/sites/audreymurrell/2018/07/31/pushing-the-ethical-boundaries-of-big-data-a-look-at-chinas-social-credit-scoring-system/ (acesso em: maio/2021)
OLIVEIRA, Jelson Roberto de. Democratizar e humanizar a tecnologia: Andrew Feenberg e Hans Jonas. 2013. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade, v. 9, no 18, 2013. Disponível em: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rts/article/view/2631/1744 (acesso: maio/2021).
PRINCE, Anya & SCHWARCZ, Daniel. Proxy Discrimination in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data. Iowa Law Review, v. 105, no. 3, 2020, p. 1257-1318. Disponível em: https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/proxy-discrimination-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence-and-bi (acesso: maio/2021).
ROBERTS, Huw & COWLS, Josh & MORLEY, Jessica & TADDEO, Mariarosaria & WANG, Vincent & FLORIDI, Luciano. The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society, v 36, 2021, p. 59-77. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2.pdf (acesso: maio/2021).
SÍTHIGH, Daithí Mac & SIEMS, Mathias. The Chinese Social Credit System: A Model for Other Countries? The Modern Law Review, v 82, no 6, 2019, p. 1034-1071. Disponível em: https://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/66073 (acesso: maio/2021).
SNOW, Charles Percy. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
WALLACH, Wendell. Robot Minds and Human Ethics: The Need for a Comprehensive Model of Moral Decision Making. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology, v. 2, no 3, 2010, p.243-250. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-010-9232-8 (acesso: maio/2021).
ZALNIERIUTE, Minoka & BENNET, Lyria & WILLIAMS, George. The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making, The Modern law Review, v 82, no 3, 2019, p. 425-455. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3348831 (acesso: maio/2021)
ZHANG, Dongpo. Big Data Security and Privacy Protection. Advances in Computer Science Research, volume 77, 2018, p. 275-278. Disponível em: https://download.atlantis-press.com/article/25904185.pd (acesso: junho/2021)
