Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1996). Reflexive Modernisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societes. London: Sage.
Habermas, J., 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action (volume 1). Boston, Beacon.
Hertz, H. (1894). Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhange dargestellt. Leipzig: Barth.
Medawar, P. (1996). Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud? In: P. Medawar The Strange Case of the Spotted Mice and other classic essays on science (p. 33-39). New York: Oxford University Press.
Merton, R.K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schäfer, W. ed. (1983). Finalization in Science: The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress. Dordrecht: Springer.
Shapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Von Schomberg, R. (2024). Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science? Merton Revisited and the Prospects of Institutionalizing the Research Values of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness. NOvation – Critical Studies of Innovation, VI (2024), pp. 1-33.
Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. In H.H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (eds.) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (p. 129-156). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95879
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.