Transition or Tradition: Imagining National R&D Innovation in South Korea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i1.91162Keywords:
National Innovation, R&D policy, Imagination, Discursive Oscillation, Developmental StateAbstract
From the late 1990s, many national policies for research and development (R&D), focusing on innovation, were established in South Korea. In May 2015, the Korean government announced another bold blueprint for R&D innovation emphasizing a serious approach toward overcoming outdated ideas and practices regarding the governance of the science and technology sectors. This emphasized very high expectations for the country, though in the end it brought brutal criticism and bitter disappointment. This paper conducts a critical analysis of the discourse surrounding the notion of national R&D innovation by focusing on the case of the 2015 Government R&D Innovation Plan. Various (un)published papers were examined as mediators to reproduce, construct, and deliver a particular imagination. By analyzing not only the final policy documents but also the initial policy draft, this paper highlights a substantive discontinuity in the formation of the 2015 Government R&D Innovation Plan that illuminates different imaginations of so-called national innovation in terms of R&D. It illustrates a tension occurring in national R&D innovation in South Korea between the desire to reproduce past glory by following previous experiences and a willingness to embody semantic meanings of innovation with novel approaches. This paper reveals a discursive oscillation of imaginations in national R&D innovation which resulted in its conceptual and practical ambiguity.
References
Ahn, H.-S. (2015). Fraunhofer May Laugh. The Korean Economy Daily, May 14. http://news.hankyung.com/article/2015051423451
Ahn, J. M. (2016). New Directions for National R&D: Enhancement of Societal Impact and Openness. Journal of Social Science, 42(3), 119-139.
Cho, H. D, Hong, S. G., Lee, S. J., Song, W. H., Jeong, Y. S., & Park, E. J. (2017). An Analysis of R&D Supporting System by Innovation Actor and Policy Recommendations for Improvement. Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI).
Choi, H.-S. (1995). Never Turn off the Light of a Laboratory. Chosun Ilbo Corporation.
Dye, T. R. (2012). Understanding public policy. Pearson.
Godin, B. (2015). Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries, London: Routledge.
Government Task Force for R&D Innovation (2015). The Plan for Building Creative Government R&D Innovation. Government of the Republic of Korea.
Hull, M. S. (2012). Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. University of California Press.
Jamrisko, M., & Lu, W. (2018). The U.S. Drops Out of the Top 10 in Innovation Ranking. Bloomberg, January 23. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-22/south-korea-tops-global-innovation-ranking-again-as-u-s-falls
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47, 119-146.
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2013). Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies. Science as Culture, 22(2), 189-196.
Jeon, C. (2010). A Road to Modernization and Unification: The Construction of the Gyeongbu Highway in South Korea. Technology and Culture, 51(1), 55-79.
Jo, H.-J. (1997). A Hearing for the Five Year Plan for Science and Technology, expecting to make a breakthrough to overcome the IMF Crisis. Maeil Business Newspaper, December 17. https://newslibrary.naver.com/viewer/index.nhn?articleId=1997121700099116001&editNo=16&printCount=1&publishDate=1997-12-17&officeId=00009&pageNo=16&printNo=9937&publishType=00010
Kang, M. (2015). Headquarters for Science and Technology Have to be Under the Prime Minister’s Office”, HelloDD, May 21. http://www.hellodd.com/?mt=view&pid=53450
Korean Academy of Science and Technology (2018). National R&D Innovation Strategy': Opinions of Science and Technology Society for Advancing National R&D Policy. KAST.
Korean Union of Public Sector Research and Professional Workers (2015). Seven (4+3) Science and Technology Policy Requirement of KUPRP on the National R&D Innovation Plan. KUPRP.
Kim, B.-K., & Vogel, E. F. eds. (2011). The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Harvard University Press.
Kim, G. B. (1990). A Study on the Process of Establishing KIST: Focusing on U.S. Assistance and Its Influence. The Korean Journal for the History of Science, 12(1), 44-69.
Kim, G. B. (2016). The Structure of Scientific and Technological Revolution in Korea. Dulnyouk.
Kim, S.-H. (2014). The Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in South Korea: Contesting National Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Science as culture, 23(3), 293-319.
Kim, S.-H. (2017a). Science, Technology, and the Imaginaries of Development in South Korea. Development and Society, 46(2), 317-347.
Kim, Sang-Hyun (2017b). Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Dissident Groups during the Park Chung Hee Regime. Yuksabipyeong 120, 316-346.
Kim, T. ed. (2018). Beyond the Myth of ‘Park Chung-Hee, the Science President’: Science, Power, and Nation. Yuksabipyeong.
Kwun, S.-I. (1997). Forward. In The Five Year Plan for Science and Technology Innovation. Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology.
Lee, M.-H. (2016). Historical Transformation of Government-Supported Research Institutes and Its Future Development. Science and Technology Policy, 26(4), 18-25.
Lundvall, B.-Å. ed. (1992). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Mackenzie, D. (1990). Nuclear Missile Testing and the Social Construction of Accuracy. In Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance (p. 340-381). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Mckenna, J. (2018). South Korea and Sweden are the most innovative countries in the world. World Economic Forum, February 6. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/02/south-korea-and-sweden-are-the-most-innovative-countries-in-the-world/
Mcneil, M., Arribas-Ayllon, M., Haran, J., Mackenzie, A., & Tutton, R. (2017). Conceptualizing Imaginaries of Science, Technology, and Society. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (p. 435-464). MIT Press, 4th edition.
Ministry Concerned (2015a). The Plan of Government R&D Innovation. Government of the Republic of Korea.
Ministry Concerned (2015b). Status and Future Plan of the Plan of Government R&D Innovation. Government of the Republic of Korea.
MST (2008). 40 Years of Science and Technology. Ministry of Science and Technology.
MST, ME, MTI, MCT (1997). The Five Year Plan for Science and Technology Innovation: Synthetic Report. Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Trade and Industry, & Ministry of Construction and Transportation.
MSIP (2017). Direction and standards for 2018 government R&D investment. Ministry of Science, ICT, & Future Planning.
MSIP, & MTIE (2013). MSIP-MTIE Policy Companionship: Hosting a Ministerial Policy Meeting to Establish Cooperation System. June 11. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, & Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw315&artId=1212356
MSIP, & MTIE (2014a). MSIP-MTIE Reaffirms Coordination System for Future Growth, Third Ministerial Policy Meeting (7.22). July 23. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, & Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw315&artId=1214089
MSIP, & MTIE (2014b). Cooperating in Revitalizing Creative Economy Innovation Center and Executing the Manufacturing Innovation 3.0, Fourth Ministerial Policy Meeting (9.22). September 23. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw315&artId=1214279
MSIP, & MTIE (2014c). MSIP and MTIE, R&D Innovation Hand in Hand, Fifth Ministerial Policy Meeting (11.25). November 25. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw315&artId=1228229
MOSF (2014). Plan of In-Depth Evaluation on Government R&D Projects for Innovation. November 27. Ministry of Strategy and Finance. http://www.moef.go.kr/nw/nes/detailNesDtaView.do?searchBbsId1=MOSFBBS_000000000028&searchNttId1=OLD_4092538&menuNo=4010100
MSIP, MOSF, & MTIE (2015). Government R&D Innovation Action Plan Announced: 38 Tasks Completed by the End of This Year. June 15. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. https://msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw315&artId=1266544
MSIT (2018a). National R&D, 'People-society' Centered Advancement. July 26. Ministry of Science and ICT. http://www.moef.go.kr/nw/nes/detailNesDtaView.do?searchBbsId1=&searchNttId1=OLD_4092538&menuNo=4010100
MSIT (2018b). The Plan of National R&D Innovation for the Advancement of National Innovation System (NIS). Presentation, National R&D Innovation Forum, May 2. Ministry of Science and ICT.
MOSF (2018). Bloomberg 2018 Innovation Index: South Korea Ranked Number One for 5 Years. January 23. Ministry of Strategy and Finance. http://www.moef.go.kr/nw/nes/detailNesDtaView.do?searchBbsId1=MOSFBBS_000000000028&searchNttId1=MOSF_000000000015400&menuNo=4010100# [accessed in 22 March, 2019]
Mizuno, H., Moore, A. S., & DiMoia, J. ed. (2018). Engineering Asia: Technology, Colonial Development, and the Cold War Order. Bloomsbury Academic.
Moon, M. (2004). Reappraisal of the Establishment of KIST: U.S. and Korea’s Role. The Korean Journal for the History of Science, 26(1), 57-86.
Moon, M. (2007). ‘Science and Technology Boom’ in 1960s: The Formation of Science and Technology System in Korea. The Korean Journal for the History of Science, 29(1), 67-96.
Moon, M.-Y. (2010). The Formation of Modern R&D System in South Korea: The Establishment and the Development of the KIST, 1966-1980. Sunin.
Moon, M. (2017) The Evolution of Science and Technology Research systems in South Korea. Dulnyouk.
Nguyen, H. (2018). V-KIST: a milestone in science and technology co-operation” Vietnam Investment Review, March 23. http://www.vir.com.vn/v-kist-a-milestone-in-science-and-technology-co-operation-57531.html
Noble, D. (1999). Social Choice in Machin Design: The Case of Automatically Designed Machine Tools. In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology (p. 161-176). Open University Press, 2nd edition.
Oh, Y, M. (2014). The Performance of Financial Evaluation System and the Plan of Its Improvement. Monthly Public Finance Forum, 222, 6-22.
OECD (1996). Reviews of National Science and Technology Policy: Republic of Korea. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Park, J.-H. (2006). A Study on the Historical Development of Research Community in Korea: Focused on the Government Supported Institutes. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(1), 119-151.
Pfotenhauer, S. M., Juhl, J., & Aarden, E. (2018). Challenging the ‘Deficit Model’ of Innovation: Framing Policy Issues under the Innovation Imperative. Research Policy, 48(4), 895-904.
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (p. 17-50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sabatier, P. A. ed. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, 2nd edition.
Song, S. (2005). A Content Analysis on the Long-Term S&T Comprehensive Plans in Korea. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Special Act on Innovation in Science and Technology, Act no. 5340 (1997).
STEPI (2015). The In-Depth Evaluation of R&D Projects: General Opinion. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Sun, Y.-J. (2008). The Docking of Science and Politics: Converting a Scientist’s Breeding Research into the President’s ‘Tongil rice’. The Korean Journal for the History of Science, 30(2), 417-439.
Theodoulou, S. Z., & Cahn, M. A. (2013). Public Policy: The Essential Readings. Pearson, 2nd edition.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Youjung Shin, Hanbyul Jeong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
