Between sustainability commitments and anticipated market requirements: Exploring the resilience of the techno-economic innovation paradigm in the midstream of construction research
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asdal, K. (2015). Enacting values from the sea. On innovation devices, value practices, and the co-modification of markets and bodies in aquaculture. In I. Dussauge, C.-F. Helgesson & F. Lee (Eds.), Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine (pp. 168-185). University Press Scholarship Online.
Braun, K., & Kropp, C. (2021). Schöne neue Bauwelt? Versprechen, Visionen und Wege des digitalen Planens und Bauens. In K. Braun & C. Kropp (Eds.), In digitaler Gesellschaft. Neukonfigurationen zwischen Robotern, Algorithmen und Usern (pp.135-165). transcript.
Bogner, A., Decker, M., & Sotoudeh, M. (2015). Technikfolgenabschätzung und Responsible Innovation. In A. Bogner, M. Decker, & M. Sotoudeh (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? (pp. 11-28). Nomos.
Burget, M., Bardone, E., & Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), pp. 1-19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
Callon, M. (2002). From Science as an Economic Activity to Socioeconomics of Scientific Research: The Dynamics of Emergent and Consolidated Techno-economic Networks. In P. Morowski & E. M. Sent (Eds.), Science Bought and Sold. Essays in the Economics of Science (pp. 277-317). University of Chicago Press.
Coroamă, V. C., & Mattern, F. (2019). Digital Rebound – Why Digitalization Will Not Redeem Us Our Environmental Sins. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on ICT for Sustainability, ICT4S 2019 (2382).
Delgado, A., & Åm, H. (2018). Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good. PLoS biology, 16(3), e2003921. https://doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921
Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. L., & Mitcham, C. (2006). Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(6), 485-496. https://doi: 10.1177/0270467606295402
Fisher, E. (2007). Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions. Nanoethics 1, 155-165. https://doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0016-5
Fisher, E., & Schuurbiers, D. (2013). Socio-technical integration research: Collaborative inquiry at the midstream of research and development. In N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel & M. E. Gorman (Eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology (vol 16, pp. 97-110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_5
Fisher, E., O’Rourke, M., Evans, R., Kennedy, E. B., Gorman, M. E., & Seager, T. P. (2015). Mapping the integrative field: Taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2(1), 39-61. https://doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671
Fisher, E., Konrad, K.E., Boenik, M., Schulze Greiving-Stimberg, V.C., Walhout, B. (2016). Building an Agenda for Socio-Technical Integration Approaches. In D. M. Bowman, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. S. Guivant, K. Konrad, K., H. van Lente & S. Woll (Eds.), Responsibility and Emerging Technologies: Experiences, Education and Beyond (pp. 43-56). Amsterdam.
Flipse, S. M., Van Der Sanden, M. C., & Osseweijer, P. (2013). Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: Redefining what is ‘part of the job’ of researchers in industry. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1141-1164. https://doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6
Flipse, S. M., & Van De Loo, C. J. (2018). Responsible innovation during front-end development: increasing intervention capacities for enhancing project management reflections on complexity. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(2), 225-240. https://doi: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1465168
Gagg, C. R. (2014). Cement and concrete as an engineering material: An historic appraisal and case study analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 40(5), 114-140. https://doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.004
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Gurzawska, A., Mäkinen, M., & Brey, P. (2017). Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Practices in Industry: Providing the Right Incentives. Sustainability, 9(10), 1759. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1759
Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of Knowledge. The co-production of science and social order (pp. 1-13). Routledge.
Joly, P.-B., & Rip, A. (2012). Innovationsregime und die Potentiale kollektiven Experimentierens. In G. Beck & C. Kropp (Eds.), Gesellschaft innovativ. Wer sind die Akteure? (pp. 217-233). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Konrad, K., Rip, A. & Greiving-Stimberg, V. S. (2017). Constructive Technology Assessment–STS for and with technology actors. EASST review, 36(3), 15-19. https://easst.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/review_2017_11.pdf
Kropp, C. (2021). Embedded Humanism: Chancen und Risiken von STIR für eine transformative TA. In R. Lindner, M. Decker, E. Ehrensperger, N. B. Heyen, S. Lingner, C. Scherz & M. Sotoudeh (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Transformation: Gegenstand oder Aufgabe der Technikfolgenabschätzung (22nd ed., pp. 119-131). Nomos.
Kuzma, J., & Roberts, P. (2018). Cataloguing the barriers facing RRI in innovation pathways: a response to the dilemma of societal alignment. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(3), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1511329
Lange, S., Pohl, J. & Santarius, T. (2020). Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecological Economics, 176, 106760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
Lee, G., & Borrmann, A. (2020). BIM policy and management. Construction Management and Economics 38 (5), pp. 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1726979
Lukovics, M., & Fisher, E. (2017). Socio-technical integration research in an Eastern European setting: Distinct features, challenges and opportunities. Society and Economy, 39(4), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2017.004
Manzeschke, A., & Gransche, B. (2020). Aufs Ganze gesehen. In B. Gransche, & A. Manzeschke (Ed.), Das geteilte Ganze (pp. 235-347). Springer Fachmedien.
Mayntz, R. (2015). Technikfolgenabschätzung – Herausforderungen und Grenzen. In A. Bogner, M. Decker & M. Sotoudeh (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? (1st ed., pp. 29-46). Nomos Edition Sigma (Gesellschaft, Technik, Umwelt, Neue Folge). https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845272825-29
Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
OECD (2019). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In M. Heintz, R. Owen, & J. R. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible Innovation (1st ed., pp. 27-50). John Wiley & Sons.
Phelps, R., & Fisher, E. (2011). Legislating the Laboratory? Promotion and Precaution in a Nanomaterials Company. In S. J. Hurst (Ed.), Biomedical Nanotechnology. Methods and Protocols (pp. 339-358). Human Press.
Prior, M. (1998). Economic Valuation and Environmental Values. Environmental Values, 7(4), 423-441.
Ribeirinho, M. J., Mischke, J., Strube, G., Sjödin, E., Blanco, J. L., Palter, R., Biörck, J., Rockhill, D., & Andersson, T. (2020). The next normal in construction. How disruption is reshaping the world’s largest ecosystem. McKinsey & Company.
Roland Berger (2016). Digitization in the construction industry. Building Europe's road to "Construction 4.0". Roland Berger GmbH.
Schikowitz, A. (2020). Creating relevant knowledge in transdisciplinary research projects – Coping with inherent tensions. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(2), 217-237. https://doi: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1653154
Schuurbiers, D. (2011). What happens in the lab: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 769-788. https://doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8
Stilgoe, J. (2013). Foreword: Why Responsible Innovation? In M. Heintz, R. Owen, & J. R. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. xi-xvi). Wiley.
Stubbe, J. (2020). Sechs Thesen für gelingende Integrierte Forschung. In B. Gransche & A. Manzeschke (Eds.), Das geteilte Ganze (pp. 197-211). Springer Fachmedien.
Timmermans, J. (2017). Mapping the RRI Landscape: An Overview of Organisations, Projects, Persons, Areas and Topics. In L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 3 (pp. 21-47). Springer International Publishing.
UN (2019). World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ST/ESA/SER.A/423.
UN (2020). Policy Brief: COVID-19 in an Urban World. United Nations.
UNEP (2020). Global Status Report for Building and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. United Nations Environment Programme.
Von Schomberg, R. (2008). Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, (pp. 39-61). VS Verlag.
Von Schomberg, L., & Blok, V. (2021). Technology in the Age of Innovation: Responsible Innovation as a New Subdomain Within the Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 309-323. https://doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00386-3
Von Schomberg, R., & Hankins, J. (2019). Introduction to the International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. In R. von Schomberg & J. Hankins (Eds.), International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource (pp. 1-11). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Yaghmaei, E., & Van De Poel, I. (2021). Assessment of Responsible Innovation: Methods and Practices. Routledge.
Zhang, L., Balangé, L., Braun, K., Di Bari, R., Horn, R., Hos, D., Kropp, C., Leeistner, P., & Schwieger, V. (2020). Quality as Driver for Sustainable Construction – Holistic Quality Model and Assessment. Sustainability, 12(19), 7847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197847
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91153
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
_________________________________________
Journal «NOvation – Critical Studies of Innovation»
ISSN 2562-7147
BDP: https://revistas.ufpr.br/wp
E-mail: novation@ufpr.br
The content of this journal is published under the following licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
