The Configuration of Older Users as Drivers of Innovation in the Design of Digital Technologies
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme (2008). Call for Proposals 2008 AALK-2008-1: ICT based solutions for Prevention and Management of Chronic Conditions of Elderly People. Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/aal-2008-1-call-text.pdf
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme (2009). Call for Proposals AAL-2009-2: CT based solutions for Advancement of Social Interaction of Elderly People. Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/aal-2009-2-call-text.pdf
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme (2010). Call for Proposals 2010AAL-2010-3: ICT-based Solutions for Advancement ofOlder Persons’ Independence and Participation in the“Self-Serve Society”. Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/call-3-full-text-with-eligibilty-criteria-5-ed-10-vi.2010.pdf
Beimborn, M., Kadi, S., Köberer, N., Mühleck, M., & Spindler, M. (2016). Focusing on the Human: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Ageing and Technology. In E. Dominguez-Rue & L. Nierling (eds.), Ageing and Technology: Perspectives from the Social Sciences (p. 311-333). Transcript Verlag.
Chicot, J., Domini, A., & Fisher, R. (2018). Case Study Report: Active and Assisted Living Programme (EU). Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://jiip.eu/mop/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/EU_AAL_ChicotDominiFisher.pdf
Compagna, D. (2012). Lost in translation? The dilemma of alignment within participatory technology developments. Poiesis & Praxis, 9(1-2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0118-1
Compagna, D. (2018). Partizipation und Moderne: Nutzerorientierte Technikentwicklung als missverstandene Herausforderung. In H. Künemund & U. Fachinger (eds.), Alter und Technik (p. 177-206). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Ehlers, A., Heß, M., Frewer-Graumann, S., Olbermann, E., & Stiemke, P. (2021). Digitale Teilhabe und (digitale) Exklusion im Alter. Expertise zum Achten Altersbericht der Bundesregierung. https://www.achter-altersbericht.de/fileadmin/altersbericht/pdf/Expertisen/Expertise-FFG-Dortmund.pdf
Endter, C. (2015). Seh’ ich was, was Du nicht siehst?–Aushandlungen von Partizipation in einem Technikentwicklungsprojekt am Beispiel der eigenen Forscherinnenposition: Auf der Suche nach den Tatsachen: Proceedings der 1. Tagung des Nachwuchsnetzwerks “INSIST”, 22.-23. Oktober 2014, 15-23.
Endter, C. (2016). Skripting Age – The Negotiation of Age and Aging in Ambient Assisted Living. In L. Nierling & E. Domínguez-Rué (eds.), Ageing and Technology: Perspectives from the Social Sciences (p. 121-140). Transcript Verlag; Knowledge Unlatched.
Endter, C. (2018). How older people matter—Nutzer- und Nutzerinnenbeteiligung in AAL-Projekten. In H. Künemund & U. Fachinger (Hrsg.), Alter und Technik: Sozialwissenschaftliche Befunde und Perspektiven (S. 207-225). VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.
Endter, C. (2020). User participation as a matter of care: the configuration of older users in the design of assistive technologies. Tecnoscienza, 11(2, Special Issue “When Theory Meets Practice”), S. 93-116.
Endter, C. (2021). Assistiert Altern. Die Entwicklung digitaler Technologien für und mit älteren Menschen. Springer VS Verlag, Reihe Altern und Gesellschaft.
Decision No 742/2008/EC, L 201 Official Journal of the European Union, 49 (2008).
DiDuca, D, Partridge, C, & Heres, J. (2006): ICT use and the elderly – Cohort, lifestage or just irrelevant? In. B. Anderson, M. Brynin, J. Gershung, & Y. Raban (eds.), Information and communication technologies in society (p. 88-103). Routledge.
Fachinger, U. (2018). Altern und Technik: Anmerkungen zu den ökonomischen Potentialen. In H. Künemund & U. Fachinger (eds.), Alter und Technik (p. 51-68). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Fischer, B., Peine, A., & Östlund, B. (2020). The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design. The Gerontologist, 60(7), e513-e523. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz163
Federal Ministery of Education and Research (FMER) (2008). Selbstbestimmt Leben: Altersgerechte Assistenzsysteme für ein gesundes und unabhängiges Leben—AAL. Federal Ministry of Education and Research. [Press release]. https://www.bmbf.de/foerderungen/bekanntmachung.php?B=337
FMER (2011). Das Alter hat Zukunft.: Forschungsagenda der Bundesregierung für den demografischen Wandel. Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
FMER/AGE/AEEIF (2011). Loccumer Memorandum: Technische Assistenzsysteme für den demografischen Wandel – eine generationenübergreifende Innovationsstrategie [Press release]. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Association of German Engineers, Association of Eletrical, Electronic & Infromation Technologies
FMER (2018). Technik zum Menschen bringen | Forschungsprogramm zur Mensch-Technik-Interaktion. Die Neue Hightech Strategie Innovationnen für Deutschland. http://www.technik-zum-menschen-bringen.de/dateien/service/forschungsprogramm-technik-zum-menschen-bringen-barrierefrei.pdf/download
FMIC (2012). Jedes Alter zählt: Die Demografiestrategie der Bundesregierung. Federal Ministry oft the Interior and Community
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Grates, M. Heming, A.-C., Vukoman, M., Schabsky, P, & Sorgalla, J. (2018). New perspectives on user participation in technology design processes: an interdisciplinary approach. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 45-57.
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S., Wherton, J., Hughes, G., Lynch, J., A’Court, C., . . . Stones, R. (2016). Scals: A fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open, 6(2), e010208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010208
Hagen, H., Nitschke, M., Schlindwein, D., & Goll, S. (2018). Akzeptanz als Problem, Partizipation als Lösung? Zu Prämissen und Bias in der partizipativen Forschung. In Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen: Dritte transdisziplinäre (p. 127-137). Konferenz: Hamburg 2018.
Karlsson, F., Holgersson, J., Söderström, E., & Hedström, K. (2012). Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.009
Künemund, H. (2018). Problem centered design: shifting debates from the user to problems. Gerontechnology, 17(1), 34s. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2018.17.s.037.00
Künemund, H., & Fachinger, U. (eds.) (2018). Alter und Technik. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21054-0
Künemund, H., & Tanschus, N. (2013). Gero-Technology: Old Age in the Electronic Jungle. In K. Komp & M. Aartsen (eds.), Old Age In Europe (p. 97-112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6134-6_7
Künemund, H., & Tanschus, N. M. (2014). The technology acceptance puzzle. Results of a representative survey in Lower Saxony. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 47(8), 641-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-014-0830-7
Lassen, A. J., Bønnelycke, J., & Otto, L. (2015). Innovating for ‘active ageing’ in a public–private innovation partnership: Creating doable problems and alignment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.006
Mackay, H., Carne, C., Beynon-Davies, P., & Tudhope, D. (2000). Reconfiguring the User. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 737-757. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005004
Marcus, A., (Ed.) (2015). Design, user experience, and usability: Design discourse. Conference proceedings of the 4th international conference, DUXU 2015, held as a part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2-7. Springer.
Merkel, S., & Kucharski, A. (2019). Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e16-e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny034
Nedopil, C., Schauber, C., & Gleinde, S. (2013a). Knowledge Base: AAL Stakeholders and their requirements. Ambient and Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/AALA_Knowledge-Base_YOUSE_online.pdf
Nedopil, C., Schauber, C., & Glende, S. (2013b). Guideline: The Art and Joy of User Integration in AAL Projects. Active and Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu//wp-content/uploads/2015/02/AALA_Guideline_YOUSE_online.pdf
Neven, L. (2010). ‘But obviously not for me’: Robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
Neven, L. (2015). By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people’s wish to live at home. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.016
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (eds.) (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Peine, A., Faulkner, A., Jæger, B., & Moors, E. (2015). Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing – Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.010
Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2019). From Intervention to Co-constitution: New Directions in Theorizing about Aging and Technology. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050
Peine, A., Rollwagen, I., & Neven, L. (2014). The rise of the “innosumer” – Rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013
Peine, A., van Cooten, V., & Neven, L. (2017). Rejuvenating Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(3), 429-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916664589
Pelizäus-Hoffmeister, H. (2013). Zur Bedeutung von Technik im Alltag. Springer VS.
Vestergaard, S., & Andersen-Ranberg, K. (2013). Hearing impairment and adverse outcomes among Europeans. In A. Börsch-Supan, M. Brandt, H. Litwin, & G. Weber (Eds.), Active ageing and solidarity between generations in Europe: First results from SHARE after the economic crisis. (p. 225-232) De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295467.fm
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P., & Brittain, K. (2015). An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(1), 1-27. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2414536.2414633
Walker, A. (2007). Why involve older people in research? Age and Ageing, 36(5), 481-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm100
Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2018). Doing Age in a Digitized World—A Material Praxeology of Aging With Technology. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006
Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Socio-Gerontechnology – ein Forschungsprogramm zu Technik und Alter(n) an der Schnittstelle von Gerontologie und Science-and-Technology Studies [Socio-gerontechnology-a research program on technology and age(ing) at the interface of gerontology and science and technology studies]. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01862-2
Waycott, J., Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Ozanne, E., Kulik, L., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2012). Actively engaging older adults in the development and evaluation of tablet technology. In: OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (p. 643-652). ACM Press.
Youse GmbH (2013). Toolbox: Methods of User Integration for AAL Innovations. Active and Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu//wp-content/uploads/2015/02/AALA_ToolboxA5_online.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i3.91147
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
_________________________________________
Journal «NOvation – Critical Studies of Innovation»
ISSN 2562-7147
BDP: https://revistas.ufpr.br/wp
E-mail: novation@ufpr.br
The content of this journal is published under the following licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
