The Configuration of Older Users as Drivers of Innovation in the Design of Digital Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i3.91147Keywords:
innovation age, digitization, participation, funding policies, user-centred design (UCD), solution-centered designAbstract
This paper develops hypotheses on the discovery of older people as "users" in the publicly funded development of digital technologies and underlying innovation policy motives. We then describe the effects of this innovation policy on the development of products and older people as their users in the context of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL). To this end, we reconstruct the involvement of users in two AAL funding programs, one at the European level and one at the national level (Germany). Based on this, we discuss the resulting consequences by describing how older people are configured as users in technology development with a focus on the concept of user-centered design (UCD) and what this configuration means for the developed technologies as well as for the older users. We describe how the participation of older people in technology development projects is a complex task that is not without controversy in social science research on user participation. We conclude by arguing for alternative technology development strategies and funding practices.
References
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme (2008). Call for Proposals 2008 AALK-2008-1: ICT based solutions for Prevention and Management of Chronic Conditions of Elderly People. Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/aal-2008-1-call-text.pdf
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme (2009). Call for Proposals AAL-2009-2: CT based solutions for Advancement of Social Interaction of Elderly People. Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/aal-2009-2-call-text.pdf
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme (2010). Call for Proposals 2010AAL-2010-3: ICT-based Solutions for Advancement ofOlder Persons’ Independence and Participation in the“Self-Serve Society”. Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/call-3-full-text-with-eligibilty-criteria-5-ed-10-vi.2010.pdf
Beimborn, M., Kadi, S., Köberer, N., Mühleck, M., & Spindler, M. (2016). Focusing on the Human: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Ageing and Technology. In E. Dominguez-Rue & L. Nierling (eds.), Ageing and Technology: Perspectives from the Social Sciences (p. 311-333). Transcript Verlag.
Chicot, J., Domini, A., & Fisher, R. (2018). Case Study Report: Active and Assisted Living Programme (EU). Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://jiip.eu/mop/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/EU_AAL_ChicotDominiFisher.pdf
Compagna, D. (2012). Lost in translation? The dilemma of alignment within participatory technology developments. Poiesis & Praxis, 9(1-2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0118-1
Compagna, D. (2018). Partizipation und Moderne: Nutzerorientierte Technikentwicklung als missverstandene Herausforderung. In H. Künemund & U. Fachinger (eds.), Alter und Technik (p. 177-206). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Ehlers, A., Heß, M., Frewer-Graumann, S., Olbermann, E., & Stiemke, P. (2021). Digitale Teilhabe und (digitale) Exklusion im Alter. Expertise zum Achten Altersbericht der Bundesregierung. https://www.achter-altersbericht.de/fileadmin/altersbericht/pdf/Expertisen/Expertise-FFG-Dortmund.pdf
Endter, C. (2015). Seh’ ich was, was Du nicht siehst?–Aushandlungen von Partizipation in einem Technikentwicklungsprojekt am Beispiel der eigenen Forscherinnenposition: Auf der Suche nach den Tatsachen: Proceedings der 1. Tagung des Nachwuchsnetzwerks “INSIST”, 22.-23. Oktober 2014, 15-23.
Endter, C. (2016). Skripting Age – The Negotiation of Age and Aging in Ambient Assisted Living. In L. Nierling & E. Domínguez-Rué (eds.), Ageing and Technology: Perspectives from the Social Sciences (p. 121-140). Transcript Verlag; Knowledge Unlatched.
Endter, C. (2018). How older people matter—Nutzer- und Nutzerinnenbeteiligung in AAL-Projekten. In H. Künemund & U. Fachinger (Hrsg.), Alter und Technik: Sozialwissenschaftliche Befunde und Perspektiven (S. 207-225). VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.
Endter, C. (2020). User participation as a matter of care: the configuration of older users in the design of assistive technologies. Tecnoscienza, 11(2, Special Issue “When Theory Meets Practice”), S. 93-116.
Endter, C. (2021). Assistiert Altern. Die Entwicklung digitaler Technologien für und mit älteren Menschen. Springer VS Verlag, Reihe Altern und Gesellschaft.
Decision No 742/2008/EC, L 201 Official Journal of the European Union, 49 (2008).
DiDuca, D, Partridge, C, & Heres, J. (2006): ICT use and the elderly – Cohort, lifestage or just irrelevant? In. B. Anderson, M. Brynin, J. Gershung, & Y. Raban (eds.), Information and communication technologies in society (p. 88-103). Routledge.
Fachinger, U. (2018). Altern und Technik: Anmerkungen zu den ökonomischen Potentialen. In H. Künemund & U. Fachinger (eds.), Alter und Technik (p. 51-68). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Fischer, B., Peine, A., & Östlund, B. (2020). The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design. The Gerontologist, 60(7), e513-e523. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz163
Federal Ministery of Education and Research (FMER) (2008). Selbstbestimmt Leben: Altersgerechte Assistenzsysteme für ein gesundes und unabhängiges Leben—AAL. Federal Ministry of Education and Research. [Press release]. https://www.bmbf.de/foerderungen/bekanntmachung.php?B=337
FMER (2011). Das Alter hat Zukunft.: Forschungsagenda der Bundesregierung für den demografischen Wandel. Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
FMER/AGE/AEEIF (2011). Loccumer Memorandum: Technische Assistenzsysteme für den demografischen Wandel – eine generationenübergreifende Innovationsstrategie [Press release]. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Association of German Engineers, Association of Eletrical, Electronic & Infromation Technologies
FMER (2018). Technik zum Menschen bringen | Forschungsprogramm zur Mensch-Technik-Interaktion. Die Neue Hightech Strategie Innovationnen für Deutschland. http://www.technik-zum-menschen-bringen.de/dateien/service/forschungsprogramm-technik-zum-menschen-bringen-barrierefrei.pdf/download
FMIC (2012). Jedes Alter zählt: Die Demografiestrategie der Bundesregierung. Federal Ministry oft the Interior and Community
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Grates, M. Heming, A.-C., Vukoman, M., Schabsky, P, & Sorgalla, J. (2018). New perspectives on user participation in technology design processes: an interdisciplinary approach. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 45-57.
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S., Wherton, J., Hughes, G., Lynch, J., A’Court, C., . . . Stones, R. (2016). Scals: A fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open, 6(2), e010208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010208
Hagen, H., Nitschke, M., Schlindwein, D., & Goll, S. (2018). Akzeptanz als Problem, Partizipation als Lösung? Zu Prämissen und Bias in der partizipativen Forschung. In Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen: Dritte transdisziplinäre (p. 127-137). Konferenz: Hamburg 2018.
Karlsson, F., Holgersson, J., Söderström, E., & Hedström, K. (2012). Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.009
Künemund, H. (2018). Problem centered design: shifting debates from the user to problems. Gerontechnology, 17(1), 34s. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2018.17.s.037.00
Künemund, H., & Fachinger, U. (eds.) (2018). Alter und Technik. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21054-0
Künemund, H., & Tanschus, N. (2013). Gero-Technology: Old Age in the Electronic Jungle. In K. Komp & M. Aartsen (eds.), Old Age In Europe (p. 97-112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6134-6_7
Künemund, H., & Tanschus, N. M. (2014). The technology acceptance puzzle. Results of a representative survey in Lower Saxony. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 47(8), 641-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-014-0830-7
Lassen, A. J., Bønnelycke, J., & Otto, L. (2015). Innovating for ‘active ageing’ in a public–private innovation partnership: Creating doable problems and alignment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.006
Mackay, H., Carne, C., Beynon-Davies, P., & Tudhope, D. (2000). Reconfiguring the User. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 737-757. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005004
Marcus, A., (Ed.) (2015). Design, user experience, and usability: Design discourse. Conference proceedings of the 4th international conference, DUXU 2015, held as a part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2-7. Springer.
Merkel, S., & Kucharski, A. (2019). Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e16-e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny034
Nedopil, C., Schauber, C., & Gleinde, S. (2013a). Knowledge Base: AAL Stakeholders and their requirements. Ambient and Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/AALA_Knowledge-Base_YOUSE_online.pdf
Nedopil, C., Schauber, C., & Glende, S. (2013b). Guideline: The Art and Joy of User Integration in AAL Projects. Active and Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu//wp-content/uploads/2015/02/AALA_Guideline_YOUSE_online.pdf
Neven, L. (2010). ‘But obviously not for me’: Robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
Neven, L. (2015). By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people’s wish to live at home. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.016
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (eds.) (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Peine, A., Faulkner, A., Jæger, B., & Moors, E. (2015). Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing – Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.010
Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2019). From Intervention to Co-constitution: New Directions in Theorizing about Aging and Technology. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050
Peine, A., Rollwagen, I., & Neven, L. (2014). The rise of the “innosumer” – Rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013
Peine, A., van Cooten, V., & Neven, L. (2017). Rejuvenating Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(3), 429-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916664589
Pelizäus-Hoffmeister, H. (2013). Zur Bedeutung von Technik im Alltag. Springer VS.
Vestergaard, S., & Andersen-Ranberg, K. (2013). Hearing impairment and adverse outcomes among Europeans. In A. Börsch-Supan, M. Brandt, H. Litwin, & G. Weber (Eds.), Active ageing and solidarity between generations in Europe: First results from SHARE after the economic crisis. (p. 225-232) De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295467.fm
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P., & Brittain, K. (2015). An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(1), 1-27. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2414536.2414633
Walker, A. (2007). Why involve older people in research? Age and Ageing, 36(5), 481-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm100
Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2018). Doing Age in a Digitized World—A Material Praxeology of Aging With Technology. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006
Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Socio-Gerontechnology – ein Forschungsprogramm zu Technik und Alter(n) an der Schnittstelle von Gerontologie und Science-and-Technology Studies [Socio-gerontechnology-a research program on technology and age(ing) at the interface of gerontology and science and technology studies]. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01862-2
Waycott, J., Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Ozanne, E., Kulik, L., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2012). Actively engaging older adults in the development and evaluation of tablet technology. In: OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (p. 643-652). ACM Press.
Youse GmbH (2013). Toolbox: Methods of User Integration for AAL Innovations. Active and Assisted Living (AAL) European Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu//wp-content/uploads/2015/02/AALA_ToolboxA5_online.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
