Thematic Issue Presentation: Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91119Keywords:
Critical Studies of Innovation, Social Innovation, Social Enterprise, Social Solidarity Economy, Literature ReviewAbstract
This Thematic Issue seeks to explore critical perspectives of an international nature on social innovation (SI), social enterprise (SE) and/or social solidarity economy (SSE). The aim is to examine the grand narrative, explore the ontological assumptions of the field, challenge the normative and present alternatives that draw attention to political economy, critical theory and critical management studies.
Critical perspectives emerged in social innovation (SI) literature as a concerted effort sometime in 2008. A few voices sounded from the edges of the field much earlier. Ash Amin, Professor of Geography at Durham University, inspected the new favourite of public policy way back in 2002, discarded it as a “a poor substitute for a welfare state” and never returned to the subject. There were heated debates that challenged the grand narrative of SI at the International Social Innovation Research Conferences (ISIRC) (once called the Social Enterprise Research Conference before becoming ISIRC with the involvement of the social innovation theme from Skoll Centre). The Voluntary Sector Studies Network (VSSN) conferences picked away at the promise of unlimited performance and achievement of the upstart SE in a mature voluntary and charity network (Aiken, 2002, 2006, 2007; Grenier, 2009; Pharaoh, Scott & Fisher, 2004). Still, on the whole, the literature in the last twenty years has been overwhelmingly interested in promoting social enterprise (SE) and SI as (a) an inherently good thing, (b) a solution to all problems and (c) a politically neutral complement to neo-liberal economics globally.
We hope this Thematic Issue raises some interest and some thought-provoking conversations in the future. Many thanks to the reviewers, the authors and above all the editors of NOvation, for trusting us with this Thematic Issue! We hope scholars enjoy the edition as much as we have in bringing this together.
References
Aiken, D. M. (2006). How Do Social Enterprises Operating In Commercial Markets Reproduce Their Organisational Values? 3rd Annual UK Social Enterprise Research Conference. London: South Bank University.
Aiken, M. (2002). Managing Values: the reproduction of organisational values in social economy organisations. Doctoral dissertation, The Open University.
Aiken, M. (2007). What is the role of social enterprise in finding, creating and maintaining employment for disadvantaged groups? Cabinet Office: Office of the Third Sector.
Arthur, L., Keenoy, T., Scott Cato, M., & Smith, R. (2006). Where is the ‘social’ in social enterprise? Third Annual Social Enterprise Conference, June 22–23, London: South Bank University.
Betta, M., Jones, R., & Latham, J. (2010). Entrepreneurship and the innovative self: A Schumpeterian reflection. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(3), 229-244.
Bull, M. (2008). Challenging tensions: critical, theoretical and empirical perspectives on social enterprise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14(5), 268-275.
Bull, M., & Ridley-Duff, R. (2018). Towards an appreciation of ethics in social enterprise business models. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 619-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3794-5
Bull, M., Ridley-Duff, R., Whittam, G., & Baines, S. (2018). Challenging tensions and contradictions: Critical, theoretical and empirical perspectives on social enterprise, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), 582-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2018-526
Comte, A., (1841). Cours de philosophie positive (Volume 5). Second Edition, Paris: Ballière et Fils [1864].
Curtis, T. (2007). Mind forg’d: taking a Foucauldian look at prison based social enterprises. Fourth Annual UK Social Enterprise Research Conference. London: South Bank University.
Curtis, T. (2008). Finding that grit makes a pearl: a critical re‐reading of research into social enterprise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14(5), 276-290.
Curtis, T., Herbst, J., & Gumkovska, M. (2010). The social economy of trust: social entrepreneurship experiences in Poland. Social Enterprise Journal, 6(3), 194-209.
Dey, P (2010). ‘The Symbolic Violence of 'Social Entrepreneurship': Language, Power and the Question of the Social (Subject)’. - 3rd Research colloquium on social entrepreneurship. Oxford UK.
Dey, P., & Teasdale, S. (2013). Social enterprise and dis/identification: The politics of identity work in the English third sector. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(2), 248-270.
Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703.
Froggett, L., & Chamberlayne, P. (2004). Narratives of social enterprise: From biography to practice and policy critique. Qualitative Social Work, 3(1), 61-77.
Glaser, E. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Grant, S. (2008). Contextualising social enterprise in New Zealand. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(1), 9-23.
Grenier, P. (2009). ‘Social Entrepreneurship in the UK: from Rhetoric to Reality’. In: R. Ziegler (Ed.), An Introduction to Social Entrepreneurship: Voices, Preconditions, Contexts (p. 174-206). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Grenier, P. (2010). Vision and Values: The Relationship between the Visions and Actions of Social Entrepreneurs. In K. Hockerts, J. Mair & J. Robinson (Eds.), Values and opportunities in social entrepreneurship (p. 52-70). London: Springer, Palgrave Macmillan.
Horkhiemer, M., (1982). Critical Theory. New York: Seabury Press.
Hu, X. (2018). Methodological implications of critical realism for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Critical Realism, 17(2), 118-139.
Hu, X., Marlow, S., Zimmermann, A., Martin, L., & Frank, R. (2019). Understanding opportunities in social entrepreneurship: A critical realist abstraction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 1032–1056
Jones, R., Latham, J., & Betta, M. (2008a). Narrative construction of the social entrepreneurial identity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 14(5), 330-345
Jones, R., Latham, J., Betta, M., & Goss, D. (2008b). Foucault, feminism, shame, and the dynamics of discourse: theorising entrepreneurship on the borders of established convention. In L. M. Gillin (Ed.), Regional Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: 5th International Australian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship (AGSE) Entrepreneurship Research Exchange (p. 611-622). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, February 5-8.
Nicholls, A., & Cho, A. H. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: the structuration of a field. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change (p. 99-118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyoni, G. A. (2016). Exploring the problems and possibilities of capacity building in refugee organisations: the case of Manchester refugee support network (MRSN). Doctoral thesis (PhD), Manchester Metropolitan University.
Peredo, A. M., Haugh, H. M., Hudon, M., & Meyer, C. (2020). Mapping Concepts and Issues in the Ethics of the Commons: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4), 659-672.
Pharoah, C., Scott, D., & Fisher, A. (2004). ‘Social Enterprise in the balance: Challenges for the voluntary sector’. Charities Aid Foundation.
Ridley‐Duff, R. (2007). Communitarian perspectives on social enterprise. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 382-392.
Ridley-Duff, R., & Bull, M., (2021). The coming of age of the social solidarity economy through hybrid internet based organizational forms. Business Strategy & the Environment. Iss.1. no.18 DOI: 10.1002/bse.2707
Roy, M. J., and& Grant, S. (2020). The contemporary relevance of Karl Polanyi to critical social enterprise scholarship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 177-193.
Sargant, W. L. (1858). ‘Social Innovators and Their Schemes’, London: Smith, Elder and Co.
Scott-Cato, S., Arthur, L., Keenoy, T., & Smith, R. (2008). Entrepreneurial energy:: Associative entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector in Wales. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(5), 313-329.
Seanor, P., Bull, M., Baines, S., & Ridley‐Duff, R. (2013). Narratives of transition from social to enterprise: you can’t get there from here! International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 19(3), 324-343.
Steyaert, C., & Dey, P. (2010). Nine verbs to keep the social entrepreneurship research agenda ‘dangerous’. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 231-254.
Teasdale, S., Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Critique and the radical enactment of the social. Social Enterprise Journal. Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 90-107.
Teasdale, S., McKay, S., Phillimore, J., & Teasdale, N. (2011). Exploring gender and social entrepreneurship: women's leadership, employment and participation in the third sector and social enterprises. Voluntary Sector Review, 2(1), 57-76.
Thompson, M., Nowak, V., Southern, A., Davies, J., & Furmedge, P. (2020). Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1171-1194.
Watkins, H. M. (2017). Beyond sweat equity: Community organising beyond the Third Way. Urban Studies, 54(9), 2139-2154.
Yıldırım, N., & Tuncalp, D. (2016). Legitimating Mitigator or a Powerful Comrade? Social Innovation from a Marxist Perspective. [Paper presentation] 32nd EGOS Colloquium – European Group for Organizational Studies. Subtheme 18: Marxist Organization Studies: Institutional Forms of Power and their Legitimacy: Napoli, Italy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Bull, Timothy Curtis, Vicky Nowak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
