Everything and nothing: A critical review of the “social” in Innovation and Entrepreneurship studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91114Keywords:
critical social studies, innovation studies, entrepreneurship studies, social innovation, social entrepreneurshipAbstract
Over the past two decades we have witnessed growing academic and policy interest in phenomena such as social innovation and social entrepreneurship. In these instances, the “social” element has often been described as a new or rediscovered category, indicating a normative predisposition to “elevate” existing or emerging innovation and entrepreneurship processes by identifying and promoting socially-acceptable standards of behavior and goal-setting. While previous reviews on social innovation have focused on the historical development of the concept and its role in academic debate, this article critically reviews the place of the “social” in current mainstream Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E) studies. The aim is to understand how this literature has been evolving in relation to this element and to what extent this addition has promoted a radical shift in the research direction. Our review, based on selected articles from 16 I&E mainstream journals, advances a novel classification of the dominant approaches to the social dimension in I&E studies, identifying four main categories: disciplinary, integrationist, separationist, and essentialist. What emerges is that most I&E studies ignore, minimize, or compartmentalize the “social”, using it to extend existing frameworks rather than to evolve them. Indeed, while the “social” has been offering an avenue for critical views to challenge mainstream discourse, at present it does not seem to significantly affect the latter’s evolution.
References
Acs, Z. J., Boardman, M. C., & McNeely, C. L. (2013). The social value of productive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 785-796.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000), Doing Critical Management Research, Sage Publications, London
Anderson, A. R. (2015). The economic reification of entrepreneurship: re-engaging with the social. In A. Fayolle, & P. Riot (Eds.), Rethinking entrepreneurship: debating research orientations (p. 44–56). Abingdon: Routledge.
Abingdon: Routledge.Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173-1190.
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen, M. S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S., & O’Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195-206.
Baba, Y., & Walsh, J. P. (2010). Embeddedness, social epistemology and breakthrough innovation: The case of the development of statins. Research Policy, 39(4), 511-522.
Bartoloni, S., Calò, E., Marinelli, L., Pascucci, F., Dezi, L., Carayannis, E., Revel, G. M., & Gregori, G. L. (2021). Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix-Design Thinking approach to technology. Technovation, 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102413
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In G. S. Becker (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (p. 209-240). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. S., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brazeal, D. V., & Herbert, T. T. (1999). The genesis of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 29-46.
Brieger, S. A., & De Clercq, D. (2018). Entrepreneurs’ individual-level resources and social value creation goals: The moderating role of cultural context. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2), 193-216.
Bull, M. (2018). Reconceptualising social enterprise in the UK through an appreciation of legal identities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), 587-605.
Callegari, B., Misganaw, B. A., & Sardo, S. (2022). Introduction to Rethinking the Social in Innovation and Entrepreneurship Studies. In Rethinking the Social in Innovation and Entrepreneurship (p. 1-24). Cheltanham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Carayannis, E., & Forbes, J. (2001). A pragmatic representation of systems engineering based on technological learning. Technovation, 21(4), 197-207.
Carayannis, E. G., Goletsis, Y., & Grigoroudis, E. (2018a). Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 4-17.
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018b). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162.
Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship: Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 5–26.
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491.
Crupi, A., Liu, S., & Liu, W. (2022). The top‐down pattern of social innovation and social entrepreneurship. Bricolage and agility in response to COVID‐19: cases from China. R&D Management, 52(2), 313-330.
Curtis, T. (2008). Finding that grit makes a pearl: a critical re‐reading of research into social enterprise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14(5), 276-290.
Dabbous, A., & Tarhini, A. (2019). Assessing the impact of knowledge and perceived economic benefits on sustainable consumption through the sharing economy: A sociotechnical approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, 119775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119775
Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107-128.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–31.
De Silva, M., & Wright, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial Co-creation: societal impact through open innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 318-342.
De Silva, M., Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., & Russo, M. (2021). Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: a conceptual framework for science-based co-creation. Technovation, 104, 102268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102268
Dequech, D. (2012). Post Keynesianism, heterodoxy and mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 24(2), 353-368.
Desmarchelier, B., Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2020). Mapping social innovation networks: Knowledge intensive social services as systems builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120068. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162519315288
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
Dosi, G., & Roventini, A. (2016). The irresistible fetish of utility theory: from “pleasure and pain” to rationalising torture. Intereconomics, 51(5), 286-287.
Edlund, L., & Korn, E. (2002). A Theory of Prostitution. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 181-214.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123
European Commission (2010). Europe 2020: flagship initiative innovation union. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2013). Social innovation research in Europe: Approaches, trends and future directions. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research.
Flink, T., & Kaldewey, D. (2018). The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor. Research Policy, 47(1), 14-22.
Ford, R., Walton, S., Stephenson, J., Rees, D., Scott, M., King, G., Williams, J., & Wooliscroft, B. (2017). Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 138-150.
Fougère, M., & Meriläinen, E. (2021) Exposing three dark sides of social innovation through critical perspectives on resilience, Industry and Innovation, 28(1), 1-18.
Fu, P., Sarpong, D., & Meissner, D. (2022). Recalibrating, reconfiguring, and appropriating innovation: a semantic network analysis of China’s mass innovation and mass entrepreneurship (MIME) initiatives. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 1506-1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09878-x.
Gaglio, G., Godin, B., & Pfotenhauer, S. (2019). X-Innovation. NOvation: Critical Studies of Innovation, I(2019), 17-17.
Gallouj, F., Rubalcaba L., Toivonen M., & Windrum P. (2018). Understanding social innovation in services industries. Industry and Innovation, 25(6), 551-569.
Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455-478.
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495-510.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417.
Godin, B. (2015). Social innovation: From scheme to utopia. In B. Godin (Ed.), Innovation contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries (p. 122-133). London: Routledge.
Goss, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship and ‘the social’: Towards a deference-emotion theory. Human Relations, 58(5), 617-636.
Havránek, T., Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Bom, P., Geyer‐Klingeberg, J., Iwasaki, I., Reed, W. R., Rost, K., & Van Aert, R. C. M. (2020). Reporting guidelines for meta‐analysis in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 469-475.
Hechavarría, D. M., & Brieger, S. A. (2020). Practice rather than preach: cultural practices and female social entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 58, 1131-1151.
Hernández‐Carrión, C., Camarero‐Izquierdo, C., & Gutiérrez‐Cillán, J. (2017). Entrepreneurs’ social capital and the economic performance of small businesses: The moderating role of competitive intensity and entrepreneurs’ experience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(1), 61-89.
Hoogendoorn, B. (2016). The prevalence and determinants of social entrepreneurship at the macro level. Journal of Small Business Management, 54, 278-296.
Huybrechts, B., & Nicholls, A. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Definitions, drivers and challenges. In C. K. Volkmann, K. O. Tokarski & K. Ernst (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship and social business (p. 31-48). Gabler Verlag.
Ibáñez, M. J., Guerrero, M., Yáñez-Valdés, C., & Barros-Celume, S. (2022). Digital social entrepreneurship: the N-Helix response to stakeholders’ COVID-19 needs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 556-579.
Kimmitt, J., & Muñoz, P. (2018). Sensemaking the ‘social’ in social entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 36(8), 859-886.
Kleinhempel, J., Beugelsdijk, S., & Klasing, M. J. (2022). The changing role of social capital during the venture creation process: A multilevel study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 297-330.
Kohler, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2019). From collaborative community to competitive market: The quest to build a crowdsourcing platform for social innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 356-368.
Korsgaard, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2011). Enacting entrepreneurship as social value creation. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 135-151.
Kuhlmann, S., & Rip, A. (2018). Next-generation innovation policy and grand challenges. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 448-454.
Kupferberg, F. (1998). Humanistic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial career commitment. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 10(3), 171-188.
Kwon, S. W., & Arenius, P. (2010). Nations of entrepreneurs: A social capital perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 315-330.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2002). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 681-701.
Lazear, E. P. (2000). Economic Imperialism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99-146.
Lee, R., Tuselmann, H., Jayawarna, D., & Rouse, J. (2019). Effects of structural, relational and cognitive social capital on resource acquisition: A study of entrepreneurs residing in multiply deprived areas. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(5-6), 534-554.
Lee, S., Lee, H., & Lee, C. (2020). Open innovation at the national level: Towards a global innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119842
Lehner, O. M., & Kansikas, J. (2012). Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship: A thematic meta analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21, 25-58.
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29(2), 243-255.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441-1449.
Lie, M., & Sørensen, K.H. (1996). Making technologies our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. In R. Ling, R. & P. E. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile Communications: Renegotiation of the Social Sphere (p. 1-30). Springer.
Linton, J. D. (2009). De-babelizing the language of innovation. Technovation, 29(11), 729-737.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2013). Innovation studies: A personal interpretation of “the state of the art”. In J. Fagerberg, B. R. Martin & E. S. Andersen (Eds.), The future of innovation studies: Evolution and future challenges (p. 21-70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
Malerba, F., & Brusoni, S. (Eds.). (2007). Perspectives on Innovation. Cambridge University Press.
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5b2811d1-16be-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
Minniti, M., & Lévesque, M. (2008). Recent developments in the economics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 603-612.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group* (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: Nesta.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nelson, R. R. (2011). The Moon and the Ghetto revisited. Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 681-690.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2019). Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 462-484.
Nicholls, A., & Cho, A. H. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: The structuration of a field. In A. Nicholls (Ed.) Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change (pp.99-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
Paredes-Frigolett, H. (2016). Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 126-133.
Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., Kunze, I., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J. M., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2020). Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Research Policy, 49(8), 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080
Pittz, T. G., Intindola, M. L., Adler, T., Rogers, S., & Gard, C. (2019). Collaborating smartly: the role of open strategy in absorptive capacity. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1595-1615.
Posner, R. A. (1985). An economic theory of the criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 85(6), 1193-1231.
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruebottom, T. (2013). The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: Building legitimacy through heroes and villains. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 98-116.
Schubert, C. (2019). Social innovations as a repair of social order. NOvation: Critical Studies of Innovation, I(2019), 41-66.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2010). The Nature and Essence of Economic Theory. London: Transaction Publishers.
Shepherd, D. A., Sattari, R., & Patzelt, H. (2020). A social model of opportunity development: Building and engaging communities of inquiry. Journal of Business Venturing, 106033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106033
Stevens, R., Moray, N., & Bruneel, J. (2015). The social and economic mission of social enterprises: Dimensions, measurement, validation, and relation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1051-1082.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.
Stirzaker, R., Galloway, L., Muhonen, J., & Christopoulos, D. (2021). The drivers of social entrepreneurship: agency, context, compassion and opportunism. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(6), 1381-1402.
Stornelli, A., Ozcan, S., & Simms, C. (2021). Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and innovation: A systematic literature review on barriers, enablers, and innovation types. Research Policy, 50(6), 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104229
Søraa, R. A., Nyvoll, P., Tøndel, G., Fosch-Villaronga, E., & Serrano, J. A. (2021). The social dimension of domesticating technology: Interactions between older adults, caregivers, and robots in the home. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120678
Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Özbilgin, M., Forson, C., & Slutskaya, N. (2014). A Bourdieuan relational perspective for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 615-632.
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research policy, 34(8), 1203-1219.
Urban, B. (2010). Entrepreneurship as a discipline and field of study. In B. Urban (Ed.), Frontiers in Entrepreneurship (p. 33-62). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935.
Venugopal, S., & Viswanathan, M. (2019). Implementation of social innovations in subsistence marketplaces: a facilitated institutional change process model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(6), 800-823.
Verleye, K., Perks, H., Gruber, T., & Voets, J. (2019). The long and winding road: Building legitimacy for complex social innovation in networks. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(6), 695-720.
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165-184.
Wiarda, M., van de Kaa, G., Yaghmaei, E., & Doorn, N. (2021). A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121053
Yakovlev, P. (2011). The economics of torture. In C. J. Coyne & R. L. Mathers (Eds.), The handbook on the political economy of war (p. 109–25). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Yan, J., & Sorenson, R. (2006). The effect of Confucian values on succession in family business. Family Business Review, 19(3), 235-250.
Zafirovski, M. (1999). Probing into the social layers of entrepreneurship: Outlines of the sociology of enterprise. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(4), 351-371.
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519-532.
Zinyemba, T., Pavlova, M., & Groot, W. (2020). Effects of HIV/AIDS on children's educational attainment: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(1), 35-84.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
NOvation is an open-access journal under a Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement (and preservation) of the author's authorship and intellectual property rights.
To this extent, the authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the rights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons – CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows [...].
2. Authors have authorization for distribution, of the version of the work published in this journal, in an institutional repository, thematic, databases and in other works as a book chapter, with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in the journal;
3. Papers published in this journal will be indexed in databases, repositories, portals, directories and other sources in which the journal is and will be indexed.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
