Chico Mendes, the rubber tappers and the Indians: reimagining conservation and development in the Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v48i0.58829Palavras-chave:
Chico Mendes, Amazon, conservation, developmentResumo
In the mid-1970’s rubber tapper leaders Chico Mendes and Wilson Pinheiro reformulated strategic objectives of the rubber tappers’ movement, from protesting and denouncing violent dispossession of families and deforestation to defending rubber tappers’ forest territories and diversified land use. This strategic turn laid the basis for the rubber tappers’ transformation from a solely class-based union movement to one that incorporates a specific cultural identity associated with land and resource uses defined as opposed to the government-sponsored socio-environmentally destructive development model. The rubber tappers’ conceptual transformation of “extractivism”, from an archaic, outdated and primitive economic activity into an alternative for a modern, sustainable development model, based in their distinct culture, mirrored and paralleled the emergence of identity-based social movements globally. It also mirrored the re-emergence of “submerged” indigenous ethnicities and subsequent “ethnogenesis” of allegedly extinct or forgotten indigenous peoples, in both cases contrary to the assumptions and predictions of both policy and some anthropological theory. The rubber tappers’ definition of extractive reserves as collective land rights – and access to technology, social services and markets on terms in some measure controlled by the communities – in exchange for environmental and forest protection enabled significant territorial gains (parallel to indigenous territories), as well as proliferation of extractive reserve analogues in both environmental and land reform policy. Alliances with indigenous peoples and environmentalists were central to the development of this vision. The model of collective rights, with access to technology, services and markets could have very broad applicability for poor populations globally, in light of climate change and other environmental crises, if at-scale incentives for climate change and other environmental mitigation can be created.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os Direitos Autorais sobre trabalhos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. O conteúdo dos trabalhos publicados é de inteira responsabilidade dos autores. A DMA é um periódico de acesso aberto (open access), e adota a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Não Adaptada (CC-BY), desde janeiro de 2023. Portanto, ao serem publicados por esta Revista, os artigos são de livre uso para compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial) e adaptar (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial). É preciso dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas.
Os conteúdos publicados pela DMA do v. 53 de 2020 ao v. 60 de 2022 são protegidos pela licença Creative Commons Atribuição – Não Comercial – Sem Derivações 4.0 Internacional.
A DMA é uma revista de acesso aberto desde a sua criação, entretanto, do v.1 de 2000 ao v. 52 de 2019, o periódico não adotava uma licença Creative Commons e, portanto, o tipo de licença não é indicado na página inicial dos artigos.