Research themes of family and community physicians in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v12i0.87497Palavras-chave:
Family physicians, Brazil, Bibliometrics, Biomedical research, Cluster analysis, Graduate EducationResumo
Introduction: Research capacity in primary care varies worldwide, and bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science do not index most primary care research coming from Latin America. Our objective was to investigate the research themes of family and community physicians in Brazil, and to correlate the articles’ research themes with their authors’ trajectories in postgraduate education. Methods: we compiled a national list of family and community physicians, retrieved their curricula from the Lattes Platform, compiled a list of journal articles, and obtained their keywords from LILACS and MEDLINE. Treating journal articles and their keywords as the two node types in a bipartite network, we derived research themes using the dual-projection algorithm, combining the Leiden algorithm with hierarchical clustering. Results: We found two research themes to be the largest, most developed, and most central ones: human health and primary care. Authors with a master’s or PhD in collective health (public health, epidemiology, and social sciences and humanities in health) were as likely as those with no postgraduate degree to publish articles on primary care. On the other hand, authors with a postgraduate degree in medicine were more likely to publish articles on human health. Conclusions: After discussing the findings in light of previous research and methodological aspects, we conclude there’s a relative divide between primary care and clinical research, and the highlight policy implications.
Referências
Almeida, M., Gusso, G., & Trindade, T. (2016). Primary care research in Brazil. In F. Goodyear-Smith & B. Mash (Eds.), International Perspectives on Primary Care Research (pp. 161–163). CRC Press.
Arthur, R. (2020). Modularity and projection of bipartite networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 549, 124341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124341
Arya, N., Gibson, C., Ponka, D., Haq, C., Hansel, S., Dahlman, B., & Rouleau, K. (2017). Family medicine around the world: Overview by region. Canadian Family Physician, 63(6), 436–441.
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(11), 3747–3752. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400087101
Beasley, J. W., Dovey, S., Geffen, L. N., Gómez-Clavelina, F. J., Haq, C. L., Inem, V., Lam, C. L. K., Nugmanova, A., Pavlic, D. R., Qidwai, W., & Weel, C. van. (2004). The contribution of family doctors to primary care research: A global perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks (IFPCRN). Primary Health Care Research & Development, 5(4), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1191/1463423604pc221oa
Beasley, J. W., Starfield, B., van Weel, C., Rosser, W. W., & Haq, C. L. (2007). Global health and primary care research. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM, 20(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070172
Bonet, O. (2014). Os médicos da pessoa: Um olhar antropológico sobre a medicina de família no Brasil e na Argentina. 7Letras.
Brocato, J. J., & Mavis, B. (2005). The Research Productivity of Faculty in Family Medicine Departments at U.S. Medical Schools: A National Study. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 244–252.
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
Ceitlin, J. (2006). La medicina familiar en América Latina. Presentación. Atención Primaria, 38(9), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1157/13095056
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695.
Dolor, R. J., Campbell‐Voytal, K., Daly, J., Nagykaldi, Z. J., O’Beirne, M., Sterling, P., Fagnan, L. J., Levy, B., Michaels, L., Louks, H. A., Smith, P., Aspy, C. B., Patterson, V. B., Kano, M., Sussman, A. L., Williams, R., & Neale, A. V. (2015). Practice‐based Research Network Research Good Practices (PRGPs): Summary of Recommendations. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(6), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12317
Domínguez, N. M. S. de, Ponzo, J., Aranda, J. M. R., Haro, C. A. A., Ríos, M. E. R., Villarreal, P. V., Franco, J. V. A., Terrasa, S. A., García, J. C. P., Días, M. C. da C., Toala, F. G. T., & González, R. F. (2016). Pesquisa em Medicina de Família e Comunidade na Ibero-América. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 11(0), 64–74.
Donner, P., & Schmoch, U. (2020). The implicit preference of bibliometrics for basic research. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03516-3
Escobar, M. A. R., Rivera, L. M. M., Martínez, O. F., & Ortega, M. Á. F. (2018). Pesquisa aplicada ao território desde a Medicina Familiar. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 13(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc13(1)1851
Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2013). The dual-projection approach for two-mode networks. Social Networks, 35(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.004
Falk, J. W. (2004). A Medicina de Família e Comunidade e sua entidade nacional: Histórico e perspectivas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 1(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc1(1)2
Fontenelle, L. F. (2021). Analytic code for “Research themes of family and community physicians in Brazil.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5798092
Fontenelle, L. F., Oliveira, M. H. M. de, Rossi, S. V., Brandão, D. J., & Sarti, T. D. (2021). In which journals do family and community physicians in Brazil publish? The Trajetórias MFC project. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 16(43), 2589. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2589
Fontenelle, L. F., Rossi, S. V., & Oliveira, M. H. M. de. (2019). Postgraduate education among family and community physicians in Brazil: The Trajetórias MFC project. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3376310
Fontenelle, L. F., Rossi, S. V., & Oliveira, M. H. M. de. (2021a). Journal articles published by family and community physicians from Brazil up to 2018 [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5797816
Fontenelle, L. F., Rossi, S. V., Oliveira, M. H. M. de, Brandão, D. J., & Sarti, T. D. (2020). Postgraduate education among family and community physicians in Brazil: The Trajetórias MFC project. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(3), e000321. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000321
Fontenelle, L. F., Rossi, S. V., & Oliveira, M. H. M. (2021b). Anonymized dataset for “Research themes of family and community physicians in Brazil” [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5798132
Freeman, T. (2012). Family Medicine’s academic contributions. Family Medicine Research Days, İzmir, Turkey. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi, 16(4), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.2399/tahd.12.181
Freeman, T., & McWhinney, I. R. (2016). McWhinney’s textbook of family medicine (4th edition). Oxford University Press.
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102
Glanville, J., Kendrick, T., McNally, R., Campbell, J., & Hobbs, F. R. (2011). Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Bibliometric analysis. BMJ, 342, d1028. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1028
Goodyear-Smith, F., & Mash, B. (2016a). Introduction. In F. Goodyear-Smith & B. Mash (Eds.), International Perspectives on Primary Care Research (pp. 161–163). CRC Press.
Goodyear-Smith, F., & Mash, B. (Eds.). (2016b). Who conducts primary care research? In International Perspectives on Primary Care Research (pp. 11–18). CRC Press.
Green, L. A., & Hickner, J. (2006). A Short History of Primary Care Practice-based Research Networks: From Concept to Essential Research Laboratories. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.1.1
Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25(suppl_1), i20–i24. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn055
Gupta, A., Gray, C. S., Landes, M., Sridharan, S., & Bhattacharyya, O. (2021). Family medicine: An evolving field around the world. Canadian Family Physician, 67(9), 647–651. https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6709647
Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis. PLOS ONE, 3(12), e4021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004021
Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4
Hagen, N. T. (2013). Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 784–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.06.005
Harzheim, E., Stein, A. T., Álvarez Dardet, C., Cantero, M. T. R., Kruse, C. K., Vidal, T. B., & Nava, T. R. (2005). Revisão sistemática sobre aspectos metodológicos das pesquisas em atenção primária no Brasil. Revista dad AMRIGS, 49(4), 248–252.
Huas, C., Petek, D., Diaz, E., Muñoz-Perez, M. A., Torzsa, P., & Collins, C. (2019). Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: The views of members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe. European Journal of General Practice, 0(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546282
Jabbarpour, Y., Wilkinson, E., Coffman, M., & Mieses, A. (2020). Has Female Authorship in Family Medicine Research Evolved Over Time? Annals of Family Medicine, 18(6), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2584
Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science metrics more scientific. Nature, 464, 488–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/464488a
Leite, P., Mugnaini, R., & Leta, J. (2011). A new indicator for international visibility: Exploring Brazilian scientific community. Scientometrics, 88(1), 311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0379-9
López-Torres Hidalgo, J., Basora Gallisà, J., Orozco Beltrán, D., & Bellón Saameño, J. Á. (2014). Mapa bibliométrico de la investigación realizada en atención primaria en España durante el periodo 2008-2012. Atención Primaria, 46(10), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2014.02.007
López-Torres Hidalgo, J., Párraga Martínez, I., Martín Álvarez, R., & Tranche Iparraguirre, S. (2020). Mapa bibliométrico de la investigación realizada en atención primaria en España durante el periodo 2013-2017. Atención Primaria, 52(7), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2019.08.002
MacAuley, D. (2011). Brazilian Family Medicine and academic excellence. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 6(20), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc6(20)403
Mash, R., Almeida, M., Wong, W. C. W., Kumar, R., & von Pressentin, K. B. (2015). The roles and training of primary care doctors: China, India, Brazil and South Africa. Human Resources for Health, 13(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0090-7
McWhinney, I. R. (1996). The importance of being different. The British Journal of General Practice, 46(408), 433–436.
McWhinney, I. R. (2001a). Why are we doing so little clinical research? Part 1: Clinical descriptive research. Canadian Family Physician, 47, 1701–1715.
McWhinney, I. R. (2001b). Why are we doing so little clinical research? Part 2: Why clinical research is neglected. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, 47, 1944–1946, 1952–1955.
Melamed, D. (2014). Community Structures in Bipartite Networks: A Dual-Projection Approach. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e97823. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097823
Mena-Chalco, J. P., Digiampietri, L. A., Lopes, F. M., & Cesar, R. M. (2014). Brazilian Bibliometric Coauthorship Networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1424–1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23010
Mold, J. W., & Peterson, K. A. (2005). Primary Care Practice-Based Research Networks: Working at the Interface Between Research and Quality Improvement. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(suppl 1), S12–S20. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.303
Muldoon, L. K., Hogg, W. E., & Levitt, M. (2006). Primary care (PC) and primary health care (PHC). What is the difference? Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique, 97(5), 409–411.
Nagykaldi, Z., Mold, J. W., Robinson, A., Niebauer, L., & Ford, A. (2006). Practice Facilitators and Practice-based Research Networks. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 19(5), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.5.506
Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131
Okabe, M., & Ito, K. (2002). How to make figures and presentations that are friendly to color blind people. University of Tokyo. https://jfly.uni-koeln.de/html/color_blind/
Ortega, M. Á. F., Velazco, G. R., Coria, A. E. I., & Prato, J. B. R. (2016). Produção e disseminação de conhecimento em medicina de família na América Latina. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 11(0), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc11(0)1280
Osmo, A., & Schraiber, L. B. (2015). The field of Collective Health: Definitions and debates on its constitution. Saúde e Sociedade, 24, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902015S01018
Peleg, R., & Shvartzman, P. (2006). Where Should Family Medicine Papers be Published—Following the Impact Factor? The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 19(6), 633–636. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.6.633
Pires-Alves, F. A., & Paiva, C. H. A. (2021). Entre a ausência em Alma-Ata e o Prevsaúde:a atenção primária à saúde no ocaso da ditadura. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 28(3), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702021000300002
Ponka, D., Rouleau, K., Arya, N., Redwood-Campbell, L., Woollard, R., Siedlecki, B., & Dunikowski, L. (2015). Developing the evidentiary basis for family medicine in the global context: The Besrour Papers: a series on the state of family medicine in the world. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, 61(7), 596–600.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rodrigues, R. D. (2007). Programa de Residência em Medicina de Família e Comunidade da UERJ: Uma perspectiva histórica. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 3(11), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc3(11)333
Romano, V. F. (2008). In search of identity for the family doctor. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 18(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312008000100002
Sidone, O. J. G., Haddad, E. A., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2016). A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: Evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração científica. Transinformação, 28(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800002
Siqueira, M. B. (2019). Sucupira—A Platform for the Evaluation of Graduate Education in Brazil. Procedia Computer Science, 146, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.081
Sparks, B. L. W., & Gupta, S. K. (2004). Research in Family Medicine in Developing Countries. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(suppl 2), S55–S59. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.192
Starfield, B., Shi, L., & Macinko, J. (2005). Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(3), 457–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x
Steijn, M. P. A. (2021). Improvement on the association strength: Implementing a probabilistic measure based on combinations without repetition. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00122
Traag, V. A., Van Dooren, P., & Nesterov, Y. (2011). Narrow scope for resolution-limit-free community detection. Physical Review E, 84(1), 016114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.016114
Traag, V. A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z
van der Zee, J., Kroneman, M., & Bolíbar, B. (2003). Conditions for research in general practice. Can the Dutch and British experiences be applied to other countries, for example Spain? The European Journal of General Practice, 9(2), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814780309160401
Vieira-da-Silva, L. M., & Pinell, P. (2014). The genesis of collective health in Brazil. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(3), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12069
Weidner, A., Peterson, L. E., Mainous, A. G., Datta, A., & Ewigman, B. (2019). The Current State of Research Capacity in US Family Medicine Departments. Family Medicine, 51(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.180310
Wenceslau, L. D., Sarti, T. D., & Trindade, T. G. da. (2020). Reflections and proposals for the establishment of Family and Community Medicine Master’s Programs in Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25(4), 1281–1292. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020254.29802019
Westfall, J. M., Wittenberg, H. R., & Liaw, W. (2021). Time to Invest in Primary Care Research—Commentary on Findings from an Independent Congressionally Mandated Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06560-0
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
A revista AtoZ é um periódico científico de acesso aberto e o copyright dos artigos e da entrevista pertence aos respectivos autores/entrevistados com cessão de direitos para a AtoZ no que diz respeito à inclusão do material publicado (revisado por pares/postprint) em sistemas/ferramentas de indexação, agregadores ou curadores de conteúdo.

Todo o conteúdo da Revista (incluindo-se instruções, política editorial e modelos) está sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Não Adaptada, a partir de Outubro de 2020.
Ao serem publicados por esta Revista, os artigos são de livre uso para compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial) e adaptar (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial). É preciso dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas .
A AtoZ não cobra qualquer tipo de taxa para submissão e/ou processamento e/ou publicação de artigos.