COMPOSITE-INDICATORS FOR URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AT SITE-LEVEL: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/revsbau.v19i0.94342Palavras-chave:
Urban Management, Urban Green Areas, Environmental Indicators, Green InfrastructureResumo
Urban green areas, crucial components of green infrastructure, provide a variety of ecosystem services (ES) essential for enhancing the quality of life in cities. The quantity and quality of these ES are estimated and evaluated using indicators that serve as urban planning tools. However, these indicators are often challenging to generalize as they have been developed for specific locations and situations, frequently focusing on just one dimension - ecological, environmental, or economic. In this context, this study explored indicators for ES in urban green areas found in scientific articles from Scopus, Web of Science, and Scielo, through a Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Upon thorough examination of the 37 articles resulting from PRISMA, a predominance of indicators related to regulating services, particularly in urban parks, followed by cultural and supporting services, was observed. A diversity of indicators, methodologies, and analysis frameworks for ES was identified without a clear standardization, potentially complicating their application in urban green infrastructure planning and management. A research gap was noted regarding ES indicators studies in tropical and subequatorial urban environments, especially those that establish connections between ES and the necessary innovations to promote them.
Referências
ALAM, M., DUPRAS, J., Messier, C. A framework towards a composite indicator for urban ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, v. 60, p. 38–44. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.035
ANDERSSON-SKÖLD, Y., KLINGBERG, J., GUNNARSSON, B., CULLINANE, K., GUSTAFSSON, I., HEDBLOM, M., KNEZ, I., LINDBERG, F., ODE SANG, Å., PLEIJEL, H., THORSSON, P., THORSSON, S. A framework for assessing urban greenery’s effects and valuing its ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 205, p. 274–285. 2018.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.071
BARTESAGHI KOC, C., OSMOND, P., PETERS, A. Evaluating the cooling effects of green infrastructure: A systematic review of methods, indicators and data sources. Solar Energy, v. 166, p. 486–508. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.008
BELAIRE, J. A., HIGGINS, C., ZOLL, D., LIEBERKNECHT, K., BIXLER, R. P., NEFF, J. L., KEITT, T. H., JHA, S. Fine-scale monitoring and mapping of biodiversity and ecosystem services reveals multiple synergies and few tradeoffs in urban green space management. Science of the Total Environment, v. 849, e157801. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157801
BREUSTE, J., SCHNELLINGER, J., QURESHI, S., FAGGI, A. M. Urban Ecosystem services on the local level: Urban green spaces as providers. Ekologia, v. 32, n. 3, p. 290-304, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2013-0026
BRZOSKA, P., GRUNEWALD, K., BASTIAN, O. A multi-criteria analytical method to assess ecosystem services at urban site level, exemplified by two German city districts. Ecosystem Services, v. 49, e101268. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101268
BRZOSKA, P., SPĀĢE, A. From City- to Site-Dimension: Assessing the Urban Ecosystem Services of Different Types of Green Infrastructure. Land, v. 9, n. 5, 150. 2020. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050150>. Accessed on: December 01, 2022.
CHAROENKIT, S., PIYATHAMRONGCHAI, K. A review of urban green spaces multifunctionality assessment: A way forward for a standardized assessment and comparability. Ecological Indicators, v.107, e105592. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105592.
CHEN, D., ZHAO, Q., JIANG, P., LI, M. Incorporating ecosystem services to assess progress towards sustainable development goals: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Science of the Total Environment, v.806, e151277. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151277.
CORTINOVIS, C., GENELETTI, D. A framework to explore the effects of urban planning decisions on regulating ecosystem services in cities. Ecosystem Services, v.38, e100946, 100946. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100946.
CORTINOVIS, C., GENELETTI, D., HEDLUND, K. Synthesizing multiple ecosystem service assessments for urban planning: A review of approaches, and recommendations. Landscape and Urban Planning, v.213, e104129. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104129
DANIELS, B., ZAUNBRECHER, B. S., PAAS, B., OTTERMANNS, R., ZIEFLE, M., ROß-NICKOLL, M. Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective. Science of the Total Environment, v. 615, p. 1364–1378. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.167
DICKINSON, D. C., HOBBS, R. J. Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosystem Services, v.25, p.179–194. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.014
DOBBS, C., ESCOBEDO, F. J., ZIPPERER, W. C. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, v.99, n. 3-4, p.196–206. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004
DONG, Y., LIU, H. Reframing the index system of urban green space planning toward public health in China: problems and solutions, Cities & Health, v.5, n.3, p.256-275, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2018.1544329
ENGSTRÖM, G., GREN, A. Capturing the value of green space in urban parks in a sustainable urban planning and design context: pros and cons of hedonic pricing. Ecology and Society, v.22, n.2, p.1-13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09365-220221
GAUDERETO, G. L., GALLARDO, A. L. C. F., FERREIRA, M. L., NASCIMENTO, A. P. B. D., MANTOVANI, W. Evaluation Of Ecosystem Services And Management Of Urban Green Areas: Promoting Healthy and sustainable cities. Ambiente & Sociedade, v.21, e01203, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0120r3vu18l4td
GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E., BARTON, D. N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, v.86, p.235–245. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
JATO-ESPINO, D., CAPRA-RIBEIRO, F., MOSCARDÓ, V., BARTOLOMÉ DEL PINO, L. E., MAYOR-VITORIA, F., Gallardo, L. O., … DIETRICH, K. A systematic review on the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v.86, e127998, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127998
KELLY, J. R., HARWELL, M. A. Indicators of ecosystem recovery. Environmental Management, v.14, n.5, p.527–545. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02394708
KIM, D., SON, Y. Differences in Perceptions of Naturalness among Urban Park User Groups in Seoul. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, v.10, n.4, p.112–129. 2022. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.4_112
KIM, J., SON, Y. Assessing and mapping cultural ecosystem services of an urban forest based on narratives from blog posts. Ecological Indicators, v.129, e107983. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107983
KRAEMER, R., KABISCH, N. Parks in context: advancing citywide spatial quality assessments of urban green spaces using fine-scaled indicators. Ecology and Society, v.26, n.2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-12485-260245
LAMARQUE, P., QUÉTIER, F., LAVOREL, S. The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. Comptes Rendus Biologies, v.334, n.5-6, p.441–449. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.11.007
LOCOSSELLI, G. M., BUCKERIDGE M. S. The science of urban trees to promote well‑being. Trees, v.37, p.1–7. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-023-02389-2
LOGSDON, R. A., CHAUBEY, I. A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, v.257, p.57–65. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.009
MÜLLER, F., BURKHARD, B. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, v.1, n.1, p.26–30. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
MUÑOZ-PACHECO, C. B., & VILLASEÑOR, N. R. Urban Ecosystem Services in South America: A Systematic Review. v.14, n.17, p.10751–10751. 2022 https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710751
NUR, I. J., SARKER, M. H., HOSSAIN, T., FERDOUS, T., RAHMAN, S., IQBAL, B., HELAL, MD. G. J., HOSSAIN, MD. F. Evaluation of ecosystem services of rooftop gardens in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, v.4, e100166. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100166
PAGE, M. J., MCKENZIE, J. E., BOSSUYT, P. M., BOUTRON, I., HOFFMANN, T. C., MULROW, C. D., SHAMSEER, L., TETZLAFF, J. M., AKL, E. A., BRENNAN, S. E., CHOU, R., GLANVILLE, J., GRIMSHAW, J. M., HRÓBJARTSSON, A., LALU, M. M., LI, T., LODER, E. W., MAYO-WILSON, E., MCDONALD, S., & MCGUINNESS, L. A. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, v.372, n.71. n.p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
PAKZAD, P. AND OSMOND, P. Developing a sustainability indicator set for measuring green infrastructure performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 216, p. 68 – 79. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.009
PESCHE, D., PHILIPPE MÉRAL, HRABANSKI, M., BONNIN, M. Ecosystem Services and Payments for Environmental Services: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Studies in Ecological Economics, p. 67–86. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7_4
PRISMA. PRISMA flow diagram. 2020. Available at: <http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram
RAYYAN - AI Powered Tool for Systematic Literature Reviews. 2021. Available at: <https://www.rayyan.ai>. Accessed on: December 01, 2022.
ROBINSON, S. L., LUNDHOLM, J. T. Ecosystem services provided by urban spontaneous vegetation. Urban Ecosystems, v.15, n.3, p.545–557. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0225-8
SAISANa, M. Composite Indicators - A review. Second Workshop on Composite Indicators of Country Performance, Feb. 26-27th 2004 OECD, Paris. 2004. Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267986167_Composite_Indicators_-_A_review >. Accessed on: December 01, 2022.
SCHRAM-BIJKERK, D., OTTE, P., DIRVEN, L., BREURE, A. M. Indicators to support healthy urban gardening in urban management. Science of the Total Environment, v.621, p.863–871. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.160
SIKORSKI, P., GAWRYSZEWSKA, B., SIKORSKA, D., CHORMAŃSKI, J., SCHWERK, A., JOJCZYK, A., CIĘŻKOWSKI, W., ARCHICIŃSKI, P., ŁEPKOWSKI, M., DYMITRYSZYN, I., PRZYBYSZ, A., WIŃSKA-KRYSIAK, M., ZAJDEL, B., MATUSIAK, J., & ŁASZKIEWICZ, E. The value of doing nothing – How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks. Ecosystem Services, v.50, e101339. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101339
STRUCTURE OF CICES |. (n.d.). Retrieved August 17, 2023. Available at: <https://cices.eu/cices-structure >. Accessed on: December 01, 2022.
SUTHERLAND, I. J., VILLAMAGNA, A. M., DALLAIRE, C. O., BENNETT, E. M., CHIN, A. T. M., YEUNG, A. C. Y., CORMIER, R. (2018). Undervalued and under pressure: A plea for greater attention toward regulating ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, v.94, p.23–32. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.047
SZÜCS, L., ANDERS, U., BÜRGER-ARNDT, R. Assessment and illustration of cultural ecosystem services at the local scale – A retrospective trend analysis. Ecological Indicators, v.50, p.120–134. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.015
TANCOIGNE, E., BARBIER, M., COINTET, J.-P., RICHARD, G. The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, v.10, p.35–48. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004
TUDORIE, C. M., GIELEN, E., VALLÉS-PLANELLS, M., GALIANA, F. Urban green indicators: a tool to estimate the sustainability of our cities. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, v.14, n.1, p.19–29. 2019.https://doi.org/10.2495/dne-v14-n1-19-29
UNGARO, F., MAIENZA, A., UGOLINI, F., LANINI, G. M., BARONTI, S., CALZOLARI, C. Assessment of joint soil ecosystem services supply in urban green spaces: A case study in Northern Italy. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v.67, e127455. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127455
VEERKAMP, C. J., SCHIPPER, A. M., HEDLUND, K., LAZAROVA, T., NORDIN, A., HANSON, H. I. A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure. Ecosystem Services, v.52, e101367. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101367
WANG, J., FOLEY, K. Assessing the performance of urban open space for achieving sustainable and resilient cities: A pilot study of two urban parks in Dublin, Ireland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v.62, e127180. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127180
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution. Em virtude da aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
